Skip to main content

Keep the news in the Wayback Machine. Sign Fight for the Future's letter.

Full text of "American Breeders Magazine"

See other formats


Google 



This is a digital copy of a book lhal w;ls preserved for general ions on library shelves before il was carefully scanned by Google as pari of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

Il has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one thai was never subject 

to copy right or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often dillicull lo discover. 

Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher lo a library and linally lo you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud lo partner with libraries lo digili/e public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order lo keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial panics, including placing Icchnical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make n on -commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request thai you use these files for 
personal, non -commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort lo Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each lile is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use. remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 

countries. Whether a book is slill in copyright varies from country lo country, and we can'l offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through I lie lull lexl of 1 1 us book on I lie web 
al |_-.:. :.-.-:: / / books . qooqle . com/| 



1V7 



f 



HARVARD UNIVERSITY. 



LIBRARY 



MUSEUM OP OOMPAEATITE ZOOLOGY. 



■W^WV^^v^lW 



W 1 J 



V 



THE AMERICAN BREEDERS 

MAGAZINE 



A JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND EUGENICS 



t PUBLISHED BY THE 

AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 



INDEX TO VOL. Ill 



WASHINGTON, D. C. 
1912 



>- 



v. 



THE WAYERLY PRESS 
BALTIMORE. U. 8. A. 



■*■ 



^^ 



_ J 



INDEX TO VOLUME III AMERICAN BREEDERS 

MAGAZINE 

Acclimatizing; Possibilities of, South American Birds and Mammals 144 

A Million Years Hence 140 

Anderson, W. S., Evolution of a Type of Horse 209 

Animals, The Introduction of 140 

Animal Breeding, Some Biological Principles in 270 

Arabian Horse, A History of the, and Its Influence on Modern Breeds. . . 174 

Association, The American Breeders, and the Practical Breeder 224 

A Study in Eugenic Genealogy 241 

Barleys, The Breeding of Winter 108 

Biography, A. E. Blount 81 

Nehemiah P. Clarke 161 

Martin Hope Sutton 1 

Biological Principles, Some, in Animal Breeding 270 

Blount, A. E., Biography 81 

Breed, The Karakul, of Sheep 158 

Breeder, The American Breeders Association and the Practical 224 

Breeding, Circuit 57 

End Results in 137 

Farm, A Fruit, in Minnesota 316 

For Eggs, Testing System of 316 

Genetics, Eugenics 308 

Horses and Horse 282 

Plant, as a Business for Farmers 64 J 

Some Biological Principles in Animal 270 

Ten Years of Corn 295 ' 

The Effect of Research in Genetics on the Art of 29, 125 

Value of Seedling Characters in Plant 231 

Breeds, A History of the Arabian Horse, and its Influence on Modern 174 

Broad-Tail Sheep, Concerning the Fat-Tail and the 181 

Bush-Brown, H. K., Horses and Horse Breeding 282 

Canadian Seed Growers Association, The, and Its Work 237 

Castle, W. E., Some Biological Principles in Animal Breeding 270 

Cattle, Korean 312 

Relation Between Yields of Milk and Yields of Fat in Dairy 148 

The Illawara Breed of Dairy 164 

Census, Ethnic, in Minnesota 318 

Characters, Value of Seedling, in Plant Breeding 231 

Circuit Breeding. 57 

Clarke, Nehemiah P., Biography 161 

CHub, The Eugenics, at the University of Wisconsin 69 

Clubs, Eugenics, in Educational Institutions ! 63 

Committee, Report of, on Heredity of Feeblemindedness 134 

Conference, First Annual, of the Eugenics Field Workers 265 

Congress, The International, of Eugenics 75 



> • • 



in 



V 

iv American Breeders Magazine 

Corn Breeding, Methods of 99 / 

Ten Years of 295* 

Cornell, The, Experiments in Breeding Timothy 85 

Cross, Fertility of Hybrids in a Mammalian Species 261 

Crosses, Transmission of Color and Color Markings in Hereford-Shorthorns 201 

Demography, Fifteenth International Congress on Hygiene and 232 

Derr, H. B., The Breeding of Winter Barleys 108 

Detlefsen, John, Fertility of Hybrids 261 

Domestication of the Fox 37 

Ethnic Census in Minnesota 318 

Eugenic Genealogy, A Study in 241 

Eugenical Aspect of Venereal Disease, The 256 

. Eugenics, A Pertinent, Question 228 

Breeding, Genetics 308 

Club at the University of Wisconsin, The 69 

Clubs in Educational Institutions 63 

Congress, International 75 

Constructive 5, 113 

Field Workers, First Annual Conference of 265 

Our Immigration Laws from the Viewpoint of 20 

Record Office, An Account of the Work of the 119 

Section, Report of the Meeting of the 74 

The Pedagogics of 222 

Evolution of the Standard Bred 45 

The, of a Type of Horse 209 

Experiments, The Cornell, in Breeding Timothy 85 

Farmers, Plant Breeding as Business for 64* 

Fat-Tail, Concerning the, and the Broad-Tail Sheep 181 

Feeblemindedness, Report of Committee on Heredity of .• 134 

Fertility of Hybrids in a Mammalian Species Cross 261 

The Size of the Seed Plant and the, of the Plant Produced 293 

Field Workers, First Annual Conference of Eugenics 265 

Foals, Another Instance of Bay, from Chestnut Parents 228 

Fogle, E. P., Hereford-Shorthorn Crosses 201 

Fox, Domestication of the 37 

Funk, Eugene, Ten Years of Corn Breeding 295> 

Gartley, A., A Study in Eugenic Genealogy 241 

Genealogy, A Study in Eugenic 241 

Genetics, A Field for the Scientific Philanthropist 303 

Breeding, Eugenics 308 

at the University of Illinois 310 

Pedagogics of 302 

The Effect of Research in, on the Art of Breeding 29, 125 

Gideon, The, Memorial Tablet 310 



Index to Volume III v 

Hall, Prescott F., Report of Committee on Immigration 249 

Harris, J. Arthur, Size of Seed Planted and Fertility of Plant Produced . 293 

Hayes, H. K., Methods of Corn Breeding 99 

Hays, W. M., Constructive Eugenics 5, 113 

Nehemiah P. Clarke. (Biography) 161 

Heredity of Feeblemindedness, Report of Committee on 134 

Studies in Human 318 

History, A, of the Arabian Horse and Its Influence on Modern Breeds. . . 174 

Horse, The Evolution of a Type of 209 

Horses and Horse Breeding 282 

Best Color for, in the Tropics 156 

Human, Alternative Inheritance 26 

Heredity, Studies in 318 

Hybrids, The Fertility of, in a Mammalian Species Cross 261 

Hygiene, Fifteenth International Congress on, and Demography 232 

Illawara Breed of Dairy Cattle, The 164 

Immigration, First Report of Committee on 249 

Our, Laws from the Viewpoint of Eugenics 20 

Inheritance, Alternative Human 26 

The, of Skin Color 317 

Insanity, The Geographical Distribution of, in Massachusetts 11 

Instance, Another, of Bay Foals from Chestnut Parents 228 

International, The, Eugenics Congress 75 

Introduction, The, of Animals 140 

Irwin, W. M., The Turkey as an Egg Producer 204 

Jones, J. Walter, The Domestication of the Fox 37 

Jordan, H. E., The Eugenical Aspect of Venereal Disease 256 

Karakul Sheep, The Breed of 138 

Knorr, F., A History of the Arabian Horse 174 

Korean Cattle 312 

Laughlin, H. H., Conference of Eugenics Field Workers 265 

Eugenics Record Office 119 

Law, An Early Work with Mendel's 145 

Laws, Our Immigration, from the Viewpoint of Eugenics 20 

Love, H. H., Hybrids and Selections in Oats 289 

Malde, A. E., A Method of Recording Types 52 

Markings, Transmission of Color and Color, in Hereford-Shorthorn 

Crosses 201 

Marshall, F. R., Evolution of the Standard Bred 45 

Massachusetts, The Geographical Distribution of Insanity in 11 

McCaffrey, Frank, Illawara Dairy Cattle 164 

Meeting, Report of, of Eugenics Sections 74 

Mendelian Segregation, Illustration of 71 

Mendel's Law, An Early Work with 145 



vi American Breeders Magazine 

Method, A, of Corn Breeding 99 

of Recording Types and Variations by Direct Printing 52 

Minnesota, Ethnic Census in 318 

Nursery Stock, Pedigreed 156 

Oats, Comparison of Yields Between Hybrids and Selections in 289 

Olin, W. H., A. E. Blount (Biography) 81 

Organization of a Eugenics Club at Cornell University 229 

Parents, Another Instance of Bay Foals from Chestnut 228 

Pedagogics of Genetics 302 

The, of Eugenics 222 

Pedigreed Nursery Stock 156 

Pure Lines, Selection in 311 

Rayner, Ben I., Domestication of the Fox 37 

Report of Committee on Heredity of Feeblemindedness 134 

of Meeting of the Eugenics Section 74 

Progress, from the University of Wisconsin 230 

Research, The Effect of, in Genetics on the Art of Breeding 29, 125 

Results, End, in Breeding 137 

Rogers, A. C, Heredity of Feeblemindedness 134 

Science, A New, and Its Findings 157 

Seed Growers Association, The Canadian, and Its Work 237 * 

The Size of the, Planted and the Fertility of the Plant Produced 293 - 

Segregation, Illustration of Mendelian 71 

Selections in Oats, Comparisons between Hybrids and 289 

in Pure Lines 311 

Sheep, Concerning the Fat-Tail and the Broad-Tail 181 

The Karakul Breed of 158 

Skin Color, The Inheritance of 317 

Southard, E. E., Distribution of Insanity 11 

Sutton, Martin Hope (Biography) 3 

The Size of the Seed Plant and the Fertility of the Plant Produced 293 

Timothy, The Cornell Experiment in Breeding 85 

Transmission of Color and Color Markings in Hereford-Shorthorn Crosses 201 

Tropics, Best Color for Horses in the 156 

Turkey, The, as an Egg Producer 204 

Types, A Method of Recording, and Variations by Direct Printing 52 

Type, The Evolution of a, of Horse 209 

University, Organization of a Eugenics Club at Cornell 229 

Progress Report from the Wisconsin 230 

Variations, A Method of Recording Types and, by Direct Printing 52 

Venereal Disease, The Eugenical Aspect of 256 



Index to Volume III vii 

Ward, R. DeC, Our Immigration Laws 20 

Webber, Herbert J., Breeding Timothy 85 

Plant Breeding as a Business for Farmers 64 

The Effect of Research in Genetics on the Art of Breeding 29. 124 

Wisconsin, Progress Report from the University of 230 

The Eugenics Club at the University of 69 

Woods, Alternative Human Inheritance 26 

Yields, Relation Between, of Milk and Yields of Fat in Dairy Cattle 148 

Young, C. C, The Fat-Tail and the Broad-Tail Sheep 181 






THE AMERICAN BREEDERS 
ASSOCIATION 

An organization whose efforts are devoted to: 

The study of heredity In man, animals and plants; the 
furthering of the art and science of practical breeding to 
increase the quantity and quality of the world's animal 
and plant resources; the breeding of farm crops and farm 
animals to a thorough adaptation to their respective uses 
in all industries dependent upon the farm for their raw 
materials; the promotion of eugenic knowledge and senti- 
ment for bettering the human race. 

Membership: Annual $2.00; Life $20.00 
Institutions $25.00 

Washington, D. C. 



THE AMERICAN BREEDERS 

MAGAZINE 

Published Quarterly by the American Breeders Association 

FOR THE USE OF ITS MEMBERS 

PRICE OF SINGLE COPIES, 35 CENTS 
Address communications to American Breeders Association, Washington, D. C. 

Vol. Ill, No. 1 First Quarter, 1912 Whole No, 9 

CONTENTS PA „ 

Martin Hope Sutton Biography (with portrait). F. W. Giles, Reading, 

England 3 

Constructive Eugenics. W. M. Hays, Washington, D. C 5 

The Geographical Distribution of Insanity in Massachusetts. E. E. 

Southard, Boston, Mass 11 

Our Immigration Laws from the Viewpoint of Eugenics. Robert De C. 

Ward, Cambridge, Mass 20 

Alternative Human Inheritance. F. Adams Woods, Boston, Mass 26 

The Effect of Research in Genetics on the Art of Breeding. Herbert J. 

Webber, Ithaca, N. Y 29 

Domestication of the Fox. Ben. I. Rayner, J. Walter Jones 37 

Evolution of the Standard Bred. F. R. Marshall, Columbus, 45 

A Method of Recording Types and Variations by Direct Printing. O. G. 

Malde, Madison, Wis 52 

EDITORIALS: 

Circuit Breeding 57 

Eugenics Clubs in Educational Institutions 63 

Plant Breeding as a Business for Farmers 64 

NEWS AND NOTES: 

The Eugenics Club at the University of Wisconsin. O. E. Baker 69 

Illustration of Mendelian Segregation. W. R. Ballard 71 

Report of Meeting of Eugenics Section. C.B.Davenport 74 

The International Eugenics Congress 75 

Publications Received 76 

ASSOCIATION MATTERS: 

Membership Fees are due 80 

Place of the next Meeting, 1913 80 

Worth of the Work of the American Breeders Association 80 

(Copyright, 1912, by the American Breeders Association.) 

1 



Martin Hope Sutton, His Son and Grandson 



THE AMEEICAN 
BEEEDEES MAGAZINE 

"The character of a nation Is determined by the character of the people living In it. The char- 
acter of the people Js determined by their heredity— the kind of blood that runs in their veins." 

— David St abb Joed an. 

Vol. Ill First Quarter, 1912 No. 1 



MARTIN HOPE SUTTON, 1815-1901 

Walter F. Giles 
Reading, England 

Martin Hope Sutton was born at Reading, England, the son of 
a corn factor and miller. From very early days he found his recrea- 
tion in studying works on botany, and before the development of 
the railroads spent much of his leisure time in walking tours to visit 
famous gardens and nursery grounds within reach of his home. 
Later on he was able to extend these visits to greater distances, 
finally visiting some of the most interesting gardens on the continent 
of Europe. 

His parents hoped he would adopt a profession, but his inclina- 
tions were strongly in favor of a business career, and being keenly 
interested in the improvement of plants, the knowledge he had gained 
in his travels inspired the idea of starting an experimental ground 
at Reading. Consequently at the age of twenty-two he commenced 
practical work in plant improvement, joining his father's old estab- 
lished business, and added to it the branch which was afterwards 
destined to play so important a part in the development of agricul- 
ture and horticulture. 

The disastrous Irish potato famine in 1847 was one of the first 
means of focussing attention on the improvements which he had. 
effected in selecting and adapting vegetables and plants for food. 
Public men of the day realized the value of his labors and the sub- 
stitutes he suggested for the devastated potato crop, which by their 
quick growth would mitigiate the severity of the famine, were at 
once accepted by the government. 

The study of grasses under their natural conditions possessed a 
strong fascination for Mr. Sutton, and when, owing to agricultural 
depression, many thousands of acres were laid down to grass in 
England, he was able to apply his knowledge in recommending pre- 
scriptions which would be suitable for all kinds of soils. Previously 

3 



4 American Breeders Magazine 

the only grass seeds generally procurable were the sweepings of hay 
lofts, usually consisting of worthless grasses, weeds, and the immature 
seeds of good varieties. In 1861 he contributed to the Journal of 
the Royal Agricultural Society of England an article on "Permanent 
Pastures." This was reprinted by desire, and since its enlargement 
by his eldest son, Mr. Martin J. Sutton, has passed through several 
editions, and is now one of the standard works on grasses. 

Martin Hope Sutton had five sons, three of whom joined their 
father in his work of plant improvement. Upon the foundation 
already laid they were able to greatly extend the work, with the 
result that they have brought into commerce many new and im- 
proved types of roots, vegetables, and flowers, and their achieve- 
ments are known practically throughout the world. 

The Golden Tankard mangel, so highly esteemed by almost all 
dairy farmers, was introduced in 1872, and because of its high feed- 
ing value it was awarded a gold medal by the Highland Agricultural 
Society in 1873. In 1876 the Magnum Bonum potato was brought 
out, so well known as the pioneer of all the disease-resisting varieties 
of the present day. For combining the very important factor of 
earliness with the large podded types, the name of the Marrowfat 
peas stands in the front rank. 

Many new types of flowers had their origin in experiments carried 
out by the Suttons. The pure white Gloxinia "Her Majesty" was 
produced by selection and reselection, the elimination of the pink 
shades in the type worked upon taking some fourteen or fifteen years. 
The "Duchess" type of Primula was a distinct break, resulting from 
a cross between a dark crimson flower and a blush type. It is ac- 
knowledged to be the most distinct Primula sinensis yet introduced, 
and was given an award of merit by the Royal Horticultural Society. 
The origin of the single tuberous rooted Begonia (Reading Beauty 
strain) dates from 1878. Begonia Pearcei (yellow) was crossed with 
Moonshine (small white). By crossing the hybrids, scarlet, coral, 
rose, bronze, cream, white, and many other shades of blooms have 
been produced; but whereas in 1880 the flowers averaged only 3 
to 4 inches across, by continued selection they have been so improved 
as to attain to 6 or 8 inches in diameter. 

Mr. Sutton's work was on many occasions recognized by the royal 
family. Her Majesty Queen Victoria was always very gracious to 
him, and at the annual shows, in which the Prince Consort was speci- 
ally interested, Mr. Sutton was one of those appointed to accompany 
the Queen and explain the most interesting exhibits. He also had 



Hays: Constructive Eugenics 5 

the honor of personally receiving at Reading the late King Edward 
VII, when Prince of Wales, who sent kindest congratulations to him 
on the attainment of his eighty-second birthday. 

Mr. Sutton took a great interest in religious and philanthropic 
work, and many societies besides those in his native town benefited 
by his advice and generosity. 

He was in his eighty-seventh year when he died, and the work 
which he commenced, and which has for many years been continued 
by his sons, is now carried on by his sons and grandsons, each of 
whom specializes in a particular branch of the business. 

CONSTRUCTIVE EUGENICS 

Willet M. Hats 
Washington, D. C. 

Science and practical experience are rapidly evolving plans of so 
breeding plants and animals as to discard the undesirable and per- 
petuate only the desirable. Much of this work consists simply of 
selecting the best species nature has provided, and of selecting within 
these species so as to secure and perpetuate as useful varieties those 
types into which nature has divided the species. In many cases this 
means that marked economic mutations are discovered, the progeny 
of which are so far superior that the old stocks are entirely discarded 
for the new. Again, the best native and improved stocks each of 
which has specially desirable characters are cross-bred and from the 
resultant hybrids those in which occur recombinations of the highest 
value are secured by selective breeding and are multiplied. And 
again, from among those recombined stocks, mutations are sought 
and these are multiplied into varieties, again placing the values 
higher than before. Thus by these processes, step by step, con- 
trolled evolution produces types better fitted to the needs of man 
in the production of his food and clothing. And each year the ge- 
netic scientists and the breeders of plants and animals add new facts, 
clarify their philosophy, and create new bases in the forms of better 
foundation varieties and breeds upon which to build the next story 
in the achievements of breeding. 

The truth is being developed that the facts and technique, the 
sensible philosophy and practice which all this work is bringing for- 
ward, have a relation to the heredity of man. And while the problem 
of the improvement of heredity in the human species seems radically 



6 American Breeders Magazine 

different from the problem of improving plants and animals, our plant 
and animal specialists call our attention to the fact that the breeders 
of each class of plants and of each species and even of each breed of 
animals have new problems to be solved. And those who are expe- 
rienced in the developing of methods of improving the heredity of 
the numerous species of plants and of the numerous species or breeds 
of domestic animals, see in eugenics only another set of difficulties 
such as are being solved yearly by the genetic scientists and practical 
breeders who deal with plants and animals. 

It must be admitted that the difficulties are more stupendous in 
the case of man, but the results are of such paramount importance 
that even minor inprovement of the human heredity would yield 
high return on the cost of any sensible efforts made in that direc- 
tion. That wonderful social institution, monogamy, the comparatively 
long life of the individual, the one child at a birth, and the relatively 
few children born to the parents, are all limiting factors. Those seem 
to be great obstacles as compared with the advantages arising in 
the plant kingdom from large numbers and from the brevity of the 
life of each generation, as in the breeding of wheat or corn. Yet 
there is in eugenics opportunity not only for the application of 
selective breeding, with fair prospects of not unduly delayed results, 
but also for multiplication of the progeny of human mutants and 
improvement by the recombination of desirable characters from sep- 
arate families and separate, similar, races. 

Much of the discussion of eugenics has been confined to a study of 
the defective classes. The eugenic problems concerning the feeble- 
minded, the insane, the immoral, and those non-resistant to such dis- 
eases as tuberculosis have seemed to be the problems first to be 
attempted. The methods of investigation devised by Darwin, Men- 
del, and others seem to be especially adapted to a consideration of 
the heredity of these classes of unfortunate people. The elimination 
from the human network of descent of the characteristics which pro- 
duce these inefficient people is alone a problem worth many times any 
possible cost that can reasonably be used in the improvement of 
the heredity of man. The presentation of the facts concerning the 
heredity of human families is fast leading intelligent people past 
any prudishness in the scientific discussion of eugenics. And re- 
search shows that beyond and above the elimination of the least 
efficient 'of 7the race is the substantial improvement, through the 
centuries A to come, of the 90 per cent who can not be classed as 
defective. 



Hays: Constructive Eugenics 7 

Speaking broadly, the eugenic problems are much the same through- 
out as the problems of plant breeding and animal improvement. 

(1) How can we select the genetically best and by more rapidly 
multiplying them have the best blood eventually dominant in the 
whole of the race? 

(2) How can we so recombine the strongest characters of families 
and of similar races as to secure from among large numbers of these 
recombined groups an opportunity to select better types? 

(3) How can we select from the foundation classes and also from 
the recombined or hybrid classes mutations the progeny of which, 
when multiplied, make marked improvement over the average of the 
foundation stocks or of the selected cross-bred stocks? 

(4) May we not hope to advance greatly the average of efficiency, 
to practically lop off the defective classes below, and also increase the 
number of the efficient at the top? 

(5) While we must attend to the numerous minor matters and must 
continue to work out the science of the subject, shall we forget that 
the goal in the end is more splendid races of people, possibly averag- 
ing as high in efficiency as the very best individuals the races now 
possess? 

Modern charity, science, and individual development— and may we 
not add also peace — broadly speaking, are rapidly lengthening human 
life from an average of approximately thirty-three years to fifty 
years. Fifty per cent added to the length of human life will help 
eventually to bring our something more than one and one-half billion 
of people in the world up toward three billion. It seems conserva- 
tive to estimate that by the year 2000 the world will have three 
billion people. Shall the world remain in eugenic blindness or shall 
it bring to bear the clear light of fact upon the improvement of the 
heredity of this vast number of men? Shall the ten billion or more 
of human beings which the world eventually may maintain, carry 
its load of eugenically defective and its vocationally inefficient, as 
well as the present social and civic handicaps, or shall it become a 
race with greatly improved heredity trained as highly in the peaceful 
arts of production and citizenship as an improved heredity will allow? 

It would seem that students of heredity have prepared the race 
to evolve its own efficiency, which would respond superbly to the 
greatly improved environment made possible by science and religion. 
The impulse given by scientists to cast off superstition has made pos- 
sible the study of the full nature of man. The altruism which Christ 
awoke in humanity should have a vastly purer heredity through 
which to carry its blessings to all people. 



8 American Breeders Magazine 

Then vocational as well as general education can be offered to and 
taken advantage of by all youth, whatever may become their func- 
tions in society. The races will then be created more nearly equal 
and every man will be more nearly equal to every other man. Demo- 
cratic forms of business as well as democratic forms of government 
will be practicable. Justice, hope, comfort, and happiness will be- 
come well-nigh universal. The improvement beyond the present 
may be as great as the present is beyond the dark ages. 

As the complexities of society increase, as science develops, as the 
intricacies of industry and transportation increase, as charity becomes 
wider, and as social and governmental agencies become more efficient, 
the conditions under which men live are vastly ameliorated. Defec- 
tive individuals and families which could not survive under the con- 
ditions of society in earlier periods, are now protected. Through 
charity, especially, do we interfere with the law of the survival of the 
fittest, and since society enables the inefficient to survive, society is 
really responsible for the reproduction of the defective classes. It 
would seem to be an important function of science to show that the 
genetic elimination of such families as are generally subject to feeble- 
mindedness, insanity, etc., may be quite as much of a religious duty 
as the giving of charity to the deficient individuals of these classes. 
It would seem to be a good function of our racial religion to place 
the duty of more abundant child bearing on the most efficient classes 
and the duty of less abundant child bearing on the least efficient 
classes; that thus, in several generations, the network of descent of 
the whole race may be developed so as to produce a genetically more 
efficient people. 

There are two genetic facts of stupendous importance which need 
to be faced squarely, and their relation to human progress should be 
thought out fearlessly and clearly. 

The first is the need of restraining from the function of repro- 
duction the genetically deficient classes and families. Scientists 
who have studied the heredity of the feeble-minded, the insane, and 
several other classes of defectives have proof which abundantly war- 
rants the affirmation that individuals who have in their heredity 
a large percentage of these defective characteristics have no racial 
right to perpetuate their kind, a large percentage of whom cannot 
sustain themselves and must be a burden on society. Mendel and 
his disciples have given a knowledge of unit characters which warrants 
the belief that if all persons with a transmissable defective character 
in their heredity were rendered unproductive, by segregation or 



Hays: Constructive Eugenics 9 

otherwise, nearly all of that characteristic could within a few genera- 
tions be eliminated from the network of human descent. 

A study of insanity and feeble-mindedness is resulting in an accumu- 
lation of facts which should lead to genetic genealogies of the defec- 
tive classes and thus to facts upon which to act in the prevention 
of such unfit marriages as might be expected to result in the birth 
of feeble-minded or otherwise very defective children. It must be 
recognized, of course, that the great racial poisons, alcohol and ve- 
nereal diseases, have stupendous effects and do doubtless contribute 
to these genetic frailties. 

As to the means of reducing to a minimum the production of 
defective children, there is not room in this brief paper for discussion. 
Suffice it to say that even in this most difficult part of the problem 
progress is being made by science. The advantage to society of 
the elimination of the larger part of these classes which are a great 
public economic burden and a heart burden on their families, and 
which contribute greatly to crime, is so stupendous that even extra- 
ordinary means would seem justified. As a matter of fact, means 
devoid of either apparent cruelty or criminality are being sought 
for this purpose by the numerous scientists who are working along 
this line. 

The second fact needing especial emphasis is the loss of genetic 
values through war. This fact has been most effectively empha- 
sized by Dr. David Starr Jordan, chairman of the Eugenics Section 
of the American Breeders Association. The patriotic appeals of 
war are strongest to the best men. The young men of high school 
and collegiate age go forward to the conflict at arms with a racial 
impulse and unity most wonderfully admired by a world in which 
courage in arms has ever been worshipped. Not only the losses in 
battle but the diseases in camp also greatly reduce the number of 
men available for the production of succeeding generations of sound 
children. If during the last two thousand years wars had destroyed 
the least efficient of the race, instead of the most efficient, the world 
would today be far in advance of its present position. And the 
time has come when those families with the best blood should demand 
on the one hand that the world be peaceful, and on the other that 
the best heredity shall be safeguarded, to multiply and possess the 
earth. 

Eugenics will show the city, state, and nation many things which 
should be changed in the interest of posterity. For example, no one 
doubts that the farm and the suburban homecrof t are the best places 



10 American Breeders Magazine 

for children, thay they may develop normally and strongly. No one 
disputes the fact that in these homes motherhood's condition is such 
that larger families are practicable. There is neither the enervation 
of the wealthy home nor the difficulties of the poor home. Here, then, 
is where the genetically best families should reside, that here the best 
folks may in the best manner produce the most folks. 

The strongest argument for the use of vastly larger sums of public 
money for good roads in the country and for consolidated rural 
schools in which scientific farming and farm home making may be 
successfully taught is the eugenic argument. The country should 
be made attractive to the best parentage. And it is to the interest 
both of the city and of the nation that farming be so profitable, farm 
houses so excellent, and such adjuncts to these homes as roads and 
schools be so efficient that our best mothers will there find their 
largest life's work. From the standpoint of eugenics the state and 
nation should be the patrons of country life. Our forms of commerce 
having amassed and deposited too much of the nation's wealth in 
the centers of population, there must be devised ways of redistri- 
buting it where it will be used to the best advantage in the produc- 
tion of citizens. Homes should be less heavily taxed. Mothers of 
splendid genetic power should be endowed by non-public founda- 
tions, and even public endowments for this purpose could be justified. 

If the genetically least efficient half of the people would have 
families only sufficient in size to maintain their own numbers and 
the genetically best half would increase 50 per cent in each gener- 
ation of forty years, in two hundred years the best would become 
88 per cent of the whole. These statements and figures illustrate 
the fact that the country does and doubtless will and should con- 
tinue to supply fresh blood to the cities. Neither the city nor the 
country can afford to receive defective blood from the other; and 
Dr. Ward has abundantly shown the danger to our nation from 
the entrance of immigrants who are normal but whose heredity is 
defective and results in a percentage of defective children. 

[Continued in next number.] 



NOTE ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION 
OF INSANITY IN MASSACHUSETTS. 

1901-1910* 

E. K Southakd, M.D. 
Boston, Massachusetts 

1. Abb there Eugenic Areas in Massachusetts? 
li. Eugenic and Cacogenic Abbas Defined 
ill. The Increase of Commitments of the Insane in Massachusetts. Review of 

Factors. (Owen Copp's Data) 
iv. Geographical Ibbegularitos in thb Mobbidity-batb as Repbbsented by New 

(First) Commitments 
v. Findings 

Vi. SUMMABT AND CONCLUSIONS 

i. Are there Eugenic Areas in Massachusetts? — Are there areas 
in Massachusetts which can fitly be termed eugenic areas, areas 
maintained socially at least in statu quo by the forces of heredity? 
I raise this question; but I must confess the answer is not ready. I 
think I can prove (1) that areas exist which might be regarded as 
eugenic, (2) that conditions the reverse of eugenic (cacogenic) are 
suggested by certain other and quite separate areas, and (3) that a 
remarkable parallellism exists, if we may trust available data, in (a) 
the output of insanity and allied conditions, (b) the occurrence of 
social defectives, and (c) the incidence of general disease, in the areas 
considered in the present note. If we bear in mind the comparatively 
stable social conditions maintained in both types of area and the 
difficulty of explaining by any single set of environmental conditions 
the parallelism observed in mental, social, and physical defects, it 
will be found not unnatural to ascribe a certain weight to hereditary 
forces of varying character in the different regions. 

I anticipate that some surprise will greet the statement that the 
Berkshire Hills and some of the islands of Massachusetts contain 
a group of twelve towns which have a zero rate of insanity production 
for the decade 1901-1910. I fancy that the facts may be questioned, 
that special conditions of commitment might be invoked, that the 
small total population might be thought to lead to exceptional con- 
ditions for the decade in question. Nor with the bare facts of com- 
mitment-rates from the different towns should I venture to draw more 
than the minor conclusions that commitment-rates vary greatly, 
from to 20 in a decade per 1,000 inhabitants of a given town. 

a Read at the Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Breeders Association, Washington, D. C. 
December 29, 1911. 

11 



12 American Breeders Magazine 

Less easy to ascribe to chance or small numbers was the obser- 
vation that the towns with highest commitment-rates (far higher 
than those of cities, which as a fact I do not here consider) are largely 
grouped in the interior of the Commonwealth and are neither west of 
the Connecticut River in the higher hill region nor on the seacoast. 

Interesting, too, was the parallelism that shortly transpired in re- 
spect to the development of conditions allied to insanity: the zero rate 
for insanity was maintained for feeble-mindedness, epilepsy, and in- 
ebriety in the towns we are tempted to term eugenic; whereas these 
allied conditions were found freely and proportionately developing 
in the other group. 

To me the most convincing argument was afforded by the compara- 
tive findings of the census enumerators of the Massachusetts census 
of 1905. Not only did the enumerators find relatively fewer mental 
and allied cases in the homes in the "eugenic" group, but — and here 
the disparity was striking — relatively far more paupers and criminals 
in the "cacogenic" group, and, lastly, a darker background,of general 
bodily disease in the "cacogenic" group. There was thus a sort 
of conspiracy among otherwise unrelated statistical facts which might 
discover its true arch-conspirator in the forces of heredity. 

Before giving in more detail the findings so far obtained, I will, 
first, define more narrowly in a short section (ii) what eugenic areas, 
especially in Massachusetts, might be taken to mean. Secondly, 
in another short section (iii), I will rehearse the facts that led me to 
conceive that there might be significant geographical irregularities 
in the insanity production of Massachusetts towns. 

ii. Eugenic and Cacogenic Areas Defined. — The eugenic area of 
state or country can be rightly defined both positively and negatively. 
An area in which the forces of heredity are operating to produce a 
better human stock is eugenic in a positive, incremental, evolu- 
tionary sense. If the hereditary forces are engaged merely in the 
prevention of deterioration within a given area, we may still usefully 
define such an area as eugenic, but in a negative or stationary sense. 
For the immediate purposes of society the more useful definition is 
very possibly the latter. Sufficient unto the day for practical prop- 
agandists is the more modest program which seeks to maintain at 
least our present social level, to hold, as it were, our human stocks 
at par. 

Indeed, the incremental program of artificial human evolution, 
culminating in what might be termed the aristogenic program of 
producing more and greater great men for the world, at present hardly 



Southard: Insanity in Massachusetts 13 

escapes ridicule and certainly leaves your practical, Anglo-Saxon 
economist rather cold. The practical man is apt to feel, though he 
cannot readily prove, that the forces of deterioration are overcoming 
any possible forces of betterment, that the operation of hereditary 
forces, so far from acting in the eugenic or aristogenic direction, is 
slowly or rapidly pulling down the level of society. To prove this 
assumed levelling-down of society in a state, the ordinary citizen is 
likely to point to such and such places where degeneracy is rife, crime 
rampant, and pauperism supreme. Doubtless such areas exist and 
might be usefully termed cacogenic areas, in so far as heredity can 
be proved to underlie their social decline. 

The data available for the present note (whose purpose is entirely 
one of orientation in the matter) permit remarks merely in the direc- 
tion of that more modest eugenics which seeks to maintain the present 
social level. Moreover the materials of the note are limited in the 
main to certain forms of so-called degeneracy (insanity, f eeble-minded- 
ness, epilepsy, inebriety). 

Massachusetts is of particular interest in this direction. Aside 
from the well-known spiritual pride of Bostonians, a statistical basis 
for the eminence of Massachusetts in certain departments has been 
given by Dr. F. A. Woods, b from a study of the unprejudiced pages 
of Who's Who in America, Lippincott's Biographical Dictionary, and 
American Men of Science. However, we hear much at home con- 
cerning the decline of native stocks, rural degeneracy, and the increase 
of insanity and mental defect in the commonwealtji at large. These 
rumors, coupled with suspicion of many immigrating stocks (to 
say nothing of the observation of mutual suspicions between the 
different immigrating races), lead many lovers of society to sorrow 
for Massachusetts. 

Although such sorrow is born of statistics, I do not expect to al- 
lay it by more statistics. Hereditary forces have always produced 
in Massachusetts pessimists-in-the-bud and reformers-in-the-bloom. 
Mere facts of statistics hardly count against hereditary ideas. Much 
of our reform spirit is truly aristogenic, if not otherwise Utopian, 
in its aim. 

ill. The Increase of Commitments of the Insane in Massachusetts. ' 
Review of Factors. — Regardless of eugenics, one good reason for a close 
investigation of the distribution of insanity in Massachusetts is the 
supposed increase of insanity in the institutions of the commonwealth. 

b Woods, F. A., Hlstoriometry as an Exact Science. Science, n. s., vol. xxxlll, no. 850, pp. 568- 
574, April 14, 1911. 



14 American Breeders Magazine 

Owen Copp's work under the Board of Insanity shows conclusively 
enough that such major factors as (1) increase of general population, 
(2) declining discharge rate from the hospitals, and (3) immigration, 
as well as factors of smaller range like (4) the greater inclusiveness 
of the modern classification "insane, " (5) greater longevity outside 
hospitals, uncovering possibly more senile dements, (6) greater longev- 
ity inside the hospitals, which bears on the lowering discharge rate, 
(7) more frequent commitments of dotards both by friends and by 
town officials, and (8) the trend to city life which is less consistent than 
country life with home care of the mentally defective, are factors 
together responsible for the increase of visible insanity. The accumu- 
lation-rate, in brief, is .not the morbidity-rate. , These conclusions 
of the Massachusetts Board of Insanity have been adopted and 
printed in summary form by the Massachusetts Commission of 1910 
"To Investigate the Question of the Increase of Criminals, Mental 
Defectives, Epileptics, and Degenerates/' which concludes in its 
report (January, 1911) that "only one-fifth of the accumulation 
(in hospitals) is due to increase in the ratio of admission of new cases 
of insanity. There is no evidence of a marked increase in the number 
of new cases of insanity in the community. " 

iv. Oeographical Irregularities in the Morbidity-rate of New Com- 
mitments of the Insane. — Reflection upon such facts leads to the con- 
ception that there may be irregularities in the production of insanity 
in different communities of Massachusetts and that these irregular- 
ities may tend ta balance each other. Indeed, if the conditions 
reported by social workers and by field workers in eugenics be at 
all representative, it seems irresistibly certain that cacogenic forces 
in one area are countervailed by eugenic forces in another, or that 
the up and down forces of heredity may mingle in the one and the 
same area. 

I have made a small beginning upon this problem of the distri- 
bution of eugenic and cacogenic forces in respect to mental disease 
in Massachusetts by a study of data available at the office of the Board 
of Insanity. I make this report of progress in order to stir others 
to a similar study of the neglected bright side as well as the all too 
obvious dark side of this division of social service, and especially 
to a study of regions of another make-up. 

c Report of the Commission (Waiter E. Feraald, Hollis M. Blaokstone, Everett Flood, Benjamin 
F. Bridges, Ernest V. Serlbner) to Investigate the Question of the Increase of Criminals, Mental 
Defectives, Epileptics and Degenerates, created by Chapter 60, Acts of 1010, Massachusetts, State 
Printers, January, 1911. 



Southard: Insanity in Massachusetts 15 

I have limited my consideration for the present to the new cases 
(first commitments) of insanity in Massachusetts in the decade 1901- 
1910. I have been especially aided by the elaborate Census of Massa- 
chusetts in 1905, both volume I (Population and Social Statistics) 
available in 1909 d and volume II (Occupations and Defective Condi- 
tions) available in 1910. e The conditions found in the mid-decade 
state censuses may well serve as the characteristic conditions of the 
decade in question. 

v. Findings, — The statistician will note (1) that the commitment 
rates here. discussed are first- or new-commitment rates for the decade 
and give no picture of accumulation rates in hospitals, (2) that the 
available figures were based on 1910 population for the commitment- 
rates, on 1905 population for census-rates of defectives, and (3) that 
the commitments and non-institutional defectives are classified by 
residence and not by birthplace. The study is accordingly in the 
first instance environmental, and eugenic sensu strictiori only in so 
far as the persons in question are native-born. Only elaborate and 
year-long study could answer with exactness how far environmental, 
and how far hereditary, forces are responsible for the geographical 
irregularities here displayed. My usage of the term "eugenic" and 
its antonym "cacogenic" might therefore be opposed on the ground 
that hereditary forces have not been proved to account for the dif- 
ferences. But the usage is in sufficient accord with Galton's. 

I find (1) a somewhat maxfc*rfy uneven distribution of insane 
commitments, classified by^mnties of residence. The ratios (figured 
on the population of 1910) vary from 4.2 per 1,000 in the island 
county of Dukes (Martha's Vineyard, etc.) to 9.4 per 1,000 in the 
metropolitan county of Suffolk (Boston, etc.). The island county of 
Nantucket has a high ratio, 8.1 per 1,000, but the figures — popu- 
lation (1910) 2,962, first commitments 24 (1901-1910)— are perhaps 
exceptional. On the face of the figures, the island counties differ 
markedly, just as we shall find other apparently similar regions 
differing from one another. Other counties (besides Suffolk and Nan- 
tucket) having ratios higher than that of the State at large — 7 per 
1,000 (first commitments 1901-1910) — are Hampshire County in the 
south-Massachusetts part of the Connecticut River Valley and the 
midland county of Worcester, both yielding a ratio of 7.2 per 1,000. 
Essex, the northeastern seacoastcounty /approaches the general com- 

d Census of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1005, vol. 1, Population and Social Statistics, 
State Printers, 1009. 
e Ibid., vol. ii, Occupations and Defective Conditions, 1010. 



16 



American Breeders Magazine 



monwealth rate, reaching 6.8 per 1,000. Rounding off the figures, 
we arrive for the counties at this series (calculated on population 
of 1910) : 

TABLE 1 



Per 1,000 
Suffolk 9 

Nantucket 8 

Essex 7 

Hampshire 7 

Worcester 7 

Bristol 6 

Franklin 6 



Per 1,000 

Middlesex 6 

Plymouth 6 

Barnstable 5 

Berkshire 5 

Hampden 5 

Norfolk 5 

Dukes 4 



The Commonwealth 7 

Having thus established the general likelihood of geographical vari- 
ations in insane-commitment rates of a significance involving (but 
possibly deeper than) the urban vs. rural variation, I directed atten- 
tion to the towns and found that (2) classification by residence in 
towns, just as by residence in counties, revealed surprisingly uneven 
distribution of first commitments. Though the towns as a whole 
show a markedly lower ratio (5.7 per 1,000) than the cities as a whole 
(7.6 per 1,000), yet individual towns to the number of twenty equalled 
or excelled the highest city ratio, viz. 10.1 per 1,000. Indeed, ten 
of these twenty towns yielded far" higher ratios than that of the city 
in question, viz., ratios from 12.5 to 20.8 per 1,000. The highest 
ratio (20.8 per l,000)is in one respect artificial and it would befairer 
to state the highest ratio as about 18.8 per 1,000. 

So much in support of rural degeneracy! But I found that (3) 
there are twelve Massachusetts towns from which no insane have 
been committed in the decade 1901-1910. This possibly eugenic role 
with respect to insanity is assumed by — 

Monroe Peru 

Mt. Washington Washington 

New Ashf ord Wendell 

Of these, three (Chilmark, Gay Head, and Gosnold) are in the island 
county of Dukes, and furnish in part the explanation of the low 
general percentage of Dukes County (4 per 1,000) which was so sur- 
prising in contrast with the 8 per 1,000 of Nantucket. 

Of the others, all but two are west of the Connecticut River and 
might be classed as Berkshire Hill towns (Monroe on the Vermont 
line is the north westernmost town of Franklin County). Wendell 
is in Franklin County, and Holland is in Hampden County on the 



Alford 


Gosnold 


Chilmark 


Hancock 


Gay Head 


Holland 



Southard: Insanity in Massachusetts 17 

Connecticut line. The region, then, . of seven of the towns which 
have produced no first commitments in 1901-1910 is the Berkshire 
Hill region, characterized by a general level of 1800 feet above the 
sea, narrow but fertile valleys, dairying opportunities, and the New 
York summer colony. 

No Berkshire town yields percentages approaching those of the 
maximal town percentages, and I find that (4) the regional occurrence, 
studied comparatively in these two groups of zero and maximal 
commitment-rate, is roughly suggestive: Some island towns and 
several hill towns have contributed little or no insane in the period 
of study, whereas five Worcester County towns, two towns on the 
eastern line of Worcester County, and five other towns (none west 
of the Connecticut River and none on the seacoast) have supplied 
maximal ratios of first commitments (13 to 19 per 1,000). To 
unravel the reasons for these conditions in particular towns would 
be % a very worthy object of a sociological survey on broad lines. f This 
we hope to compass some day. Meantime there are available some 
data of value. 

(5) The question might naturally be raised: If twelve towns 
are producing no committed insane, may they not be producing 
other so-called forms of degeneracy? Search of the records has 
shown, however, that in 1901-1910 none of these towns has produced 
any committed cases of (a) insanity, (b) feeble-mindedness, (c) epi- 
lepsy, (d) inebriety. The towns with maximal insanity-percentages 
have produced other so-called forms of degeneracy in all cases but 
two. In more detail, the twelve possibly cacogenic towns chosen 
to compare with the twelve possibly eugenic towns have produced 

189 new cases of insanity in 1901-1910. 
29 new cases of feeble-mindedness in 1901-1910. 
10 new cases of epilepsy in 1901-1910. 
8 new cases of inebriety in 1901-1910. 

being in all 15.3 per 1,000 of the population in 1910. 

(6) The ratio of degenerates discovered by census in these towns 
hardly alters the above conclusions. In the absence of an intensive 
sociological survey, we can test the value of certain data of the Massa- 
chusetts Census of 1905. The findings of the census enumerators 
should be equally reliable (or unreliable) for the two groups. They 
found in the homes as of May 1, 1905, representatives of our four 
classes : 

f Davenport, C. B., Heredity in Relation to Eugenics. New York, 1911, pp. 267-269. 



18 American Breeders Magazine 

In twelve eugenic(?) towns 8 (26 per 1,000) 

In twelve cacogenic (?) towns 47 (30 per 1,000) 

We should perhaps expect a greater difference than we find in the 
two groups. Such as it is the difference is in favor of the relatively 
non-degenerate towns. The findings may possibly be consistent with 
factor 8 discussed in our review of Copp's work on the supposed 
increase of the insane, viz, the greater likelihood of commitment of 
cases from larger than from smaller towns. 

(7) The background of social defectives as a whole is a blacker 
background for the twelve towns with high insanity-rates. As social 
defectives, following the Massachusetts Census of 1905, we may 
classify prisoners, juvenile offenders, paupers, and neglected children. 
The census enumerators found social defectives as follows: 

In twelve eugenic (?) towns 24 (8 per 1,000) 

In twelve cacogenic (?) towns 310 (20 per 1,000) 

(The difference is still sharper when we consider that 12 of the 24 
social defectives in the eugenic (?) towns were from a single town 
(Washington) and may have represented unusual conditions, actual 
or incidental in enumeration.)* 

(8) The general medical and social status (established by extracting 
ratios for the totals of physical and social defectives) of the possibly 
cacogenic towns is somewhat worse than the general medical and 
social status of the possibly eugenic towns (53 per 1,000 against 44 
per 1,000). 

(9) The total population of the twelve eugenic (?) towns is far 
smaller than that of the twelve cacogenic (?) towns. The population 
of the eugenic (?) group is slightly decreasing, 3209 (1900) to 2945 
(1910) ; that of the cacogenic (?) groups is slightly increasing 15,385 
(1900) to 15,415 (1910). 

(10) The nativity of the general population of these groups (1905) 
was as follows: 

Eugenic (?) Cacogenic 
group. (?) gioup. 

Native-born 83 84 

Parents native-born 73 67 

Grandparents native-born 67 60 

This ratio suggests a greater instability (in respect to the conditions 
here studied) in the more mobile population. 

E Eleven neglected male children and one pauper. 



Southard: Insanity in Massachusetts 19 

vi. Summary and conclusions. — The eugenic area or areas of a 
region are characterized by the operation of hereditary factors in 
either (a) the improvement of the contained human stocks or (b) 
the maintenance of these stocks in statu quo. 

The aristogenic program is that extreme eugenic program which 
seeks to produce more and greater great men for the world by more 
effective mating. 

Against an ideal aristogenic program are operating certain deteri- 
orating factors of hereditary nature (cacogenic factors). 

The data immediately available in Massachusetts may be used in 
the study of eugenic areas in the second or negative sense (see b 
above), with respect to insanity. 

The morbidity-rate of the Massachusetts insane commitments is 
not the same as the accumulation-rate, as an effect of many com- 
bined causes (Owen Copp's data). 

One possibly eugenic area exists in Massachusetts in three island 
townships; another, in nine more scattered western townships (seven 
in the Berkshire Hill region). 

The twelve possibly cacogenic towns have produced, in 1901- 
1910, 236 new cases of insanity and allied conditions, being 15 per 
1,000 of the population of these towns in 1910 (total Massachusetts 
rate 7 per 1,000) highest single town rate considered 19 per 1,000; 
Suffolk County (Boston, etc.) rate (9 per 1,000); highest single city 
rate 10 per 1,000. 

These possibly cacogenic townships lie chiefly in the midland 
county of Worcester and in no case west of the Connecticut River 
or on the seacoast. 

The possibly eugenic and possibly cacogenic towns as considered 
from the commitment standpoint remain so to a degree when con- 
sidered from the standpoint of the census of the same four classes 
enumerated in the townships May 1, 1905, viz, 2.6 per 1,000 in the 
former to 3 per 1,000 in the latter group. 

A more striking numerical disparity was shown by the census of 
social defectives (prisoners, juvenile offenders, paupers, and neg- 
lected children) May 1, 1905, viz, 8 per 1,000 in the eugenic group 
to 20 per 1,000 in the cacogenic group. 

The population of the eugenic group is small (2945, in 1910) as 
compared with that of the cacogenic group (15,415 in 1910); the 
eugenic group is falling somewhat, the cacogenic group rising some- 
what in general population. 

The nativity of the general population in the two groups differs 



20 American Breeders Magazine 

little, 830 per 1,000: 840 per 1,000; but the eugenic group has a some- 
what higher percentage of native-born parents and a still higher 
percentage of native-born grandparents, and may therefore represent 
somewhat stabler stocks, than the cacogenic group. 

The general medical and social picture presented by the census 
of 1905 is distinctly worse for the cacogenic group than for the eugenic 
group, suggesting that the insanities and allied conditions are apt 
to occur in a background of more general diseases. 

If we assume that active eugenic measures are the duty of society 
on the principles of self-preservation or of self-improvement, then 
such measures must begin somewhere. The present note has no 
measures to propose, but merely displays certain concrete social 
differences in different regions of Massachusetts. The prevailing 
laissez-faire policy cannot safely fall back on the idea that all the 
stocks are "just generally degenerating" and that we "should not 
know where to begin." I should therefore advocate more intensive 
locality-studies in Massachusetts, as well as elsewhere, and the 
collection of social statistics through every public and private chan- 
nel in preparation for that active eugenic program which the concrete 
data will be sure to indicate. 

If there be a statistical correlation between insanity, crime, pauper- 
ism, and disease, there may be a deeper causal relation between 
some of these factors. 

OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS FROM THE VIEW 

POINT OF EUGENICS 4 

Robert DeC. Ward 
Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 

How far do our present immigration laws enable us to exclude 
those aliens who are physically, mentally, and morally undesirable 
for parenthood; those whose coming here will tend to produce an 
inferior rather than a superior American race; those who, in other 
words, are eugenically unfit for race culture? We, in the United 
States, have an opportunity which is unique in history for the prac- 
tice of eugenic principles. Our country was founded and developed 
by picked men and picked women. And today, by selecting our 
immigrants through proper legislation, we have the power to pick 

a Read before the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders Association, Washington, D. C, 
December 29, 1911. 



Ward: Our Immigration Laws 21 

out thie best specimens of each race to be the parents of our future 
citizens. 

The responsibility which rests upon this country in this matter 
is overwhelming. We may decide upon what merits, physical, in- 
tellectual, or moral, the fathers and mothers of American children 
shall be selected. But we have left the choice almost altogether to 
the selfish interests which do not care whether we want the kind of 
immigrants they bring or whether the immigrants will be the better 
for coming. Steamship agents and brokers all over Europe and 
western Asia are today deciding for us the character of the American 
race of the future. 

It is no argument against practising eugenic ideas in the selection 
of our alien immigrants to say that the New England country towns 
are full of hopelessly degenerate native Americans, who are inferior, 
mentally, morally, physically, to the "sturdy peasants of Europe." 
The degeneracy of our country native stock is probably chiefly due 
to the drawing-ofif of the stronger and more capable men and women 
to the cities; to prolonged inbreeding, and to the continued repro- 
duction of feeble-mindedness, which is rife in many of our country 
districts. It will not help to reduce the number of our native degen- 
erates if we admit alien degenerates. National eugenics for us means 
the prevention of the breeding of the unfit native, as well as the 
prevention of the immigration, and of the breeding after admission, 
of the unfit alien. 

Should we not exercise at least the same care in admitting human 
beings that we are now exercising in relation to animals, to insect 
pests, or to disease germs? Yet it is actually true that we are today 
taking more pains to see that a Hereford bull, or a Southdown ewe, 
imported for the improvement of our cattle, is sound and free from 
disease than we take in the admission of an alien man or woman 
who will be a parent of American children. We do not hesitate 
to prohibit the importation of cattle from a foreign country where 
a serious cattle disease is prevalent. It is only in very extreme 
cases indeed that we have ever taken such a step in connection 
with the importation of aliens. Yet there are thousands of aliens 
every year who should not be allowed to enter this country for reasons 
which are eugenically of the first importance. 

Our present laws aim to exclude some twenty-one classes of men- 
tally, physically, morally, and economically undesirable aliens. On 
paper the list of the excluded classes is long and formidable, and 
seems more than sufficient to accomplish our eugenic purposes. But 



22 American Breeders Magazine 

« 

the fact is that careful and unprejudiced students of immigration 
agree that these laws do not keep out the unfit so as to preserve 
the status quo, to say nothing of promoting eugenic improvement. 
We already have an army of probably not less than 150,000 feeble- 
minded in the United States, of whom only about 10 per cent are 
in institutions, the rest being free to propagate their kind. And 
of those in institutions the large proportion are kept there only 
temporarily, being at liberty for much of the time during their repro- 
ductive period. The same is true of thousands of criminals, whom 
we shut up for varying periods of time, but allow, in the intervals when 
they are out of prison, to populate the world with children much of 
whose inheritance is criminal. We are today legalizing the begetting 
of criminal children by failing to give permanent custodial care to 
habitual criminals. 

Further, there are more than 150,000 insane in the institutions of 
the United States alone, and of these many have already left offspring 
to perpetuate their insanity. In spite of this appalling situation — 
appalling from the standpoint of mere sentiment and of mere philan- 
thropy — doubly appalling from the standpoint of eugenics, we have 
been admitting alien insane, and alien imbeciles, and alien epileptics 
and alien criminals, partly because of a lax enforcement of the law 
under former administrations; partly because the law is incapable, 
under existing conditions, of effective enforcement. The dispropor- 
tionate increase of alien insane, of alien imbeciles, of alien criminals, 
and many other facts which may be ascertained by any person who 
is interested in this question, show that, as just stated, our immigra- 
tion laws do not now enable us to preserve the status quo. Sir Fran- 
cis Galton has clearly shown that "each married degenerate produces 
on the average one child who is as degenerate as himself or herself, 
and others in whom the taint is latent but liable to appear in a suc- 
ceeding generation. ' ' Further, it is well known that imbeciles have 
larger families than normal persons, and that they also have a large 
number of illegitimate children. Parenthood on the part of all these 
classes of persons, native or alien, is a crime against the future. To 
admit to this country the feeble-minded, the insane, the epileptic, 
the habitual criminal, is no less a crime against the future. 

The ideal eugenic selection of our immigrants would be possible 
only if we could have a fairly complete history, running back a few 
generations, showing the hereditary tendencies of each alien. This 
is certainly in the immediate future impracticable, but there are 
some things we can do. We can insist that each alien, on land- 



Ward: Our Immigration Laws 23 

ing here, should undergo a very thorough mental and physical exami- 
nation at the hands of 010* Public Health and Marine Hospital Service 
surgeons. These examinations would involve the stripping to the 
skin of each alien, the usual physical examination for physical defects, 
mental tests, tests for syphilis, and similar precautions. Is this 
too much to demand when the welfare of the future American race 
is at stake? I have myself seen thousands of aliens landed, and I 
have marvelled at the skill with which our surgeons are now able, 
by the most superficial examination as the aliens file by, at the rate 
of several a minute, to detect some of the physical and even some 
of the mental defects which put these aliens into one or another of 
the classes which may be excluded. But such a superficial exami- 
nation is all wrong. It is nothing short of a crime to admit people, 
as often happens in a rush season, at the rate of 3,000, 4,000, or 
5,000 in one" day at Ellis Island. On April 11, 1910, 7,931 im- 
migrants were inspected by the medical officers. Think of that! 
And these medical officers were supposed to detect any mental and 
physical defect which might exclude! I believe that we ought- to 
limit the number of aliens who shall be landed in one day to a certain 
number which could reasonably well be carefully inspected. We 
ought largely to increase the number of the surgeons detailed for 
that most important work of inspecting arriving aliens. We ought 
to enlarge the accommodations at some of our immigrant stations, 
in order that this work might be properly carried out. 

Again, we can go a long way towards the accomplishment of our 
object by increasing the fines which the steamship companies now 
pay when they bring over an. alien who is found, on our own exam- 
ination here, to be an idiot, imbecile, epileptic, or suffering from a 
loathsome or dangerous contagious disease which could have been 
detected at the port of departure. The fine is now only $100. The 
steamship companies pay little attention to the provision. They 
run their chances of having such aliens detected on landing, and in 
some cases they insure themselves against possible loss by obliging 
the alien to deposit $100 when he buys his ticket. Now, if we increase 
this fine to $500, and that is none too large, the steamship companies 
would themselves, without expense to us, make a much more thorough 
examination abroad, before sailing. Further, for the more effective 
detection of aliens who are physically, mentally, and morally undesir- 
able, and who are already enumerated in our list of classes excluded* 
by existing law, we should put immigrant inspectors and our own 
surgeons on board of all immigrant-carrying vessels. These officials, 



24 American Breeders Magazine 

mingling with the immigrants on the voyage over, should see that 
they are properly treated and cared for; that they are not over- 
crowded; and that they receive adequate medical attention. But, 
of far greater importance than that, these officials would be able 
to detect a great many cases of physical and of mental defect which 
we can not possibly detect in our necessarily hurried examination 
when these people land. And in this way we should be able to 
exclude and to send back far larger numbers of eugenically undesir- 
able aliens than is at present possible, however strictly we may try 
to enforce the law. An immigration bill introduced into the Senate 
in August last by Senator Dillingham of Vermont, numbered S. 
3175, contains an excellent clause which provides for just such inspec- 
tion on the voyage over as I have here advocated. We ought all 
to do what we can to have that bill enacted into law. 

In addition to these steps which we should take, and take instantly, 
to accomplish the more effective exclusion of the insane, the imbecile, 
the idiot, the tuberculous, and those afflicted with loathsome or danger- 
ous contagious diseases, we ought to amend our laws so that it will 
be. possible to exclude more aliens of such low vitality and poor 
physique that they are eugenically undesirable for parenthood. The 
law of 1907 excludes persons "who are found to be and are certified 
by the examining surgeon as being mentally or physically defective, 
such mental or physical defect being of a nature which may affect 
the ability of such alien to earn a living." This clause has been 
found to be rather ineffective, partly because it has been taken to 
be an economic test and not a physical one; partly because of other 
provisions in the same act which largely nullify this section by making 
it possible to admit on bonds aliens who fall into the group here named. 
Now aliens of such low vitality, poor physique, or suffering from 
such mental or physical defect that their ability to earn a living is 
thereby interfered with are highly undesirable persons, economically 
as well as eugenically, in the large majority of cases. They are not 
only themselves weaklings and unlikely to resist disease, but they 
are likely to have defective and degenerate children. Bonds will 
not prevent them from breeding. We constantly speak of the need 
of more "hands" to do our labor. We forget that that we are import- 
ing, not "hands" alone, but bodies also. The vast majority of 
incoming alien immigrants are potential fathers and mothers. And 
the character of the race that is here to be born depends upon the 
kind of alien bodies which we as voters, and therefore as having some 
control over our legislation, are allowing to have landed on our 



Ward: Our Immigration Laws 25 

shores day by day. We ought to take this seriously to heart. It 
is a tremendous responsibility which rests upon us. 

Conservation of our natural resources: How much we hear about 
that! Conservation of American forests is important. So is con- 
servation of American coal, and oil, and natural gas, and water 
supply, and fisheries. But the conservation and improvement of the 
American race is vastly more important than all other conservation. 
The real wealth of a nation is the quality of its people. Of what 
value are endless acres of forests, millions of tons of coal, and bil- 
lions of gallons of water, if the race is not virile, and sane, and 
sound? 

Fearfully misguided has been most of our so-called philanthropy. 
We have housed and clothed and fed the defective, the degenerate, 
the delinquent, to such an extent that we have encouraged them to 
reproduce their kind in ever-growing numbers. We have spent in- 
creasing sums for asylums, almshouses, prisons, and hospitals, in 
which we have temporarily confined the insane, the pauper, the criminal, 
the imbecile; leaving them free, during most of their lives, to propa- 
gate their kind. It is a fact, disguise it as we will, that we have taxed 
ourselves to support institutions which hrve resulted in increasing 
and not decreasing the number of the unfit. We have before us an 
immediate duty, of tremendous importance, in caring for our own 
unfit; in seeing to it, by adequate legislation, that the insane, the 
criminal, the feeble-minded, and similar classes are permanently seg- 
regated, so that they cannot reproduce their kind to be a further 
burden upon the nation, and in enacting laws which shall prevent 
the marriage of those whose offspring will be unfit. 

But, in addition to our own very heavy burden of those who are 
defective or degenerate, we are adding every year, by immigration, 
many hundreds if not thousands of aliens whose presence here will 
inevitably result, because of their own defects, or those of their 
offspring, in lowering the physical and mental and moral standards 
of the American race. 

We readily admit that we have much to learn about heredity. 
But of some things we are already sure. Enough is known to make 
it absolutely essential, if the quality of the American race is to be 
preserved, that there should be a far more careful selection of our 
incoming alien immigrants, on eugenic grounds, than we have ever 
attempted. 

The need is imperative for applying eugenic principles in much 
of our legislation. But the greatest, the most logical, the most 



26 American Breeders Magazine 

effective step that we can take is to begin with a proper eugenic 
selection of the incoming alien millions. If we, in our generation, 
take these steps, we shall earn the gratitude of millions of those who 
will come after us, for we shall have begun the real conservation of 
the American race. 

Let us see to it that we are protected, not merely from the burden 
of supporting alien defectives, delinquents, and dependents, but 
from what George William Curtis so well called that "watering of 
the nation's life-blood" which is the result of their breeding after 
admission. 



ALTERNATIVE HUMAN INHERITANCE AND 

EUGENICS 4 

F. Adams Woods, M.D. 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 

The sharp contrasts in traits of character between children born 
of the same parents and educated under the same surroundings 
is often a matter of wonderment, and such variations in the human 
strip, reckless as they at first sight seem in their individualistic 
expressions, have often deterred belief in the value of heredity. The 
real lesson is quite the reverse and these same contrasts when rightly 
understood form perhaps the strongest argument in favor of mental 
inheritance. They support the belief in the essentially predetermined 
nature of such differences as commonly exist between man and man, 
and bring the whole question of family and individual vicissitudes 
within the scope and understanding of the germ-cell theory. 

The phrase "alternative heredity" was in use before the rediscov- 
ery of Mendel's law in 1900. It is a broader, looser term than strict 
Mendelian heredity, and does not raise the question of dominance 
and recession. It does, however, involve the idea of segregation of 
the germ-plasm and is a convenient term to employ when "factors" 
and "units," "dominance" and "recession" have not yet been 
unravelled. 

There have been a number of researches published lately on human 
inheritance. They all, as far as I know, show alternative inheritance 
or an approach to the pure Mendelian segregation, and confirm a 
belief which I had forced upon me some dozen years ago, that human 

a Head before meeting of Eugenics Section of the American Breeders Association at Washington, 
D. C, December 30, 1911. 



Woods: Human Inheritance and Eugenics 27 

traits would be found in the main to be non-blending, — not an 
absolute election or exclusion of a large or important trait, but what 
is better expressed as a rough alternative inheritance. Anyone 
tracing out family histories can scarcely fail to notice this principle 
if he is careful to include in the records all the members of a group 
of close relatives — all the sons and daughters, all the uncles and aunts, 
and all of the ancestors for two or three generations. The reason 
why this mode of human descent- has not been generally noticed 
I attributed to the fact that complete family records are difficult 
to obtain, especially as regards mental and moral differences. 

'Workers on the question of human heredity who had used scien- 
tific methods at all had confined themselves largely to questions 
of averages, of coefficients, and of correlation without making criti- 
cal studies of small groups. Furthermore, private family records 
are often vitiated by purposely suppressed information. Unless the 
greatest care be taken to unearth the truth, the bad traits which 
stand out in alternative contrast to the good traits may not be ob- 
tained. 

Now that records are being collected and constructed in a thorough 
way and the detailed pedigrees published, the facts of alternative 
inheritance are obvious. As a result of studies in royalty I found 
such traits as the following to be in a general sense alternative in 
descent — high intellectual qualities, which might be called genius, 
alternating with lesser mentality or mediocrity, or perhaps with mental 
deficiencies of a marked nature, distinct moral elevation alternating 
in the same way with ordinary or average types, or very often with 
notorious moral deficiencies. Marked types of brutality and de- 
bauchery show little tendency to lose themselves by blending, as 
they are passed on through the generations. It is very easy to see 
that such traits as licentiousness, treacherousness, cruelty, chastity, 
benevolence, and honesty, if not absolute unit characters, neverthe- 
less hold themselves together more or less as a unit; and the facts 
of distribution on the pedigree charts are only to be explained if we 
suppose considerable germ-plasm segregation to take place. There is 
also a tendency for many of the features of the .face to be inherited 
as units, such as the form of the nose, the slope of the forehead, the 
shape of the lips and chin. 

Within the last two years some very complete pedigrees have been 
compiled by the Francis Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics 
in\The Treasury of Human Inheritance. These have been pub- 
lished with the idea of merely bringing forward the facts and have 



28 American Breeders Magazine 

not yet been subjected to analysis or theoretical interpretation. They 
show alternative inheritance for diabetes insipidus, split-foot, poly- 
dactylism, brachydactylism, pulmonary tuberculosis, deaf-mutism, 
marked ability, chronic trophoedema, angio-neurotic oeedma, herma- 
phroditism, hemophilia, insanity and allied characters, and probably 
for commercial ability and liberal thought. In none of the pedigrees 
within the Treasury is blending apparent. 

But it does not appear that we can, with the exception of hemo- 
philia and brachydactylism, make any of these traits either a domi- 
nant or a recessive. Brachydactylism appears to be a dominant, 
and the descendants of unaffected parents do not transmit the defect. 
Polydactylism, however, shows 24 cases in which the anomaly reap- 
peared when both parents were unaffected. Therefore polydacty- 
lism is not clearly a distinct dominant like brachydactylism. That 
polydactylism is not a recessive is made probable by its frequent 
transmission by direct descent. It is improbable that the normal 
mates of these transmitters should all come from affected stocks, 
since polydactylism is such a rare anomaly. For chronic trophoedema 
there are 7, for angio-neurotic oedema 22, and for diabetes insipidus 
24 cases, comparable to these 24 cases of polydactylism. For all 
the other traits here described, cases arise which prevent one from 
classifying them as dominant or recessive. 

Even if factors and units can not at present be worked out, for 
many human characteristics, the appreciation of the general prin- 
ciple of alternative heredity has this double value. It shows that 
processes are at work during the maturation of the human gametes 
which lead towards segregation and gametic purity, and consequently 
one is stimulated to further research, to analysis of the complex into 
its elements, and to the hope of finding simpler factors or units. 

The other lesson is this: The more these contrasts are found to 
exist and to breed true, to be equally characteristic of psychical and 
of physical traits, the more credit must be given to forces predeter- 
mined in the germ. Chromosomes and gametes, from every point 
of view, are in the light of our present knowledge now expected to 
give rise to alternative heredity. Environment (or more technically 
modification) on the other hand should tend to eliminate the con- 
trasts. The fact that these differences are not obliterated even among 
those living in the same homes and the same social atmosphere is a 
strong argument in favor of germ-plasm causation and a support 
to the advocates of eugenics. 



THE EFFECT OF RESEARCH IN GENETICS ON 

THE ART OF BREEDING" 

Herbert J. Webber 
Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. 

The knowledge of breeding has advanced so rapidly in recent 
years that few of us realize the great change that has taken place 
in our understanding of the fundamental principles, and the effect 
which this change has had on the methods of practical breeding 
that we advocate. I had the good fortune to begin my studies and 
experiments in breeding in 1890, ten years before the rediscovery 
of Mendel's now famous principles of heredity, or the publication 
of De Vries' mutation theory. I have thus had the opportunity to 
follow this change through all its ramifications. From a condition 
of ignorance and largely of chaos, where all advance was taken as 
a lucky chance, we hav£ developed to a position where practically 
each step may be taken intelligently. True, we touch the limits of 
knowledge on every hand and many of the most fundamental prob- 
lems still remain unsolved, yet our understanding today, which 
enables us to analyze a plant into its component parts or characters 
and then in turn, by synthesis, to build up a new structure by the 
combination of different characters into a new race or variety, is to 
our former understanding as light to darkness. The knowledge 
of breeding has developed into the science of genetics, and is fast 
assuming, through the orderly presentation and classification of 
facts, the form of an exact science. Yet, with all this advance in 
our understanding, the methods of breeding which can be recom- 
mended for the use of practical breeders have changed but little in 
the last twenty years, the greatest change being primarily in the 
greater surety with which we now make recommendations. It is 
my purpose in this address to emphasize certain salient features of 
the advance that has been achieved, and point out what I conceive 
to be some of the most important problems awaiting solution. 

Twenty years ago our understanding of the principles of breeding 
was derived largely from Knight's physiological papers, and Dar- 
win's Origin of Species and Plants and Animals under Domestication. 
Verlot's admirable pamphlet On the Production and Fixation of Varie- 
ties of Ornamental Plants gave a general outline of the best methods 
then followed, and we derived our knowledge of the use of hybrids 

a Paper No. 27, Department of Plant Breeding, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Annual 
address of retiring chairman of the Plant Section, American Breeders Association, delivered 
December 30, 1911. 

29 



30 American Breeders Magazine 

largely from Focke's excellent text, Die Pflanzenmischlinge, published 
in 1880, and the work of the French experimenter Naudin. 

At that time breeders clearly understood the fact that hybrids 
segregated in the second generation and gave new combinations of 
characters, and the suggestion was even then present in the minds 
of scientific breeders that this segregation of characters took place 
during the reduction division. At that time breeders, just as defi- 
nitely as now, planned experiments in hybridizing different varieties 
or species to secure certain recombinations of desired characters in 
the hybrids. The experiments in citrus hybridization conducted 
by Mr. W. T. Swingle and myself were planned in 1893 entirely on 
this basis, yet the principle was in no sense of the word original with 
us, but was at that time well understood by all practical breeders. 
This understanding, I believe, was largely derived from the investi- 
gations of Naudin, though various investigators contributed to it. 

With a full understanding of the knowledge and practices of the 
breeders of two decades ago, it must be admitted that the conception 
of unit characters and Mendelian segregation was necessary to 
clarify this knowledge and bring out the latent possibilities of the 
material presented by nature for the use of the breeder, and it is 
doubtful whether we even yet adequately comprehend the almost 
infinite possibilities open to us. 

To understand breeding today we must clearly understand the 
conception of unit characters. We no longer conceive the species, 
race or variety, as a fixed ensemble of characters. Following De 
Vries, we now commonly conceive the species or variety to be made 
up of a certain number of unit characters, that are in large measure 
associated together by the accident of evolution or breeding and 
which are separable entities in inheritance. We may liken these 
unit characters to bricks used in the construction of a building, each 
separate and yet dependent on the others for the maintenance of 
the structure; as each unit character is dependent on the other unit 
characters for the maintenance of the plant body. We may think 
of these unit characters as organic elements similar to chemical 
elements, that by their recombination through hybridization form 
new compounds — new plants — of distinctly different appearance, 
but which in turn do not effect the unit characters, which may again 
be separated and led to form other compounds, again resulting in 
distinct organisms. Related species may possess many distinct 
unit characters, but ordinarily would be expected to possess many 
similar unit characters. Cultivated races or varieties ordinarily 



Webber: Research in Genetics 31 

9 

would differ only in a few unit characters, and difference in a single 
unit character would be sufficient to give a distinct and recognizable 
race or variety. Indeed, the difference between two varieties in a 
single unit character might mean that one variety would be exceed- 
ingly valuable and the other practically worthless. De Vries asserts 
that unit characters are discontinuous in inheritance and do not 
exhibit transitional forms. A plant cannot be hairy and at the same 
time smooth, or a fruit yellow and at the same time red. While 
there is yet much difference of opinion on these questions the prepon- 
derance of evidence certainly favors the unit character conception. 

If, then, we recognize that species are made up of unit characters 
and that different species differ in the possession of different unit 
characters, the great problem in the evolution of species becomes 
the question of how the new unit character is acquired. Have all 
unit characters existed from the beginning, or are new unit char- 
acters being continuously acquired? A few years ago we supposed 
that new characters if acquired in any form must be seized upon, 
as it were, by natural selection and preserved, or otherwise that they 
would be swamped by intercrossing and lost. We now know from 
Mendelian analysis that the unit character may be apparently lost 
in crossing owing to the prevailing presence of its dominant allelo- 
morph, but that in reality it is not lost or apparently changed and 
will reappear again when it happens that two gametes both bearing the 
character meet in fecundation. It may remain hidden for many 
years, but as we are now inclined to view the matter, the character 
or the determiner of the character would not be permanently lost to 
the species unless all individuals possessing it were killed before 
they produced seed. This unit character idea would lead us to the 
conception of the species as made up of all the unit characters that 
it has acquired by any means in its development and which still 
exist. The acquirement of any new unit character would add one 
more character to the species and double the number of possible 
varieties or races of the species. 

In evolutionary studies we have long recognized that variation 
was the foundation of evolution and that no evolution was possible 
without variation, but we have assigned to selection an all important 
part as guiding and even stimulating the variation in a certain 
.direction. Darwin and particularly some of his more radical fol- 
lowers have assigned to selection a creative force, in that it has been 
assumed that when nature by a slight variation gave the hint of a 
possible change in a certain direction, natural or artificial selection, 



32 American Breeders Magazine 

by choosing this variant and selecting from among its progeny the 
most markedly similar variants, could force the advance of the varia- 
tion in the direction indicated. Since Darwin's time this cumulative 
action of selection has been emphasized so forcibly that we had 
come to recognize selection as an active force in creation rather than 
simply as a selective agency. Before selection can be accepted as a 
vital principle of evolution, the selectionist must show that a new 
character can be created by selection, otherwise selection becomes a 
secondary principle. 

When viewed from the standpoint of the production of a new 
and definitely heritable unit which mendelizes, the task of selection 
becomes more doubtful. Darwin's idea that changes in species 
required many years and probably many centuries for accomplish- 
ment took the subject largely out of the field of experimentation 
and in a measure developed a speculative science. One of the great- 
est contributions to science made by De Vries was to establish the 
study of evolution on an experimental basis. With the demon- 
stration that evolution could be studied experimentally, the question 
of the effectiveness of selection was taken up, and we are now doubt- 
less on the road to a solution of the problem. It is only possible 
for us here to call attention to a few of the researches in this direction. 

The classical researches of De Vries, now familiar to us all, chal- 
lenged the correctness of the selection theory and sought to show 
that species originated by sudden jumps or mutations. We may 
admit that De Vries proved that species or new characters were 
formed suddenly as mutations, but this would not prove that they 
might not also be formed or actually induced to mutate by a contin- 
uous process of selection. Indeed, in his experiments on the production 
of a double-flowered variety of Chrysanthemum segetum (Mutations- 
theoriej vol. i, p. 523), a few generations of selection led to markedly 
increasing the number of ray-florets before the ligulate corollas 
appeared among the disk-florets, the change which he interpreted 
as the mutation that gave him the double variety. 

Johannsen has contributed much to our knowledge of selection 
and has given us a more exact method of experimentation by his 
conception of pure lines, biotypes, genotypes, and phenotypes. His 
experiments in the selection of pure lines of beans in an attempt to 
produce large and small seeded types have led him to conclude that 
selection within a pure line is ineffective in producing changes. He 
did, however, secure new types from pure lines through mutations. 

Tower's experiments with the potato beetle in attempting to 



Webber: Research in Genetics 33 

create by selection large and small races, albinic and melanic races, 
and races with changed color-pattern, although conducted carefully 
for from ten to twelve generations, failed to give any evidence of 
producing permanently changed types. While strains of plus and 
minus variates gave populations with a range of variation apparently 
markedly restricted to their respective sides of the normal variation 
range, still these selected strains did not greatly exceed the normal 
range of variation in either direction, and when the selection was 
discontinued, in two or three generations, again produced popula- 
tions exhibiting the normal range of variation. Clearly no new 
unit characters had been added by the selection. Tower, however, 
found that by subjecting the beetles, during the process of the for- 
mation of gametes, to certain abnormal conditions, he was likely 
to obtain mutations in the progeny that would immediately form 
the beginnings of new races. 

Jennings in a series of selection experiments conducted with Para- 
mecium, that were continued for over twenty generations, obtained 
no evidence of a permanent modification of the type. 

Pearl has conducted an extended experiment in the selection of 
chickens in the attempt to produce a breed of high egg-laying capac- 
ity. His results have led him to the conclusion that selection alone 
has no effect in producing a permanent improvement or a change 
of type. 

Up to the present time these are the principal contributions to the 
subject, discrediting the effectiveness of selection as an active agency. 

On the opposite side of the controversy we have the very careful 
and extensive researches of Castle and MacCurdy in the selection 
of Irish rats to increase the black-colored dorsal band on the one 
hand and to decrease or obliterate it on the other. Castle appears 
to have gotten very positive results favoring the gradual cumulative 
action of the selection, as he succeeded in markedly increasing the 
amount of black in one strain until the rats were almost wholly 
black, and in the other strain almost wholly obliterating the black. 
I am not informed whether the inheritance in hybridization of these 
apparently new characters has been tested. If a new character has 
been added it should maintain itself and segregate after hybridization. 

The experiments conducted by Dr. Smith and others at the Illinois 
Experiment Station in selecting high and low strains of corn with 
reference to oil and protein content have resulted in markedly dis- 
tinct strains possessing these qualities, which are inherited appar- 
ently as long as the selection is continued. It seems certain that 



34 American Breeders Magazine 

they have increased the oil and protein content much beyond the 
maximum, which existed in the original race. I am informed by 
Dr. Smith that these new races of high oil and high protein content 
have maintained their character for several years in isolated plants 
without selection and it would thus seem that a permanent heritable 
change of character has been produced as a result of the selection. 
The behavior of these apparently new characters in hybridization 
has, however, not been tested and we thus do not yet have the com- 
plete evidence of the test of the characters which is necessary to 
enable us to fully analyze the results. 

Very many cases of increases obtained in quantitative characters 
could be cited, but the majority of the experiments were undertaken, 
primarily, to obtain practical results, and whether such apparently 
new characters would stand the test of unit characters is doubtful. 

The improvement of the sugar beet by selection forms a typical and 
instructive case of this kind. The careful selection of the sugar beet 
was started over sixty years ago by Louis Vilmorin, at which time 
a range of variation in sugar content of from 5 per cent to 21 per 
cent was known to exist. Since that time the industry has grown 
extensively until hundreds of thousands of beets are examined annu- 
ally and the richest in sugar content selected for seed production. 
The process of selecting the beets richest in sugar content for mothers 
has now been continued for sixty years and is practiced extensively 
every year and yet there is no evidence that the maximum sugar con- 
tent has been increased, and it is certain that the character of richness 
in sugar content has not been rendered permanently heritable, as 
sugar-beet growers well know that their success depends upon the 
continuance of the selection. Here it is certain that no distinct unit 
character has been added by the continuous selection. 

The strongest evidence as to the method of origin of new charac- 
ters is derived naturally from our knowledge of known cases of the 
origin of such typical new characters. When we view the evidence 
critically, I think it must be admitted that in practically all, if not 
all, of the cases of new characters appearing, they have come into 
existence suddenly. The cut-leaved Celedonium, the Cupid sweet 
pea, Bursa heegeri, the Otter sheep, the muley cow, are illustra- 
tions familiar to all and doubtless each of us could add several 
such illustrations from our own knowledge. Such new characters 
appearing suddenly are heritable and maintain themselves as unit 
characters in hybridization. We cannot but admit that the evidence 
of these known cases counts against the origin of characters by 
gradual cumulative selection. 



Webber: Research in Genetics 35 

In summarizing this part of our discussion we can only state that 
at present it appears that far the greatest weight of evidence is 
opposed to the origin of a new unit character through the cumulative 
action of selection. 

Are we, then, to conclude that the practice of breeders in con- 
tinually selecting from the best for propagation is useless, and must 
we advise practical breeders to discontinue their selection? How 
can we do this in the light of the success of the sugar-beet breeders? 
Have not Sea Island cotton growers increased and maintained the 
length and fineness of their staple by continuous selection? Have 
not corn growers maintained high productiveness of different strains 
by selection? Are not the Jersey and Holstein maintained at a 
high degree of efficiency by selection? Has not the speed of our 
trotting and pacing horses been increased and maintained at a high 
rate by the most careful selection? To one familiar with the his- 
tory of agriculture and breeding these questions arise fast and are 
likely to be insistent. There can be no doubt that the practical 
breeders have made advances by selecting from the best individuals. 
No genetist or scientific breeder will deny this. It is simply the 
question of the interpretation of how the results were obtained that 
is in doubt and whether these results can be considered as permanent 
new unit characters. Before we can thoroughly understand this 
subject it is probable that each individual case will require to be 
carefully analyzed to determine the nature of the advance made 
and the interpretation of the process or processes concerned. At 
present we can only partially understand the phenomena presented. 

It appears to me that we are dealing in breeding with two markedly 
distinct types of selection, based on different principles and arriv- 
ing at different results, both right in principle and productive of 
equally valuable practical results, but of very different value when 
considered from a strictly evolutionary standpoint. 

It would seem that such cases of improvement as are illustrated 
by the sugar beet indicate that the continuous selection, generation 
after generation, of maximum fluctuations shown by a character will 
result in maintaining a strain at nearly the maximum of efficiency; 
and that within a pure race the progeny of a maximum variate 
which would probably be classed as a fluctuation does not regress 
entirely to the mean of the race in the first generation succeeding 
the selection, but that we only have a certain percentage of regres- 
sion similar to the regression determined by Galton. It^would 
further seem to be indicated by the evidence now available that 



36 American Breeders Magazine 

in some cases we may even expect the continuously selected strain 
to exceed the ordinary maximum of the unselected population; In 
the Illinois corn experiments the maximum oil and protein content 
seems clearly to have exceeded the ordinary maximum, and is cer- 
tainly maintained at a very high degree with a new mode and range 
of variation. If a new mutant of high protein content has been 
secured in the course of the experiments with a change of type, it is 
probable that this high protein content will behave as a unit charac- 
ter in inheritance. On the other hand, if the results are interpreted 
as simply the maintenance by isolation of a strain produced by select- 
ing fluctuations, there would probably be a rapid return to the normal 
range of variation of this character if the selection was discontinued. 

De Vries has pointed out that natural selection can produce races 
and maintain them, but its power to develop races beyond the nat- 
ural range of variability remains to be demonstrated. 

With reference to his experiments with the potato beetle Tower 
states, "It is demonstrated that among the fluctuating variations 
there are individuals which are able to transmit their particular 
variation and give rise by selection to a race, while the majority are 
not able to hand on their particular conditions to their progeny. 
Races developed by selection from such variations have not been 
carried beyond the normal limit of variability of the species." These 
races or selected strains maintain themselves as long as the selection 
is continued and when the selection is discontinued rapidly regress 
to the mean of the species. . 

The above examples from the sugar beet, corn and potato beetle 
will illustrate the type of improvement usually secured by practical 
breeders. By their selection they maintain a strain of high efficiency 
without having in general exceeded the limits of variation of the 
species or race and without having produced new unit characters 
which would be maintained without selection and segregate as pure 
units following hybridization. 

[Continued in next number.) 



DOMESTICATION OF THE FOX. 

Ben. I. Ratnbr, AJberton, P. E. I., Canada 

and 
J. Waltbb Jones, Washington, D. C. 

The silver fox rearing industry is not new to scientists. As long 
ago as 1908 the Biological Survey of the United States Department 
of Agriculture published a bulletin on the subject and E. Thompson 
Seton in 1909 wrote of the industry in his Mammals of North America. 
The silver, cross, and red foxes have been bred for five or ten years 
in Ontario, Labrador, and Maine, but all these breeders secured their 
stock with few exceptions on Prince Edward Island, Canada. Visitors 
to Prince Edward Island, seeking information as to breeding methods, 
generally secured very little information. In fact, not 2 per cent of 
the 100,000 inhabitants of that beautiful and thickly settled island 
knew that an exceedingly profitable industry was being prosecuted 
somewhere in the woods on their neighbors' farms. Although the 
industry began twenty-three years ago, no breeding stock of large 
value had left the hands of the close circle of breeders who were 
guarding their secret well. Only a few choice skins and a few light 
silver foxes had come into the possession of those outside the "com- 
bine" previous to 1910, when it broke. At the present time there 
are about eighty ranches on Prince Edward Island stocked with 
about two hundred fine dark silvers, about 300 silver-grays and per- 
haps 400 very light silvers, crosses and reds. , The total skin value 
is about $550,000 and current prices of breeding stock make them 
worth at least $1,500,000 but it is safe to say that the industry could 
not be purchased outright with twice that sum. 

In the year 1888 one James Lamb, while hunting some strayed 
cows in the woods, found two silver fox pups, a male and a female, 
in a hollow log. He contrived to carry them home and swapped 
them with a neighbor for a cow and a few dollars to boot. The 
neighbor experimented for several years with various kinds of pens 
and treatment, but he became discouraged and sold the foxes for 
$80 to another neighbor, who also was no more successful than the 
original finder. This second man gave over his experiment to yet 
another neighbor, who lived on an island in Cascumpec Bay. The 
quiet of the new place, the increasing tameness of the foxes, and the 
understanding of the new keeper produced conditions that relieved 
Madame Reynard's nervous apprehension for her youngs' safety and 
three pups were reared to maturity in two seasons. This success, 

37 



38 American Breeders Magazine 

the result of eight years of experimentation, gave a strong impulse 
to the industry, which began in earnest About six men possessed 
a knowledge of the fine art of rearing foxes in captivity and jealously 
and successfully guarded their secret until 1910. Up to that time 
no live foxes were sold, except some light silvers to distant places. 



Thb Silver Fox. 
domestic animal. Who will achieve the domestication of the Russian "Gable?" 

The surplus stock were killed and the pelts marketed in London. 
In 1901 a dark silver pelt brought £580 (S2825) at a London auction, 
and last year (1910) prices of £540 and £480 were obtained. These 
are the highest prices ever paid for the pelts of any kind of animal. 



Rayner, Jones: Domestication of the Fox 39 

The common red fox — Vvlpes fitivus — is usually red in color, but 
redness is not a distinguishing mark of the species. The other color 
is black, or silver-black, when only a near-by examination reveals 
the presence of light hairs, excepting on the tip of the tail. The 
light hairs are black at the base and tip but have a silver portion not 
far from the outer end. Between the two color extremes there are 
found animals presenting every gradation of color between red and 
black. The animals are grouped in markets as red fox, cross fox, 
light silver fox, and dark silver fox. A black fox, socalled when alive, 
is classified as dark silver. 

In nature, where indiscriminate crossing of the colors takes place, 
foxes occur in about the following proportions and pelts are bought 
from the trapper or breeder at approximately the following prices: 
Red 100,000, value $5 each; cross 10,000, value $15 each; light silver 
1000, value $2 each; dark silver 100, value $1000 each. The price 
is in inverse ratio to the number produced. But while scarcity may 
influence the price of dark silvers, there is no question of the great 
intrinsic value of their pelts. They are marvels of richness and beauty 
and even if produced in as great numbers as the red ones, they would 
be many times more valuable. The price of the dark silver fox has 
always been high because that fur has always been popular with 
royalty and thus a constant demand existed. The enormous decrease 
in costly furs and the vastly increased numbers of people demanding 
them have brought about a situation very encouraging to the domes- 
tication of many animals with valuable fur because of the great 
profits. 

The Siberian marten, called "Russian sable" in the trade, is now 
nearly as valuable as dark silver fox. A sable coat worn at the recent 
Horse Show in New York cost $22,000. A set of natural black fox 
worn at the same place, consisting of not more than three skins, cost 
the owner $16,000. Unless immediate steps are taken to increase 
the number of foxes, Siberian and other martens, otter, beaver and 
mink and some other valuable fur animals which promise to be cap- 
able of being domesticated, none but the extremely wealthy will 
be able to buy furs. The fact that the silver fox has been success- 
fully domesticated by the efforts of a few men, without any encour- 
agement from government, and with no financial backing except 
meager incomes from farming and trapping, should inspire extensive 
governmental experiments to determine the feasibility of extending 
the number of domestic animals to those which produce fur. The 
production of costly fur, henceforth, is a problem for the animal 



40 American Breeders Magazine 

husbandman. Doubtless the day will soon come when books of pedi- 
greed records of foxes, martens, otters, and minks will be published. 

When choosing a farm for purposes of breeding foxes three princi- 
pal considerations— soil, climate, and location — must be kept in mind. 
A limestone or alkaline soil will decrease the value of the fur by making 
it harsh and brittle. A cold climate is a necessity in the production 
of high-class fur. The fox pens must be secluded from the intrusion, 



The Utter or Fivb i'oira PHODdccD in Tins Pen in 1911 Sold fob 114,000. 

or even the observation, of strange men and animals, and a forest 
covering, preferably of spruce, fir, pine, or cedar, is very desirable. 

The best breeders enclose from three to five acres with a 2-inch 
mesh wire fence 8 feet high. The wire is buried about 3 feet into the 
ground to prevent burrowing under and it is turned in at right angles 
for 2 feet at the top to prevent climbing out. No. 14 gauge, galvan- 
ized, wire is used in the ground and No. 16 gauge at the top. The gate 
in this outside fence is kept constantly locked and often the keeper, 
who sleeps in his little cottage close by, maintains watch dogs and 
bloodhounds. Inside the five-acre enclosure and for the most part 
not visible from the outer fence are placed the pens. The fences 



Rayner, Jones: Domestication of the Fox 41 

about them are similar to those described above, but built with a 
little more care. Meshed wire is sold in 150-foot lengths and one 
roll is used to enclose a pen, which therefore is about 37 feet square. 

The fox house, or kennel, has been in the past built like an ordinary 
dog kennel with a crooked spout for an entrance. The crook excludes 
the light and the spout resembles a burrow sufficiently to cause the 
fox to accept the man-made wooden substitute in lieu of her own 
"home-made" den. But more advanced husbandmen have devised 
better housing facilities. The best of these, probably, is the invention 
of B. I. Rayner, of Alberton, one of the pioneer breeders and on whose 
father's farm the original foxes were caught. His house is 8 by 10 
feet, with a pitch roof and provided with ventilation. It is double- 
boarded and papered. A passageway extends through to admit the 
keeper. Four fox apartments — one for each pen — are constructed, 
one in each corner 'of the house. Each of these apartments leads 
through a spout or burrow to the pen, or paddock, outside. Each 
apartment has two rooms, — a cleaning room and a nest which is care- 
fully lined with seaweed. Ventilation over these is provided, and 
provision is made for allowing the owner a sly peep into the nest 
while the mother is outside getting her meal. Such a house is always 
built strongly in order to resist the possible attempts of sneak thieves 
to enter. When strangers are about, foxes are nowhere else but in 
their nests. 

In any well-settled country there is enough cheap food to provide 
for hundreds of foxes. A healthy old horse or cow, livers, heads, 
feet and other butchers' refuse, calves, fish, bread, milk, eggs, rabbits 
and even poultry — all provide the best of fox food. A nursing mother 
fox gets a goodly share of eggs, milk, and porridge. As a whole, 
in a province like Prince Edward Island, settled with fifty people 
to the square mile, it costs two or three cents per fox, per day, to feed 
them. Some of the ranches have great numbers of rabbits inside the 
outer fence which give the foxes a chase and familiar food frequently. 

The problem of breeding for quality has been well worked out, 
When good dark silvers are once secured they always produce dark 
silver pups. It may prove that black is the recessive color, — breed- 
ing true when secured. It is said by trappers that sometimes crosses 
and silvers have been found in red fox dens. If so, the proportion 
of reds and silvers are near enough to indicate that the red color is 
dominant and the black recessive. But as far as Prince Edward 
Island experience goes only blendings of the two colors is produced 
by any mating and every blend breeds true to its own color. 



42 American- Bkeedkhs Magazine 

Numerous attempts have been made to introduce silver stock from 
Labrador and Newfoundland. Though in every case size and strength 
were secured, quality of fur was lost. No high-priced pelt has resulted 
from such mating. Many cross bred foxes were imported from the 
Western States with the object of securing size and eventually breed- 
ing up to a dark silver strain from cheap stock. Descendants of 
these are on various ranches today, but not in those of experienced 
breeders. 

The ranchers working with the best success have only descendants 
of the stock originally caught on Prince Edward Island. All high- 



priced pelts came off foxes of this strain. If an ordinary red fox of 
Prince Edward Island is bred to a black, and the resulting young is 
bred to a black, and thus for four or five generations, a good silver 
fox results. The first cross produces what is designated as a " cross" 
or "patched" fox. The next mating produces a cross of a better 
quality with almost no reddish tinge in any hair and silver patches 
over the back, the third mating produces a light silver worth prob- 
ably five hundred dollars, and a fourth mating produced a silver 
worth probably one thousand dollars. Many farmers of small means 
thus breed up their stock by the use of only one high-priced animal 

Foxes have been kept as pets and in zoological gardens from time 
immemorial but they have Dever been known to rear young. The 
reason of this seems to be the extreme nervousness of the female, 



Rayner, Jones: Domestication of the Fox 43 

She has been known to carry her young about in her mouth for days, 
putting them now in one place, then carrying them to another, until 
they succumbed to exposure and handling. Keepers have had to 
stay by the pens day and night for several days at a time to keep 
watch on the mother. An instance of the behavior of a certain 
mother fox on an Ontario ranch is related as typical of what a slight 
incident may cause trouble. A ranch owner whose home was within 
sight of his fox pen was having his house painted. When the painter 
began to put the new color on the house, either the sight of the 
stranger or [the smell of the paint so excited the mother that she 
brought out' her young and Jailed them. They are so wild that 
ranchers make a habit of closing up the ranches in January to all 
except the keepers, and keeping the ranches closed until June, when 
the young are out playing about. Only keepers may approach the 
pens during the breeding season and it is declared by some of them 
to be risky even to change clothes lest the change worry the fox. 

The male, which is monogamous in the wild state, forages for the 
young. But when food is provided two parents would probably kill 
the young with overattention. Therefore, the male is removed about 
the middle of March. The period of gestation is fifty-one days 
exactly. The young arrive in March, April or early May. Litters of 
from one to as many as eight are recorded but the average is usually 
about four pups. One mother fox has reared eighteen young in three 
years and a price of $8000 was refused for her. They are fertile nine 
or ten years. They are mature in eight months for fur or breeding. 
Some breeders have been able to mate one male with two agreeable 
females, such as sisters, and the custom appears to be growing. Thus 
selection of sires can be made and quicker improvement in quality 
achieved, if indeed improvement be possible. 

During their productive period of about nine years one pair of 
foxes will produce on an average about thirty young. If these are 
of the best stock, the pelts are worth fifteen hundred dollars each 
at the present market prices. Thus the yearly profits from a pair 
is about $5,000. But certainly every joint-stock company that 
forms and hires a manager cannot expect to secure such results. 
Efficient managers are very hard to find and the best management 
will not prevent occasional escapes and thefts. The industry is best 
prosecuted as a regular part of the work on a diversified farm where 
waste food materials, quiet, and the personal interest of the owner 
will go farther towards insuring success than any skilled management 
capital can purchase. The business could be very profitably prose- 



44 American Breeders Magazine 

cuted by neighbors who could unite in the feeding, care, protection 
of the stock from thieves, and hunting and trapping of escaped ani- 
mals. Joint stock companies with a total capitalization of over a 
million are now incorporated for fur farming in Eastern Canada and 
the result of applying capital to a farming industry of this kind is 
being watched with great interest. The result at this date has 
been to raise the price of foxes from $1,500 or $2,000 — the actual 
fur value of good dark silvers — to $3,000 and even $4,000 for the 
pups of 1912. The quantity of foxes being limited to a small increase 
each year, there ought to be no danger of a "rush" or boom. At 
any rate, the prices are not yet high enough to prevent considerable 
profits, eliminating, of course, the risk of theft and escape from the 
argument. 

The profits of this form of wild animal breeding was stated by an 
experienced breeder in another way, thus: "It is more profitable for 
an experienced breeder to rear red foxes at $5 a pelt than to rear 
sheep, getting $5 for each lamb and 20 cents a pound for wool." 

The fur is taken the last week of December. It is usually sold 
at the March sales in London, to which city it is sent by mail, insured. 
After the sale, the skins mostly go to Germany for manufacture. 
Many of the furs become the property of royalty, particularly those 
of Russia and Austria. A gorgeous effect is produced in some cases 
by putting gold, by electrolytic methods, on the hair tips, — black 
fox being the only fur that retains it. 

The immense profits of the industry are a considerable induce- 
ment to farmers to enter into the business, and a question which 
naturally rises is as to when and where the break in price will occur. 
With growing wealth and love of luxury the day is far distant when 
the demand will decrease or the prices fall. There is a basis for a 
huge industry in production of furs. Between two and three hundred 
million dollars is the price the "consumer" annually pays for Ameri- 
can reared fur alone. It may be argued that silver fox is only for 
the wealthy, but so is the whole diamond industry. The Cullinan 
diamond, now being cut and polished in Amsterdam for Britain's 
King, will have an actual commercial value of $2,500,000 when finished 
and its unique character will make it priceless. 

And when estimates of increase in numbers of foxes are made it 
must not be assumed that all ranchers will be successful and produce 
the natural yearly increase of 300 per cent. Probably 200 per cent 
increase is nearer the actual results to be obtained. Thus there will 
be 4000 silver foxes in 1915. Even if every one of these were marketed 



Marshall: Thb^Standard Bred 45 

in the same year, so small a number would only stimulate prices by 
attracting more buyers to the auction. And finally, even granting 
that the price of dark, silver pelts shall in twenty years' time have 
dropped to $100 each, there is at that price more profit in the industry 
than any of the fox ranchers could possibly make in other stock- 
breeding lines. 

With such prospects, why is the domestication of other valuable 
fur bearers delayed? Why are the woods being depleted of our hand- 
some wild animals by such a cruel method as trapping? Why are 
not trappers converted into animal husbandmen? 

EVOLUTION OF THE STANDARD BRED 

F. R. Marshall 
Columbus, Ohio 

The Standard Bred or American Trotting Horse is the most notable 
success of American effort in the field of breeding. The breeding 
and racing of trotters is a national sport and for many years past 
has engaged the closest study of some of the most capable Americans. 
We have other native breeds of note, but none that is anything like 
so generally distributed through the various states as is the trotting 
bred horse. All professions and all kinds of business include men 
who give much of their thought to the breeding and raising of a few 
colts each season. What such men do for pleasure and for recreation 
is usually done quite thoroughly. Accomplishment in breeding comes 
through careful study and the exercise of common sense and the 
ability to execute what the judgment dictates. Such men as have 
been referred to have usually given their horses the same study and 
good judgment that had been exercised in the development of their 
commercial interests. Their wealth has enabled them to carry their 
ideas into practice in a way that has seldom before occurred in the 
history of any breed. The result has been the combination of the 
best qualities of the various strains and families from which the breed 
in its present status has sprung. Men of more modest means have 
often accomplished with their brains what money alone could not 
do, but a surprisingly large proportion of the stronger breeding strains 
have arisen in the studs of men, characteristically American, in busi- 
ness lines and in the field of sport. 

Standard-bred horses vary in color, size, shape, and way~of A going. 
Some writers argue that because of this admitted fact these horses 



46 American Breeders Magazine 

cannot be properly designated as a breed. The test of breed status 
is uniformity in the characteristics by which the animals are dis- 
tinguishedjrom^others of their kind, and in their ability to answer 
the purpose for which they are bred. Percherons are bred for draft 
work, and lack the uniformity of a breed if considered from any other 
standpoint. Some saddle bred horses have speed, but the American 
saddle horse is a breed only when considered as adapted to use under 
saddle. Judged by color or conformation, the standard bred horse 
does lack uniformity. But his distinguishing trait and the reason for 
his existence is speed at the trotting gait. When considered on this 
basis, there can be no room for argument as to his fixity of type. The 
50,000 stallions that have been recorded in the last thirty-five years 
include some foaled as early as 1840. Necessarily many of these 
stallions never received for themselves or for their get the oppor- 
tunity to demonstrate their speed qualities. The total number of 
horses registered in the American Trotting Register up to date is 
something over 200,000. Of the mares included in this number, a 
considerable proportion have never had a fair opportunity to enter 
the 2:30 list. Yet the list of 2:30 trotters and 2:35 pacers at the 
present time includes over 46,000 horses and in 1910 there were 
entered 1661 trotters and 1983 pacers. At the close of 1910, 1367 
trotters and pacers had records below 2:10. What other breed can 
show as large a proportion of its registrations having as high a degree 
of demonstrated merit? Nor is the criticism as to lack of uniformity 
in appearance well founded. A discriminating eye will find as high a 
degree of uniformity in the points of conformation that contribute 
to speed as is to be found in the essential features of any other breed. 

Readers of the American Breeders Magazine are familiar with the 
history of our national horse. The purpose of this article is to use 
the trotters' history to show what may be the true r61e of selection 
in breed improvement. It used to be considered that successive 
crossings of superior sires effected a continuous advance of the progeny 
toward the qualities of the stock from which the sires came. We can- 
not yet discard this idea in considering the grading up of nondescript 
animals by the use of well-bred sires. But it is in the effort to explain 
the production of new types within breeds that the greatest diffi- 
culty is met. Those whose thoughts are chiefly of practical breeding 
hold to the idea of cumulative selection though they have to admit 
that the advance is much more marked at some times than at others. 
Persons less well acquainted with the history of breeds and alive to 
the significance of the developments of the last ten years are often 



Makshall: The Stand akd Bked 47 

skeptical as to cumulative selection and explain improvement as the 
result of fortuitous combinations of characters, which also are much 
more likely to appear under some conditions than under others. 
This latter school would regard the epoch-making animals of the past 
and present as mutations. If that word is to be used, however, we 
can discard the thought that such animals really possess any character 
not previously found. They represent happy combinations of the 
good qualities of numerous ancestors, all combined in one package 
by the possibilities in reduction and combination of gametes. Such 
an animal may exhibit a particular character in a new degree by 
having received it in full strength through both parents. In this 
sense selection does permit an accumulative effect though it origi- 
nates nothing. Such effect is not certain from any particular mating 
but is most likely to occur when the desired tendencies are present in 
both parental lines. 

Professor Harper's figures showed that high producing cows come 
chiefly from high yielding strains and fast trotters occur most fre- 
quently among the offspring of fast parents because there is an 
enhanced probability of accentuating existing tendencies or of unit- 
ing facilities of speed not previously united in a single animal. 

All the qualities that make up our fast horses were in existence 
even before 1788, the beginning of the era of Messenger. These 
qualities were widely scattered, however, and it has been the work 
of those doing the selecting to combine the elements that go to make 
up trotting speed and thus to secure horses having a greater pro- 
clivity to trot than was possessed by any single one of their various 
ancestors. Nothing was originated unless we think of a new com- 
bination of qualities as coming under that term. 

To attempt to determine the ultimate source of the numerous 
peculiarities that facilitate speed at the trot, would lead into the 
earliest forms of the species and be much more a study for the evolu- 
tionist than for the breeder. I have referred to the component parts 
of trotting speed. No scientific or practical good can come from con- 
sidering the ability to trot in record time as a single, separate or unit 
character. It is impossible to completely analyze speed, but the least 
experienced follower of the trotting game readily recognizes that speed 
is possible only in the presence of a combination of a large number 
of separate qualities or characters. While no data is at hand to 
support this, it is possible and highly probable that each one of 
these contributing factors is inherited in Mendelian fashion, but until 
these factors are reduced to unit characters their transmission cannot 
be studied with any approach to exactness. 



48 American Breeders Magazine 

One of the main features in trotting speed is driving power. The 
efficiency of driving power depends upon the proportions of the body 
and of the limbs and the muscular developement. These determine 
the smoothness of the working of the machine, and the proportion 
of the power that contributes to the forward motion. Then there 
are differences in elasticity and capacity of muscles to withstand 
the tiring effects of extreme exertion. Defects of conformation, includ- 
ing muscling or proportion, eliminate some and limit many. "They 
go all shapes" but in spite of them, and when an ill-shapen one is 
really fast it is usually by virtue of unusual mentality. In a much 
larger degree than is commonly supposed, speed comes from the brain. 
Some horses cease trying to win when they lose the lead, while others 
fight through the stretch to the wire with all the courage and deter- 
mination of the best athlete. Others with wonderful speed lack the 
balance and control and steadiness necessary to keep them at their 
gait. The main reason why the trotter is more popular than the 
running horse is that he must try to win and yet have mentality 
enough to resist the temptation to run. Troubles in feet and limbs 
and joints hamper many that are otherwise fitted to go fast, and 
soundness and wearing quality in these respects are vital elements of 
trotting speed. 

In considering the r61e of selection in the evolution of the trotter, 
we will not be far astray if we consider the sources and development 
of his peculiarities of conformation, his mentality, the wearing quali- 
ties of joints and tendons, and chiefly his disposition to go at the trot 
in preference to any other gait. It has been the work of the breeders 
to combine these components of trotting speed in one animal and then 
to breed so as to secure horses strong enough in their inheritance of those 
qualities as to be similarly strong in the transmission of them. The 
work of combining inheritance of symmetry and refinement and reduc- 
ing the dross of native equine stock had been notably well done in 
the home of the Arabian. The existence of the Arabs depended upon 
their horses and centuries of selection resulted in an animal having 
a combination of characters that portrayed the ideals of his breeders. 
In beauty, stamina, and structure of limb and joint the Arabian 
horse has been the pattern for all subsequent types. With English 
breeders he was deficient in size and he had been bred for a long- 
distance running rather than f 01 track racing. The union of Arabian 
blood with that of the best English horses gave some animals more 
useful to the English breeder than the best representatives of either 
of the parent stocks. In time the same results might have come 



Marshall: The Standard Bred 49 

from selection within pure Arab lines but the stock was scarce and 
its type too firmly fixed to be readily modified. On the other hand, 
England would have had a great running horse even without Eastern 
blood but such a performance as that of Eclipse in 1769 would have 
come at a much later date. 

In the first crossings of the English and imported horses there were 
doubtless many that combined the undesirable features of both lines 
and in only a few instances did the then unknown germ cells bring 
into combination a preponderance of the best from both lines. Nor 
were performance and appearance sufficient to show which were the 
most valuable animals. Then, as now, the breeding test was supreme 
and some individuals of note left poorer offspring than others more 
obscure but really superior or else more fortunately mated. The final 
result of English effort was the thoroughbred. 

The relation of the American trotter to the thoroughbred is anal- 
ogous to the relationship between the thoroughbred and the Arabian. 
The horse stock of America was strongly charged with qualities 
received from the thoroughbred before there was any distinct effort 
to breed a roadster. The animal desired for road driving needed 
all the stamina and points of conformation and structure of limbs 
and joints that characterized the thoroughbred. Some thoroughbreds 
were very useful in harness, but as trotting races became more common 
it was apparent that the ungovernable propensity to run that was the 
making of this horse under saddle was his undoing when in harness. 
The founders of the trotting breed of trotters have not needed to 
develop a number of new qualities. Their chief work has been to 
take propensity to trot wherever it could be found, to accentuate it 
and combine it with the common points of equine excellence. 

Just what enters into the propensity to trot is not clear. It is pos- 
sible though unlikely that it is a single and separate inherited feature. 
There is no uniform difference between trotters and runners in body 
proportion or in the proportionate lengths of forearms and cannons. 
When we see yearlings and two-year-olds from certain families that 
make the most extreme efforts to win and yet never leave the trotting 
gait we must recognize the part played by the mental make-up of 
the trotters, and as yet mental features cannot be analyzed or easily 
followed in transmission. 

By 1800 it was apparent that the get of the imported thorough- 
bred Messenger was especially good at the trot. Mares of other 
strains were mated to him and some of the get that inherited the trot- 



50 American Breeders Magazine 

ting propensity in its full strength from both parents, if their other 
characters permitted, were much better trotters than either of their 
parents. Thus, selection, while it does not originate anything, does 
accentuate minor tendencies or originate new degrees of tendencies 
or propensities. Selection when pursued in the light of careful study 
of individuality and ancestry seems to keep together in a single 
individual the desirable features of the best animals and also to add 
thereto such qualities from other sources as may serve to make higher 
degrees of excellence. Of course many of the animals bred will be 
no improvement upon their parents and sometimes the reverse. But 
where there is any harmony of mating, some chance combinations 
of good are bound to occur if the breeder is qualified to recognize 
them and they may be brought together, their produce similarly 
used, the misfits eliminated, and the type finally fixed. 

Imported Messenger was not the only source of distinctive trotting 
qualities. Norfolk County breeders had long prized good driving 
horses and from thence came Bellfounder, thirty-four years after the 
landing of Messenger. A stallion strong in the blood of Messenger 
bred to a daughter of Bellfounder produced Rysdyk's Hambletonian, 
the first great sire of trotting speed and a progenitor of the large 
majority of living trotters. Hambletonian's second dam was a double 
granddaughter of Messenger. This or similar matings may have 
produced other horses able to transmit trotting qualities as did Ham- 
bletonian 10. If such were produced, they were never discovered. 
No other horse has ever meant so much to the trotters of his time as did 
Hambletonian 10 to the trotters of the third quarter of last century. 
He possessed nothing new unless we consider a new combination 
of previously scattered peculiarities of conformation and mentality 
as a creation. If he is to be considered as a mutation, then Henry 
Clay, sprung from the Arabian line, must have been the same, 
because Hambletonian's son George Wilkes from a daughter of Henry 
Clay was remarkable as an individual and as a breeder. If we. adapt 
Mendelian terms, this result could not have occurred in the first 
generation unless George Wilkes' dam was a hybrid, and therefore 
able to transmit the trotting qualities. 

Mr. Henry F. Euren has suggested an explantion of the greatness 
of Hambletonian 10 on the basis of the fact that both Messenger and 
Bellfounder trace to Blaze of 1733 to 1756. These are his words: 

The fact that in the seventh generation from Blaze, on each side, the 
reunion of the blood in Rysdyk's Hambletonian, the sire of so many fast Ameri- 



Marshall: The Standard Bred 51 

can trotting horses, should have proved to have been of the most impressive 
character, would appear to warrant the conclusion that there was a strong 
latent trotting tendency in the ancestors of one, if not on both sides of Blaze. 

In 1887 Mr. J. H. Wallace wrote: 

The foreign horse that played the most important part in orginating the 
American trotting breed, and that figures in the ancestry of our greatest sires 
and performers, was Imported Messenger. Ever since trotting speed first 
began to be considered a mark of merit in the American horse, ever since trot- 
ting blood was talked of, the blood of this horse, Messenger, has been unani- 
mously considered the chief foundation stone on which the greatest trotting 
families have been built. Just as the English race-horse was founded on 
oriental blood, and in years of selection and development for a special purpose 
was bred to a point of excellence unknown to the oriental, so-the most unpre- 
tentious trotting blood of today is superior to what the direct blood of Messenger 
was. It is with writers on horse-breeding a very common but very erroneous 
thing to inculcate the idea that because some family of horses originated in a 
famous ancestor he was necessarily superior to his descendants of the present 
day. They forget that in forming a breed we rise superior to as we go away 
from the beginning. A stream meandering from a mountain spring may be 
the source of a great river; but if we follow that stream we find it joined by 
tributary after tributary until the aggregated whole is a mighty volume com- 
pared with which the source is insignificant. So the speed-transmitting power 
of Messenger, if it could be now drawn upon directly, would be a weak and 
sluggish element in the swift and intense speed currents of today. Still, none 
the less did it play its part as an original source. 

Mr. Wallace's analogy can be regarded as a true one only when 
we think of the breed as a whole. The breeder deals with individuals 
and repeated matings of the same parents often give a wide variety 
of results. The combination of characters necessary to 2:30 speed 
is such a common one that there are now strains strong enough in 
their inheritance of those qualities to make the production of a 2:30 
horse a practical certainty. As yet, the requisites of 2:10 speed are 
not regularly inherited together though some strains produce a sur- 
prising proportion of horses of that class. 

Mr. Hamlin was peculiarly successful in breeding 2:10 speed and 
was able at the same time to combine with it size and style. Possibly 
fortune favored him, but his announcement at the beginning of his 
work that he would produce the then known 2:10 horse makes it 
seem that he must have had a remarkable insight that enabled him 
to bring from various sources the qualities he sought and unite them 
in the foals of Village Farm. 



A METHOD OF RECORDING TYPES AND VARIA- 
TION IN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES BY 

DIRECT PRINTING 

O. G. Malde • • 

Madison, Wis. 

A special printing method has been employed with success in keep- 
ing records of cranberries in connection with nursery work at the 
Wisconsin State Cranberry Experimental Sub-Station, located at 
Grand Rapids, Wisconsin. Propagation by selection is carried on 
with about one hundred and sixty beds started from single cuttings 
of cranberry vines which were originally found on a few bogs and in 
wild marshes and which produced some exceptionally fine fruit. From 
the very choicest of these, seeds have also been planted and about 
thirty-five new varieties have thus been established. The recording 
or scoring is done on a basis of 10 for twelve characters or qualities, 
as follows: size, form, color, gloss, uniformity, keeping quality, firm- 
ness, flavor, productiveness, vigor of vine, time of flowering, season 
(early or late). 

The first two characters on this score card it will be readily seen 
would require several measurements and considerable description. 
Size and form were first recorded by taking the measurements of three 
diameters of the berry. These however proved to be of little value 
for later reference, especially when it was necessary for the work to 
be continued by one not thoroughly familiar with the original method 
of taking the measurements. 

Another character needing recording was that of the thickness of 
flesh of different varieties, and the writer therefore, in the winter 
of 1907, tried numerous experiments in bisecting large berries, stamp- 
ing them on a well saturated inking pad in the same way that a rubber 
stamp would be used, and then printing directly on cards or in the 
record book. The method was found so satisfactory that it has been 
adopted for the record books and also in making up card indexes. 
Fig. 1 shows prints of the three main types of cranberries, namely, 
the round or "cherry," the oval or olive ("Jumbo"), and the long or 
" Bugle. " 

The main types each have two sub-types, one being tapering at 
the stem end and large at the blossom end, or bell shaped (this is 
in fact the prevailing or dominant sub-type); the other sub-type, 
but not nearly as common as the bell, is the one large at the stem end 
and tapering at the blossom end, or appearing as an inverted bell. 

52 



Mauds: Recording Types bt Printing 



o"), and the long or "Bugle," 
Rows 3 and *.— Six sub-types, two for each mala type; the first tapering at the stem end and large 
Bt blossom end, called "Bell." True is the most common sub-type. The seoond sub-type 1» large at 
the atom ondand pointed at the blossom end, Lka in Inverted "Bell." It Is described aj a pointed 
berry, and to not common. The second sub-type of the "Bugle" la rather rare, as nearly all of the 
■ub-typea Unci toward the -Boll." 



54 



American Breeders Magazine 




Fig. 2. 
The "Pick-up." 
A substitute for a 
pair of tweezers (full 
size). This permits 
one to use some pres- 
sure In printing. 



The main method of bisecting to illustrate general form is by cutting 
longitudinally, while to show the general arrangement of the cells 
the berry is cut transversely at its largest diameter. 

Immediately after the fruit is cut it is placed on 
the ink pad and pressed down gently so all of the 
cut surface will become inked. Then it is picked 
up with a substitute for a tweezers which consist of 
a No. 2 cork (fig. 2) with two pins extending about 
J inch through and with the points about i inch 
apart. The advantage of using the cork is that 
it permits applying pressure in making the print. 
In using the printing method with the cranberries 
all longitudinal prints are made with the stem* end 
up. As the seeds easily shake loose when the berry 
is ripe there seldom is print of seeds, except where 
mature but unripe berries are used. 

Fig. 3 illustrates the same method used with 
ripe imported tomatoes purchased on the market, 
and shows how well the thickness of flesh can be 
illustrated by this direct printing, and also shows 
how the seed mass in the ripe tomato has receded 
from the sides. Comparing two varieties not fully ripe and just 
removed from the plants in the greenhouse, one can readily see (as 
in fig. 4 of the " Comet ") how well the 
thickness of flesh in the two is illustrated. 
In comparing these with fig. 3, one can see 
how the seed mass in the unripe tomato 
clings to the sides. 

Fig. 5 illustrates the arrangement and 
size of stalks of celery. 

Further tests with green peppers, carrots, 
onions (fig. 6), string and wax beans, apples, 
and pears have proved quite conclusively 
that this method can be used to much ad- 
vantage in recording quickly characteristics 
and variations in types in connection with 
card indexing progress and results in various ^_ n T 

. r . Fig. 3. Longitudinal and 

plant breeding experiments. cboss sections op ripe tomato 

Such preliminary tests as have been made (import)- 

, . . . . ,, , , Purchased on the local mar- 

show that this printing method may be used ket. Notice thickness of flesh 
also in copying cross sections of branches, f nd the "^ ma *» 00 2 t, ? ote * 

„ „ , , ... , , from outside walls. Reduced 

or of galls and other injuries on branches, one-half. 




Maldh: Recording Types bt Printing 55 

Cross section of bulbs can be secured as can also stalks, buds, seed 
pods of simple-stemmed plants of the lily family, or the water hem- 
lock, etc. 

Some practice is necessary in securing the best results and the fol- 
lowing points should be borne in mind when this form of copying 
is to be practiced: 

(1) Have inking pad well saturated with reg- 
ular stamping ink, red or black. Two pads are 
to be recommended in order that one may be 
freshly inked while the other is in use. There 
is considerable difference in the amount of ink re- 
quired for different objects. 
fio.i.-chobb me- (2) Medium weight cards with a smooth but 
tioh of "Comet" to- no t too heavily calendered, slightly absorptive 
"*?? j, ._, surface, give best results. Straw colored semi- 

Uuripe and fresh from ' 6 

viae. NotethiokneMof gloss cards of medium weight are also satisfactory, 
flash and the oiingim of Cards are found best as they do not warp with 
slight moisture. 
(3) Bisecting should always be done with a thin but rigid knife. 
Well worn case knives have given good results. Mounted Gillette 
safety razor blades are exceptionally well adapted to bisecting cran- 
berries and other small fruit. 
An ordinary thick-backed razor 
is not suitable. 

(4) Mature fruits or vege- 
tables give best results when 
fresh and not quite ripe. 

(5) Very juicy fruit should 
first be stamped on a smooth 
blotting paper or left on it for a 
short time, but not long enough 
for the edges to contract. 

(6) It is necessary to work 
rapidly when bisecting and ink- 

Fio. 8.— Cbo» sbctiok or ciujibi Plant. ing the material to be printed in 
AnangsmBnt of Mama. order that none of the objects 

shall be left long on the inking pad, for if left too long on the pad 
they become very moist and must be stamped on the blotting paper 
before making a print on the card. 

(7) In the case of a large and hard object such as an apple, it is 
necessary after placing it on the card to pass the fingers gently over 



56 Ambwcan Bbebdebs Magazine 

the under side of the card to secure perfect contact with the printing 
surface. 

There are only a few of the fruits whose juices would sufficiently 
color the card to give a satisfactory print and for that reason chiefly 
it is desirable to use the ink. One could no doubt satisfactorily 



print a red beet, however, without the use of ink, as fairly good prints 
have been secured of cranberries by means of their own juice alone. 
The chief difficulty is that the juice has a tendency to spread and this 
is avoided by the use of the viscid stamping ink. 



EDITORIALS 

CIRCUIT BREEDING 

Conditions existing upon the islands of Jersey and Guernsey'and 
in the counties of Hereford and Lincoln in England are examples 
of the many advantages arising from the creation of a valuable new 
breed of. domestic animals. The entire community is benefited 
by having superior animals for their own use, thus increasing the 
value of the products of their farms. Those who carry on the busi- 
ness of producing pedigreed breeding stock for sale outside the com- 
munity make satisfactory profits from the high prices which breeders 
and farmers are willing to pay for superior pedigreed animals. The 
public at large are benefited by being able to secure animals of a 
new breed which adds value to their herds and farms. 

Our own and other countries have long been lulled to sleep by 
the magic word "imported." We have rather assumed that only 
in England and western Europe could there be created new breeds 
of animals. Our own market for pedigreed animals is the largest 
and vastly the best in the world. Yet we threw the cream of it 
into the hands of the British breeders. They found that fat and 
the finish made by good keeping so caught the eye of the American 
breeder that even breeding horses of the draft breeds were often 
sold on a basis of weight. Horses with forms beautifully rounded 
and fashioned by fat brought prices all out of proportion to their 
values as parents of long4ived, tough, clean-limbed, sound-footed 
horses having, in their turn, genetic power to produce drafters full 
of years, crowded with days of work. The importer's standards 
have been too narrowly those of the farmers to whom he was to sell 
breeding animals, and. the farmer accepted as standards too often 
those over-fatted meat or breeding animals which brought the highest 
prices in the sales ring or won the highest award in the show ring. 

The time has come when Americans should discontinue the rather 
unoriginal device of importing European pedigreed stock. Few 
breeding animals should be imported and those few should be the 
exceptional mutations, and chosen with the greatest care and scien- 
tific skill, primarily to serve as foundation stock in the production 
of superior sub-breeds and breeds of our own. 

There has been accumulated in the work of animal breeding, 
plant breeding, and genetics a sufficient body of scientific fact, phil- 
osophy, and method to serve as a basis for the construction of broad 
plans for the rapid and profound improvement of American domestic 

57 



58 American Breeders Magazine 

* 

animals. Many excellent foundation stocks of nearly all the species 
of domestic animals to be found in the world are already assembled 
in American herds and flocks. The blood of some of our wild species 
may prove valuable and our resources and possible profits are such 
as to warrant the importation of such stocks of domestic and wild 
species, wherever found in the world, as may promise to serve our 
purposes. 

Plan of Cooperative Circuit Breeding. — Through its committee on 
Cooperative Breeding of Animals, the American Breeders Association 
has made a study of plans for better unity, science, and practice 
in the production of improved forms of our domestic animals. This 
investigation resulted in plans which have been put into operation 
by the United States Department of Agriculture and several experi- 
ment stations, under the name of Cooperative Circuit Breeding. 
These plans were so wrought out as to utilize to the greatest advan- 
tage the best practice of those who have created the existing breeds 
of animals and the similar but more highly perfected practice of 
those who produce new varieties of plants. These plans though 
scientific are simple, straightforward, and look to important results 
in the early development of families, sub-breeds, or even breeds 
which yield increased service and profits per head or per herd and 
flock; plans which are directed toward securing those combinations 
of characters which best serve in the production of the one or more 
specific purposes for which the breed is designed. They are designed 
to find the blood of those mutants whose blood when rather 
narrowly bred will give herds or flocks of high average excellence, 
and when used in upgrading herds of common or mixed breeding 
will be potent in rapidly improving them. 

The plan of cooperative circuit breeding provides public funds 
for the scientific direction of such parts of the work of a group of 
twenty or more cooperating breeders, as recording the individual 
and genetic value of each animal, assisting the breeders in the methods 
of uniform care, and the mating of the animals. The cooperating 
breeders, in return for the scientific assistance rendered, serve the- 
public under contracts to continue for a specified period in their 
efforts to secure the best foundation animals of the breed or breeds 
chosen to be improved, and annually to retain and so breed those 
which have the best individual and genetic records as to build up 
gradually a family, a sub-breed, or perhaps even a breed of the high- 
est value to the public at large. Circuit breeding under public 
auspices takes the plans of our greatest breeders, improves upon 



Editorials 59 

« 
them, broadens out more widely the basis of the number of animals 
used, and seeks thoroughly for superior and mutating foundation 
stocks; it combines art and scientific records of performance in select- 
ing and mating animals, discards more rigidly all but the very best, 
and avoids the loss which comes from the dispersion of a herd conse- 
quent upon the death of a successful breeder. These plans recognize 
the superlative importance, once a superior breed or family has 
been created, of having a permanent source of supply of breeding 
animals of the improved type, and that this source of supply be 
continued under scientific management; also that a permanent sup- 
ply of large numbers of highly efficient breeding animals be con- 
tinuously available to breeders outside the circuit, in the same 
state or in other states. 

Organization of a Breeding Circuit. — Ten to twenty breeders 
form a cooperative circuit breeding association, the farms of these 
breeders being located preferably in the same county, or at least 
in adjoining counties with not too great distances between the farms. 
The State Experiment Station and the United States Department 
of Agriculture join in this cooperation. The association, the station, 
and the department each choose a person to act as member of a 
"circuit council." The cooperating breeders purchase and own 
the animals. The two public institutions furnish the money to 
pay the salary and expenses of a circuit superintendent, including 
the cost of record books, materials and apparatus for making tests, 
as well as traveling expenses. The breeders individually and collect- 
ively contract with the council that each will own and breed a herd 
of animals of a breed and quality approved by the council. They 
further agree that each year the council shall separate each herd 
into two classes. The best individuals are to be placed in a reserved 
class which cannot be sold except to other members of the circuit, 
so that they will not leave the circuit. The remainder are held 
for sale for breeding purposes to outsiders. It is practically certain 
that the breeders in these circuits will with this public help build 
up herds from which they will be able to sell breeding animals at 
good prices; and in some cases these circuit herds may become so 
famous that breeding animals coming from them will be held at a 
high premium, and the simple fact of an animal having been bred 
in the circuit may come to be considered a guarantee of quality. 
The contract provides that when one breeder drops out, another can 
be elected to the cooperative association to take his place. 

In bringing together superior animals for the foundation stocks 



60 American Breeders Magazine 

the superintendent assists the breeders. He keeps all data concerning 
the herds, collects and studies the literature of the particular herd, 
travels if necessary in search of stock even to foreign countries. It 
is proving convenient and wise to have one of the cooperating 
herds on an experiment station or branch station farm. Then pub- 
lic funds can more properly be used in bringing into the circuit 
high-priced animals from very distant points. Young stock in the 
reserved class can then be sold by the station to the other codperating 
breeders in the circuit. 

Two Cooperative Circuit Breeding Associations already Successfully 
Established. — The expenditure of public funds is abundantly justified 
by the selection and creation of superior stocks of domestic animals 
to be used by breeders and farmers in producing livestock products. 
Thus, in Minnesota the Department of Agriculture and the State 
Experiment Station are cooperating in the production of a sub- 
breed of Shorthorn cattle which are at once good beef and good dairy 
animals. If that work had now been in progress twenty years and 
the breeders of pedigreed Shorthorns could there secure breeding 
animals with which to restore some of the lost milking ability of this 
breed — made too exclusively a beef breed— the breeders in this 
circuit would be able to command excellent prices for all they could 
register for sale outside the circuit. And if milking Shorthorns 
should prove more profitable for dairy farms, or for general farms 
where the desire is not to milk the year round yet where cows are 
kept for special-purpose dairy cattle or special-purpose beef cattle, 
they would come very much into demand in their own communities. 
The fact that there is a dispute on as to whether dual-purpose cattle 
are more profitable, herd for herd, than special-purpose cattle for 
the general or specialized farm, constituted good reason for choosing 
milking Shorthorns as one of the first breeds to place under circuit 
breeding. The methods which are growing out of the work of com- 
parison of animals and herds in circuit breeding herds will be useful 
in comparing the profits of herds of the different classes of live stock. 

The second cooperative circuit breeders association was inaugurated 
three years ago under the combined auspices of the United States 
Department of Agriculture and the North Dakota Experiment Sta- 
tion. The breed chosen was the Holstein-Friesian, and the coop- 
erators are a group of farmers, mostly of German descent, out on 
the edge of the short-grass country. They had proved to their 
satisfaction that a combination of dairy and grain farming was 
necessary to success in that region of deficient rainfall. They are 



Editorials 61 

delighted with the circuit scheme of improving their herds and they 
are gradually introducing the blood of superior Holstein-Friesian 
families. As these circuit breeders test these blood lines for their 
adaptability for their own peculiar conditions, they will weed out 
and select so as to have a sub-breed of Holstein cattle suited to the 
dry, windy, cold climate of the northwest. 

The Possibilities of Circuit Breeding Have Only Been Touched at 
the Edges. — A number of localities have been mentioned and dis- 
cussed in some detail for additional circuits. Thus in New Mexico, 
Colorado, and other states it has been suggested that circuits be 
established under which horse ranchmen would cooperate under 
scientific supervision in the production of light horses, both drivers 
and saddlers. It has been pointed out that in the production of 



saddlers the largest and best of the grades would be available for 
army remounts and that the smaller ones would be in demand for 
cow ponies and for prairie saddlers generally. The hilly country in 
the Appalachian region has been mentioned as suited to circuits for the 
production both of driving and saddle horses. The Morgan-horse 
project in Vermont will doubtless naturally take on more and more 
of the form of the typical circuit project. In the hilly country of 
Pennsylvania, West Virginia and southward are splendid areas in 
which circuits for either drivers or saddlers could be organized. 
Why not one such circuit devoted to purebred Arabs, another to 
purebred North African horses, as well as others to Thoroughbreds, 
to American Saddlers, and to American Roadsters? 

In the light of modern efforts at making scientific plans for breeding, 
what a mistake Vermont made in allowing her famous Merinos to 
be dissipated and her Morgan horses to wellnigh pass off the state! 
Circuit cooperation on the part of the federal and state governments 
would soon secure to the Green Mountain State large profits from 
the sale of the choicest of breeding animals from these two breeds; 
and the country at large, the world in fact, would be receiving an 
annual blessing in the form of superior breeding stock. Why should 
not Vermont and New Hampshire organize a circuit association 
and become the great centers of Ayrshire cattle breeding? Why 
should not Maine and Rhode Island become the* great centers for 
scientifically bred poultry? Massachusetts and Connecticut could 
easily take leading places in the breeding of dairy cattle for the pro- 
duction of city milk, as well as in the breeding of varieties of flint corn. 

Experts in Tennessee are studying the feasibility of circuit breeding 
for the production of mules. Here the circuit must provide first 



62 American Breeders Magazine 

for the production of an improved strain of jack stock and an im- 
proved strain of horses, which when crossed will produce mules of 
a high average of excellence. Iowa and surrounding states have 
been suggested as the best places for circuits of purebred draft-horse 
breeds. Breeders near Duluth have expressed a preference for a cir- 
cuit of Guernsey cattle and the breeders of Rice County, Minnesota, 
have laid a splendid foundation for a circuit of Holstein cattle, and 
Shelby County, Kentucky, needs but the skill of the organizer to 
establish a promising breeding circuit of Jerseys. Wyoming has 
many of the conditions for a successful circuit for creating the best 
type of short-grass-country sheep. Borden of Texas has success- 
fully accomplished the initial work needed for the foundation of a 
circuit for forming a hybrid breed of cattle based on India or Brahma 
cattle and our common cattle. Even the breeders of silver foxes 
on Prince Edward Island might properly work under this plan. 

Our state agricultural colleges are organizing divisions of genetics 
where they are producing men capable of serving as circuit superinten- 
dents, as members of governing boards, and as cooperating circuit 
breeders. Those who spent the time to devise the circuit scheme 
for creating new families, sub-breeds, breeds and even species have 
been in no haste and are in no haste now to push the matter forward. 
The American Breeders Association, which appointed the committee 
to formulate plans, at its recent meeting in Washington expressed 
its unanimous approval in the following resolutions: 

Resolved : That the Animal Section of the American Breeders Association 
approves the so-called circuit cooperative system of breeding domestic animals, 
under which the federal and state government provide scientific guidance and 
assistance to cooperating groups of breeders in the production of superior 
sub-breeds and breeds of animals, 

The time has evidently come when this subject should be discussed 
in more detail, and in reference to specific projects. The American 
Breeders Magazine would be pleased to receive brief statements 
suggesting specific plans for circuits for breeds of horses. General 
forms for writing out a circuit breeding project for any breed or any 
purpose have been prepared by members of the committee, and will 
be supplied upon application to the Magazine or to members of the 
Committee on Cooperative Animal Breeding. 



Editorials 63 

EUGENICS CLUBS IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS 

On page 69 Prof. 0. E. Baker, organizer of an Eugenics Club 
at the University of Wisconsin, gives a brief statement and report 
concerning that organization to which we desire to call special atten- 
tion. It is clear that in the atmosphere of study and research of a 
college or university, conditions are favorable for the sane considera- 
tion of the subject of eugenics. The American Breeders* Association 
has done a public service of inestimable value, in that it has put 
the discussion of this subject, in its earlier stages, into the hands of 
scientists and students, to the end that this class of people may have a 
directing influence in the treatment of this delicate yet most impor- 
tant subject. No one can predict when or where the treatment of 
this subject may become a fad and the more earnest, scholarly, 
scientific people who have a sane and scientific knowledge of the 
subject take a part in it, the less harm will come of possible fadism. 

The big part of this subject is dealt with in the last paragraph 
of Mr. Baker's statement. He says: "We must exalt motherhood 
and fatherhood and insist not only upon limiting the propagation 
of the undesirable classes but also upon encouraging the perpetuation 
of the most perfect. No social duty can exceed this." And a 
little farther on he says: "It is easier to reform the other fellow 
but I believe it would be better for the leaders of the eugenic move- 
ment to endeavor to establish a more sturdy social code among the 
higher classes, substituting for the criterion of conspicuous expendi- 
ture by which men and more particularly women are prone to judge 
each other, the more difficult accomplishment of rearing a healthy 
and happy family." 

It is true that our educational system has an anti-eugenic affect. 
Our schools pay relatively more attention to training the tastes of 
the students for the enjoyment of rare and good things, than to 
training their ability to produce these good things. No doubt our 
educational system is somewhat unbalanced and should be so changed 
as to give more of vocational and technical education to people 
generally; especially to those people who have the best eugenic blood 
and who, on that account, should multiply more rapidly than the 
average. 

Mr. Baker has clearly demonstrated that there are lines of serious 
investigation and discussion which college and university eugenics 
clubs could properly consider. It is a question whether there is 
any subject now before the American people which is at once of 



64 American Breeders Magazine 

prime importance, and requires more serious and unbiased considera- 
tion than that of the possible improvement of the heredity of future 
generations. The American Breeders Association is a scientific and 
cooperative organization. It can do no larger service than to assist 
in bringing to the American people a sane viewpoint concerning 
methods of improving the network of descent of the human family. 
This number of the Magazine will go to presidents of colleges and 
universities and to such deans and professors as should be especially 
interested in leadership in this work. The Association is anxious 
to be of assistance in elsewhere organizing clubs of this character. 

PLANT-BREEDING AS A BUSINESS FOR FARMERS 

To one familiar with the improvements that can be produced in 
plants and animals by breeding, it is difficult to realize why practical 
men are so slow to take up work in this field. This is particularly 
true of plant-breeding. With our domesticated animals breeding 
has come to be recognized as one of the primary elements of success 
and in almost all the counties of our principal states there are found 
special breeders of the different races of cattle, hogs, sheep and horses. 
In dairy sections, the importance of using good stock is well recog- 
nized and it is now common to find pure bred dairy herds, or at least 
herds of high grade animals that approach pure bred pedigree herds 
in effectiveness. For many years the production and sale of pure 
bred pedigreed stock has occupied the attention of many of our 
most intelligent and wide awake farmers and has proven in most 
cases an interesting and profitable business. Such live stock breeders 
in general, are stimulated by the nature of their work to more care- 
fully study business methods and the principles of breeding, and 
almost invariably they are strengthened mentally and financially 
by their relation to this specialized industry. 

It is true that animal breeding has by no means reached the high 
state of efficiency that we desire it to reach, but it has become a 
well recognized standard industry and is making rapid strides. Not 
all of the so-called breeders have developed the skill and judgment 
required for the most successful direction of breeding, and not all 
of them are as fully informed on the principles of breeding as we 
might wish, but the great majority are doing genuinely good work. 
We still find it necessary to import many pure bred animals but the 
time is rapidly approaching when this will no longer be necessary. 
Indeed, it is probable that we now have many breeders of the major- 



Editorials 65 

ity of the important breeds, who can supply fully as good, if not 
better, animals than those ordinarily imported. 

How different is the story of plant-breeding. The experiment 
stations and agricultural press have urged the importance of improved 
varieties until farmers have come to believe that there is something 
in plant-breeding, as well as in stock breeding, and experiment 
stations are being flooded with inquiries as to where improved pedi- 
greed seed of corn, wheat, oats, cotton, potatoes, and the like, can 
be* purchased. At the present time, in most cases, these inquiries 
must be answered imperfectly. Usually experiment stations are 
compelled to confess that they know of no one having carefully bred 
seed for sale, or otherwise must refer inquirers to parties in distant 
states from which the importation of seed, no matter how highly 
bred, is an experiment. This is all wrong! Plant-breeding can be 
conducted with as great or even greater certainty of success than 
can animal breeding and is less expensive. There is just as great 
a necessity for having plant breeders as animal breeders, and it 
should be possible in every county in a state to purchase from local 
breeders, highly improved strains of the principal crops grown in 
the section. 

Plant-breeding methods have now been developed that can be 
utilized by practical breeders in the improvement of almost any 
of our agricultural crops. These methods are easy to learn and 
simple of application. Hosts of young farmers are seeking new 
lines of work that give promise of advancement and remuneration, 
and in plant-breeding they can find a virgin field with unlimited 
possibilities for achievement. 

Why should such a field be attractive to young men? In answer 
I would give three reasons. 

(1) Because of the little capital necessary to start such work. 
In the beginning one would naturally start with but few crops, as 
possibly, corn and oats, or wheat and potatoes, and the general, 
farming would go on as usual. 

(2) Because of the profit to be derived from the sale of seed. 

(3) Because by breeding and improving seed for the use of a 
community one is helping to improve and build up that community 
by bettering its agriculture. 

The field is more than ordinarily attractive because while the 
individual is primarily working for the compensation derived from 
the sale of seed, if his work is honestly done, and he is earnest and 
faithful, his influence is certain to lead to the general use of better 



66 American Breeders Magazine 

seed in his community and therefore, to a very general improvement 
in conditions. 

The importance of using highly bred seed can no longer be ques- 
tioned. The improvement of the corn crop of Illinois, following 
the general introduction of methods of corn selection, has been very 
marked. It has been estimated that the crop of the state as a whole 
has been increased as a result by an average of about five bushels 
per acre, and in special instances, an average increase of nearly 
fifteen bushels per acre is claimed to have been obtained. 

While working at the Minnesota Experiment Station, Professor 
W. M. Hays, now the assistant secretary of agriculture of our great 
national department, obtained increases with different highly selected 
strains of wheat, averaging from one to five bushels per acre. 

Sea-Island cotton growers, by continuous selection over a period 
of fifty years, increased the length of fiber from an average of about 
1J inches up to 2 \ and 2\ inches in special strains, and these fine 
strains which sell at very high prices, are maintained by a continuous 
and rigid selection. 

Sugar beets furnish an illustration of the value of selection that 
is familiar to many, the world over. Here an extensive industry 
has been built up that is dependent on the continuous use of seed 
from mother beets of high sugar content. The growing of sugar beet 
seed for the seed trade is conducted on a very extensive scale by 
certain German firms, hundreds of thousands of beets being tested 
annually as to form and richness in suger content in order to secure 
good mother beets for seed production. 

The writer's experiments in the breeding of timothy have led to 
the production of a number of new varieties, 17 of which in field 
trials in 1910, gave under identical conditions of cultivation and 
treatment, an increase in yield of 851 pounds per acre over test plats 
grown from the best timothy seed which could be purchased on the 
market. In 1911 these same plats gave an average increase in yield 
of 3,062 pounds per acre over ordinary timothy grown in comparison 
with them and four of the best varieties each gave an increase of 
over 4,000 pounds, or 2 tons, per acre over ordinary timothy. The 
very striking increases in yield given by these new sorts will be appre- 
ciated when it is remembered that the average yield in the section 
where these trials were made is only about 1.30 tons per acre and 
where 2 tons per acre is considered a good crop. An idea of the value 
of such new races to the country, if equally good sorts could be grown 
universally, can be gained from the following statement. 



Editorials 67 

Hay is one of the largest agricultural crops of the United States, 
outranking all other crops, except corn, in total value of production. 
In 1910, according to the statements issued by the United States 
Department of Agriculture, there were grown in the United States 
45,691,000 acres of hay which yielded a crop having a farm valuation 
of $747,769,000 No statistics are available from which we can 
determine what proportion of this hay was timothy, but the writer 
believes that we may safely conclude that at least one-third of the 
entire hay crop of the country is timothy. If this is true, the timothy 
crop of the United States in 1910 had a valuation of over $249,000,000. 
In the two years during which tests have been made, the 17 new 
sorts gave an average increased yield of slightly over 36t per cent 
above ordinary timothy. A 36$ per cent increase in the valuation 
of the timothy crop as above estimated would give us over $90,000,- 
000 as the estimated annual gain in the value of the crop which 
would be obtained if equally good new sorts could be used through- 
out the country. 

A method of breeding timothy has been introduced by the writer that 
is simple of application and is believed to be adapted to the use of 
farmers who desire to breed timothy and produce seed of improved 
races for sale. This method which will be described in detail in a 
bulletin of the Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station 
soon to be published, is fully as simple and easy of application as 
the methods of corn breeding used by farmers in Illinois, Iowa and 
Ohio, and the writer believes is more certain to give marked increases 
in yield. 

It may be considered doubtful whether it is wise to urge farmers 
to embark on new enterprises, but in urging them to breed improved 
varieties of timothy and grow the seed for sale, the writer thinks 
that he is on safe ground. A farmer near Ithaca, in the summer 
of 1911 had a crop of ordinary timothy that he estimated would 
yield about 1 J tons per acre. He harvested the crop for seed, obtain- 
ing 7 bushels of seed per acre, which he sold in his local market at 
$7.00 per bushel. The threshed timothy straw, of which there was 
a yield of about 1 ton per acre, when baled sold for $14.00 per ton. 
This gave a gross income of $63.00 per acre. The maximum wheat 
yields of the same area were less than 30 bushels per acre, which 
at a price of $1.00 per bushel would give a gross income of only $30.00 
per acre. Timothy seed of improved new varieties may be expected 
to sell readily for many years to come at a rate of from $10 to $15 



68 American Breeders Magazine 

per bushel and a careful and successful breeder of this crop should 
be able to obtain an abundant reward for his study and labor. 

The ease with which improvements can be made by careful breed- 
ing is also illustrated by results obtained by the writer in breeding 
corn for early maturity. In this experiment in the selection of corn 
to increase the earliness, conducted at Ballston Lake, N. Y., a test 
was made last year, after 4 years of selection, to determine what 
improvement had been effected. A careful grading of the ears at 
harvest time gave for the orginal seed with which the selection was 
started, a proportion of 87 per cent unripe to 13 per cent ripe and for 
the selected strain, 72 per cent ripe to 28 per cent unripe. This means 
a gain of nearly 2 weeks in earliness. The two strains were clearly 
distinguishable in the field. Another interesting feature exhibited 
was the fact that the selected strain had also increased in yield to 
the extent of nearly three bushels per acre so that considering its 
degree of maturity, it gave a heavier yield than the original strain. 

These results were obtained by four years of selection by a 
method easy of application and inexpensive. While the breeding 
is in progress, a crop of corn is being produced that is just as valuable 
as any other corn and while not of sufficiently high grade to be sold 
as improved seed, can all be utilized except that portion reserved 
for planting, and no greater proportion of the crop will be utilized 
for seed purposes than would be used in planting the corn crop of 
the farm if no breeding work was being conducted. By the fourth 
year a certain part of the crop from selected seed can be sold for 
seed purposes and from that time forward a larger and larger amount 
of more and more highly bred seed can be offered for sale. 

No special field of agriculture offers greater opportunities for 
advancement and profit than does plant-breeding. The country 
is coming to demand seed of known quality and high efficiency. 
This demand will surely and steadily increase so that no risk is in- 
volved in taking up the business except in the ability and adaptability 
of the individual. Intelligence, honesty and perseverance, are the 
three qualities most necessary. No man possessing these qualities 
or characteristics should fail to achieve success. — Herbert J. 
Webber. 



NEWS AND NOTES 

THE EUGENICS CLUB AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 

Having been interested in plant breeding for several years, the 
writer last October suggested to other members of Professor Ross' 
seminar in sociology that the formation of a small study group would 
afford us more information about the eugenics movement. The 
idea was immediately approved, but it was soon learned that the 
various courses and seminars in biology, experimental breeding, and 
sociology were offering such work. Moreover, most of us were 
pressed for time, and hence wished our information condensed 
and from authorities, if possible. So it was decided to organize 
a more popular Eugenics Club, secure speakers, and meet twice 
monthly. Immediately several young ladies applied for member- 
ship, involving a second problem, which was decided in the affirm- 
ative. And may I add that the women have proven a source of 
strength to the club, and that at no time has there occurred any 
occasion for embarrassment. 

Organization: — There are a president, vice-president, and secretary-treas- 
urer, and five committees, whose chairmen, with the officers, constitute an 
executive committee: 

The Extension Committee, whose work at present is three fold : 

(1) The investigation and tabulation of all laws, such as those of Indiana, 

Connecticut, Switzerland, relative to marriage of defectives, steri- 
lization and other means of eugenic control. 

(2) The preparation of a study bulletin for distribution through the 

Extension Department of the University. 

(3) The recommendation of lecturers to the Extension Department. 

The first piece of work is approaching completion, the second has 
been begun, and the third is under consideration. 
The Research Committee, whose work is also three fold : 

(1) The gathering of genealogies of interesting cases. 

(2) The investigation of certain subjects allied to eugenics, several of 

the members securing credit for the work performed from the Univer- 
sity departments concerned; while others are taking eugenic subjects 
for their seminary or thesis topics. Several members of the Exten- 
sion Committee are also securing University credits for their work. 

(3) The supplying of information to the Extension Committee. 
The Literature Committee, whose work is two fold : 

(1) The reading and tabulation of all available literature upon the subject. 

(2) The supplying of information, list of readings, etc., to the Extension 

Committee and to the Club. 
The Membership Committee, whose work is two fold: 
(1) The solicitation of desirable members. 

69 



70 American Breeders Magazine 

(2) Passing upon applicants for membership. 
The Chairman of this committee is a woman. 
The Program Committee, which, — 

(1) Secures speakers, advertises the meeting, and inserts press notices. 
Membership: — The membership at present is about 75, and the attendance 
averages one hundred. Probably one-half are graduate students, mostly from 
the College of Letters and Science and from the Agricultural College. An 
effort will soon be made to interest the medical and law students. About 
one-quarter are undergraduates from the same colleges, and the remaining 
fourth physicians (mostly women), a lawyer, and other mature people from the 
city, and several professors. Each of the three committees' first mentioned, 
by the way, has three professors serving as consulting members. 

Programs: — Four meetings have been held, three addressed by University 
professors, and one by a city physician. The next session will be devoted to 
a report of the Extension Committee, giving the results of its investigations ; 
and now that the club has gotten into running order it is anticipated that fully 
half of the sessions will conducted by the student members alone. Since 
willingness to work is as excellent a criterion of sincere interest in a subject 
in a university as an appropriation bill is in a legislature,, it would appear that 
the eugenic movement has secured a substantial hold upon the affections of 
the members of the club. 

Both Mr. Kelly, of the Research Committee, and myself have 
called the attention of the Club to the American Breeders Association, 
and I suppose that ere this Professor Cole has sent you some new 
names. 

Now may I be pardoned in offering some observations, and asking 
opinions on some hasty suggestions upon a certain aspect of Eugenic 
reform. Probably our modern system of education, particularly 
of higher education, is one of the most potent anti-eugenic forces 
operating today. I believe that an investigation in England has 
shown that whereas defectives and criminals average over six child- 
ren per family, the normal family ranges from four to five child- 
ren, while the "intellectuals" are credited with less than four. Our 
own American college graduates appear in an equally undesirable 
light, Harvard and Yale men averaging much less than two children 
apiece. In other words, that portion of our population which is 
intellectually superior is not self-maintaining; but, as Professor 
Holmes remarked at a recent meeting of the Club, we are killing the 
goose that lays the golden eggs. Which he suggested might explain 
the prevalent opinion among instructors of increasing mediocrity 
of college students. 

A few hours consideration of this problem has suggested to me 
several means of relief: First, I am inclined to credit the Carnegie 
Pension Fund, in addition to other excellent results, as being one 



News and Notes 71 

of the most effective eugenic measures ever accomplished. This sug- 
gests the ultimate desirability of the establishment of fellowships 
for married students. There appear to be three ways of encouraging 
fecundity among educated people: 

(1) By shortening the period of preparation; and since the fetish 
of mental discipline is no longer being worshipped, and professional 
courses are being driven down into the freshmen and sophomore 
years, this would appear in process of accomplishment. 

(2) By economic encouragement permitting marriage before the 
completion of professional preparation, as suggested above. 

(3) By substituting a different social standard for that diletante 
etiquette which today frowns upon family life. We must exalt 
motherhood and fatherhood, and insist not only upon limiting the 
propagation of the undesirable classes, but also upon encouraging 
the perpetuation of the most perfect. No social duty can exceed 
this. In the Eugenics Club reference has several times been made 
to the enactment of legal restrictions upon unfit marriages, which 
is well — it is easier to reform the other fellow; but I believe it would 
be better for the leaders of the eugenic movement to endeavor to 
establish a more sturdy social code among the higher classes; substi- 
tuting for the criterion of conspicuous expenditures, by which men, 
and more particularly women, are prone to judge each other today, 
the higher and more difficult accomplishment of rearing a healthy 
and happy family. — Oliver E. Baker, Madison, Wisconsin. 

ILLUSTRATION OF MENDELIAN SEGREGATION . 

On page 210 of the American Breeders Magazine, vol. ii, no. 3, 
Prof. Arthur W. Gilbert in his interesting article on "Suggestive 
Laboratory Exercises for a Course in Plant Breeding," gives in Exer- 
cise 18 an illustration of the application of the law of chance. Under 
"(a)" materials and methods are suggested to illustrate the union 
of gametes where two pairs of characters are concerned. While 
this illustration gives very well the theoretical ratio, an optical 
representation of Mendelian segregation would be greatly appreciated 
by those students who find it difficult to get a clear conception of 
abstract relations. For this purpose and to simplify matters it would 
seem better to let a single kernel of corn (or other object) represent 
a single character rather than two, i. e., yellow color and flintiness, 
in the above example. Starting with two individuals each having 
two characters which are to be combined in the cross, the resultant 



72 American Breeders Magazine 

hybrid will have in its make-up these four characters (partly domi- 
nant and partly recessive). In the F 2 generation these characters 
will be recombined into nine different types. 

To illustrate this process the following method is suggested. To 
make it as clear as possible an actual case of Mendelian segregation 
has been taken, that of the origination of the "Waved King Edward" 
sweet pea, by the simple crossing of the plain red "King Edward" 
with the waved pink "Countess Spencer."* 

Provide four kinds of beans of as near the same size as possible 
in equal numbers: let the black beans, B, represent the dominant 
plain character of the sweet peas mentioned above, the gray beans, 
G, the recessive wavy character, the white beans, W, the recessive 
pink character, and the spotted beans, S, the dominant red character. 
Suppose the allelomorphic composition of the first parent is BBSS, 
the gametes of this parent will be BS. The composition of the 
second parent may be represented by GGWW with gametes GW. 
The cross between them is BGSW. This hybrid produces four types 
of gametes, viz: BS, BW, GS, GW. The union of these four types 
of gametes gives: 

(1) 1 BBSS (4) 2 BGSS (7) • 1 GGSS 

(2) 2 BBSW (5) 4 BGSW (8) 2 GGSW 

(3) 1 BBWW (6) 2 BGWW (9) 1 GGWW 

Provide two vessels, in one of which place all the black, B, and 
gray, G, beans (the choice being between a plain and a wavy charac- 
ter) ; in the other, place all the white, W } and spotted, S, beans (the 
choice being between pink and red characters). 

Draw at random two at a time from each vessel and combine 
them into groups of four which will represent individual sweet pea 
plants in the F 2 generation. It will be seen that the nine types 
above will be produced in a ratio as near the theoretical as is obtained 
in actual plant breeding practice. The larger the number of beans 
the nearer, of course, will the result correspond with the theoretical. 

In ten trials using 100 beans of each kind the following result was 
obtained: 



a Mendel's Law of Heredity and its Application to Horticulture, C. C. Hurst, F. L. S., pp. 
22-23. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society \ vol. 36, part I. 



News and Notes 



73 













Types. 










Trtab. 


(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 


(6) 


(7) 


(8) 


(9) 




BBSS 


BBSW 


BBWW 


BOSS 


BQSW 


BGWW 


QOSS 


OQSW 


OGWW 


1 


3 


14 


5 


19 


22 


15 


7 


6 


9 


2 


8 


14 


7 


13 


26 


13 


10 


8 


6 


; 3 


6 


14 


3 


9 


29 


16 


7 


13 


3 


4 


6 


15 


4 


10 


26 


14 


7 


12 


6 


5 


7 


13 


6 


13 


20 


15 


5 


16 


5 


6 


7 


10 


10 


11 


21 


14 


9 


14 


4 


7 


9 


14 


2 


11 


25 


14 


3 


14 


8 


8 


5 


17 


8 


13 


17 


10 


8 


13 


9 





4 


21 


4 


13 


16 


13 


7 


14 


8 


10 


3 


12 


7 

56 
1.05 
1 


18 


27 


12 


5 


11 


5 


Total* 


53 
1 
1 


144 
2.7 
2 


130 
2.4 
2 


229 
4.3 
4 


136 
2.5 
2 


68 
1.2 
1 


121 
2 2 
2 


63 


Ratio, actual 


1.1 




1 



It will be seen that the actual ratio corresponds more or less closely 
to the theoretical ratio of the nine types obtained where two con- 
trasting pairs of characters are used. 

To apply the results to the sweet pea cross we have the following: 

Type (1) BBSS, plain red sweet peas, pure (first parent). 

(2) BBSW, plain red sweet peas, with recessive pink characters. 

(3) BBWW, plain pink sweet peas, pure. 

(4) BGSS, plain red sweet peas, with recessive wavy characters. 

(5) BQSW, plain red sweet peas, with recessive wavy and pink charac- 

ters. 

(6) BGWW, plain pink sweet peas, with recessive wavy characters. 

(7) GOSS, wavy red sweet peas, pure ("Waved King Edward"). 

(8) GGSW, wavy red sweet peas, with recessive pink characters. 

(9) GGWW, wavy pink sweet peas, pure (second parent). 

Of these nine types, 1, 3, 7, and 9 are pure types and come true as 
determined in the F 8 generation. The remaining five types break up 
in various ways, each of them producing more or less of one of the 
fixed types above. 

Because of the dominancy of the red and plain characters we 
should expect in the F 2 generation to get plain red sweet peas (some 
pure, others not), wavy reds (some pure, others not), plain pinks 
(some pure, others not) and wavy pinks (pure). Collecting these 
four kinds from the table above we have: 



74 . 



American Breeders Magazine 



Plain reds. 


Wavy reds. 


Plain pinks. 


Wavy pinks. 


Types. 


Totals. 


Types. 


Totals. 


Types. 


Totals. 


Types. 


Totals. 


(1) 
(2) 
(4) 
(5) 


53 
144 
130 
229 


(7) 
(8) 


68 
121 


(3) 
<») 


56 
136 


(9) 


63 


Totals , , 


556 
8.8 
9 


189 




192 
3 
3 




63 


Ratio, actual 


3 
3 




1 


Ratio, theoretical 


1 







To determine which of these are pure types it is necessary to raise 
the third generation self-pollinated. Those which come true from 
seed are pure types. 

For laboratory practice it would be desirable to have disks with 
the names of the contrasted characters printed upon them and desig- 
nated as to dominancy or recessiveness. — W. R. Ballard, Maryland 
Agricultural Experiment Station. 



REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE EUGENICS SECTION 

A meeting of the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders' 
Association was held at Washington, December 29 and 30, 1911, 
with the attendance of about fifty members at all sectional meetings. 

At the general session, December 29, Dr. E. E. Southard, director 
of the Neuropathic Institute, gave a paper "Geographical Relations 
of Nervous Diseases in Massachusetts." At the general evening 
session of December 29, Hon. W. M. Hays, Assistant Secretary of 
Agriculture, gave a paper entitled, "Constructive Eugenics." At 
the general session in the afternoon of December 30, Dr. H. H. 
Goddard read a paper, "Heredity of Feeble Mindedness, a Social 
Danger." 

The special session on the afternoon of December 29 was held at 
the Volta Bureau founded by Dr. Alexander Graham Bell. After 
an address of welcome by the superintendent of the Volta Bureau, 
Mr. Taylor, and response by the secretary of the Section Dr. E. E. 
Southard was elected chairman for the meeting. Dr. Bell gave an 
opening address concerning the foundation and work of the Volta 
Bureau. Mr. H. H. Laughlin, superintendent of the Eugenics Record 
Office reported on the work of the office for the past year. Prof. 
Robert DeC. Ward of Harvard University read a paper, "Our Immi- 
gration Laws from the View Point of Eugenics." Dr. A. H. Esta- 
brook of the Eugenics Record Office presented a paper on inheritance 



News and Notes 75 

of shyness and of eroticism, based on some field studies. A party was 
personally conducted by Dr. Bell to inspect the vault and filing 
system of the Bureau. 

A second special session of the Eugenics Section was held Decem- 
ber 30 at 9:30 in the Government Hospital for the Insane. Dr. 
Henry A. Cotton, medical director of Trenton State Hospital was 
elected chairman pro tempore. Dr. William A. White, superinten- 
dent of the Government Hospital discussed the methods and results 
of the field work and spoke critically of the difficulties of diagnosis. 
He laid stress upon the importance of the charts in exhibiting the 
results in popular form. Dr. Frederick A. Rhodes of Pittsburgh gave 
a paper entitled, "Eugenics from the Standpoint of the Physician." 
Dr. Henry A. Cotton showed charts illustrating inheritance of insan- 
ity and a paper by Dr. F. A. Woods, entitled "Alternative Human 
Inheritance in Eugenics." On motion of Mr. W. M. Hays the fol- 
lowing resolutions were adopted: 

Resolved : That the Eugenics Section organize a permanent committee on 
immigration, with authority to cooperate with similar committees of other or- 
ganizations in securing laws which will be more effective in securing immigrants 
which bring good health and only normal and superior heredity to this country. 

Resolved : That the Eugenics Section request the Association to appoint 
a committee to report on the possibilities of securing data and useful eugenics 
legislation through the United States Census Bureau, the Bureau of Health 
and other societies and institutions. 

After luncheon provided by Dr. White an opportunity was given 
for visiting the hospital. The following officials were elected at the 
sectional meeting of December 30, Dr. E. E. Southard, chairman; 
Dr. H. H. Goddard, Vineland, N. J., vice-chairman; Dr. C. B. 
Davenport, secretary. — Dr. C. B. Davenport, Secretary Eugenics 
Section, A. B. A. 

INTERNATIONAL EUGENICS CONGRESS 

The first international Eugenics Congress has been called to meet 
in London, on July 24 to 31, 1912 at the instance of the London 
Society of Eugenics. Dr. David Starr Jordan in a note to the editor 
states that: "The purpose of this Congress is to try to bring together 
as many people interested in the subject as possible and to have a 
series of papers and discussions, primarily those of popular interest; 
it not being intended to make the Congress a vehicle for exclusively 
technical papers. " 



76 American Breeders Magazine 

The circular announces that the work of the Congress will be 
grouped in four sections : 

(1) The bearing upon eugenics of biological research. 

(2) The bearing upon eugenics of sociological and historical re- 
search. 

(3) The bearing upon eugenics of legislation and social customs. 

(4) Consideration of the practical application of eugenic principles. 
The following persons are the vice-presidents from the United 

States: Alexander Graham Bell, Dr. C. B. Davenport, Charles W. 
Eliot, Dr. David Starr Jordan, Gifford Pinchiot, Dr. E. E. Southard 
and Bleecher von Wagenen. 

Dr. Jordan and Prof. Vernon Kellogg will both attend the Congress. 

The American Breeders Association which holds a membership in 
the Congress will be duly represented. 

Those who are interested in the proceedings of this Congress may 
obtain further information by addressing The Honorary Secretary, 
Eugenics Education Society, 6 York Building, Adelphi, London. 
Membership is one pound ($5). 

The president of this international body is Major Leonard Darwin; 
P. von Fleischl, Honorary Treasurer; Mrs. Gotto, Honorary Sec- 
retary. 

PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED 

The Inhebitancb of Color in Short Horn Cattle. H. H. Laughlin, Car- 
negie Station for Experimental Evolution, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. 
Reprinted from the American Naturalist, Vol. XLV, Dec, 1911. pp. ?05- 
742; and Vol. XLVI, Jan., 1912, pp. 6-28, 9 figs. 

The Mating op the Unfit: A Study in Eugenics. W. J. ConkUn, A.M., 
M.D., Dayton, Ohio. Pp. 22, 4 figs. 

The Production of the Lima Bean: The Need and Possibility of its 
Improvement. G. W. Shaw and M. E. Sherwin. Bulletin No. 224, Agri- 
cultural College Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, 1911. Pp. 199 
.-246. Illustrated. 

Twenty-Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Animal Industry 
Department of Agriculture, for the Year 1910. 573 pp., pis. XLII, 
75 text figs. 

Three articles in this publication deserve to be especially named to 
members of the American Breeders Association, who are interested 
in animal breeding. 

The Army Remount Problem. Dr. George M. Rommel, Chief Division of 
Animal Husbandry. 85 pp. Illustrated. 

The Principles of Breeding and the Origin of Domesticated Breeds 
of Animals. Dr. J. Crossar Ewart. 53 pp. Illustrated. 



News and Notes 77 

The Ancestry of Domesticated Cattle. Dr. E. W. Morse. 53 pp. Illus- 
trated. 

An Improved Method of Artificial Pollination in Corn. G. N. Collins 
and I. H. Kempton. Circular No. 89, Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. 
Department of Agriculture. 7 pp., 2 figs. 

Breeding Poultry for Egg Production. Raymond Pearl. Bulletin No. 
192, Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Pp. 113-176. 

A Comparative Microscopic Study of the Melanin Content of Pigmenta- 
tion of Skins with Special Reference to the Question of Color 
Inheritance among Mulattos. . Prof. H. E. Jordan, University of Vir- 
ginia. Pp. 449-470, 3 fig. Reprinted from the American Naturalist, 
Vol. XLV, Aug., 1911. 

Experimental Studies in Indian Cottons. H. Martin Leake, M.A. Pp. 
447-451. Reprint from Proceedings of the Royal Society. 

Studies in Indian Cotton. H. Martin Leake, M.A. Figs. 4, pis. II. 
Reprint from Journal of Genetics, Vol. L, No 3. 

The Genotypes of Maize. Dr. George Harrison Shull. Cold Spring Harbor, 
N. Y. Pp. 234-252. Illustrated. Reprinted from American Naturalist, 
1911. 

Reversible Mutants in Lychnis Dioica. Dr. George Harrison Shull. Pp. 
329-368, 15 illustrations. Reprinted from the Botanical Gazette, Nov., 
1911. 

Defective Inheritance. Ratios in Bursa Hybrids. Dr. George Harrison 
Shull. Pp. 12, pis. VI. Reprinted from Vol. XLIX of Transactions Des 
Naturforschender Vereins in Brunn. 

Methods in Breeding Cereals for Rust Resistance. Edw. C. Johnson, 
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Pp. 76-80. Reprint from Proceedings 
of American Society of Agronomy. Vol. 2, 1910. 

Cross Breeding Corn. C. P. Hartley, Earnest B. Brown, C. H. Kyle and 
L. L. Zook, Office of Corn Investigation, B. P. I., U. S. Department of 
Agriculture, Bulletin No. 218. Pp. 72. 

NEW BOOKS 

Heredity in Relation to Evolution and Animal Breeding. William E. 
Castle, Professor of Zoology, Harvard University. 184 pp., 53 illus- 
trations. Apple ton and Company, New York and London, 1911. 

Few subjects are commanding such universal and popular atten- 
tion as the rising science of genetics. The literature of the subject 
is rapidly growing voluminous. The task of putting this varied and 
interesting material into pedagogical form is fortunately being assumed 
by writers who possess the gift of presenting the subject clearly and 
interestingly. Heretofore we have known breeding only as an art. 



ASSOCIATION MATTERS 

MEMBERSHIP FEES ARE DUE 

Please send in your 1912 membership dues promptly upon receipt 
of due bill and try by all means to send dues of a new member in 
addition. 

PLACE OF THE NEXT MEETING, 1918 

The National Corn Exposition has invited the American Breeders 
Association to hold its ninth annual meeting at Columbia, South 
Carolina, February 8-9 1912, setting the date of the meeting so that 
it will be held on the two days immediately preceding the opening 
of the Exposition. In this way conflict of interest will be avoided, 
and members by staying over may visit the Corn Exposition, which 
promises to be not only on a larger scale than any previous one, 
but to include more educational features and a wider scope generally, 
No definite announcement will be made until the Council shall have 
decided this matter by vote. 

The Corn Exposition authorites with their usual generosity have 
offered to the American Breeders' Association facilities for holding 
meetings and the use of rooms for lectures, and the commercial bodies 
of Columbia and Charleston have expreseed the desire to entertain 
the members of the Association. An attractive program for the 
entertainment of members has been tentatively worked out and 
includes among other things a visit to the tea farm at Summers- 
ville South Carolina, the only tea farm in the United States, an 
auto trip from Summersville to Charleston. 

WORTH OF THE WORK OF THE AMERICAN BREEDERS 

ASSOCIATION 

I wish to congratulate you upon the wonderful progress you have made with 
your society and its publications. I am proud of it; I am proud of having 
a little connection with the organization. — William George, Aurora, III. 

I wish to express my appreciation of the excellent form in which our Maga- 
zine has been written, edited and published during the past year. — Joseph 
S. Montgomery, St. Paul, Minn. 

I congratulate you upon the fine appearance of the last number of the Maga- 
zine. I am pleased to note that you have included eugenics in the sub-title. 
I suppose it is more than a branch of genetics on account of its social bearings. 
— Chas. B. Davenport, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y. 

80 



i 



Address AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 
Washington, D. C. 



I '. 



U)l 



THE AMERICAN 
BREE DE RS M A GAZINE 

"One of the most precious things in the world is the labor of human beings; and I find myself 
asking over and over: 'What a vast difference in the reward of labor does it make what kind of 
seeds are planted on the millions of cultivated acres?' I have not yet answered my own question, 
but ask you to remember that the problem raised is also yours." — A. M. Ferguson. 

Vol. Ill Second Quarter, 1912 No. 2 



A. E. BLOUNT, 1831-1911 

W. H. Olin 
Boise, Idaho 

Since the 1911 meeting of the American Breeders Association at 
Columbus, Ohio, one of the pioneer plant breeders of America has 
" passed over the range" — Prof. A. E. Blount. 

Ainsworth Emery Blount was born at Brainard, East Tennessee — 
a mission station — February 6, 1831. He passed his early boyhood 
in that region, leading a simple form of life in the midst of the Cher- 
okee Indians. His children later in life delighted to hear their 
father talk and sing in the Cherokee language, which he learned 
from his boyhood playmates. 

On his father's side Professor Blount was descended from Puritan 
stock, while his mother, born Harriet Ellsworth, was granddaughter 
of Oliver Ellsworth, first Chief Justice of the United States, and 
member of that memorable convention which drafted the Federal 
Constitution in 1787. Professor Blount graduated from Dartmouth 
College in 1859, and at the time of the Civil War he was principal 
of the Masonic Female Institute, Cleveland, Tenn. He resigned 
his position at the opening of the war; entering the first East Tennes- 
see Cavalry as a private, he came out of the war with the rank of 
captain in above named regiment. In 1865 he married the daughter 
of Dr. J. F. Hall of Portsmouth, N. H. 

After the Civil War, Professor Blount began elaborate investiga- 
tions in the principles of heredity and the breeding of cereals. He was 
the first plant breeder in the cereals — corn and wheat — as well as one 
of the first workers with and propagators of alfalfa in America. The 
writer believes Professor Blount to have been the first plant breeder 
in America to use as the fundamental principle which governed all his 
breeding work with the cereals: " Select the best to cross on the best 
to make a better offspring." It is the use of this rule which has en- 

81 



Olin: Blount 83 

abled Luther Burbank and others to produce such desirable and 
valuable results in nuts, fruits, flowers, and grains. 

In his corn work Professor Blount began with an eight-rowed white 
dent corn and, after ten years' work in crossing and selection, he 
had created a new variety, Blount's Prolific. Of this, he says: 
"I had the satisfaction of putting into the hands of real live farmers 
a variety that excelled anything in the shape of maize that, up to 
that time, had been grown in America, as the Rural New Yorker of 
1879 fully illustrates. It is still for sale all over the country by no 
less than a dozen seed houses, but, sad to say, it is so deteriorated that 
its prolific feature is hardly left. Corn mixes so readily it is impos- 
sible, even isolated miles away from all other kinds, to keep pure 
and genuine seed without a yearly protection.'' 

Professor Blount was the first one to introduce durum wheats in 
the United States. It was while Professor Blount was at the Colo- 
rado State Agricultural College as Agriculturist that probably his 
greatest work was done in seed breeding. 

Speaking of this work in correspondence with the writer he says: 
"While thei£ [in Colorado], in 12 of the best years of my life, I made 
many crosses between the best varieties, only 43 of which were worth 
propagating. I then called them hybrids, but on further investigation 
declared them only 'crosses,' not hybrids. It was in 1879 that I re- 
ceived a very small sample of the then smooth Defiance Wheat and 
his Champion Bearded No. 9 from E. C. Pringle (Vt.), who claimed 
to have 'originated' them — how he never told me, though I sought to 
know his method. From this seed I gained quite a large number of 
average heads, the largest, if I remember rightly, not quite 3 inches 
long, with only about 21 kernels in the glumes, including the white 
cap. The next year I selected the 'best and crossed the best on the 
best to get a better offspring' — the rule I worked on in all my exper- 
iments. In 1885 you will see how much it was improved by 'selecting 
the best to cross on the best to get a better offspring.' See No. 8, 
page 44, Secretary's Report for 1886. 

Professor Blount told the writer in a letter that one single grain 
of Defiance in his nursery, under irrigation, produced 106 good heads 
containing an average of 43 kernels each, heads fully 5 to 6 inches 
long from base to tip of white-cap. 

The president of the college was a man of classical training who did 
not appreciate the work being done by Professor Blount, and the 
director of the experiment station — a graduate of the Agricultural Col- 
lege of Michigan — refused to recognize the worth and value of this vet- 



84 American Breeders Magazine 

eran plant breeder's most excellent work and so the world at large 
learned little of what was being done. It is to be regretted that much of 
the best work in plant breeding done by Professor Blount at the 
Colorado Station was lost after he was driven from the station by col- 
lege politics. He had in his nursery over 400 named varieties of 
wheat, most of which he knew at a glance without consulting the 
labels. He was in correspondence with 40 of the best plant breeders 
of his day, in Australia, Asia, England, Continental Europe, North 
and South America. From 1890 to 1898 Professor Blount did active 
and valuable work in the new agricultural station of New Mexico. 
Failing health caused him to retire from active service. He spent 
his last years in his truly delightful home among family and friends 
at Wellesley, Mass. Even here, he was consulted by plant specialists 
for advice, for his experience, perseverance ; and capacity for accurate 
and delicate work had made him an authority on plant breeding. 
As long as he lived he was constantly in receipt of letters from all the 
wheat-growing states and foreign countries growing this cereal. 

His death, February 21, 1911, was caused by an attack of pneu- 
monia. Defiance Wheat is his gift to the Irrigated West, demon- 
strated by miller and farmer to be the best milling spring wheat 
grown on the irrigated lands of America. He was a most modest 
man, an untiring investigator, a great lover of nature and of little 
children, as well as of plants and flowers. He attained success. A 
speed-mad and money-mad commercialized world would perhaps 
not consider it such. The writer inclines to proclaim as a successful 
man, one who has added one flower, one food grain, fruit or economic 
plant, useful to man or beast; who has not lost the love of little chil- 
dren; who has learned the love of Nature, and though he may not have 
amassed wealth, has made the world better for his having lived in 
it, living a life that speaks for purity, truth and love. Such success 
Blount had achieved. 



THE CORNELL EXPERIMENTS IN BREEDING 

TIMOTHY" 

Herbert J. Webber 
Ithaca, New York 

Introduction. — Almost all of our cultivated plants and animals are 
represented by numerous varieties and breeds. We do not cultivate 
merely wheat, corn, or apples, but we grow Dawson's Golden Chaff 
wheat, Learning corn, or Baldwin apples. We have hundreds of 
races of corn and wheat and over a thousand varieties of apples. In 
cotton, oats, barley, peaches, plums, pears, strawberries, and, indeed, 
in almost all plants that man has domesticated, we find numerous 
varieties. Not so, however, in timothy, our greatest of all hay plants. 
Timothy is only timothy. When we buy timothy seed we do not 
ask for Excelsior timothy or Jones' timothy; we simply order timothy 
seed, and take seed from Illinois, Michigan, Iowa, or any other place 
if it is called timothy. Sometimes we ask for a guarantee that the 
seed is good, but by this we mean only that it will germinate. We 
do not concern ourselves with the all-important question of how 
much hay per acre it will produce. When we remember that the 
hay crop ranks among the three largest crops in value produced in 
the United States, and that timothy forms the bulk of this crop, it 
is difficult to conceive that this can be true, but such is the deplorable 
fact. 

So far as the writer is informed only one series of experiments in 
the breeding of timothy has been carried to a successful conclusion. 
Between 1895 and 1899, Dr. A. D. Hopkins, then of the West Virginia 
Experiment Station, made selections of good timothy plants observed 
in nature and found that they could be bred into distinct varieties. 1 * 
These varieties were later placed with the U. S. Department of Agri- 
culture for trial, but have not been introduced into general cultivation. 

It is clear that the most important problem before hay growers 
today is to secure improved varieties which are known to be adapted 
to certain local conditions and fitted to give the best hay under these 
conditions. Not until good varieties adapted to various regions 
have been secured can we expect any very general improvement and 
increase in the hay crop of the country. 

The Cornell Experiments. — The Cornell experiments in breeding 
timothy were started in 1903 under the direction of Prof. T. F. Hunt, 

a Paper No. 25, Department of Plant-Breeding, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 
b Hopkins, A. D., Proc. Soc. Pro. Agr. Science, 1895, pp. 29-33. 

85 



86 American Breeders Magazine 

assisted by Professor Gilmore and Mr. Fraser. The writer was 
placed in charge of the experiments in the spring of 1907, and from 
that time until 1910 he was assisted in the work by Dr. C. F. Clark. 

In order to secure various forms, seed was obtained from 231 dif- 
ferent places throughout the world, 21 states, Canada, Japan, and 9 
European countries being represented. These seeds were germinated 
in sterilized soil and the little plants grown for a time in the green- 
house. They were later transplanted into field plats, 42 plants being 
grown from each lot of seed. In the field the plants were placed 
in rows 30 inches apart each way in order to facilitate the cultivation 
and allow the full development of each individual. Grown under 
such conditions the plants gradually increase in size by stooling and 
the most vigorous individuals in two or three years reach a diameter 
of from 1 to 1J feet. Little can be told regarding their characters 
until the second year, when they begin to show clearly their mature 
character. No final conclusions can be drawn regarding the com- 
parative value of the individuals until they have been under observa- 
tion for four or five years. 

In 1905 certain distinct plants were selected from among this lot, 
and open-fertilized seed retained, which was used in planting individ- 
ual test rows, the plants being handled and planted separately as 
in the preceding case. 

The original planting of 1903 included about 20,000 different individ- 
ual plants, while that of 1905 included 6304 plants. A good stand 
was obtained at first, but a considerable number of plants died later 
from various causes. When the writer took charge of the experiments 
in 1907 there were probably about 20,000 different plants still living, 
and in most cases they were in excellent condition. At that time 
all of the plants had reached sufficient age to permit their mature 
characters to show plainly and thus were in prime condition for 
studying the variations and for choosing plants of different types. 

Variations in Timothy. — The variations in different plants of timothy 
cannot be observed plainly when the plants are grown under field 
conditions. It is necessary to have the individual plants grown 
alone with considerable space around them in order to study the 
variations. No one who has not studied such a field of timothy 
plants can comprehend the richness of forms presented. It is beyond 
the scope of such a paper as this to discuss all of the forms presented, 
but the following illustrations will give some idea of the variation 
in those characters that are of most importance from a practical 
standpoint. 



Webber: Timothy Breeding at Cornell 87 



88 American Breeders Magazine 

Yield depends primarily upon the height and diameter of the 
plant and upon the density or number of culms developed and also 
on the size of each culm, size of head, number and size of leaves, 
and the like. 

In height, the plants ranged from 18 inches to 55 inches, as shown 
by Dr. Clark's summary. Some are veritable dwarfs and others 
giants. The diameter of the plant is independent of height. Some 
of the dwarf plants formed in a given period clumps almost as large 
in diameter as the tall plants. Many plants of three and four years 
of age will remain very small, showing very little stooling and produc- 
ing each year only a half dozen or a dozen culms. Other plants 
stool abundantly and form clumps from 1 foot to \\ feet or more in 
diameter, with hundreds of culms. 

In the original planting of 1903 the range of variation in yield of 
dried hay per plant was from 0.16 of an ounce to 21.60 ounces. If 
this difference in the yield of individual plants is transmitted, fields 
sowed with small and large yielders should show considerable dif- 
ference in this important character. 

The stems vary greatly in their diameters and ability to stand 
erect, softie individuals showing a decided tendency to lodge. 

The leaves vary greatly in length and width but show little varia- 
tion in number. The great majority of plants produce almost reg- 
ularly 5 nodes with 5 leaves, but occasionally plants are found which 
develop normally from 6 to 7 nodes and as many leaves, while occa- 
sionally also a lower number of nodes, 3 to 4, is found as the normal 
number. This character, however, apparently means but little in 
the production of valuable sorts. 

The heads also present a large range of variation in size and shape. 
They are long and short, thick and thin, smooth and simple, or rough 
and branched, and the like. 

Plants differ also in density, position of leaves, color, time of rip- 
ening, resistance to disease, and hosts of other characters more or 
less important. In season of maturity a variation of from two to 
three weeks is occasionally found, which is a very important charac- 
ter. The variation in susceptibility to rust (Puccinia graminis) is 
one of the most valuable characters observed. Some plants are 
badly affected every year, while other plants remain almost wholly 
free from this most serious disease of timothy. 

The question of importance is whether these various individuals 
showing valuable characters will reproduce these characters, or 
whether they are hybrids or accidental variations that are unstable 



Webbeb: Timothy Breeding at Cornell 



'ii lype with fa* culnn and to 



90 American Breeders Magazine 

in nature. The selection and testing of such variations has formed 
the basis of the experimental work since 1907. 

Methods of Experimentation. — Plats grown from open-fertilized 
seed were found to show great variation and little indication of a 
transmission of the characters fpr which the plants were selected. 
Timothy is normally a cross-fertilized plant, and when plants are 
grown in a mixed field where they are freely crossed with all sorts of 
pollen, this lack of transmission would be expected. A few heads 
protected from cross-pollination by covering with paper bags in 1907 
gave a few good seeds, showing that at least some seed would set by 
self-fertilization. Since that time each season a considerable number 
of the selected plants have been protected from cross-pollination by 
covering the entire plant with small cloth tents, or by covering cer- 
tain heads with paper bags. In this way self-fertilized or inbred 
seed has been obtained from a large number of select types for 
testing. 

The test of any particular chosen plant is conducted in the follow- 
ing way. 

(1) The selected plant is propagated vegetatively by digging up 
and separating the bulbs that are formed in the stoolingof the plant. 
These are taken in early September and a row of from 16 to 24 plants 
grown. These plants, it will be understood, are simply transplanted 
parts of the same individual. From such propagation the character 
of the individual can be judged much better and a more reliable idea 
can be obtained of the yielding capacity of the plant as well as other 
characters. 

(2) Inbred seed is carefully grown in sterilized soil and the seed- 
lings transplanted in rows in field plats as above described, to 
test the transmission of the characters for which the plants were 
selected. 

(3) As soon as sufficient seed can be obtained, plats of the dif- 
ferent select types are sowed broadcast in the usual way to test the 
yield under ordinary field conditions. 

(4) As soon as a variety is known or believed to be valuable, iso- 
lated plats are planted with inbred seed to obtain seed for planting 
large arie^Vhich will finally give 11 sufficient quantities of seed for 
distribution. 

A large number of types have now been tested more or less thor- 
oughly by these methods and very suggestive results obtained. 

Do the Variations Transmit their Qualities? — In 1907 over 200 
different types were propagated in rows by taking the bulbs and 



Webber: Timothy Breeding at Cornell 



Plate III -V*w*iioiw in Timoibt. 
1, A low dwarf type; 2, a low yielding type with few eul me: 3, a heavy yielding good ty 
In diameter and dense: 4, a light yielding plant with fen and spreading culms. 



92 



American Breeders Magazine 



growing them as clonal varieties. The examination of these rows 
when they were two, three, and four years old showed wonderful 
differences in type and clearly demonstrated that the differences first 
observed in the individual seedlings were by no means accidental. 
Dwarf plants remained dwarf in such rows and giants remained giants. 
Heavy yielders and light yielders transmitted these qualities in 
wonderful degree (see Plate IV). In the following table the records 
of the average yield per plant by clonal propagation in 5 light-yielding 
and 5 heavy-yielding rows will give an indication of the differences 

Table 1. — Showing transmission of yield in timothy by clonal and seed 

propagation. 



No. of 

Original Plant. 



Plat No. 



Average yield per 

plant of mother 

by clonal 

propagation. 

ounces. 



Plat No. 



Average yield per 

plant of progeny 

by seed 

propagation. 

ounces. 



LIGHT-YIELDING PLANTS. 



9.02 


1788 


2.872 


3104 


1.666 


12.07 


1797 


.768 


3216 


1.875 


17.25 


1728 


1.744 


3167 


1.411 


128.19 


1799 


2.872 


3217 


0.857 


211.31 


1792 


2.464 


3211 


1.333 



HEAVY-YIELDING PLANTS. 



9.03 


1611 


15.520 


1916 


10.533 


37.31 


1630 


19.680 


1909 


9.714 


147.41 


1620 


15.003 


1906 


10.000 


269.41 


1743 


16.592 


1931 


9.428 


278.40 


1752 


15.904 


1942 


9.500 



between the various types in this one important character. (See 
Table I, column headed "Average yield per plant of mother by clonal 
propagation.") 

In 1908 and 1909 test rows of plants from inbred seed of a consid- 
erable number of different types were planted, and in many cases 
by the side of these were grown rows from open-fertilized seed and 
from clons of the same original plant. These plats had reached 
sufficient size in 1910 and 1911 to allow careful study and judgment. 
The writer is now able to state definitely that a very large number 
of the variations selected have transmitted their characters in marked 



c A clon or clonal variety is one propagated vegetatively by cuttings, bulbs, or grafts, such as the 
varieties of strawberries, apples, and the like. 



II 

!l 
II 



94 American Breeders Magazine 

degree. Indeed, many of the types appear to be as uniform as any 
of the varieties of wheat and corn that we have in cultivation. 
It would appear that the plants originally selected must have been 
mutations or biotypes. Certain it is, they represent distinctly different 
types which transmit their characters. Here as in the tests of the 
selected individuals by clonal propagation the character of light or 
heavy yield is strikingly transmitted. The record of the average 
yield per plant of 5 light-yielding and 5 heavy-yielding plants is given 
in Table I and will indicate the transmission through seed of these 
characters. (See Table I, column marked "Average yield per plant 
of progeny by seed propagation.' ' These records are from inbred 
seed of the same original mother plants, the average yield of which 
by clonal propagation is given in the preceding column.) 

Tests of New Varieties of Timothy. — The experiments described 
above have shown that when the plants are grown in rows, with all 
the space which they require for full development around them, 
they transmit their good qualities, such as yield, and are to be re- 
garded as stable or fixed varieties. The grower will immediately 
inquire whether these qualities of differences in yield are shown when 
the different sorts are grown by broadcast sowing in the ordinary 
way, for of what value are they unless their good qualities are main- 
tained under ordinary methods of cultivation? 

To test the different sorts under ordinary conditions, open-ferti- 
lized seed, thus probably somewhat mixed, was sown in test plats 
in comparison with similar check plats of ordinary timothy. The 
open-fertilized seed of the 17 new sorts was taken from rows of these 
varieties propagated from bulbs and while not isolated was very 
much less subject to crossing than where one plant of a type stands 
alone in a mixed field. The later experience with the plats grown 
from this seed has shown that there was little crossing, as the plats 
of the different sorts clearly show their different characters, such as 
lateness and earliness, color and form of head, and the like. 

The seed used for the check plats in these experiments was pur- 
chased from a local seedsman and was the best timothy seed which 
he supplied to his trade. The plats were 1 rod wide and 4 rods 
long, thus one-fortieth of an acre, and every fourth plat was used as 
a check and planted with the ordinary timothy seed. These plats 
were sown in the fall of 1909 and gave good test yields in 1910 and 
1911. 

Table II shows the actual yields per acre of field-dried hay ob- 
tained from each plat in 1910 and 1911. From a study of this 



Webber: Timothy Breeding at. Cornell 



95 



Table 2. — Showing yields of 17 new varieties of timothy in comparison with 

ordinary timothy. d 



Plat 

No. 



c 


1831 


Check 




1832 


1606 




1833 


1611 




1834 


1620 


c 


1835 


Check 




1836 


1627 




1837 


1629 




1838 


1630 


c 


1830 


Check 




1840 


1653 




1841 


1668 




1842 


1671 


c 


1843 


Check 




1844 


1676 




1845 


1684 




1846 


1687 


c 


1847 


Check 




1848 


1715 




1840 


1722 




1850 


1743 


c 


1851 


Check 




1852 


1745 




1853 


1748 




1854 


1777 


c 


1855 


Check 



Parent 
No. 



1910 yields In pounds. 



Average yield 17 new sorts 

Average yield checks 

Actual average Increase. . . 



Yield per 
acre. 


Check yield 

per acre 
estimated. 


pounds. 


pounds. 


5280 


5280 


6720 


5410 


7000 


5540 


6680 


5670 


5800 


5800 


7680 


6000 


8320 


6200 


7600 


6400 


6600 


6600 


7440 


6790 


6040 


6980 


7640 


7170 


7360 


7360 


8200 


7260 


7280 


7160 


7600 


7060 


6960 


6960 


8000 


7120 


7240 


7280 


7520 


7440 


7600 


7600 


Road p 


ut through 


6520 


7440 


9200 


7280 


oat 




7451 lbs. 


per acre 


6600 lbs. 


per acre 


851 lbs. 


per acre 



Gain In 
yield. 

pounds. 

1310 
1460 
1010 

1680 
2120 
1200 

650 

-940 

470 

940 
120 
540 

880 

-40 

80 

this plat. 
-920 
1920 



1911 yields In pounds. 



Yield per 
acre. 



Check yield 
| per acre 
1 estimated. 



pounds. ' pounds. 



Gain In 
yield. 



5400 

6880 
7760 
7040 
4000 

8320 
8080 
7320 
3960 

7680 
7160 
7240 
4320 

8280 
6920 
6080 
3600 

8040 
6280 
5880 
3440 

5280 
7360 
3920 



5400 

5050 
4700 
4350 
4000 

3990 
3980 
3970 
3960 

4050 
4140 
4230 
4320 

4140 
3960 
3780 
3600 

3560 
3520 
3480 
3440 

3560 
3680 
3800 
3920 



7153 lbs. 
4091 lbs. 
3062 lbs. 



per acre 
per acre 
per acre 



pounds, 

1830 
3060 
2690 

4330 
4100 
3350 

3630 
3020 
3010 

4140 
2960 
2300 

4480 
2760 
2400 



1600 
3560 



d In the above table the column headed "Check yield per acre estimated" may need explanation. 
The comparison of two plats grown side by side may not be fair, as the land changes somewhat even 
In one rod. We desire to get as nearly as possible an estimated check yield for each plat of what the 
check seed would have given If sown In that plat. Taking a specific illustration, in 1910, check plat 
1831 yielded 5280 pounds per acre and the next check plat 1835 gave 5800 pounds per acre. Evidently 
for this season the land is getting better as we proceed toward the second check, plat 1835. The dif- 
ference between the two checks is 520 pounds. In every four plats there Is one check and one-fourth 
of 520 pounds Is 130 pounds. Now if we add 130 to the yield of plat 1831 we get the estimated check 
yield for plat 1832 which is 5410 pounds. Adding 130 pounds to this gives us 5540 the estimated check 
for plat 1833. This will probably make the method clear. The correction number between each 
two checks will obviously be a different number In most cases. 



table it will be seen that in 1910 three of the new sorts, 1841, 
1849, and 1863, produced less than the yields of their estimated 
checks but that in the other cases the yields were much in advance 
of the checks. In this year all of the 17 new sorts gave an average 



96 American Breeders Magazine 

yield of 7451 pounds per acre, while all of the check plats gave an 
average yield of 6600 pounds per acre. The new varieties, even 
including three two low yielders, gave an average increase of 851 
pounds per acre. 

In 1911, which was in general a less favorable season for timothy, 
all of the new sorts showed substantial gains over the checks. In 
this year the average yield of all of the 17 new sorts was 7153 pounds 
per acre, while the check plats gave an average yield of only 4091 
pounds per acre. The new varieties in this year thus gave an average 
increase per acre of 3062 pounds, or over \% tons per acre. 

The' reason for the decrease in the check plats in the second season 
is clear to one who has followed this work. Ordinary timothy rusts 
badly and owing to lack of vigor is comparatively short-lived. A 
large part of the decrease is due to these causes, but it is also in some 
measure due to the poorer season. On the other hand, the new vari- 
eties are selected for vigor, rust resistance, and ability to stool, and 
they would naturally increase in size for three or four years and would 
gradually cover the ground more thickly. These varieties were 
clearly cut down by the poor season, or they would have given a 
better yield the second year than the first. Throughout this exper- 
iment, which was made as uniform for every plat as possible, the 
new varieties have clearly shown their superiority in greater height 
and thicker development on the ground (see Plate V). It may be 
stated furthermore that several hay dealers belonging to this Asso- 
ciation who have visited the plats have stated without reservation 
that the quality of hay produced by the new sorts, owing to the reten- 
tion of a fresh green quality and leafiness, would be much superior 
to that on the check plats of ordinary timothy. 

What do these New Varieties Meant — It may seem surprising to 
those unfamiliar with breeding that such striking results can be ob- 
tained in so short a time. It is truly rather remarkable, but is in no 
sense a greater increase than would be expected under the conditions. 
When we remember that timothy is one of the most general crops 
grown in the civilized countries of the world and that it has been 
cultivated for about two centuries under very widely differing con- 
ditions of soil and climate, we can see that every opportunity possible 
has been furnished for the stimulation of variations. We now know 
that a variation once produced is rarely lost in nature but usually 
is added to the total character variations of the species. Through 
many years and over millions and millions of acres, among countless 
billions of plants, these variations have been accumulating, with 



Webber: Timothy Breeding at Cornell 



i 

s 

If 

f 

Si 

1 

8 



is 

If 



98 American Breeders Magazine 

no attempts to isolate them and use the best for the foundation of 
improved races for cultivation. Is it any wonder then, that with 
this accumulation of material by selecting the best variations we 
get faces that yield nearly double the mixture of all sorts of types? 

Suppose, for comparison, apples had not been bred for the last 
two centuries and we had a 40-acre orchard planted with all sorts 
of variations taken at random, including the worthless wild types 
and all other sorts such as would have been produced in this period 
of cultivation without selection. What would be the comparison 
of value between the crop of such an orchard and the crop from a 
similar 40-acre orchard planted with Northern Spy or any one of 
500 of our good modern varieties? The crop from the unselected 
varieties would in large measure be wholly unsalable in our modern 
markets. Probably not more than one-sixth of the crop could be 
sold for any purpose, and it is doubtful whether even one one-hun- 
dredth of the crop could be compared with our modern sorts. If 
we compare the results obtained in timothy, therefore, with a sim- 
ilar illustration in apples, we can readily see that the timothy results, 
as obtained in the experiments described above, are no greater, if 
as great, as we might expect. Indeed the writer feels that only a 
beginning has been made up to the present time. 

Hay is among the three largest agricultural crops of the United 
States, in total value of production. In 1910 according to the state- 
ments issued by the United States Department of Agriculture there 
were grown in the United States 45,691,000 acres of hay which yielded 
a crop having a farm valuation of $747,769,000. No statistics are 
available from which we can determine what proportion of this hay 
was timothy, but the writer believes that we may safely conclude 
that at least one-third of the entire hay crop of the country is tim- 
othy. If this is true the timothy crop of the United States in 1910 
had a, valuation of over $249,000,000. In the two years during which 
tests have been made the 17 new sorts gave an average increased 
yield of slightly over 36| per cent above ordinary timothy. A 36f 
per cent increase in the valuation of the timothy crop as above esti- 
mated would give us over $90,000,000 as the estimated annual gain 
in the value of the crop which would be obtained if equally good 
new sorts could be used throughout the country. 

Such figures it must be remembered are simply estimates and 
mean but very little other than to give us quickly a comprehension 
of what such experiments under ideal conditions might mean to the 
country. The writer would state very emphatically, however, that 



Hayes: Methods of Corn Breeding 99 

he believes it would be entirely possible to increase the yield of the 
crop to this extent if it were possible to have every field of timothy 
in the United States sown with the one of these new varieties best 
adapted to the conditions. In New York, which is the largest hay- 
producing state in the Union, and where these varieties have been 
developed, their introduction into cultivation should result in a marked 
increase in the average yield. 

When can Seed of the New Sorts be Obtained? — For the next two 
years it is probable that every seed of the new varieties available 
will be grown to increase the supply. Every effort will be made to 
get these varieties into the hands of growers at the earliest possible 
date. While timothy increases very rapidly, a considerable period 
must necessarily intervene before the seed will be available in large 
quantities. The writer would request that growers do not write 
for seed at the present time, as it cannot be supplied. 

METHODS OF CORN BREEDING 

H. K. Hayes 

Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Conn. 

The purpose of this paper is to bring before the association some 
further evidence to show that practical corn breeding does not at 
present take advantage of its full possibilities. 

We now recognize two main types of variation: the one which 
is germinal and transmits its characteristics to later generations 
and the other which is due to environmental conditions and is not 
inherited. The type which is heritable is of most importance to the 
breeder. 

The excellent work of Johannsen, which has been corroborated 
by many other investigators, shows that commercial varieties of 
plants are composed of many types which by selection can be isolated 
and which will breed true to type. These types have been called 
" types." 

The types of Maize. — The work of Shull and East shows that 
any variety of corn is composed of many types. Further evi- 
dence on this point has been obtained in the last few years at our 
station in connection with a study of inheritance in maize. For 
this purpose it has been necessary to use a number of inbred families. 
The most interesting of these from the standpoint of biotypes in 
maize are five inbred strains which originally came from the same 



100 American Breeders Magazine 

commercial variety of Learning. These types have been given the 
numbers 6, 7-1 , 7-2, 9 and 12 respectively. No. 9 is a pure red-silked 
form, but all the others have white silks. No. 6 and No. 9 are erect . 
in habit of growth and have strong sturdy stalks, while the two 7 
types and No. 12 are more slender in habit, being more easilyblown 
down by the wind. No. 6 has a cylindrical ear, No. 9 a conical ear, 
while both the 7 types have flattened ears. Nos. 6 and 9 have a 
modal class of 16 rows, No. 7-1 a modal class of 20 rows, and No. 
7-2 of 22 rows. 



These data show that in certain characters these types have meas- 
urable differences, besides others of course which cannot easily be 
either described or measured. 

These inbred types have differed also in their yielding capacity 
and the average height of plants, as is shown in Table 1, which 
gives the number of generations each has been inbred, the yield 
in shelled corn figured to an acre basis and the average height of 
plants in inches. 



Hayes: Methods of Corn Breeding 



101 



Table 1. — Yields of inbred strains for 1911. 



No. 

* 


Number of years 
Inbred. 


Bushels of ears 
per acre. 


Height of plants. 


6 

7-1 
7-2 

9 
12 


5 
5 

5 
6 
6 


27.7 
25.4 
41.3 
26.0 
2.0 


86.7 
81.1 
90.5 
76.5 
81.8 



In 1911 these inbred types were grown on a level plot of land at 
the experimental field but the season was so dry that the yields were 
much less than those of a normal year. All gave fair yields, however, 
except No. 12, which is a very poor yielding strain and can scarcely 
live when isolated. 

That continuous selection may eventually reach the same goal as 
inbreeding is fast becoming evident. On the same plot of land with 
the inbred types four selections were grown from seed kindly furnished 
by Smith of Illinois. These were the Illinois erect, declining, high 
and low ear strains. The high and low ear strains bred true to their 
respective types. The main difference in the erect and declining 
ear types, as has been pointed out by Smith, is in the number of nodes 
to the ear shank. The yield of these four selections is given in Table 
2, and averages about the same as that received from the inbred 
varieties previously mentioned. 

Table 2. — Yield of Illinois selections grown in Connecticut. 



Illinois strains. 



High ear 

Low ear 

Erect ear 

Declining ear 



Number of years 
selected. 



7 
7 
6 
6 



Bushel per acre. 



26.2 
18.8 
32.6 
42.9 



That the same results can be more quickly reached by hand polli- 
nation than by continuous selection is confirmed by two strains of 
white rice pop which the writer has been able to isolate from a com- 
mercial white rice pop variety in two years by hand pollination. One 
of these strains has a very short ear shank and erect ear, while the 
other has a much longer ear shank and a declining ear. These strains 
appear more uniform than the Illinois erect and declining ear selec- 
tions. 

Effects of Inbreeding on Corn. — There is an old idea that inbreeding 
decreases vigor and will eventually run out a race , but the accumu- 



102 Amekican Breeders Magazine 

lated evidence so far of the effects of inbreeding in corn does not show 
such results. The facts of the case seem much better stated by 
saying that Fi hybrids between two different types are as a rule very 
vigorous; that inbreeding does not run out a race but isolates bio- 
types and that some biotypes can scarcely live unless in a state of 
hybridity. This may seem like stating the same thing in two dif- 
ferent ways, but attention is called to the fact that in the latter case 
the type after being isolated will not be further affected by constant 
inbreeding. 

Crosses between Biotypes. — The fact that a cross between two dif- 
ferent types is very vigorous in the Fi generation has been alluded to 
by many scientists. Darwin in his Cross and Self-fertilization in 
the Vegetable Kingdom gives many examples of such increased vigor. 
Mendel, the discoverer of the only known law of heredity, mentions 
the fact that a first generation hybrid between two of his sweet pea 
types grew more vigorously and to a greater height than either parent. 

In two crosses between tobacco varieties which the writer has 
observed, the Fi generation for all characters studied except the 
number of leaves per plants showed an increase in vigor due to the 
crossing. With cigar wrapper tobacco, however, quality is the 
important factor and Fi crosses do not give as good quality as the 
parent types. 

With corn, however, the important thing from a practical stand- 
point is total yield in bushels of ears and tons of stover per acre. 
Reasoning from this standpoint, three writers published articles 
in 1909 suggesting that some method for utilizing the added vigor 
due to crossing should receive commercial trial. Shull and East 
from their studies of inheritance in maize concluded that some method 
whereby only first generation hybrids be grown for the commercial 
crop would prove of advantage and materially increase the present 
yield of corn per acre. 

Many examples have been collected by Collins of the Department 
of Agriculture showing that, as a rule, the F x generation crosses of 
corn prove better yielders than the parents. Some crosses do not 
prove beneficial, however, and it seQms important to determine the 
reason for this. 

Reciprocal crosses were made in 1910 between the inbred types 
shown in Table 1 and this year were grown on a level plot at our 
experimental field, the results being given in Table 3. In this table 
the female parent comes first and a cross between No. 6 and No. 9 
is written 6X9. A row consisting of 79 hills, 3 stalks to the hill, 



Hayes: Methods op Corn Breeding 



103 



was used for each cross. As has already been mentioned, the season 
was unfavorable and the dry weather materially decreased the yield; 
however, all crosses had an equal chance. All crosses gave large 
increases in height over the inbred types, but some were more pro- 
ductive than others. 

Table 3. — Reciprocal crosses. 





No. 

• 


Bushels of shelled corn 
per acre. 


Height of plants In Inches. 




6X7-1 


75.6 


111.4 




7-1X6 


58.8 


114.5 




6X7-2 


58.3 


117.8 




7-2X6 


57.7 






6X9 


31.6 


109.3 




9X6 


37.3 


109. 




6X12 


10.2 


115.4 




7-1 X 7-2 


41.3 


103.7 




7-1X9 


51.5 


111.8 




9X7-1 


46.2 


107.4 




7-1 X 12 


16.9 


• 




7-2 X 12 


63.5 


114.7 




12 X 7-2 


76.9 


114.0 




9 X 12 


3.6 


103.6 



It should be noted that the selections 7-1 and 7-2 are very similar 
and were isolated from strain No. 7 after it had been inbred for three 
years. A study of the previous table tends to confirm the following 
facts. 

(1) Reciprocal crosses are equal within the limits of fluctuating 
variability. This fact shows that we are dealing with very nearly 
pure biotypes. 

(2) All crosses between pure biotypes are not beneficial. Note 
the crosses between 6 and 12 and 9 and 12 which are poor yielders. 
It is interesting to note that these crosses had as one parent a type, 
No. 12, which in a state of self-fertilization was scarcely able to live. 

(3) Crosses between nearly related types show little benefit from 
crossing. 7-1 X 7-2 only gave a yield of 41.3 bushels, the same 
yield as received from No. 7-2 when self-fertilized. 

(4) Some crosses are much more vigorous than others. Reciprocal 
crosses between 6 and 7 and between 7 and 9 are good combinations. 



104 American Beeeders Magazine 

Nos. 6 and 9 are without doubt more similar in characteristics than 
7 and 6 or 7 and 9. 

It seems very probable that those types which differ in the greater 
number of characteristics will prove, as a rule, the better for cross- 



Fia. 1.— Outer eats Inbred one generation. Middle ear result of tlrnlr crossing, first generation. 

ing. It should be recognized, however, that poor genotypes should 
be eliminated by selection. 

Comparison of F j and Ft Generations. — Two comparisons of the 
yield of Fi and F 2 generations of biotype crosses were made in 1910. 
The Fj generation of a cross between a dent and flint type yielded at 



Hates: Methods of Corn Breeding 105 

the rate of 105.5 bushels per acre, while the Fj generation grown on 
the same field produced only 51.5 bushels. The Fi generation of a 
cross between two Learning strains produced at the rate of 117.5 
bushels per acre, although the F2 generation yielded only 98.4 bushels. 
These data show that the greatest stimulus to development from 
crossing two distinct types is obtained only in the first hybrid gener- 
ation. This necessitates making the cross each year. The expla- 



Fio. 3.— The middle earta the result of an Immediate en 



nation of the decrease in vigor in the second hybrid generation is 
exactly the same as the explanation of the apparent deterioration 
when com is inbred. Both are caused by recombinations of char- 
acters among which some "pure type" individuals are obtained. 
In inbreeding the apparent deterioration is more marked because 
the percentage of such individuals is likely to be much greater. 



106 



American Breeders Magazine 



Crosses between Varieties. — Whether crossing of pure biotypes 
will prove of greater value than crosses between highly selected vari- 
eties is as yet an unsettled question. Many of our corn varieties 
have been grown for long terms of years under the same conditions 
and have been gradually selected to some type. Crosses between 
such varieties give, as a rule, increases in the Fi generation. The 
following table gives the results received at our station and shows 
that Fi generations are usually more vigorous than the parents. 
The first two crosses of this table were grown in 1908 and the 
remainder in 1911. 



Table 4. — Crosses between varieties and their parents. 



Selection. 



Longfellow Flint 

Illinois High Protein t 

Cross 

Stargis Flint 

Illinois High Protein 

Cross 

Conn. Top Over Flint 

C. T. O. X Canada Flint 

Woodbridge's Canada Flint 

W. C. X Watson's White Flint. . . . 

R.I. White Flint.... 

R. I. W. X Mammoth White Flint 

Stadtmueller's Learning 

S. L. X Reld's Yellow Dent 

Brewer's Dent 

B. D.«X Early Dent 

Longfellow Flint 

Longfellow X Ives 

Ives X Longfellow 

Ives Flint • ■. 



Yield In bushels of shelled 
corn per acre. 

72.0 
121.0 
124.0 

48.0 
121.0 
130.0 

58.3 
65.3 

72.9 
80.0 

62.2 
69.3 

75.7 
99.9 

77.6 
94.7 

60.5 
69.1 
63.5 
69.5 



The varieties used in the above table are, as a rule, very pure to 
type. It will be noted that in some cases only one parent is given. 
This is due to the fact that these crosses were made by Connecticut 
farmers and seed could only be obtained from one parent. Where 
the cross has been grown both at the station and by the farmer who 
made it the average of the two tests has been used for comparison. 



Hayes: Methods op Corn Breeding 107 

Summing up the crosses given in the above table and where both 
parents were grown, using the better yielding parent, we find that 
the average yield of the parents is 82.3 bushels per acre, while the 
average yield of the Fi hybrids is 91.0 bushels. Thus we have an 
average increase of 8.7 bushels per acre for the crosses. 

As the crossing of two corn types is such an easy matter and can 
be done on any farm it seems very desirable that further < 



HighProtelnDeat. Thetwooc 

should be made to determine, if possible, what varieties are the 

most valuable to use as parents. 

Conclusion. — The utilization of Fi hybrids in corn breeding will 
materially increase the corn yield. 

Selection is of importance in isolating the better types and ridding 
the variety of the poorer types. 

The highest yields of corn will be received from carefully bred 
selections which when crossed prove the most vigorous combinations 
by actual test. 



108 American Breeders Magazine 

literature cited 

Collins, G. N. 

1909. The Importance of Broad Breeding in Corn. Dept. Agr. circular. 

1910. Increased Yields of Corn from Hybrid Seed. Dept. Agr. Year 

Book, pp. 319-328. 
East, E. M. 

1909. The Distinction between Development and Heredity in Inbreeding. 

Amer. Nat., 43, 173-181. 
East, E. M. and Hayes, H. K. 

1911. Inheritance in Maize. Conn. Exp. Sta. Bull. 167, 1-142. 
Hayes, H. K., and East, E. M. 

1911. Improvement in Corn. Conn. Exp. Sta. Bull. 168, 1-21. 

JOHANNSEN, W. 

1909. Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena. Fischer. Pp. 
1-515. 
Shull, G. H. 

1909. A Pure Line Method of Corn Breeding. Amer. Breeders' Report, 
iv, 296-301. 

1911. The Genotypes of Maize. Amer. Nat., 45, 234^252. 
Smith, L. H. 

1910. Increasing Protein and Fat in Corn. Amer. Breeders' Report, v., 

5-11. 



THE BREEDING OF WINTER BARLEYS 

H. B. Derr 
Washington, D. C. 

History of the Work. — The work in cereal breeding in the Depart- 
ment of Agriculture was inaugurated a number of years prior to the 
establishment of the office of grain investigations, which now con- 
ducts that line of work. The breeding work was first established at 
Garrett Park, Md., in 1895, by Mr. M. A. Carleton, the present 
cerealist of the Department of Agriculture, and consisted princi- 
pally in the production of disease-resistant strains of cereals. A 
few years later the work was transferred to the Agricultural Exper- 
iment Station at College Park, Md., and in 1902, Mr. H. A. Miller, 
formerly of this office, was placed in charge of winter cereal breeding. 
In 1902 Mr. Miller planted 22 varieties of winter barley and in the 
spring of 1903, 59 varieties of spring barley. This work he con- 
tinued until 1906, when the writer became associated with the Office 
and has since conducted the experiments and breeding work. 

The negative results obtained with spring barleys by both Mr. 
Miller and myself demonstrated the inadvisability of continuing 



Derr: The Breeding op Winter Barleys 109 

experimental work with them. It was clearly proven that, for the 
South Atlantic States at least, climatic conditions were against their 
successful cultivation, and since 1907 all our energies have been 
directed toward the improvement of the winter barleys. In 1907, the 
breeding work with cereals having assumed rather large proportions, 
it was removed to the Department of Agriculture's experiment farm 
at Arlington, Va., opposite Washington, D. C, and has since been 
conducted there. In our efforts to produce better-yielding varie- 
ties of barley we have succeeded, during the past four years, in chang- 



ing 16 of the leading spring barleys, such as Chevalier, Hannchen, 
etc., into winter forms (see illustration), and in several cases they 
are outyielding the standard winter barleys, of which 29 are under 
test. The breeding and testing of winter cereals occupied over 13 
acres of space the past year. 

Crossing of Barleys. — During the past seven years a number of 
crosses have been made both by Mr. Miller and myself, and from 
some of these crosses excellent practical results have been obtained. 



110 American Breeders Magazine 

As these results are to be published in bulletin form only a few of 
the lesser details can be given here. 

Several of the most important crosses were made before the writer 
became connected with the work in 1906, consequently he knows 
but little of the character of the mother plants. In 1907, among 
the large number of variations produced, several attracted attention 
owing to their peculiar plant characters. The plants from one selection 
from the cross Tennessee Winter 9 six-rowed, with Black Arabian & 
two-row were especially noticeable. Several plants produced heads 
which, while they resembled two-rowed barleys, were not typical. 
The median spikelets were fertile and produced plump, kernels with 
medium long awns, while the lateral spikelets were nearly all infer- 
tile with the exception of a few almost rudimentary kernels with 
short, bristly awns. These small lateral kernels were selected and 
planted in a head-row test, and the following year, 1908, produced 
plants, a number of which bore heads similar to those of the year 
previous but containing a much larger percentage of lateral kernels, 
the majority of which were almost entirely awnless. These were again 
carefully selected and planted in head-row tests, and in 1909 one of these 
selections produced 16 plants on which the heads were entirely awnless. 
Several other selections produced awnless plants but these strains were 
later discarded. In the fall of 1909 the heads from each of these 16 
plants were planted in separate rows for comparison. In 1910 only 
three heads produced plants having bearded heads. These entire 
strains should have been destroyed and future annoyance thus 
averted. . In September, 1910, over five hundred head selections 
were planted in the breeding plat and some interesting data are 
being compiled relative to the height, number of culms, length of 
head, etc., of the daughter as compared with the mother plants. 
Seed of this awnless barley was distributed to a number of reliable 
cooperators in the south in order to test the influence of environment. 

Most of the plants bred true in 1911, but in a few cases the im- 
pure blood of the 3 plants that showed traces of bearded characters in 
1910 appeared among the plants. By means of an index system 
adopted, the writer easily traced the record of the progeny from each 
plant through each generation back to the mother plant, and all the 
progeny from these 3 plants will be discarded. 

It is believed that there is a great future for this barley. It stools 
heavily, has stiff erect culms and gives all indications of being an 
excellent yielding variety. Pedigreed seed of the awnless barley 
has been sent to nearly all the experiment stations and farms in 



Debb: The Bbeeding op Winteb Bablets 111 

the northern states, with the request that it be sown next spring in 
an effort to change it into a spring form. With careful selection 
this is believed possible in 3 years. 

The awnless hybrid was given a name and number and is now 
known as Arlington Awnless Barley, G. I. No. 702. It was de- 
scribed in Science, Vol. XXXII, No. 823, October, 1910, and the 
type specimen and description deposited in the economic herbarium 
of the Department of Agriculture at Washington. 

Hull-less Hybrid. — A hybrid has also been produced between Mary- 
land Winter and Hankau, a bearded hull-less spring barley. This 
hybrid known as Hansee Hull-less, G. I. No. 703, has bred true for 
two years, and is a hardy bearded hull-less winter barley. The 
bearded hull-less barleys are adapted to the higher elevations of the 
western and southwestern states. This seed is being distributed 
wherever it is thought likely to succeed. Winter barleys generally 
outyield the spring barleys and, in localities were they can be grown, 
the quality is superior and the weight per bushel heavier. 

Hooded Hybrid. — Owing to the fact that, with the production of 
the Arlington Awnless barley, there were two distinct types of beard- 
less barley, it was considered necessary to adopt another name for 
the common beardless barley. As this variety was not entirely awn- 
less, having a three-pronged, hood-like appendage, the name "hooded" 
barley was proposed for it, the name "awnless" being restricted to 
the Arlington Awnless barley. These names will be used by this 
office in the future. 

In the South Atlantic States hooded (beardless) barley is quite 
popular, as it yields a highly palatable and nutrituous hay. In gen- 
eral, this has been a spring-sown crop, with the result that only under 
extremely favorable conditions can a crop of grain be produced there- 
from. The necessity for a reliable winter form of hooded barley 
was so apparent that crosses were made. After several years of 
selection, the good qualities of one of the hybrids became apparent 
and it was named Virginia Hooded barley, G. I. 648. The seed is 
being distributed to reliable cooperators for further increase. 

Standard Varieties. — There have been several standard varieties 
of winter barley cultivated in the Atlantic and Southern States, 
but, previous to 1900, little or no effort was made to improve them. 
In 1900, the Tennessee agricultural experiment station began the 
breeding of winter barleys, and in 3 years, wrought a considerable 
change in yield and quality. This was about the time that Mr. 
Carleton began the work at College Park. Excellent results have 
attended the work of this office since that time. 



112 American Breeders Magazine 

Since 1907 a large amount of selected seed of winter barley has 
been distributed. It may be thought that once having established 
a pure race the work was done, but with such factors as planting at 
the wrong time, or by improper methods, or last but not least the 
mixing due to the traveling thrashing machine, pure races among 
the farmers soon undergo decided changes and breeding and selection 
must, of necessity, be done over again. 

The three varieties of winter barley that have been selected are 
Tennessee Winter, Maryland Winter, and Wisconsin Winter. The 
first two are, without doubt, similar strains from the original winter 
barley introduced by the early colonists many years ago. Our lim- 
ited farm facilities permit only a small acreage of each variety, con- 
sequently, when a hybrid or selection has by its increased yield or 
improved plant characters demonstrated its superiority over the 
standard varieties, the seed is distributed to reliable cooperators 
over as wide an area as possible in order to test the influence of environ- 
ment upon it, as well as to obtain a more rapid distribution of the seed. 

In order to keep a line on the pure races, selections are made each 
year and carried through the series from the head-row test planted 
one year to the field test harvested four years later. 

Reports received from cooperators located in different portions 
of the winter-barley-producing area all indicate the superiority of 
this selected seed. The two new hybrid barleys, Arlington Awnless 
and Virginia Hooded, will no doubt still further increase the popu- 
larity of the winter-barley crop owing to their freedom from beards, 
the most objectionable character of barley. The high prices pre- 
vailing the past few years have made barley an excellent money crop 
but cultivation has been restricted, owing to the offensive beards. 
In the United States are localities in which barley was formerly grown 
extensively but where it is now only grown in small quantities. In 
north central Texas large barley areas have been given over to other 
crops owing to the fact that farm hands absolutely refused to handle 
the barley crop. In eastern Tennessee the same condition prevails. 
Even if the farmer is successful in harvesting his barley many of the 
thrashing crews refuse to thrash the crop, owing to the beards. While 
barley straw is readily eaten by cattle, farmers are afraid to use it 

• 

because of the injurious effect of the beards, consequently oats has 
largely taken the place of barley in the southern states. The total 
production of barley in the United States for 1911 was. 160,240,000 
bushels which was over 13,500,000 bushels less than in 1910. It 
is probable that if the experiment station workers and those inter- 



Hays: Constructive Eugenics 113 

ested in the production of barley in the northern states would take 
this awnless winter barley, by selection they would change it into a 
spring form, without injuring its present high-yielding qualtities. 
If this were done, it would in a few years increase the total produc- 
tion of barley in the United States 25 per cent, and put at least 
$24,000,000 more in the pockets of the American farmers. 

CONSTRUCTIVE EUGENICS 

Willet M. Hays 

Washington, D. C. 

[Continued from First Quarter] 

Let us then not have an open country of large estates manned 
with a semi-peasant class nor with defective classes. Let us rather 
have the family-sized farm, conducted by two or three workers, and 
splendidly supporting the farm family, that we may have our best 
heredity on the land. Let public money be freely used to supply 
the farm families with good roads, splendid consolidated rural schools, 
free delivery of mails, parcels post, and all kinds of informational 
and advisory help, the most important of which is the consolidated 
rural school. Let the state and nation in every way possible assist 
the farmers and suburban residents to organize among themselves 
those cooperative projects which enable them to carry on collec- 
tively such selling, buying, and other functions as the individual 
farmer and home maker cannot alone so well perform. And espe- 
cially is there needed research and aid to make less burdensome the 
duties of the mother. If ways could be found of successful cooper- 
ation in doing the laundering, the baking, the canning of fruits, the 
killing of stock and curing of meats, and other heavy work, the genet- 
ically best mothers would have further encouragement to live on 
the land. 

In order that the cities as well as the country may be rejuvenated 
every two hundred years, the eugenic slogan should be "the best 
people on the land." And there are other similar weighty genetic 
reasons for building up the suburban regions around about our 
cities and towns. Here encourage the efficient people of the non- 
agricultural vocations to live. And the public should provide voca- 
tional schools for all youths, that when grown they may be able to 
sustain superior homes. Low transportation rates for pupils to and 
from vocational schools is an example of how the public can give a 



114 American Breeders Magazine 

chance to the youth of suburban families to become efficient. Let 
the genetic burden be laid on the genetically efficient and give them 
the means and the security under which they can efficiently perform 
their task. 

The Arithmetic of Mass Improvement. — To illustrate the fact that 
the improvement of the human race by selection is not, after all, so 
different from the improvement of animals or even of plants, some 
arithmetical calculations are offered. Suppose, for example, that 
we divide our nearly one hundred million people into three orders. 
Let us place in the first order the genetically best one-fourth, whose 
children will be the most efficient, and let these be represented by the 
number 25. Let us place in the second order the genetically medium 
in value, and let these be represented by the number 50. Then, 
let us place in the third order the genetically least efficient, and let 
them be represented by the number 25. Without assuming that 
to be at present the correct number of individuals per family, let us 
assume that if the second order, represented by the number 50, have 
families averaging 3| in number, this will be sufficient to keep the 
number intact, so that this 50 of medium genetic value will remain 
constant at 50 for succeeding generations. Thus there will be two 
left from the average family for parents of the next generation to take 
the place of the two who served as parents of the preceding genera- 
tion. The other 1\ of the average family will be sufficient to repre- 
sent the number of infantile deaths, the number of non-married, and 
the number of those married but having no children. 

Let us now assume that the best one-fourth have families some- 
what larger — say four children per family. By subtracting the l£ for 
infantile deaths, non-marriages, etc., we have remaining 2\ with which 
to produce the next generation where there were only the two parents 
of the family the preceding generation. This is an increase of one- 
fourth. By multiplying the 25 by 1 J, we have 31£ as the number in 
the second generation. By continuing this multiplication by If for 
twelve generations we have 364, while during this entire time the 
medium one-half remains at 50. 

Now, taking the 25 least efficient genetically, let us assume that 
there is an average of only three children per family. Here, taking 
out the 1£ for infantile deaths, non-marriages, etc., we have for the 
next generation only 1^ instead of the two parents of the preceding 
generation. This is a reduction of one-fourth, leaving each gener- 
ation three-fourths as large as the last. Multiplying the 25 by f 
we have in the second generation 17£. Continuing this multipli- 



Hays: Constructive Eugenics 115 

cation for twelve generations, we find that this 25 becomes 1, or 
0.2 per cent of the whole. 

Thus, in twelve generations, or practically 500 years, we have the 
race made up of 87.7 per cent of the blood of the best one-fourth; 
12.1 per cent of the blood of the medium one-half, and 0.2 per cent 
of the blood of the least efficient one-fourth. 

We need not assume that these percentages mean that values 
would be worked out in exactly these proportions. The illustration 
is only to show that even with such little differences as an average 
of one more child per family from the genetically best families than 
from the genetically least efficient families, the undesirable will grad- 
ually become a smaller part and will give the field to the genetically 
more efficient people. 

If instead of four children per family for the genetically best one- 
fourth we take five children per family and carry out the calculations 
as above, at the end of five generations, or in two hundred years, 
the proportions will be, in whole numbers, 410 from the best, 50 
from the medium, and 6 from the genetically least efficient; or, 
expressed in percentage, we have 88 per cent from the genetically 
best 25, 10.7 per cent from the genetically medium 50, and 1.3 per 
cent from the genetically least efficient 25. If anything like such a 
ratio of sizes of the families from the most efficient and the least 
efficient parents could be maintained, there would be a marked 
increase in the efficiency of the network of descent in each period 
of two hundred years, and this could not fail to produce marvelous 
results in the inherent power of the people in the world. 

With all of our studies of heredity we must not overlook the fact 
that our schools, our churches, and our homes must so conserve 
moral conditions that normal men and women may be fully devel- 
oped, with their individual and genetic powers unimpaired as by the 
racial poisons of alcohol and venereal diseases. In case of intem- 
perance, for example, not only are men ruined by alcoholic beverages 
who, in the absence of temptation, might be useful citizens and 
efficient parents, but the impaired vitality which they impart to their 
children and which they induce by neglect helps to perpetuate the 
demand for alcohol as a stimulant during the succeeding generation, 
if indeed, there may not be an actual acquired inheritance of the 
desire for the specific stimulant. Eugenic pride based on genetic 
genealogies may eventually greatly lessen the social evil and thus 
reduce the moral and physical poisoning which is now so widely 
prevalent. Those who might too critically regard the significance 



116 American Breeders Magazine 

of the figures above should understand that they are not to be judged 
from what is commonly termed "mass selection, "such asthe selection 
of seed wheat in the fanning mill. It is assumed that the selection 
would here be genetic, which is not mere mass selection. The basis 
for comparison in the selecting of individuals would be not so much 
their individual excellence as the superiority of their genetic power 
as determined by the average efficiency of their progeny, or as esti- 
mated from average efficiency values of their coordinate relations, 
as brothers, sisters, cousins, and also ancestors. 

Some of our scientists who are creating new values by plant breed- 
ing have in their plant nurseries hundreds of thousands and even 
millions of individual plants so grown that each plant stands in a 
hill by itself, each with its individual number. These technical 
workers have wrought out plans of utilizing these individual plant 
numbers as helps in determining the genetic value of each and any 
plant. Thus they are able to determine in a given standard variety 
of a given species, as of wheat, the plants which give the largest net 
value per acre and produce the highest value in the market or in the 
mill and bake shop, and they are able to find among these best plants 
the progeny of the occasional mutation. Having found the new 
mutating stock they can rapidly and readily multiply this into a 
new and important variety. While such rapid results cannot grow 
out of systematic efforts applied to the human family, results approx- 
imately as rapid as those indicated in the calculations above might be 
possible. In any event, it would seem quite as proper and important 
that each person of the family in which we are interested should 
have a numerical name as that each plant should be so designated in 
the plant breeding nursery. 

A name with eleven letters is not over long. The number 99,000, 
000,000 has only eleven figures, yet in a series of numbers of that 
size there could be individual number-names for each of sixty times 
as many people as now inhabit the earth. At slight cost per 
name the census bureaus of the world could place in such a single 
series the number-names of every person now living, every person 
of whom there is any history, and every person who might be born 
in the next thousand years. Once instituted, such a system of 
number-names would go on indefinitely and no two persons would 
have the same number. If desired, a block of these numbers could 
be allotted to each country. By exchanging their lists of names and 
number-names the main bureau of each country would have the 



Hats: Constructive Eugenics 117 

completed series as entered up to date. At relatively small cost the 
names and number-names of the parents of each person and the 
number-name of each child born to each person could be added to 
his own name, also birth and death dates and places, thus giving all 
needed basic facts regarding his lineage, genealogy. These universal 
world number-names could then be used in lineage genealogies along 
with any system of family number-names desired, thus placing a 
means of reference from each genealogical compilation to ^very other 
similar compilation. 

Private family bureaus, or even public bureaus, could request the 
census bureau to give each person of their families a lineage number 
in this world series. The interested family could then give to each 
member a single number, usually in the form of a percentage, express- 
ing the individual value of the general efficiency of the person. 
In like manner a single numerical statement, as a percentage, could 
be used to designate any marked characteristic, as ability in music, 
or personal beauty, or tendency to obesity. Compilation of these 
percentages into averages, as of progeny, or of coordinate relatives, 
so as to give genetic ratings, also in a single numerical statement 
as a percentage of individuals and of families, would follow the same 
relatively simple bookkeeping or recording processes that are the com- 
mon practice in plant breeding and in animal breeding. 

Immense importance would soon be attached to these genetic 
family ratings. Those families with high ratings would be made to 
realize the importance of mating with those of equal genetic excellence, 
and the more rapid multiplication of their numbers. The individuals 
of these families would have a new incentive to gain high personal 
ratings and to develop their children so that they might merit high 
ratings, thus preserving and increasing the status of their families. 
The families of the best genetic blood would be at a premium, especi- 
ally among other families with high genetic ratings. Again speaking 
broadly, the best one-fourth of the race would find the world expect- 
ing of it not only success as individuals, but that the individuals 
be multiplied more rapidly than the average. On the other hand, 
the genetic facts concerning families with definite genetic defects or 
with such indifferently low genetic efficiency that their members 
cause public concern and expense, as in eleemosynary institutions, 
should be publicly recorded. Marriageable members would not be 
at a premium. The common thought of the people would not place 
upon this class any large portion of the racial duty of multiplying 



118 American Breeders Magazine 

the race. They would properly feel that they had better bear fewer 
children and give especial attention to providing good opportunities 
for them. 

It will be noticed in this discussion that differences are not drawn 
between small families and large families, but between families some- 
what above the average and families below the average. If objection 
is made that genetic facts will throw society into classes, it must be 
admitted that the classification will represent efficiency and will 
not as a rule follow false or mischievous standards. In case of one 
family where this number-name scheme is used in compiling both the 
lineage genealogy and the genetic genealogy, many of the plans of 
determining and displaying the genetic values are already being 
devised. And doubtless ere long genetics will be showing the breeders 
of plants and animals even more artful ways than they now have for 
securing and making plain the genetic values of individuals and 
families. 

Looking at the city, the country, or the world, with its peoples 
of pure and mixed races, and taking into view the fact that economic 
conflicts will continue permanently after wars with arms may have 
ceased, nothing stands out more clearly than the fact that races and 
families must make their conflicts with large numbers as well as with 
high averages of individual efficiency. Genetists will have much to 
do in their study of hybrid races, and with the place of these races in 
the conflicts among the races of the earth. When the genetist comes 
to study the great migrations of the races of men, the relation of racial 
make-up to the economic contests between countries and races, and 
legislative efforts to avoid or promote the genetic mixtures of races, 
he will find range for the highest possible wisdom and skill. It has 
been predicted that neither plant breeding nor animal breeding will 
eventually develop as highly trained genetists as will be found among 
those who make a specialty of eugenics. 

Genetic knowledge promises to have an important relation to 
the cost of living and upon the life of the nation. It seems none 
too much to hope that the science of eugenics will greatly lessen 
the cost of our eleemosynary institutions, will lead to a better average 
of efficiency, to the reduction of divorce, to temperance, and to a 
higher morality. May we not hope that, in addition to increasing 
the average of intelligence, efficiency, and happiness, eugenics may 
lead even to a larger production of great geniuses and even to the 
production of families of special-purpose people? Eugenics as a whole 
will tend to produce sane, able, well-rounded characters, strong in 



Laughlin: The Eugenics Record Office 119 

their allotted tasks, and good citizens. Who, except the prudish, 
would object if public agencies gave to every person a lineage 
number and genetic percentage ratings, that the eugenic value of 
every family and of every person might be available to all who have 
need of the truth as to the probable efficiency of offspring? 

AN ACCOUNT OF THE WORK OF THE EUGENICS 

RECORD OFFICE" 

H. H. Laughlin 

Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y. 

After having been forgotten and ignored by science for thirty-five 
years the re-discovery, twelve years ago, of the Mendelian laws of 
inheritance strongly supported the revolutionary work of Weismann 
then engaging the attention of those interested in heredity. This 
combination of forces gave biology a new key to the mysteries of 
inheritance and caused a renaissance in the study of experimental 
heredity in plants and animals. Foremost among the workers in 
this subject in America was Dr. C. B. Davenport, Director of the 
Carnegie Station for Experimental Evolution. His work with 
plants and animals had not proceeded far before human heredity 
began to attract his attention. By the summer of 1910 he had col- 
lected nearly three hundred records of family traits describing in con- 
siderable detail the family distribution of some thirty specific mental 
and physical traits. By this time the work had grown so greatly 
in interest and promise that he was invited to organize and direct an 
institution devoted solely to research in human heredity and its 
application to human affairs. This institution, the Eugenics Record 
Office, of Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island, New York, was duly 
organized, and as stated at the last meeting of this section by Octo- 
ber 1, 1910 was ready for work. The family records collected by 
Dr. Davenport <and referred to above formed the nucleus of the 
files of the institution which are now growing at a satisfactory 
rate. The functions of this office are (1) to serve as a clearing 
house for data on human heredity and its application to human 
affairs, (2) to build up an index of the American population in- 
dexing families, traits and their geographical distribution with 
special reference to sub-normal and super-normal characteristics, 

a Read before the Washington meeting of the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders 
Association at the Volta Bureau, Washington, D. C. 



120 American Breeders Magazine 

(3) to train field workers expert in gathering data of eugenic import, 

(4) to maintain a field force actively engaged in collecting such data, 

(5) to cooperate and to collaborate with persons and with other insti- 
tutions concerned with human heredity, (6) to study authentic data, 
thereby discovering the general laws of inheritance and the specific 
manner of the inheritance of specific traits, (7) to aid and to promote 
the organization of new centers for eugenic research, (8) to advise 
concernirg the fitness of marriage unions, (9) to disseminate eugenic 
truths to the end that society may proceed wisely to the application 
of plans for the betterment of the human stock. 

In the first training class — July and August, 1910 — ten persons 
already advanced students of biology and sociology, were trained as 
experts in collecting first hand data adequate to the needs of eugenic 
research, and six of these were employed jointly by the Eugenics 
Record Office and by other institutions. During the second year — 
July and August, 1911, — another and somewhat larger group of 
persons were given a similar training, and six more were added to 
the staff of field workers, thus making the field force reporting di- 
rectly to the Eugenics Record Office twelve in all. Several other 
persons were trained during the year, but not in connection with 
organized class routine, so that in all nearly fifty persons have been 
given this special training by Dr. Davenport. The next train- 
ing course will be given at the Record Office at Cold Spring Har- 
bor, from June 26 to August 6. These twelve workers have been 
gathering data on the family distribution of the following traits: 
Feeblemindediiess, epilepsy, insanity, Huntington's chorea, crimi- 
nality, juvenile delinquency, vagabondism, hare-lip, haemophilia, 
cancer, albinism, and skin color. Special studies are also being 
made in consanguinity, the eugenic import of isolated communities, 
the old Mormon families of Utah, the present day descendants of the 
old Juke family, the legal sterilization of degenerates in Indiana. 
Besides, on these lines data on a host of other traits has been gath- 
ered. This material is gotten at first hand in the home territories of 
the families studied. The absence of a body of facts suited to the 
intelligent application of Eugenic remedies makes this method of orig- 
inal observation imperative. The field workers chart out as far as 
possible the complete family network along all ancestral, collateral, 
and consort lines. They spare no pains to secure an accurate family 
network, and an equally accurate description of the inborn traits of 
each member. The facts so gathered are indexed at the Eugenics 
Record Office in accordance with a system devised by Dr. Daven- 



Laughlin: The Eugenics Record Office 121 

port, and recorded in the book of traits (Bulletin No. 6, Eugenics 
Record Office, February 1912, C. B. Davenport). This index is an 
expansive one, and is based upon the decimal system, quite the same 
as the Dewey Decimal System for classifying books. The first 
synopsis of traits is as follows: 

0. General traits, 4. Mental traits, 

General diseases, Movements. 

Occupations. 5. Sense organs. 

1. Integumentary System. 6. Nutritive system. 

2. Skeletal system, 7. Respiratory system. 

Muscular system, 8. Circulatory system, 

3. Nervous system, Lymphatic system. 

Criminality. 9. Excretory system. 

Reproductive system. 

All record is indexed on a sextuple system, with cards for each of the 
following combinations: (1) surname-trait, (2) trait-surname, (3) 
locality-trait, (4) trait-locality, (5) locality-surname, (6) surname- 
locality, The purpose of this system is to permit investigators to 
study traits and families and their geographical distribution from 
the point of view any of these combinations. The efforts of this 
office are directed toward indexing of all of the defective and sterling 
germ-plasms of the American population. The making of such an 
index is an immense task, and will demand the cooperation of many 
persons and institutions, but its value in the practical application 
of any scheme looking toward the cutting off of the defective strains 
of the American population is obvious. But the field worker is not 
the only source of data. Genealogical, biographical, and medical 
literatures are being reviewed by the office with the view to extracting 
data sufficiently biological and detailed in nature to permit of biolo- 
gical deductions. Genealogical records contain, save for data on 
consanguinity, longevity, and fecundity, but little material of value. 
Town histories, on the other hand, are much richer from the Eugenic 
point of view. Medical literature contains a considerable number 
of authentic family networks, describing in detail the distribution 
of certain traits and many valuable records have been gotten from 
this source. The number of physicians and institutions cooperating 
with the Record Office is gradually increasing. From these sources 
many pedigrees are secured, but the most valuable records are those of 
family traits which are still being secured from many splendid normal 
American families. For this purpose duplicate blank schedules are 
supplied by the Record Office, one for the files of the office, and the 



122 American Breeders Magazine 

other for the personal use of the collaborator. Besides this general 
record of traits, several special schedules have been prepared. Up 
to the present time these are schedules on (1) alcoholism, (2) hare-lip, 
(3) musical ability, (4) mathematical ability, (5) Huntington's chorea, 
and others are in the course of preparation. Any of these blank 
forms will be supplied to persons interested upon application to the 
Eugenics Record Office. 

One of the most essential parts of the work of this institution is, 
of course, the study of the data, thereby making it tell the tale 
of the manner of the inheritance of specific traits. Here, as in other 
realms of science, the criteria of truth is predicability . Eugenic 
research seeks to answer this question: Given two parents of known 
ancestry and collateral kin with reference to a given trait, how will 
this trait be distributed among their offspring? Such work of reduc- 
tion is essentially analytical or Mendelian. The mass of biometric 
methods avail but little in answering this question. 

All work of reduction is done either by Dr. Davenport personally, 
or under his direction, jointly with the field worker, or jointly with 
the scientists in charge of the research work of the collaborating 
institutions. Thus far the following publications based in whole or 
in part upon data gathered by Dr. Davenport or by field workers 
trained as above described have been issued: 

(1) Eugenics, C. B. Davenport (an elaboration of a lecture "Fit and Unfit 
Matings"). Henry Holt and Company, 1910. 

(2) Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, C. B. Davenport (the text book of 
modern eugenics). Henry Holt and Company, 1912. 

(3) Heredity of Eye Color in Man, Science, pp. 589, November, 1907. 

(4) Heredity of Skin Pigment in Man, C. B. and G. C. Davenport. Ameri- 
can Naturalist, vol. 44, November and December, 642-672, 705-731. 

(5) Heredity of Hair Form in Man, American Naturalist, vol. 42, p. 341. 

(6) Heredity of Hair Color in Man, American Naturalist, vol. 43, no. 508, 
April, 1909. 

(7) Bulletin No. 1, Heredity of Feeble-mindedness, H. H. Goddard. April, 
1911. 

(8) Bulletin No. 2, Study of Human Heredity, C. B. Davenport, H. H. 
Laughlin, David F. Weeks, E. R. Johnstone, Henry H. Goddard. May, 1911. 

(9) Bulletin No. 3, Preliminary Report of a Study of Insanity in the Light 
of the Mendelian Laws, Gertrude L. Cannon and A. J. Rosanoff. May, 1911. 

(10) Bulletin No. 4, A First Study of Inheritance in Epilepsy, C, B. Daven- 
port and David F. Weeks. November, 1911. 

(11) Bulletin No. 5, A Study of Heredity of Insanity in the Light of the 
Mendelian Theory, A. J. Rosanoff and Florence I. Orr. November, 1911. 

(12) Bulletin No. 6, The Trait Book, C. B. Davenport. February, 1912. 



Laughlin: The Eugenics Record Office 123 

Other publications are in progress including one memoir on the "Nam" 
family, (a pseudonym given to a very inferior family in one of the 
isolated communities of New York State), based on field work con- 
ducted by Dr. A. H. Estabrook of this office, and another in which 
certain epileptic and feeble-minded families of Massachusetts are 
studied. This latter is based upon field work by Miss Florence H. 
Danielson, also of this office. 

Eugenic research naturally falls into three classes: 

(1) The study of the sub-normal strains and the combination of 
their traits into the types of the socially unfit. 

(2) The normal classes and their traits. 

(3) The super-normal classes and the traits of talent, special 
skill, and genius. 

After the modes of inheritance of a great many traits have been 
worked but to a predicable nicety and many of the super-normal 
and sub-normal germ-plasmfc of the country has been indexed, it 
will doubtless be in order for society to devise some means of cutting 
off the supply of defectives and of bringing sterling germ-plasms 
together. Such efforts must, however, if intelligently directed, 
follow, not precede, investigation. Schemes for social betterment 
must, at first be experimental, but the safest experiments are doubt- 
less based on the teachings of the greatest body of facts. Such a 
body of facts applicable to eugenic remedies is just beginning to be 
organized. The present program of eugenics is, therefore, research. 



American Breeders Magazine 



THE EFFECT OF RESEARCH IN. GENETICS ON 

THE ART OF BREEDING 

Herbert J. Webber 
Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. 

(Continued fbom First Quarter] 

Our different breeds of dairy animals are maintained in a state of 
high productivity by continuous selection. Cows are followed care- 
fully with reference to their milk-producing capacity and their ability 
to transmit this quality to their offspring. The ability of bulls to 
beget high milk-producing daughters is taken as a test of their value. 
There can be no doubt, I believe, that this selection within the breed 
maintains the breed in a state of high efficiency and is absolutely 
necessary to the success of dairying. Strictly speaking, in the course 
of this selection, however, no new type has been produced. It. is 
well recognized that continuous selection is necessary to the mainten- 
ance of high milk-producing capacity, and if the selection were dis- 
continued the average milk production of any dairy herd would 
rapidly decline until it reached the normal mean for the breed con- 
cerned. The same can not be said, however, of the breed or race 
characters, that is those characters which distinguish the breeds 
or races from ether breeds. Selection is not necessary to maintain 
the general characters of the Holstein breed, for, as long as it is not 
crossed with other breeds, it will in general maintain its characters 
so far as color, conformation, and dairy type are concerned. The 
same may be said of any of our breeds of cattle and horses. The 
high efficiency of our race horses is maintained by the most careful 
selection and yet probably in most cases no distinctly new character is 
added which would maintain itself as a unit character in inheritance. 

It is true that we are dealing here with complex phenomena and 
limited exact experimentation and a distinct mutant in the direction 
of high efficiency might occur at any time and be chosen for breeding 
which would maintain itself without continuous selection. 

It is interesting at this point to recall one of the most common 
differences between plant and animal breeding Which is seldom clearly 
recognized by practical breeders. Plant breeders most commonly 
strive to produce new races or breeds with distinctive characters 
which will reproduce their desirable qualities without continuous 
selection; while animal breeders almost wholly limit their attention 
to selection within the breeds already established, to maintain them 

125 



126 American Breeders Magazine 

in the highest state of efficiency possible. The failure to understand 
this difference in purpose has frequently led to confusion in our 
discussions. 

It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss the kinds of varia- 
tion used in these different types of selection, even if we possessed 
the requisite knowledge which is doubtful. I may be pardoned, 
however, for digressing far enough to state that it is my conviction 
that there is no very hard and fast line between that variation which 
is in considerable degree inherited, such as is found frequently in 
high milk-producing cows in selection within the breed, and the 
mutation which gives absolute inheritance and established a perma- 
nent new mode. The great difficulty in determining whether there 
is any true cumulative action of selection which will extend a char- 
acter beyond the limits of the race or species is met in determining 
what are and what are not mutations. My experience has led me 
to conclude that the continuous selection of maximum fluctuations 
in a certain direction may in some cases lead to the gradual 
strengthening of the character until finally it may become, more or 
less suddenly, fully heritable, and it would then be recognized as a 
mutation. 

In many cases we find exceedingly small differences maintaining 
themselves generation after generation under different environ- 
ments when the lines of descent are kept pure. A marked illus- 
tration of this is afforded by Mr. Evans' studies on pure lines of 
Siellaria reported at this meeting. The segregation of such char- 
acters in hybridization would be exceedingly difficult to recognize 
if it did occur. Again the occurrence of such small mutants, if we 
may so designate them, within a breed under selection, if not recog- 
nized and isolated, would be crossed with fluctuations and cause 
variations which would be recognized as regressions in the highly 
selected strain. 

I think it will have become clear from the above discussion that 
in the present state of our knowledge of selection we can only advo- 
cate that practical breeders continue their selections as in the past. 
This is particularly true in the cases where it is the idea to maintain 
the race or breed at its highest efficiency. In the case of plant 
breeders working to produce new races, the mutation theory intro- 
duces a new element and leads the breeder to search for a mutant 
possessing desirable characters which he can isolate and which 
he may expect will reproduce its characters as soon as he has purified 
the type from mixtures derived through hybridization with other 



Webber: Research in Genetics 127 

types. He will select the type to purify it rather than to augment 
its good qualities. 

Returning again to the question of new characters, we may profit- 
ably question more definitely where such new characters come from, 
if they are not produced by selection. Clearly no problem is of 
more importance to the breeder than to be able definitely to produce 
or cause such new characters to appear. If the breeder must await 
the pleasure of nature to secure the changes he desires, the waiting 
may be long and tedious. If he must watch thousands of p!ants 
of a certain race of species every year in order to find the apparently 
accidental variation or mutation in the direction of the improvement 
he has in mind which may rarely or never be found, the process will 
be so hazardous that we should have to await the accidental dis- 
covery of any new characters. Indeed up to the present time we 
have had practically no other recourse than to await the accidental 
discovery of such new characters. We, however, have had many 
theorists and investigators who believed that changed environment 
would stimulate the production of variations in the direction of 
better fitting the organism to its environment. Lamarck and his 
followers have strongly maintained this hypothesis and many sci- 
entists even today believe in the effectiveness of environment in 
developing adaptive changes. Breeders have carried this principle 
so far as frequently to advocate the growing of plants in the environ- 
ment most likely to produce the change desired, as, for instance, cul- 
tivating tall plants like twining beans in the north or at higli altitudes 
if it is desired to produce a dwarf type or, vice versa, breeding the 
plants in the south and at a low altitude if a giant or tall type is 
desired. Weissman and his school of followers have apparently 
exploded this idea by demonstrating that characters acquired as a 
result of changed environment are merely physiological changes and 
are not inherited. The question, however, is by no means settled 
and we must await further evidence. 

Knight believed that increased food supply caused an increase 
in the range of variation and that it was important for breeders to 
manure their plants heavily. De Vries, on the contrary, would 
have us believe that such variations are fluctuations and nonherit- 
able. The studies of Weisse, Reinhold, MacLeod, Tammes, and 
Love have given us many instances where the range of variation is 
increased as a result of food supply and other instances where the 
variation is apparently greater on poor or sterile soil. 

It would seem that any treatment that would increase the range 



128 American Breeders Magazine 

of variation in plants that are grown for breeding purposes would be 
valuable, but it still remains to be definitely proven whether such 
increases in the range of variation are in any marked degree heritable 
and whether valuable maximum variates can be more frequently 
produced in this way than would be found in similar groups of plants 
under ordinary treatment. 

It is only very recently that the idea has developed that we can 
go farther than possibly change the environment. With the publi- 
cation of MacDougal's researches in 1906 describing mutations 
that were apparently caused by injecting the capsules of plants 
with certain solutions, such as zinc sulphate, magnesium chloride 
and the like, a possible new method of forcing variations was intro- 
duced. MacDougal apparently obtained, as a result of his treatments 
marked variations which were inherited in succeeding generations. 

Tower, by subjecting potato beetles during the formation of the 
germ cells to extremely hot and dry or hot and humid conditions 
with changes of atmospheric pressure, Was able to cause the develop- 
ment of marked changes or mutations which were found to transmit 
their characters true through several generations and which segre- 
gated as unit characters following hybridization. He concludes from 
his experiments "that heritable variations are produced as the direct 
response to external stimuli. " 

Gager has produced similar changes in plants by subjecting the 
developing ovaries of plants to the action of radium rays, and a 
number of similar studies by Hertwig and others indicate that radium 
emanations have a very active effect on both plants and animals. 

While the evidence favoring the value of such external stimuli as 
the above in producing new heritable characters is apparently definite 
and positive, the extent to which the method can be used in practical 
breeding has not been determined and indeed we must await further 
evidence before we can finally accept the evidence, or the interpre- 
tation of the evidence, presented in these very valuable and suggestive 
researches Dr. Humbert carried out experiments in my laboratory 
in which the capsules of a pure line of a wild plant, Silene noctiflora, 
were injected with the solutions used by Dr. MacDougal, and although 
the number of plants handled (about 15,000) was apparently as great 
or greater than was used in MacDougal's experiments, no mutations 
were found in the treated plants which were not also found in the 
untreated or check plants. 

Some observations and experiments are recorded in literature which 
indicate that mutilations or severe injury may induce the develop- 



Webber: Research in Genetics 129 

ment of mutations. Most noteworthy among such observations are 
those of Blaringham, who by mutilating corn plants in various ways, 
such as splitting or twisting the stalks, apparently produced varia- 
tions which bred true without regression and which he described 
as mutations. My own observations on the great frequency of strik- 
ing bud variations on recovering trunks of old Citrus trees in Florida 
following the severe freeze of 1894-5 also furnished evidence in sup- 
port of this theory. 

In general, it is assumed that in hybridization we are dealing 
merely with characters already present and that new characters 
which appear are due to the different reactions caused by new asso- 
ciations of unit characters in their mutual effect on one another. It 
is, however, possible that new unit characters may result from the 
commingling of the different hereditary units which are to be con- 
sidered as mutations rather than new combinations. As is well 
known, Weissman long ago advanced the hypothesis that valuable 
variations in evolution were due to the commingling of protoplasms 
from different parents having different hereditary tendencies, a 
process which he called "amphimixis." He did not have in view, 
however, the formation of new unit characters as distinct from new 
combinations. 

' The most marked case known to me of the appearance of a new 
character which was apparently caused by the stimulation of hybridi- 
zation is the development of a marked spur or horn on the lip of a 
hybrid Calceolaria (fig. 1). This occurred among a series of hybrids 
between a herbaceous and a shrubby species made by Professor Atkin- 
son and Mr. Shore, of the Botanical Department at Cornell University. 
One or two tapering horns about an inch in length and from 2 to 4 mm. 
in diameter at the base spring from the upper surface of the large 
corolla lip and grow erect to its surface. No such character, so far 
as can be learned, is known in the Calceolarias and it would seem to 
have been caused by the hybridization. It cannot, apparently, be 
considered as a combination of any of the known characters of the 
species concerned. 

Such apparently new characters appear rather commonly among 
large batches of hybrids, and while there is little evidence available 
on the subject I am inclined to believe it will be found that hybridi- 
zation may stimulate the production of new unit characters, which 
mendelize with the parental types. 

While the evidence at our command regarding the artificial pro- 
duction of mutations is not yet sufficiently exact and trustworthy to 



130 American Breeders Magazine 

enable us to draw definite conclusions and formulate recommen- 
dations for practical breeders, it may be stated that this is appar- 
ently one of the most profitable lines of experimentation for the 
immediate future. 

Thus far I have only incidentally discussed hybridization and the 
advance of our knowledge in this direction. The scope of this address 
will not allow of an adequate treatment of this subject and it appeared 
wiser to discuss more in detail the problems of selection and varia- 
tion. I cannot, however, close this address without referring to this 
very important field of genetics. 

No discovery in the field of breeding has had more effect or is more 
far reaching in its importance than the discovery of what have now 



flowers natural bIh) 

come to be known as Mendel's principles of heredity. While, as 
stated in the beginning of this address, breeders had long before the 
rediscovery of Mendel's papers come to understand that there was 
a segregation of characters in the Fj generation and that it was possible 
to recombine in certain hybrids the desired characters from different 
parents, there was no definite understanding of the underlying prin- 
ciples, and no conception of the almost infinite possibilities of improve- 
ment which the field of hybridization opened to us. 

The law of dominance, while not universal, has explained many 
cases of prepotency in one generation and failure of certain individuals 
to transmit the character in the next generation. It has explained 



Webber: Research in Genetics 131 

many cases of latency of characters and may account for all such 
cases. 

The law of segregation has shown us that the splitting of characters 
follows a definite method and that we can in general estimate the fre- 
quency of occurrence of a certain desired combination, if we know 
the characters concerned to be simple unit characters. 

The study of hybrids has been resolved into a study of unit char- 
acters and their relation to each other. By hybridizing related types 
having opposed characters and observing the segregations which 
occur in the later generations we analyze the characters of each type 
and determine when we have a character pair. The researches on 
this subject by Mendel, Bateson, Davenport, Castle, Punnett, Shull, 
Hurst, Correns, Tschermak, East, and dozens of other now well 
known investigators have developed a science of heredity of which 
we had no conception a few years ago. 

We can now study the characters presented by the different vari- 
eties of a plant or of different species which can be crossed with it 
and definitely plan the combination of characters desired in an ideal 
type and can with considerable confidence estimate the number of 
plants it will be necessary to grow to get this combination. We now 
know in general how characters behave in segregation and inherit- 
ance, so that we can go about the fixation of a desired type, when 
one is secured, in an orderly and intelligent way. 

The farther the study of characters is carried the more we are 
coming to realize that the appearance of apparently new types fol- 
lowing hybridization is due to recombinations of different units which 
in their reactions give apparently new characters. As an illustration, 
in a study of pepper hybrids which I have carried on during the past 
four years, it has become evident that the form of plant and branch- 
ing is due to three pairs of characters or allelomorphs, namely; (1) 
erect or horizontal branches; (2) large or small branches; and (3) 
many or few branches (fig. 2). In crossing two medium-sized races, 
one with large, horizontal and few branches, and the other with small, 
erect, and numerous branches, there results many new combinations 
of characters, among which appear some with small, horizontal and 
few branches, which gives a dwarf plant, and others will have a com- 
bination of large, erect and numerous branches, which gives a giant 
plant. These dwarfs on one hand and giants on the other appear 
as distinct, new creations, though they are very evidently merely 
the recombinations of already existing unit characters and dwarfness 



132 American Bbeeders Magazine 

and giantness are the results of the reaction of the different units 
combined. 

When we remember the large number of distinct characters which 
are presented by the very numerous varieties of any of our cultivated 
plants, we arrive at an understanding of the possibilities of improve- 
ment which the field of hybridization affords, yet I doubt if many of 
u.s have even then an adequate conception of the possibilities. Pos- 



ScgrceaUon In second generation showing the segregation of different type* of branching. 

sibly I may make this more clear by an illustration from my timothy 
breeding experiments. While the various characters presented by 
the different types under observation have not been carefully 
studied in inheritance, the following characters can be distinguished 
plainly, and, from observations on accidental hybrids, are known to 
segregate. The following is a list of 28 such character pairs which it 
is believed will prove to be allelomorphs: 



Webber: Research in Genetics 133 

Timothy Character Pairs 

Heads : Culms : 

Long or short. Tall or short. 

Thick or thin. Thick or thin. 

Dense or lax. Straight or wavy. 

Greenish or purple when young. Erect or bent outward. 

Gray or tawny when ripe. Green or purplish. 

Simple or branched. Many or few. 

Erect or nodding. 

Continuous or interrupted. Nodes: 

Apex blunt or pointed. Many or few. 

Base blunt or attenuated. Green or brown. 

Seeds large or small. Internodes long or short. 

Leaves: Habit Characters: 

Long or short. Lodging or nonlodging. 

Broad or narrow. Rusty or rust resistant. 

Erect or reversed. Early or late season. 

Rolled or flat. 
Clustered at base or extending to top of culm. 

It is possible that some of these characters may be expressions of 
the same unit, but in several cases they certainly represent several 
different unit characters. For instance, in length of head, height of 
culm, number of culms, and season of maturing, several different 
degrees are certainly present which are fully heritable. Doubtless 
there are. many more than 28 pairs of unit characters which could be 
distinguished by careful study. If we have two pairs of characters, 
such as tall or short and early or late, we know that 4 pure homozy- 
gous combinations are possible. If three pairs are considered, 8 
combinations are possible. Every time we add a different charac- 
ter pair we double the number of different combinations that are 
possible. Twenty-eight character pairs would thus give us as many 
possible combinations as 2 raised to the 28th power, or the astonish- 
ing number of 268,435,456. It would be possible then to produce 
this tremendous number of different varieties of timothy if there was 
any reason to do so, and each variety would be distinguished from 
any other variety by one distinct character and would reproduce 
true to seed. 

The task of the breeder, then, is to find which among these character 
combinations gives the superior plant for commercial cultivation. He 
will soon eliminate certain characters as unimportant and concen- 
trate his attention on those qualities that are essential. 



134 American Breeders Magazine 

It would be interesting to discuss the factor hypothesis, purity 
of germ cell, sex limited inheritance, and other important problems 
connected with inheritance studies, but I have already too severely 
tested your endurance. 

As breeders and genetists we have every reason to congratulate 
ourselves on the rapid advance of our science and the growing recog- 
nition of the importance of the subject in practical agriculture. Col- 
leges throughout the country are extending their courses of study to 
include genetics. In almost all of the experiment stations studies on 
genetics and practical breeding are now given fully as much attention 
as any other subject. With all of this advance, however, only in 
a few institutions have there been established special professorships 
or investigatorships in breeding or genetics. If the subject of genetics 
is to be properly taught or the investigations are to reach the highest 
standard, it is clear that men should have this as their special and 
recognized field. The subject should no longer be assigned indis- 
criminately to the horticulturist, agronomist, animal husbandman, 
or dairyman. We must establish more professorships of genetics or 
breeding. 



REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON THE HEREDITY 

OF FEEBLE-MINDEDNESS* 

Dr. A. C. Rogers, Chairman. 
Faribault, Minn. 

Three institutions for the feeble-minded are employing field workers 
and investigating the heredity of their inmates. Of these, the insti- 
tution at Faribault, Minnesota, is the latest addition. The situation 
there, at the time of writing this report, December 22, 1911, is as 
follows: 

EUGENICS RESEARCH WORK IN MINNESOTA. 

The Minnesota legislature, during the session of 1911, made an' 
annual appropriation of $5,000 for each of the two years ending Au- 
gust 1, 1912, and August 1, 1913, for "clinical and scientific work for 
the hospitals for insane, school for feeble-minded and penal institutions 
The expenditure of this money is to be made under the direction of 
the State Board of Control. This board appointed a committee to 

a Read before meeting of Eugenic Section, Annual Meeting, A. B. A., Dec. 30, 1911. 



Rogers: Heredity of Feeblemindedness 135 

report upon the best method of procedure. The committee consisted 
of Henry Wolfer, Warden State Penitentiary; Dr. H. A. Tomlinson, 
St. Peter State Hospital, and Dr. A. C. Rogers of the School for 
Feeble-Minded and Colony for Epileptics. The committee unani- 
mously recommended that the initial work be started at the School 
for Feeble-Minded and Colony for Epileptics and that one field 
worker should be secured and started immediately. Miss Saidee 
Devitt was employed upon the recommendation of Dr. Davenport, 
secretary of the Eugenics section, and placed in the field in October, 
1911. Up to the present time she has done the preliminary work on 
25 cases, 6 of which have been carefully charted. 

So far as the work has proceeded and a knowledge of what is pro- 
posed has been disseminated, the reaction of public sentiment has 
been sympathetic and favorable. 

eugenics research work in new jersey 

The State Home for Women at Vineland, N. J., has for somewhat 
more than a year employed a single field worker who has investigated 
about 40 cases from that institution. The results here, while not 
yet summarized, show practically the same conditions as those to 
be reported later from the Training School at Vineland. 

At the Training School there' are still three field workers. The 
results at the last summary were as follows: More than 11,000 
individuals have been investigated and of these somewhat over 1,000 
are feeble-minded. There are 22 with histories of criminal acts, while 
3,000 or more are normal. There are 286 cases of tuberculosis, 180 
cases of alcoholism, 31 epileptics, 114 sexually immoral and 19 histories 
of syphilis. These results come from the study of the families of about 
300 patients. About 65 per cent of the families investigated show the 
hereditary taint. This material is being worked up for publication in 
book form. The Mendelian indications will be carefully considered. 
One family not included in the foregoing has been kept separate be- 
cause of its peculiar character, the following results being shown: 

The chart of this family shows over 1,100 individuals. There 
have been 41 matings where both parents were feeble-minded. They 
had 122 feeble-minded children, 25 unknown, 32 died in infancy, 4 
died young, 4 miscarriages. Five matings without issue. Total 
conception 189, or 4.6 per mating. Of these children 15 were alco- 
holic, 1 tuberculous, 23 sexually immoral, 1 syphilitic, 1 epileptic, 
1 criminal, 1 case of violent temper. 



136 American Breeders Magazine 

There are 8 cases where the father was feeble-minded and the 
mother normal; the children being 10 normal, 10 feeble-minded, 8 
unknown, 6 died in infancy, 1 died young; total 35. Average per 
mating 4.3. 

Twelve cases where the father was normal, the mother feeble- 
minded. Children 7 normal, 10 feeble-minded, 8 unknown, 6 died 
in infancy, 1 died young. Two matings without issue. Total num- 
ber of children 32; average 2.6 per mating. 

Both parents normal, 36 cases. Issue, 68 normal children, 13 
unknown, 4 died in infancy, 3 died young. Four matings without 
issue. Total 89 children; average 2.5 per mating. 

Sixteen cases where the father is feeble-minded and the mother 
unknown give 1 normal child and 24 feeble-minded, while 26 cases 
where the father is undetermined and the mother feeble-minded 
give 1 normal child and 32 feeble-minded. 

There are many interesting things about this family and many 
items of jgreat social importance. These are being prepared for pub- 
lication and will soon be issued in book form by Dr. Goddard. 

The cases in the Training School will soon have been covered in the 
somewhat superficial way in which they have so far been gone over, 
namely, for the main purpose of determining how many individuals 
were normal mentally and how many were defective. As soon as 
this work is completed the field workers will be employed to go over 
the ground again and investigate each family much more in detail 
to determine what traits that appear in the children were manifest 
in the parents and grandparents, with the thought of determining, 
if possible, what are the elements, the unit characters which taken 
together constitute the complex subject for mental defect, provided 
this is of itself not a unit character. 

A method of making heredity charts which seems preferable to 
that mentioned in Bulletin No. 2 of the Eugenics Record Office, 
where rubber stamps were recommended, is in use at the Training 
School. Gummed labels are used on cross-ruled paper; the paper 
being ruled in blue, does not reproduce. These labels are prepared 
by the Dennison Company and there is one for each symbol necessary, 
viz. a square and a circle for normal, defective, and undetermined. 
By means of these labels a chart is quickly made and when finished 
is neat and accurate and ready for reproduction by the photographic 
method. Anyone interested in this can obtain further details and 
samples by corresponding with the Training School at Vineland, 
Department of Research. 



EDITORIALS 

END RESULTS IN BREEDING 

On the whole substantial progress is being made both in the sci- 
ence and in the practice of breeding. Every person who is studying 
the laws of heredity, or is breeding plants, or animals, or is consider- 
ing practical plans for the genetic betterment of man has his or her 
own bent. Each has his own viewpoint as gained by his preparation, 
study, and experience as to how to proceed in the phase of the subject 
which he has chosen to pursue. But all of us need occasionally to 
assume the position of the aviator and from a wide angle of vision 
let our minds discern which are the really large phases of the subject 
in which we are interested. The investigator and the breeder alike 
need to have their minds set upon the high points in the form of the 
end results. The goal of research is a constant addition to the 
scientific and usable knowledge of the subject. The goals of the 
breeder are improved forms, the increased value of which is clearly 
manifest. 

The American Breeders Magazine has its peculiar niche to fill. One 
of its goals is to help hold the genetic workers to the task of rounding 
up results. The scientist in many cases, needs to be encouraged to 
be practical. It is better for his work and better for science that 
he follow one vital thing to a real conclusion than that he skim the 
surface of a wide range of subjects. In no branch of study is it more 
necessary to so repeat observations, and to study the subject from 
every conceivable angle, that true and broad generalizations may 
be made, than where living protoplasm is concerned. This being 
true, the investigator should use care and wisdom in choosing problems 
the solution of which is worth the effort. He should get close to the 
breeders that he may know their problems. He needs to do his 
research work in view of the use which may be made of his results; 
just as the inventor of a machine needs to know the condition under 
which his invention is to be used. He should be prepared to bring 
his labors down to the form of practical end results, useful both to 
science and in the practice of breeding. 

In like manner the creative breeder — the person who is trying to 
produce a species, variety, breed, or strain superior to the available 
foundation stock — needs to have in mind a definite result. Here again 
the world will be vastly more enriched by the addition of one real 
acquisition in the form of a new strain, variety, or breed than by 
indifferent improvements in each of several species. The need is 

137 



138 American Breeders Magazine 

not so much that the breeder shall have in mind the exact detail of 
the newly-formed variety or breed, but rather he should plan that 
the new form shall better meet a given definite purpose. Those 
who have passed through the experience of separating out the muta- 
ting networks of descent from standard or hybrid foundation stocks, 
as of wheat, cotton, corn, swine or poultry, and have carried some 
of these improved varieties or breeds to successful commercial use, 
know full well that a broadly practical system of selective testing 
places in the lead those strains whose heredity proves to give the 
largest value per acre, per animal, per herd or per flock, somewhat 
regardless of our earlier ideals. We cannot always engraft all of our 
ideas of form, color, or other desired character on the successful 
strain. We must carry to commercial use that which under our, at 
best crude selection, will best serve the farmer or other producer. 
The writer gained a general view of the problem of plant and animal 
breeding by employing a few dozen species. 

There was need of a Burbank to give the world a zest for the inter- 
esting side of breeding and much inspiration has come from him 
because of the wide range of species he has employed. But the great 
majority of investigators will accomplish vastly more by confining 
their efforts to a restricted field or to a problem in which there is 
need of definite knowledge while the degree of improvement a breeder 
makes will in the long run not depend on the large number of species 
he undertakes to improve. And the creative breeder also should 
generally confine his efforts to one or to a few species. If Burbank, 
for instance, had spent all his efforts during the last half of his plant 
breeding activities, in the improvement of let us say potatoes, walnuts, 
and plums he would probably leave a vastly larger economic result, 
with a more lasting impulse to breeding than even have been his 
widely known results with many species. 

Creative breeding is a long-time proposition and the public, and 
especially public boards of directors in charge of such work, should 
be very sure that lack of results, if such is complained of, is really 
the fault of the worker, before thinking of changing employees. 
Sometimes results come only after long efforts, and here especially 
is good work always cumulative. It is a waste to support a worker 
through a long period of preliminary training, and of accumulating 
and testing of foundation of stocks and of analyzing unit characters 
of foundation material, and then to change to a new worker. What 
is needed is more workers, and closer division of labor, more attention 
given to the improvement of individual species. 



Editorials 139 

The possible end results of breeding are of such vast importance 
that the improvement of the heredity of living things is gradually 
gaining the status of a recognized public problem of large magnitude. 
Departments of agriculture and state experiment stations are slowly 
but surely gaining a strong hold upon the subject of plant breeding. 
They are slower in undertaking at public expense the genetic improve- 
ment of domestic animals, but in such efforts as have been made, no 
backward steps have been taken. And the vision both of possible 
practical plans for creative breeding, and of the immense economic 
results possible to achieve in the end, is gradually widening on the 
part of these institutions. 

One of the least effective parts of our breeding work, with both 
plants and animals, is the testing of the final product offered to the 
grower for commercial work. There is not a sufficient number of 
testing stations determining the comparative values of field, fruit, 
garden and forest crops, and giving to the growers of each locality 
accurate information, which variety will under given conditions 
yield the largest net returns, or best meet any specific requirement. 
The producers of live stock are in the dark as to the relative values 
of breeds and families of farm animals. It is safe to say that a billion 
dollars more crops and live stock products would result annually if, 
for the past thirty years, we had been spending publicly under scien- 
tific direction a million more than has been spent privately, in testing 
varieties of plants and breeds of animals. The growers are not free 
of blame, because they are so often indifferent to proof of excellence 
or inferiority. 

But the burden of this work is shifting to the public. 

Like many problems, this comes back to a matter of education, 
and eventually it will pass into the hands of trained men who will 
create and secure the equipment and will assure the end results. 
The American Breeders Association's leadership through its committee 
on pedagogy of genetics, has done some valiant service in bringing 
attention to the need of trained men and to the methods of develop- 
ing this as a college and school subject. Prof. Arthur W. Gilbert 
of Cornell University, the chairman of that committee merits wide 
cooperation from persons interested in this line of education. There 
are needed text-books of collegiate grade for those preparing to be 
teachers, investigators, and creative breeders. Other text-books 
are needed for agricultural secondary schools and consolidated rural 
schools. And once that subject is more thoroughly developed may 
we not hope to have text-books on eugenics? The new literature of 



140 American Breeders Magazine 

genetics is so far largely in bulletin and report form; new manuals 
and texts based on recent research are just beginning to appear. 
The promise is that this vigorous new science of genetics will ere long 
forge into a most vital place as both an economic and a culture sub- 
ject in our educational system. 

While there is every reason for our public departments of agricul- 
ture and agricultural experiment stations to take the lead in placing 
the science of heredity and the breeding of plants and animals on a 
strong basis, a large part of the work rests on the shoulders of the 
farmer. The producer of plants and animals in the aggregate deals 
with millions of individuals, at any rate with more than the experi- 
ment station researcher and breeder. On this account, and also 
because the grower deals with the individual plants and animals 
from their birth to maturity, mutating individuals may oftenest 
be found in commercial fields, gardens, orchards, and forests, and in 
the herds and flocks of the farmer and stockman. 



THE INTRODUCTION OF ANIMALS 

The United States Department of Agriculture has developed a 
world famous organization for the introduction from all countries 
of plants which promise to be useful under the varied conditions of 
this country. There are reasons why similar activities have not 
been so well developed in the introduction of animals. In the first 
place, there are relatively fewer domesticated breeds of animals in 
the world, as compared with the number of domesticated varieties 
of plants. Then, also, there was a vastly greater number of species 
of plants than of animal which in their native state were especially 
useful to man. Furthermore, the animals had a will to remain wild, 
an instinct to resist being restricted to one place, and so the process 
of domestication had to be an entirely different one. On the other 
hand many species of plants were at once ready for the garden or 
field and finding better conditions under care by man throve better 
than in the fiercer competition in the wild. 

The introduction of animals has been left almost wholly to private 
enterprise. The excellence of the great breeds of cattle, horses, sheep, 
and swine of the British Islands and the nearby countries of west 
Europe made possible a profitable business for importers of pedigreed 
stock. And this field of animal introduction has therefore been 
fairly well covered. The economic results from the importation of 



Editorials 141 

these improved breeds have been very large. We owe a debt of more 
than gratitude to the breeders of England, Scotland, the Channel 
Islands, France, Holland, and other countries. And by purchasing 
of their most popular strains we have paid large sums on this debt. 
Some of the fancy prices we have paid have been for animals better 
in individual appearance than in genetic ability to project their quali- 
ties into their progeny. But withal, in case of practically all breeds, 
our importers have secured a portion of the blood of nearly every 
long selected or mutating strain of peculiar excellence in the countries 
named, and while we shall continue to import portions of any newly 
originated strain of peculiar excellence which may arise in these breeds 
we already have as good or better foundation stock as have the 
farmers of the districts in which the respective breeds originated. 
In fact, in many cases, as in Holstein and Jersey cattle, in Percheron 
and Clydesdale horses, in Merino and Shropshire sheep, and in Berk- 
shire swine, we have a larger number of the really useful animals of 
the breed, than has the old country. Our larger numbers, the won- 
derful scope of our domestic market, both for live stock products and 
for pedigreed stock, are great advantages which should enable our 
breeders to keep in front of the breeders of the old country as to 
intrinsic quality. On the other hand, we lack in the way of live 
stock keepers who will so nurse to perfection the individual animal 
and the choicest herd of the breed, as will some of our brethren in 
England or Scotland, for example. 

Our rising agricultural science and education promise to give us 
the needed technique, the skill in the care of animals, and withal 
the ambition to create from our present grand foundations vastly 
better breeds. And why should not our rich live stock land become 
the great scientific breeding center from which to supply at good 
prices choice pedigreed stock, as England and her neighbors have so 
long supplied the best breeding stock to nearly iall other countries? 

In addition to the continued.introduction of the best foreign breeds 
we already have, there is need of the introduction of other species 
and breeds. A case illustrating this point is the recent introduc- 
tion into Texas of the Karakul sheep, to be used in hybridizing with 
our common breeds in producing first generation hybrids for their 
fur-like fleeces. Even a more striking case is the introduction by 
Mr. Borden into Texas of the Brahma breeds of cattle of India which 
are resistant to Texas fever, and inhospitable to the cattle tick which 
carries that disease. These cattle are to be produced as pure breds, 
and to be used in hybridizing with our native cattle. Both the pure 



■-sx^irT- 



142 American Breeders Magazine 

breds and hybrids produce live stock products in the tick-infested 
South more economically than do the cattle of our other breeds which 
originally came from the moist, cool climate of west Europe. Mr. 
Borden f ound numerous breeds of cattle in India, and in his introduc- 
tion of thirty head he could hardly have secured the strains of the 
several breeds which are best adapted to the respective conditions of 
our varied southern climate and agriculture. He has simply proven 
that India has breeds of cattle with certain heredity characters which 
produce rapidly-developing, large beeves in the presence of and quite 
indifferent to the cattle tick and the fever with which it infects Here- 
ford, Shorthorns, and other European breeds. 

Argentina has a breed of horses which had its origin in part in 
Morgan blood from our own Vermont, which might prove a valuable 
aid in the efforts now being made at producing a more valuable Ver- 
mont Morgan breed. Australia has in her Illawarra cattle a strain 
of milking Shorthorn blood which Minnesota should at once seek in her 
^efforts at producing a really efficient dual-purpose sub-breed of milk- 
ing Shorthorn cattle. East Europe is developing breeds of live stock 
of which we should know in detail. Here we may find breeds useful 
in their purity, or more likely bearing one or more unit characters 
needed in creating new breeds for our own use. 

Our government needs men highly trained in genetic work and 
experienced in the breeding of each species and even of each breed; 
men who know the stocks of the given species or breed throughout 
the world. They should be familiar with Mendelian characters of 
the species or breed, its peculiarities, breeding, and the economic 
value of its strains and families. These men should have advisory 
and official relations to such breeders as are seriously endeavoring 
to create new strains and breeds of higher intrinsic value. Such men 
with an opportunity to aid in the general superintendence of many 
"breeding circuits" to improve various breeds, as noted in No. 1, 
Vol. Ill, of the Magazine, would become highly experienced in intro- 
ducing needed new species and in placing them in their proper niche 
in our agriculture, to be used either as pedigreed breeds or as the 
partial basis of new hybrid breeds. By the successful making of new 
hybrid varieties, our plant breeders ere long will have gotten animal 
breeders over the theory that no new breeds shall be created. Then 
there will be no more prejudice to the mixture of the heredity of 
breeds in making new breeds than to the mixing of paints in making 
new pictures. On the other hand the indiscriminate mixing of breeds 



Editorials 143 

will be more discredited than now, though the use of first generation 
hybrids will in many cases be adopted. 

Then there is the need of introducing some species now wild. Some 
of the animals for which we might find use in stocking our extensive 
mountain pastures for instance, are certain species of small deer. 
We are in need of fur-bearing animals for our northern unused islands; 
birds which will thrive in our forests, and fish which might be more 
prolific in some of our streams and open waters than the species now 
inhabiting them. 

Furthermore our fellow breeders in other countries will not be 
asleep in genetics and leave the field wholly to us. They will im- 
prove present breeds; will utilize first generation hybrids; will con- 
tinue to form new hybrid breeds, and they, as well as we, will develop 
refined methods of determining and recording genuine genetic merit. 
We can find a large amount to do in keeping up with introducing 
their further improvements. They will bring into domestication 
more species from the wild and we shall need to secure superior sam- 
ples of these newly tamed stocks. 

The science of stock breeding, following the awakening in plant 
breeding and in eugenics, is rubbing its eyes; it is yawning, and is 
showing lively signs of the marvelous awakening of which it is capa- 
ble. The editor remembers the apathy with which live stock breed- 
ers, and even teachers of animal husbandry, only several years back, 
looked upon the proposition to join the plant breeders in developing 
the American Breeders Association and its publications. The change 
in attitude has begun, and the time is ripe for a world survey of the 
network of animal descent which we need in our business as a nation 
in the production annually of four billion dollars worth of live 
stock which should soon be six billions. 



NEWS AND NOTES 

POSSIBILITIES OF ACCLIMATIZING SOUTH AMERICAN BIRDS AND 

MAMMALS 

Recently I made a journey from Punta Arenas on the Straits of 
Magellan to the borders' of Paraguay, noting with pleased interest 
the animal life of Patagonia, Argentina, and Uruguay. It seems to 
me that there are animals and birds in temperate South America that 
would thrive with us and should be given opportunity to naturalize 
here. 

The South America ostrich lives nearly to the Straits of Magellan 
or did before men became so abundant. It is yet found far down 
in the snowbelt. It is common enough in Chubut where the climate 
is much as we have it in western Colorado. This ostrich is of the 
easiest breeding. In the fenced pastures it increases rapidly and 
seems quite hardy and healthy and very tame when not hunted. 
In Kentucky, southern Missouri, in Maryland, Virginia, and all the 
south country ostriches should thrive in pastures. They might 
afford a substitute for our turkeys, now often so difficult to rear. I 
saw many ostriches in villages, tamed and the pets of the peons, 
this in northern Argentina, and was told that they came from eggs 
carried in and hatched in the villages, under blankets. They are 
said to be fair food if eaten before they become mature, but tough 
eating when they are old. Their feathers are valuable for making 
into feather dusters. This hardy, interesting bird should appear 
in the parks of our wealthy cattle and horse breeders from Washing- 
ton to Texas, where probably the most congenial climate would be 
found. In times of deep snow ostriches would no doubt need feeding 
with us. There would be not the slightest difficulty in introducing 
ostriches, since their eggs could be sent north,making the voyage in 
twenty-one days, hatched here with ease and reared more easily than 
turkey chicks. 

There is a little bird that I. am told belongs also to the ostrich family, 
the perdice. It is larger than our quail, perhaps twice as large, 
with a longer neck. It runs and seldom flies. It is very neat and 
pretty and is a very favorite game bird. It is often caught by riding 
it down and snaring it with a noose at the end of a stick. This bird 
is of great worth and ought to be in our fields. It should be liberated 
in Texas and Oklahoma and by experiment one could learn how far 
north it would endure. I saw it in the province of Buenos Aires 

144 



News and Notes 145 

most abundant and there no snow falls. I do not know how far 
south it extends in Argentina. 

There is also a much larger bird that flies like a partridge; it is 
highly esteemed for its flesh and would no doubt be hardy with us in 
the south; its name has escaped me. 

Of animals, I will mention only the "mulita" (little mule), a species 
of armadillo about 12 inches long in body, with a tail nearly as much 
longer. The mulita is a harmless little beast, busy hunting for 
insects and roots. When one is caught it curls up and pretends to be 
dead. I carried one in my hands many a time when riding across 
the camps; its body was always delightfully warm and I used it as 
an animated hand warmer, turning it loose again before coming in 
to the headquarters of the estancias, since the peons and others eat 
mulitas and esteem them great delicacies. Mulitas would thrive 
perhaps from Washington south and could not fail to add interest 
to the countryside and doubtless perform service as insect destroyers 
and afford good food as well, if we would let them increase sufficiently 
for that. 

There are many interesting small birds in South America that 
would, I hope, thrive with us. There is the oven bird that likes to 
build its mud oven-like nest on gate posts near dwellings. It is inter- 
esting and valuable and ought to do well in the south. It is not 
migratory. It would decrease the insects of the south. It has no 
bad qualities that I could discover. The cardinal bird, with its 
bright red head and crest and its cheery song, would thrive through- 
out our south, and there are many others that could be introduced 
with profit to us. Conversely, we could send them our robins; 
they should be at home there if they did not go in the wrong direction 
when time came for winter migration! There is probably no finer 
all-around bird than the American robin, in its song, its cheer, its 
homely, man-loving nature. — Joseph E. Wing, Mechanicsburg, Ohio. 



AN EARLY WORK WITH MENDEL'S LAW 

Dining the winter of 1893-94, while working in the Ohio Agricul- 
tural Experiment Station greenhouse, I made about thirty crosses 
of tomatoes of various kinds; among these crosses was one of the 
Dwarf Champion X Potato Leaf which I afterwards for no apparent 
reason ran out into the second generation. When in F 2 it showed 
very plainly segregation of units and gave me a plant of the Dwarf 



146 American Breeders Magazine 

Potato Leaf. This peculiar stature and form of leaf was new in 
tomatoes and the plant was sold to W. Atlee Burpee & Company, 
and introduced in 1899 under the name of Fordhook Fancy. This 
tomato was strictly homozygote. Although I have raised plants by 
the thousands I have never seen the least sign of sporting or running 
back. As far as I know, this was one of the first dwarfs of the tomato 
to be named aside from the Dwarf Champion; but there have been 
added quite a number since. 

So plainly did this cross show where segregation takes place that 
I became convinced that there must be some law governing the case. 
In 1896, while living in Columbus, Ohio, I got hold of a new type 
of tomato which at the present time would probably be called a "mu- 
tant;" this tomato was introduced in 1897 by the Livingston Seed 
Company, under the name of Honor Bright. This tomato differs 
from any other kind in a peculiar yellowing of both fruit and foliage. 
At the present time this form of tomato has become fairly well known, 
as there are several forms of it, all of which I think I have had the 
privilege of originating from the first original one. In 1897, 1 crossed 
this new "mutant," the Honor Bright, with another new one — the 
Fordhook Fancy. In pondering over the work that I had done in 
making the Fordhook Fancy, one day the idea suddenly came to me 
that the combinations that go to make up the new tomatoes I wanted 
would be found only in the second generation, and in the first genera- 
tion I would have something different from what I had used in making 
the cross. The cross that I had made succeeded, so, by gathering 
as much seed as I could the following year, I would probably find 
what I looked for. 

The next season I planted enough seed to produce several thousand 
plants. What might be the total number of kinds that were produced 
I do not know. The practical plant breeder is interested only in the 
new and useful kind that may be obtained, and these I had figured 
out on paper before ever the fruit commenced to ripen, and when 
"round-up" came in the fall I had six out of a possible seven. Had 
I not had a fairly clear idea of the law which is now called Mendel's 
law I do not think I could have obtained these results. These new 
tomatoes were sold to the Livingston Seed Company and introduced 
in 1901. Tabulating the work in form of a diagram we have: 



News and Notes 



147 



Honor Bright X 

(D) (tall) 

(R) (yellow foliage) 
(D) (red fruit) 
(D) (cut leaf) 


Fordhook Fancy 

(R) (dwarf) 
(D) (green foliage) 
(R) (purple fruit) 
(R) (full leaf) 


Dominant Form 




(tall) 

(green foliage] 

(red fruit) 

(cut leaf) 


) 






L 5 


> 2 


\ 4 
I 


[ 


5 l 


3 


7 



1 = Original form of Honor Bright, purple fruit 

2 = Tall, potato leaf, Honor Bright, purple fruit 

3 = Tall, potato leaf, Honor Bright, red? 

4 = Dwarf, potato leaf, Honor Bright, purple 

5 = Dwarf, potato leaf, Honor Bright, red 

6 = Dwarf Champions, Honor Bright red 

7 = Dwarf Champions, Honor Bright, purple 



Livingston's Grandus. 
Livingston's Princess. 
Livingston's Multicolor. 
Livingston's Royal Colors. 
Livingston's Danay Dwarf. 
Livingston's Aristobright. 
Green's Neuevo. 



Just which of these tomatoes were homozygote I do not know, 
although we raised No. 7 for several years and it has proven quite 
true to type. The fact that with help of Mendel's law one can get 
a new plant that will not vary, I believe to be an important one. The 
Resplendent tomato, introduced by John Lewis Childs in 1912, is 
a Dwarf Potato Leaf sort of the Honor Bright type, the fruit being of 
the Ponderosa-like shape and size. The scientific point of interest 
in regard to it is that it is a segregation — occurring in the F2 cross. 
As far as I can remember, I had no plants of Honor Bright growing on 
my place for six years before the Resplendent came to light. Toma- 
toes while not absolutely self-fertilizing, cross-fertilize so seldom that 
I have never seen a natural cross even when different varieties were 
grown in the same field. I fail to see why a mutant cannot arise 
independently a second time, although in this case the fact that 
there were four plants found that carried the characters of the 
Resplendent is against it being called a mutant. — E. C. Green, 
Medina, Ohio. 



148 Amekican Breedebs Magazine 

RELATION BETWEEN YIELDS OF MILK AND YIELDS OF FAT 

IN DAIRY CATTLE 

The figures given in this article are taken from a master's degree 
thesis submitted by O. W. Reagin to the Animal Husbandry Depart- 
ment of the Ohio State University. 

These coefficients of correlation are concrete expressions of com- 
monly understood general relations between yields of milk and 
yields of fat in the dairy breeds. They relate in no way to inheritance 
though they may be of some use in statistical investigation of the 
inheritance of dairy capacity. 

For Guernseys all authenticated yearly records published from 
1902 to 1907 were used. Only 250 authenticated yearly Jersey 
records were obtainable and these cover the period of from 1905 
to 1908. The coefficients for Guernseys and Jerseys are comparable. 
The figures from the two groups of Holsteins can be compared with 
each other only. Considerable numbers of Holstein yearly records 
can not be secured and results of 7-day tests were used. Group I 
comprises 1,000 seven-day records made between 1898 and 1902. 
The per cent of fat was not given in the year books and was computed 
from the total milk and total butter (80 per cent fat) as recorded. 
The second Holstein group of records were all made in the year 
1908, affording a comparison of the yields of cows of this breed at 
two times ten years apart. 

If in Guernseys, for example, the total fat yields should vary 
directly with the total milk yield, the coefficient of correlation would 
then be + 1. It was found to be somewhat less but quite uniform 
with similar results from Jerseys and Holsteins. The correlation 
between the pounds of milk and per cent of fat is in all cases a negative 
one showing that high milk yields are at the expense of richness in 
fat, or in other words that the yield of fat tends to constancy. The 
yield of milk and the per cent of fat are much more variable than 
the total amount of fat. The twelve coefficients worked out are 
included in the table. The means, coefficients of variability and 
regression will be furnished to any person desiring them. 



News and Notes 



149 



Correlation existing between yields of milk and fat and yield of fat and per 

cent fat in different dairy breeds. 



Breed of cattle. 



Guernsey.. 

Jersey 

Holsteln I. 
Holsteln II 



Authenticated yearly. 



Coefficient of correlation between: 



Total milk and 
total fat. 



0.8811 
Er. 0.0064 

0.8725 
Er. 0.0101 

0.8620 
Er. 0.0055 

0.8696 
\ Er. 0.0052 



Total milk and 
per cent fat. 



—3093 
Er. 0.0258 

-3444 
Er. 0.0372 

—1851 
Er. 0.0206 

—1516 
Er. 0.0209 



Total fat and 
per cent fat. 



0.1068 \ 
Er. 0.0282 f 

0.1319 \; 
Er. 0.0414 

0.3134 
Er. 0.0192 

0.3438 
Er. 0.0207 



Number of 
record* used. 



658* 

256* 

lOOOf 

lOOOf 



t Seven-day records. 



The errors in coefficients are not stated as they are in no case 
large enough to be significant. — F. R. Marshall, Ohio State Univer- 
sity, Columbus, Ohio. 



A MILLION YEARS HENCE 

It is a common practice among scientists to look back a million 
years; but it seldom seems to occur to them to look forward that 
length of time. Perhaps there is more to be gained by such a pro- 
ceeding than might appear superficially. The general disposition to 
view the so-called laws of heredity as settled, and the progress of 
the animal from the primeval slime as beyond question, is apt to 
cause one, looking forward, to wonder how distant generations of 
scientists will manage to put in their time. 

The truth of the matter is, that while we have discovered a few 
facts relating to the methods of nature's workings, the trend of recent 
research work and experimental investigation, have clearly demon- 
strated the evanescence of hastily concocted formulas. Certain well 
defined principles emerge to assist the breeder and supplement his 
practical experience. Depending upon anything further is apt to lead 
the experimenter off into a maze of unprofitable speculation. Dr. 
Wilson has shown in one of his later papers how the actual arrange- 
ment of chromosomes differ radically from the earlier conception 
of them. Dr. McClurg brings out the pronounced character of the 
germ cells of grass hoppers; and Dr. Lillie shows how the different 
stages of chromosomic development relate to some propensity of the 
entire organism. We might go on multiplying instances where some 



150 American Breeders Magazine 

• 

popular biological conception had to be not only modified but radi- 
cally changed. 

There is much disposition to question the mutation theory in its 
various phases in the light of actual breeding experience as demon- 
strated by Prof. H. S. Bolley. 

Practical breeders everywhere are beginning to find that a great 
deal of the experimental evidence, in favor of an indefinite multipli- 
cation of the earth's useful products, has testified to too much. They 
see that patient, persistent, personal effort in selection is the thing 
that counts. 

During a million years what convulsions and changes of style will 
assail the cosmic conception! What discoveries and researches to un- 
dermine and disintegrate the biological stronghold ! How often, think 
you, the biologic castle will be stormed and taken by various armies 
during a million years? How often established and how often con- 
tested for by warring faction? — Walter Sonneberg. 

PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED 

A Literary Note on Mendel's Law. W. W. Stockberger, U. S. Dept. of Agr. 
Reprint from American Naturalist, March, 1912. Pp. 151-157. 

Contribution Al Mejoramento Del Caballo Para Usos Practicos. Revista 
De La LigaAgraria, Buenos Aires, 1911. 72 pages. Illustrated. Through 
courtesy of Wm. R. E. Blonin and Don Carlos Guerrero. 

Expansion of Races. Charles Edward Woodruff, A.M., M.D. 495 pages. 
Rebman Company publishers, New York. 

A review of this book, regarding the value of which the most diverse 
and opposing opinions exist, will be published in an early number of 
the Magazine. 

The Trait Book. Eugenics Record Office, Bulletin No. 6. Dr. C. B. Daven- 
port, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y., February, 1912. 52 pages, 1 text figure, 
1 colored frontispiece. Price, 10 cents. 

Alfalfa, The Relation of Type to Hardiness. Philo K. Blinn. Bui. 181, 
Experiment Station of the Colorado Agricultural College. 16 pages, 14 
text figures. 

Second Generation of the Cross between Velvet and Lyon Beans. John 
Belling, Assistant Botanist. Separate from Report of Florida Agricultural 
Experiment Station, 1911. 22 pages, 4 text figures. 

Eighteenth Report. Neglected and Dependent Children of Ontario. 
W. J. Hanna, Provincial Secretary, Toronto, 1911. 124 pages. Illustrated. 



News and Notes 151 ; 

i 

Delaine Merino Register of the National Delaine Merino Sheep I 

Breeders Association, Washington, Pa. Vol. VIII. 1909. 125 pages. f 

i 

Woman and Labor. Olive Schreiner. 299 pages. Frederick A. Stokes [ 

Company, publishers, New York. Price $1.25 net. * ■ 

In her statement of the all too seldom realized fact that "with ! 

each generation the entire race passes through the body of its woman- 
hood as through a mold, reappearing with the indelible marks of \ 
that mold upon it," Olive Schreiner strikes the keynote of her great 
book, Woman and Labor, which is at once one of the most logical, i 
the most appealing, the most biologically convincing, and the most 
deeply-foundationed of all the literature which has attempted to 
deal with the so-called "new woman problem." 

Sketching lightly, yet with bold and certain strokes, she draws a 
picture of the evolution of the human race with woman's part therein, j 

showing that from its very infancy woman has served the race and 
the common good side by side with man and that in addition to her 
most important function of incessant child-bearing she has also per- 
formed her full share of the labor of supporting the race and of 
carrying it onward in its appointed path of progress. By many 
historical citations the author shows that races have held their own 
in the great battle for existence only so long as their women have 
labored — have exercised to the full all their qualities of heart, hand, 
and brain, and that when a race has become so opulent that it was 
no longer necessary for the women to labor, and when as a result 
the women became to a greater or a less extent parasitic, that race, 
producing through its weak and inefficient womanhood correspond- 
ingly weak and inefficient men, has gone down before other races 
whose women were still laboring women — strong in mind and body — 
virile, efficient, worthy of motherhood. To quote from the book 
itself: "Only an able and laboring womanhood can permanently 
produce an able and laboring manhood." 

By a comprehensive outline of the economic progress of the ages, 
Miss Schreiner shows how woman's natural duties have, one by one, 
been taken from her: how for the spinning-wheels of an earlier gen- 
eration are now the great steam-driven looms of our factories; for 
the hoes and grindstones of our earlier agriculture which it fell to 
the women to tend while the men fought and hunted, are now power- 
ful agricultural implements, man-managed and often steam or elec- 
tricity driven; how factoi*y-made garments and factory-canned or 
prepared foods day by day usurp more and more the place of women ' 

as useful laborers, "while among the wealthy classes the male dress- 



152 American Breeders Magazine 

designer with his hundred male-milliners and dress-makers is help- 
ing finally to explode the ancient myth that it is woman's exclusive 
sphere, and a part of her domestic toil, to cut and shape the gar- 
ments she or her household wear." 

Even woman's great labor of child-bearing is being more and more 
restricted as the race progresses. Since, under modern conditions, 
our race is no longer decimated by plague, pestilence, famine, or 
continuous war, incessant child-bearing is no longer demanded of 
woman. From having been in times past her greatest duty it has 
come to pass in our present day that "child-bearing and suckling, 
instead of filling the entire circle of female life from the first appearance 
of puberty to the end of middle age, becomes an episodal occupation 
employing from three or four to ten or twenty of the three score- 
and ten years which are allotted to human life. In such societies 
the statement (so profoundly true when made with regard to most 
savage societies, and even largely true with regard to those in the 
intermediate stages of civilization) that the main and continuous 
occupation of all women from puberty to age is the bearing and suck- 
ling of children, and that this occupation must fully satisfy all her 
needs for social labor and activity, becomes an antiquated and 
unmitigated misstatement." 

"Looking around then, with the utmost impartiality we can com- 
mand, on the entire field of woman's ancient and traditional labors, 
we find that fully three-fourths of it have shrunk away for ever, and 
that the remaining fourth still tends to shrink." 

With these great fundamental truths as her text she makes an 
impassioned appeal that for the good not of woman alone but of the 
entire race all fields of labor — scientific, educational, social, economic 
— be opened to her; that, having travelled the path of human 
progress thus far side by side with man, it shall not be denied her 
to go still farther by his side, developing as he develops and, by 
her own development, reacting upon the race in the production of 
still stronger generations of men in the years to come. 

Taking the splendid ground of racial necessity, she demands that 
woman be not forced, by the narrowing of her former fields of labor 
and by the closure to her of all other fields, into a degrading parasitism, 
and declares the incontestable fact that: "If, at the present day, 
woman, after her long upward march side by side with man, devel- 
oping with him through the ages by means of endless exercise of the 
faculties of mind and body, has now, at last, reached her ultimate 
limit of growth, and can progress no farther; that, then, here also, 



News and Notes 153 

today, the growth of the human spirit is to be stayed; that here, on 
the spot of woman's arrest, is the standard of the race to be finally 
planted, to move forward no more, forever: that, if the parasite 
woman on her couch, loaded with gewgawa, the plaything and amuse- 
ment of man, be the permanent and final manifestation of female 
human life on the globe, then that couch is also the deathbed of 
human evolution." 

In the face of these truths, that man or woman must be much more 
foolish than brave who would dare to stand in the path of any woman 
who, the traditional fields of woman's labor having failed her, asks 
permission to exercise her powers in any new field to which her tal- 
ents or preferences may call her. The author has in this book con- 
tributed not only a social document, but unawares perhaps, a strong 
eugenic one. And whatever personal views one may hold regarding 
the woman's movement, one cannot get away from the fact that 
this book presents a number of eugenic questions from an entirely 
new viewpoint. — Hattie M. Wilson. 

The Heredity of Richard Roe : A Discussion of the Principles of Eugen- 
ics. Davis Starr Jordan, President of Leland Stanford, Jr., University. 
165 pp. American Unitarian Association, publishers, 1911. Price $1.20 net. 

For a panoramic view and a popular and readable statement of 
the subject of Eugenics we have not yet seen anything which so well 
covers the ground as this little book. The title would lead one to 
believe that it is a novel with a problem hidden between its leaves; 
whereas it is a book on eugenics purely so — Richard Roe being a 
lay-figure, which helps us to think out the problem in concrete terms. 

One fact which recommends Richard Roe to the reader, whether 
he be a general reader or a scientist, is, that the book is not a scien- 
tific one; and yet the subject is treated from the modern viewpoint, 
and the facts of science are presented together with a ripe philosophy 
of life, and with touches here and there of subtle wit. Its epigram- 
matic style makes the book entertaining and one reads it with as 
much tension as a story. Here are a few quotations from the text: 



"The purpose of the study of Eugenics is to know the kind of ancestors we 
should pick for the next generation. • • • " 

"A good stock is the only material out of which history can make a great 
nation. • • • • " 

"In spite of the facts of race suicide, and the number of foolish wives and 
broken families, motherhood was never so highly esteemed in civilized races 
as it is today. ••••»' 



154 American Breeders Magazine 

"The gilded youth and the smart set are not typical of American manhood 
or womanhood and Richard Roe is not of their kind, for he belongs to a type 
that lasts. " 

"In the instant of conception, the gifts of life are granted. • • ■ • " 

"On the other hand unexpected glories sometimes arise from the happy 
mating of these common folk whose characters chance to supplement each 
other. * • * • " 

"Among men there have always been those to whom the art of living was 
impossible. • * • 



>> 



No doubt, the largest number of persons who concern themselves 
with eugenics see it chiefly in its broader light, and its sociological 
significance, and less in its relation to self and the individual. The 
author himself seems to have been strongly impressed by the former 
viewpoint and made it the dominant note in his book, which goes 
forth from a glance at the subheads of chapters, as instance, a few, 
taken at random: Race Decline not Collective, Race Decadence, 
The Poor Whites, Poverty and Pauperism, Paupers or Parasites, 
Corruption Fund of Public Charity, Foreign Immigration, Future of 
the Republic, Slavery, The Slums, Luxury, The Higher Foolishness, 
The Mind of Nations, Breeding of the Superman, All Englishmen of 
Royal Lineage, The Wholesome World. 

Some defects we are quite willing to overlook; thus certain portions 
of the book bear evidence of either, haste in writing or at any rate 
lack of painstaking editing; at times the argument does not seem to 
be fully built out. 

The Horse, His Breeding, Care and Use. David Buffum. 160 pages, 
5 inches by 7 inches, 7 text figures. Outing Publishing Company, publish- 
ers, New York, 1911. Price, 70 cents. 

A treatise on the horse in narrative style, which makes it quite read- 
able. It is evidently written by one who knows his subject well, 
and the thirteen short chapters abound in useful suggestions as to 
curing of vices, shying, the education of the colt, treatment of certain 
cases of sickness, shoeing, etc. 

The author very aptly states that " horses vary in character and 
disposition as much as human beings do and come by their traits in 
the same way — by inheritance. The disposition of a horse seems 
to be inherited more from his dam than his sire." 

The author is strongly of the opinion that "meanness and vicious- 
ness in horses can best be avoided by not breeding it into them. Even 
if such horses can be subdued and made useful, is it worth while to 
raise them, if others without these undesirable traits can be raised. 



News and Notes 155 

There is a very interesting chapter of about twelve pages on " Our 
Debt to the Arab" narrating the fascinating story of Godolphins 
Arabian (in Tunis, Scham and Agba, his keeper). 

Horse lovers and horse raisers will do well to add this book to 
their collection of horse literature. 

"Tomorrow.' ' A play in three acts, by Percy MacKaye. 176 pages. Fred- 
erick A. Stokes Company, publishers, New York. Price, $1.25 net. 

After the reading of this play one cannot fail to be impressed that 
in this the stage entered the field as a great moral teacher. In "To- 
morrow" the author has cleverly and successfully presented one of 
the big and striking facts of eugenics, precisely as the thinking and 
seeing observe it enacted daily in real life. There is not a word or 
an incident which is overdrawn. 

The story is simple — love of a woman for a man who had earlier 
"sowed his wild oats." Her first impulse is to follow him despite 
all; eventually her training asserts itself and she exercises the rights 
of her enlightened womanhood and drops the physically poisoned 
thing for a pure man. 

The action of the play is laid in southern Cajifornia, on the farm 
of a plant breeder, and the philosophy of selecting, of hybridizing, 
or of Mendelism and the accomplishments of plant breeding are 
cleverly and instructively woven into the play. 

A characteristic sidelight is given of the attitude of the "practical 
man," who asks for the meaning of eugenics. A little blind girl is 
introduced into the play, apparently standing as a living answer to 
his question. It is probably the first time that the word "plant- 
breeder" is used in a literary production, and we feel especially grate- 
ful to the author for using this word. It is good, it is correct, and 
the public may as well now learn its meaning and become accustomed 
to its use. If the author had been a bit more of a scientist, he would 
have seen that by judiciously drawing upon a few more of the mar- 
velous facts of heredity he could have greatly strengthened the play 
and added to its general interest. 

The central thought of the play is this: That once eugenic truth 
is taught to women, the race will through them be regenerated, and 
progress to a new and wonderful human race be assured. 

Only six principal characters enter into the play; a select company 
should be able to make a powerful and appealing presentation of it. 



156 American Breeders Magazine 

REFERENCES IN CURRENT LITERATURE 

Pedigreed Nursery Stock : Circular 18, New York Agricultural Experiment 
Station. An address given at the meeting of the New York Fruit Growers, 
Rochester, N. Y., January 5, 1912, by Prof. U. P. Hedrick, Geneva, N. Y. 

The author questions the value or rather the commercial practica- 
bility of "pedigreed nursery stock. ,, The ground he takes is "that 
there is nothing to gain even though there be a scintilla of truth in 
the claims of those who would have nursery stock sold with a pedi- 
gree/' and "that a fruit grower can spend his time to better advan- 
tage than in attempting to breed fruit trees by selection." 

In support of this view the author contends that individual seed- 
lings grown from seed of the same plant may vary greatly. On 
the other hand a bud or a graft is literally a "chip of the old block" 
and while plants grown from buds may vary because of environment 
they do not often vary through heredity. "And in case of the occur- 
rence of such a variation, only trial can determine whether or not 
it is heritable." There is no evidence to show that the total varia- 
tions, due to "the richer soil, more sunlight, better care, the greater 
freedom from insects, and diseases, the longer season can be transmitted 
from parent to offspring. The fruit grower who wants to perpetu- 
ate such variations must renew for each generation the conditions 
which gave him the desirable traits. It is a question of nurture, 
not nature." 

Summing up some of the difficulties standing in the way of pedi- 
greeing fruit trees, the author fears that "opportunities for dis- 
honest practices would be greatly multiplied. If pedigreed trees 
become a vogue, tree-growing must become a petty business. Climate 
and environment would permit nurserymen who are growing pedi- 
greed stock, to propagate only a half dozen varieties of any fruit." 

"Fruit trees are not sufficiently well fixed in their characters to 
make selection from single 'best trees' worth while even should their 
characters be transmissible." 

"The burden of proof is upon those who advocate pedigreed trees, 
for the present practices of propagating fruit plants are justified by 
the precedents of centuries." 

The Best Color for Horses in the Tropics. Lieut. Col. Charles E. Wood- 
ruff, Med. Corps, U. S. Army, Journal of the U. S. Cavalry Association, 
September 1911. Pp. 243-263. 

Dr. Woodruff has been persistently pursuing the question of the in- 
fluence of light on living matter and since the publication of his Expan- 



News and Notes 157 

sion of Races, and The Effect of Tropical Light on White Man has in 
various writings added facts of material values until he has succeeded 
in bringing together an amount of data which command attention, 
particularly because of their practical value. The article under 
consideration is written mainly with the view of eliciting further 
information on the matter of skin and hair color of horses, mules 
and cattle for tropical countries and incidentally of all stock much 
exposed to sunlight. 

Dr. Woodruff maintains that "a few belated physicians still pro- 
fess to believe that nature made a mistake in pigmenting living forms 
in light countries, but that is no reason why men should be so foolish 
as to try to acclimatize where God cannot do it." "Acclimatization 
is now used only by ignoramuses." 

He believes that in transferring stock of whatever kind, from one cli- 
mate and latitude to another, skin and hair coloring is an item that must 
be considered. If not, the lethal effect of light will effect a selection 
by killing of the least fit and this is true in tropical countries, climates 
with intense sunlight, or even large cities where during "hot waves" 
conditions exist, resembling those in tropical climates. 

Best adopted in the tropics are animals with white, gray or sorrel, 
or mud colored hair and black skin, while for animals in the north 
temperate zones the best are black skins with either white or light 
coats. 

A New Science and its Findings : Some disconcerting discoveries by Karl 
Pearson; Albert Jay Nock. The American Magazine, March, 1912. 
Illustrated with portraits. Pp. 577-583. 

An article describing the progress of the study of eugenics in Eng- 
land and making "a plea for the organization of eugenics in this 
country." The writer displays an amazing lack of information con- 
cerning the status of eugenics study and organization in America. 
We cannot conceive how he can be ignorant of the organization of 
the American Breeders Association with its three great sections of 
breeders of plants, breeders of animals, and eugenists. In fact, 
there is not in all Europe an organization of similar scope. Without 
discounting the splendid work which our English friends have been 
and are doing, and the superb body of knowledge of "Rassenkultur" 
being built up by German scientists, it may in justice be said that 
America is not lagging behind. 

The Eugenics Record Office is a permanent base for the collection 
and study of eugenic fact. It is, so far as our knowledge goes, the 



158 American Breeders Magazine 

only eugenics institution having a staff of field workers. There are 
ten special eugenics committees, composed of men of whom each 
is an authority in his special line. The Magazine presents a great 
variety of genetic and eugenic subjects in a popular way and the 
Annual Report contains all the scientific and technical contributions 
from members. Under the leadership of members of the Association, 
the formation of eugenic clubs at the important educational centers 
is being inaugurated. 

This in brief is the present status of the organization of eugenics 
in this country, and we most strenuously take exception to the heed- 
less statement of the writer, who assumes to know what eugenists 
are doing in this country, but does not. 

Mr. Nock suggests: "Let us divert if necessary, a little of the 
endowment that goes so prodigally into the multiplication of veter- 
inarians, lawyers, dentists, engineers, and doctors, and endow an 
investigation into the workings of cause and effect upon our supply 
of men." He is in this only partially right. Funds are needed for 
research work in general genetics as well as in eugenics. Space is 
too limited here to explain why this is so. 

Die Karakul Schafe (The Karakule Breed of Sheep). H. Kraemer Hohen- 
heim, Germany. April 12, 1912, number of Mitteilungen der Deutschen 
Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft. 

In an interesting article, the author reviews the recent contribu- 
tion to the literature of breeding of karakul sheep by Professor Adam- 
etz of Vienna, Austria. This part of the sheep industry has been 
the object of discussion for many years, but the German with charac- 
teristic conservatism and circumspection has never risked going into 
it on a business scale. Professor Adametz of Vienna, Austria, found 
that karakuls are extensively bred and valuable furs produced in the 
Crimea, South Russia and Bosnia. Good results have been achieved 
at Gross-Engersdorf and at the imperial Thiergarten at Schoenbrunn, 
Austria. The conclusions which the author draws from all available 
Russian and Austrian experiments are here condensed very briefly as 
follows : 

That there is not demonstrable any influence of either climate or soil of the 
steppes of Bokhara and Chiwa, on the quality and amount of "curl" of the 
skin of the Karakul lamb. 

That a deteriorating influence of European climate and feed on pure Euro- 
pean bred Karakuls is not observable. 

That the characteristic "curl" and "penciling" of the fur is a mendelian 
character, which had originated probably by mutation. 



News and Notes 159 

That this character was probably strengthened by selection, and is capable 
of still further improvement by the same method. 

It seems as if the German farmer was preparing in his systematic 
and irrepressible way to add a valuable industry to his agriculture. 
It is chagrining to say the least, that the United States exports annually 
millions worth of fine furs and skins, but all as raw material. Leipzig 
is the market center of the world's fur trade and our best and 
costliest skins go there and are reimported after being made valuable 
by skilled artisans who receive apprenticeship and industrial training 
in the excellent trades schools of that country. Now the Germans 
seem to have decided in their own minds that the curl and penciling 
in the Karakul wool is a unit character and is independent of climate 
or soil and that those valuable skins can be grown to as great perfec- 
tion in Mecklenburg as in Bokhara. We would misjudge their pro- 
verbial thrift greatly, if they will not exploit that important fact. 
Here is another side. Does not all this illustrate forcibly the need 
in this country of a public service organization like the American 
Breeders Association? And ought not this Association to have at 
its disposal funds for the study of such and similar questions, which 
are too expensive and too complex for individuals to undertake, and 
for study of which it is as a rule difficult to obtain public money? 

The Transmitting Power and Influence of the Dam in Developing a 

High Class Herd of Purebred Dairy Cattle. Charles P. Reed. In 

the Michigan Dairy Farmer, Vol. Ill, No. 47, February 24, 1912. Pp. 3-6. 
What Will Your Child Inherit? Ethel C. Macomber. Delineator for 

April, 1912, with a foreword by Dr. C. B. Davenport. 
Dissemination of Purebred Grain in Wisconsin. The Farmer, St. Paul, 

Minnesota; No. 10, March 9, 1912. Pp. 363-364. 
The Red Sunflower. Prof. T. D. C. Cockerell. Pop. Science Monthly, 

April, 1912. Pp. 373-382. 
Journal of Genetics, Cambridge, England. 
Contents of February number, 1912 : 

The history of Primula Obconica, Hance, under Cultivation. Arthur W. 

Gilbert. 

Account of Family showing Minor Brachydactyly. H. Drinkwater. 

A Critical Examination of Recent Studies on Color inheritance in Horses. 

A. H. Sturtevant. 

A Further Contribution to the Study of Right and Left-handedness. 

(Torsion in plants.) R. H. Compton. 



ASSOCIATION MATTERS 

THE A.B.A.IN FOREIGN CO UN TRIES 

A most gratifying feature connected with the development of the 
American Breeders Association is the appreciation of its work by 
foreign scientists and breeders. The steadily growing world popu- 
lation is making the problem of food supply a formidable one in all 
countries 

The question of enhancing the breeding values of the world's food- 
supply— plants and animals— has a decidedly international aspect and 
although bodies of men have organized in nearly all countries into 
societies serving in each respectively, purposes similar to those of 
the American Breeders Association in this, it seems, as if the American 
Breeders Association were universally recognized as the agency most 
largely concerning itself with that question. At least, that is the 
only interpretation we can place upon the fact, for instance, that ten 
per cent of the total membership of the Association are in foreign 
countries; or the further fact that eighteen per cent of the life 
members are in foreign countries. 

The latest substantial addition to the foreign contingent of our 
membership comes from Russia. Nine new memberships were sent 
in by Mr. Basil Benzin of the Department of Agriculture at St. Peters- 
burg, Russia, making the total number of our members in that 
country fourteen. 

Two years or more ago you influenced me to join the American Breeders' 
Association. The publications have been received regularly and looked over 
somewhat, although the greater number of articles have been of too technical 
a nature to be of special interest to me. But in the preparation of a paper 
which I recently read before the meeting of the Western Michigan Holstein- 
Friesin Association I found a wealth of good material in the magazines. The 
information which I was enabled to give has been of such interest that the 
paper has been widely advertised and republished a number of times. — C. P # 
Reed, Secretary West Michigan Holstein Friesin Association , Howell, Michigan m 

Volume VI of the Annual Reports has been received, and, to say the very 
least about the material which it contains, I consider my membership fee better 
spent, or invested rather, than anything I have ever yet invested. — John C. 
Thysell, Dickinson, N. D. 

You may rest assured that I will always be more than willing to subscribe 
$2.00 a year for the excellent publication that is gotten out for the American 
Breeders Association under your efficient direction. Their worth is many 
times this amount to me. — M. M. Jardine, Professor of Agronomy, Kansas 
State Agricultural College, Manhattan, Kas. 

160 



Washington, D. C. 



W^^^/ WASHINGTON, D.C. V^^^j/ 

• AMERICAN « 
BREEDERS 
MAGAZINE 

A JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND EUGENICS 



The lllawarra Dairy Cattle 

frank McCaffrey 

Fat-Tail and Broad-Tail Sheep 

C. C. YOUNG 

Color Markings in Hereford-Shorthorns 

B. P. FOGLE 



l 



Evolution of a Type of Horse 

W. S. ANDERSON ' 




EMared u •rond-olui matter Jon* 10, 1910, it the Pot Offlw it Wmihiwrton, D. C. unto thi Act of Jul* U, V 



Vol. in, No. 3. Whole Number 11. 

CONTENTS 

Nehemiah P. Clarke, Biography (with portrait). 

W. If . Harm, Washington, D. C 161 

The IUawarra Breed of Dairy Cattle, illustrated. 

Frank McCaffrey. Kiama, N. S. W., Australia 164 

A History of the Arabian Horse, and ha Inflnenco on Modern Breeds, fflnatrated. 

F. Knorr, Mitchell, Nebraska 174 

Concerning the Fat-tail and the Broad-tail Sheet, fllnstrated. 

C. C. Tonne Beten, Tens 181 

Transmission of Color and Color Markings in Hereford-Shorthorn Crosses. 

B. P. Fogle, Beaver Creek, N. C 201 

The Turkey as an Beg Producer, illustrated. 

w. N. Irwin, Washington, D.C + 204 

The Evolution of a Type of Horse, frustrated. 

W. A. Anderson, Winchester, Kj 209 

EDITORIALS: 

The Pedagogics of Eugenics 222 

The American Breeders Association and the Practical Breeder 224 

News and Notes: 

Another Instance of Bay Foals from Chestnut Parents 228 

A Pertinent Eugenics Question 228 

Organization of a Eugenics Club at Cornell University 229 

Progress Report from the University of Wisconsin 230 

Value of Seedling Characters in Plant Breeding 231 

Fifteenth International Congress on Hygiene and Demography 232 

Publications Received 233 

New Books 233 

References in Current Literature 237 

Errata 237 

Association Matters: 

The Eugenics Record Office, illustrated 238 

Members and Endowment 238 

The Magazine to Open its Pages to Advertisements 249 



THE AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Is published quarterly by the 
American Breeders Association for the use of its members and for others who are 
students of Eugenics and Genetics and for breeders of plants and animals. 

Price of single copies 35 cents. 



The American Breeders Association 

Is a cooperative association designed to develop the science of heredity and 
the art of breeding, and to bring that knowledge to persons interested in these 
subjects. 

The membership is composed of progressive breeders of live stock, horticul- 
turists, seedsmen, scientists, teachers, publicists, physicians, and others interested 
in the various phases of heredity of plants, animals and men. All freely cooper- 
ate through the Association and contribute the time required to make investigations, 
to prepare papers, to attend the annual meetings and to help build up the literature 
of the science and practice of breeding. 



i 






All persons in any way interested are cordially invited to become members. 
Holders of memberships are entitled to the American Breeders Magazine, to the 
annual report of the Proceedings of the Association, and to full participation in the 
activities of the Association. I 

An endowment fund of $500,000 is being solicited. Who can help raise it? 

Membership: Annual, $2.00; Life, $20.00; Delegate, $25.00* 
No entrance fee* 

cAddrtss all communications to: 
AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 

Washington, D. C. 

(Ceyyrlght, 1912, by the American Bleeders Association.) 



<u- 



i 



THE AMEEICAN 
BREEDERS MAGAZINE 

"Compared with him who has the power to conceive an Ideal animal form and call it into life, 
through a profound knowledge of nature's Intricate and hidden laws, the greatest sculptor Is a mere 
mechanic."— A. H. Sandebs. 

Vol. Ill Third Quarter, 1912 No. 3 



NEHEMIAH PARKER CLARKE, 1836-1912 

Nehemiah P. Clarke of St. Cloud, Minnesota, one of the strongest 
breeders of pedigreed live stock in the United States, died on June 
29, 1912. Interested primarily in merchandising and lumbering, 
Mr. Clarke gradually developed his talents as a breeder of live 
stock until this became his main business. The Breeders Gazette 
truly says of him: "As a constructive breeder of draft horses and 
beef cattle, it is doubtful if this country has produced his superior. " 

The pioneers in breeding as in every other calling, have filled a 
large place in American life. In nearly all cases they have been 
self-made men who have won because of sheer force of personality, 
and because of peculiar fitness for their especial business. We have 
no better example of this kind of live stock pioneer than Mr. Clarke. 
His achievements are not as well known as they would have been 
had he done his work more nearly in the center of the great live 
stock region of the middle west. He was located in the northern 
zone of live stock business, but in spite of that fact won not only a 
national but an international reputation as an importer and especially 
as a breeder of several classes of pedigreed animals. 

While he bred other classes of live stock, his chief reputation came 
to him through his Shorthorn cattle, Clydesdale horses and Galloway 
cattle. For many years, in each of these three lines, he had kept 
on his three farms near St. Cloud among the largest and very best 
groups of females to be found in this country. 

His Columbian World's Fair winnings in Clydesdale classes from 
his Clyde Mains Farm first attracted attention to Mr. Clarke's 
ability in assembling and breeding live stock. During later years 
the winning at The International Live Stock Expositions of inter- 
national herd championships for Shorthorns, bred on his Meadow 
Lawn Farm, again emphasized the fact that Mr. Clarke had built 
up a great breeding establishment. His achievements in building 
up a splendid herd of Galloway cattle stood only second to his work 
with Clydesdale horses and Shorthorn cattle. 

161 



NEHIUI AH P. CLARK 



Hays: Nehemiah P. Clarke 163 

One element of Mr. Clarke's ability as a breeder was shown by 
his leaving the splendid collection of stock he had built up, in the 
hands of those who can continue the brilliant work he did in his 

► life, so that the blood which he had assembled should be kept 

as a constant wellspring of new value to be multiplied and distrib- 
uted to those who produce live stock. Too many of our breeders 
gain a state-wide or even a nation-wide reputation for herds which 
contain splendid individuals, and are splendid in their usefulness 
in producing breeding animals for sale, but at the death of the breeder 
the herds are dissipated. 

Equal to, if not greater than Mr. Clarke's public service as a 
breeder was his work in connection with the development of agri- 
cultural organizations in his state. As President of the State Agri- 
cultural Society a third of a century ago he was the leader in securing 
and building up the magnificent State Fair Grounds between Min- 
neapolis and St. Paul. In his work of organizing agricultural 
institutions Mr. Clarke was long associated with Mr. J. J. Hill. 
It was largely through their influence that the branch experiment 
stations and agricultural high schools were extended throughout 
Minnesota. Mr. Clarke was one of the leaders who stood for the 
establishment of the first agricultural high school in this country, 
at St. Anthony Park on the Minnesota Agricultural College Farm. 
He was interested to the end, in all measures to put forward the 
education of farm youth and of the mature farmers. He was a 
powerful factor in inducing the authorities to build up agricultural 
as well as general education for the farm youth of Minnesota. 
He was one of the most vigorous of those American business men 
who have aided the newer education to break away from the old 
academic learning of a third of a century ago. There should be 
placed for him a statue at Minnesota's University Farm, that those 

i who reap the benefits of his life may know of his work as a breeder 

(• and as a worker for country life betterment. 

Mr. Clarke was born in Massachusetts in 1836. He went west 
and, after a brief experience in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, entered 

r the mercantile business in St. Cloud, in 1836. He was long engaged 

in the transportation of government supplies between the Mississippi 
River and the Black Hills and for many years was extensively engaged 
in lumbering. During the last thirty years he gradually withdrew 
from most of his other enterprises and devoted himself to his three 
farms with their herds of pedigreed live stock. W. M. Hays. 



THE ILLAWARRA BREED OF DAIRY CATTLE 

Frank McCaffrey 
Kiama, New South Wales, Australia 

Illawarra, New South Wales, embraces the eastern portion of 
the County of Caimden, and the northern portion of the County of 
St. Vincent; bounded on the north by a line west to the head of the 
Cataract River, commencing on the sea shore near Bulli; on the 
west by the Illawarra range, thence straight to the middle source 
of the Kangaroo River; thence by that river to its confluence with 
the Shoalhaven River to about 2 rniles south of the Warreamungo; 
on the south by the range north of Endricko River to the source 
of Yalmal Creek and again by a range to Lambe Grant — (Jervis 
Bay) ; and by the eastern shore of St. George's basin to Sussex Haven 
and thence by the sea shore, which forms the eastern boundary to 
Bulli, as aforesaid. The eastern face of the Illawarra range con- 
sists of numerous gorges. 

Illawarra is a beautiful, fertile, roinantic district between 50 to 
90 miles from Sydney, covering about 250 square miles. The Illa- 
warra Mountain is a lofty and precipitous range running parallel 
to the coast, and supporting the elevated table-land to the west- 
ward. Looking from, the mountain toward the sea the views from 
a hundred different outlooks are indescribably beautiful and magni- 
ficent. The district proper consists of a belt of land enclosed 
between the mountains and the ocean, increasing in breadth to the 
southward. It was originally thickly wooded, and for the most 
part exuberantly fertile. In a word, nature did everything possible 
for Illawarra, on which tuankind has lived without doing anything 
in return for upwards of eighty years. Baron Hugel, an Austrian 
gentleman, who resided some time in New South Wales, devoting 
hiinself to scientific research, observed that the scenery and vegeta- j 

tion of Illawarra strongly reminded him of scenes he had visited < 

in the interior of Ceylon. Kiama, the center of the dairy industry 
in Illawarra, is situated 90 miles by road and 70 miles by railway 
south of Sydney. 

The origin of our Illawarra dairy cattle takes us back to the year 
1816. Illawarra was then in its virgin state just what a man of 
science would keenly appreciate, a display of natural harmony, 
unity in a multitude of variety; the delicate balance sustained for 
the time being by the addition of the very best strains of horses 

164 



McCaffrey: The Illawarra Breed op Dairy Cattle 165 



i 
1 

i! 
i 



n 






McCaffrey: The Illawarra Breed of Dairy Cattle 167 

and cattle that money could purchase in England. Prior to 1816 
Major Johnson, Captain Macarthur, Dr. Throsby and Messrs. De 
Avey Wentworth, James Badgery, Robert Jenkins and others 
received grants of land from the government together with stock and 
convict servants in the vicinity of Sydney. The success of these 
early experiments was phenomenal, and stock of all kinds increased 
and multiplied in numbers and quality beyond all expectation. 
The second duke of Northumberland sent this friend, Major Johnson, 
a great gift of breeding horses and cattle. Major Johnson had 
obtained on the banks of the Macquaria Rivulet which empties 
into Illwarra Lake a grant of land that consisted of rich alluvial 
flats and sloping open ridges, known as open forest land. No better 
country could be selected in Australia for a stock farm. The other 
gentlemen just mentioned quickly followed Major Johnson with 
stockkeepers, surveyors, timber getters and herds of breeding 
animals. Hence by the time the mid-twenties of last century weie 
reached, there were in Illawarra valuable herds of Durham, Long- 
horn, Shorthorn, Hereford, Devon, Holderness, Red and Dun Colored 
Polled, and Ayrshire cattle all doing well and increasing and multi- 
plying by hundreds annually. Very little change took place in 
the system of cattle raising during the next twenty years. Here 
the stud animals were bred for the fast increasing inland stations. 
Many men with capital had settled in Illawarra just prior to 1840, 
when a flood of immigration set in which displaced the convict 
system of the past. This period marked the beginning of dairying 
in Australia, as an industry, and it is from this date that Illawarra 
men date the foundation of their breed of dairy cattle. 

Having watched the several developments in dairy cattle breed- 
ing in Illawarra for a period of fifty years, I can safely say that 
many of our best types of cows and bulls appeared to be mere acci- 
dents of birth. Notwithstanding all that human art has done in 
the past, soil and climate seem to have been favorable to the pro- 
duction of a distinct type of dairy animal. So much perplexity 
surrounded every scheme of breeding and mating dairy cattle, from 
any point of view that, from the moment I grasped Mendel's Laws 
of breeding to this day, I have done naught but reflect on the breed- 
ing of our best families of Illawarra dairy cattle. For example, 
take the breeding of the tall and dwarf peas as explained by Men- 
delism. In Illawarra as long as I can remember we had a tall lengthy 
well-developed family of cattle. These cattle were evolved from 
crosses of the old Longhorned breed with the Shorthorn. They 



1 

I 

5 

I 

I 
s 

ii 
11 

°l 

! 

P 

° = 



McCaffrey: The Illawarra Breed of Dairy Cattle 169 

were called Longhorned-Durham and were mostly of a strawberry 
color. They were splendid dairy cattle, perhaps rather coarse in 
the bone, and standing high off the ground. At one time there 
were thousands of this type of animal in New South Wales. Con- 
temporary with that there was to be f ound in perhaps greater number 
a low-set red dairy cattle, evolved from crosses of the Devon and 
Ayrshire breeds. Now, I contend that by mating those two distinct 
and to some extent opposite types of cattle, we have produced our 
best strains of dairy cattle by striking a happy medium. This 
however must be borne in mind: Productiveness and udder formation 
has been the aim and object of our Illawarra dairymen for upward 
of seventy years. With regard to putting udders on their female 
progeny the imported English Shorthorns have been lamentable 
failures in Australia during the last forty years; hence the formation 
of the Illawarra Dairy Cattle Association which has for its object 
the preservation and conservation of the remaining types of the old 
strains of cattle. We think that when the dairymen come to under- 
stand the practical application of the laws of heredity, good results 
will follow. No doubt many of our most successful dairymen have 
been working for years on the simple plan of selection and crossing 
with the best types of the Shorthorn and Ayrshire breeds and it 
goes without saying that there are crosses of various kinds being 
worked into the modern milking types of both these breeds. 

These methods were carried too far in Illawarra about thirty 
years ago and many dairymen became possessed of the pure Short- 
horn craze and purchased station-bred Shorthorns and used them 
in their herds which procedure resulted in loss of udder capacity 
among their progeny, combined with other undesirable character- 
istics. Notwithstanding the great disaster wrought in our dairy 
herds by the introduction of those pure bred Shorthorn bulls there 
are still some of our dairymen to be found clinging to the "Flesh 
Pots," simply because the progeny of these beef bulls which have 
had pure Ayrshire dams look well in the show ring, and occasionally 
sell well. Dairy farming is not carried on in Illawarra for the mere 
sake of breeding show animals, it has an end beyond that. We may 
therefore anticipate that when Mendelism comes to be fully grasped 
by our Illawarra dairymen they will become its devoted students. 
Much of the every day observations on the farm confirm its simple 
rules and this will quickly appeal to common sense. 

If we now turn from the science and the art of breeding to the 
purely practical, we may still see that beauty of form consists in the 



American Breeders Magazine 



McCaffrey: The Illawarra Breed of Dairy Cattle 171 

harmony and happy proportions between the several parts of an 
animal's mechanism. With regard to the udder formation of the 
Illawarra dairy cow there may be difference of opinion; but all breed- 
ers are agreed that as far as its productive functions are concerned, 
it is as pure bred as the wool on the back of a Merino sheep. With 
regard to body conformation or type, difference of opinion seems 
also to exist; yet all are agreed that the most economic type of cow 
for dairy purposes is what is termed the wedge-shape animal. Views 
regarding color vary according to the breeder's fancy, but geneially 
speaking the lighter shades of any color or blend of colors are the 
most preferred. The photograph accompanying this article were 
taken of animals in the vicinity of Kiama, my native home, with the 
exception of Warrior which we sold from the Illawarra district some 
years ago. Too many valuable dairy animals are removed from 
places of usefulness at tempting prices by buyers who have no practi- 
cal knowledge of dairy cattle breeding. The photograph of Warrior 
was taken in Queensland on a farm to which he should not have been 
taken. 

With the oncoming of the great advance in knowledge of the 
principles of breeding as laid down by the adherents of Mendelism, 
we will no doubt soon see a much larger percentage of these high 
class dairy cattle, whose photographs accompany this article, than 
it has been our good fortune to raise. Instead of looking at these 
almost ideal animals as being so many accidents, we will become 
accustomed to look upon the waster as an accident of birth. Unfor- 
tunately the great mass of dairy farmers are too busy on their farms 
to do much reading, hence new ideas progress slowly. 

Our cattle could not be registered in the English Shorthorn herd- 
books — they are not of that type. They are of the English Short- 
horn type that existed in England prior to 1870. That is to say, they 
are Shorthorns that carry little or no beef and possess plenty of 
size without being large boned. Our cattle are descended from the 
English Shorthorn of the thirties and forties of last century. There- 
fore, they could not be entered in Coates* herdbook.* They will 
not carry the beef and that is what the English herdbook was origi- 
nally established for. 

* In the Journal of the Board of Agriculture, September, 1910, p. 447, The Coatee Herd Book Is 
described by Mr. A. T. Mathews, as follows: 

"A very great step in advance was taken when, after much persistent advocacy by Mr. Richard 
Stratton and others, the Shorthorn Society commenced in 1901 to give prises for milking Shorthorns, 
although in so doing no definite aim was claimed. The movement served the great purpose of setting 
certain breeders to think, and in 1905 they formed a new society, called the "Dairy Shorthorn (Coatee's 



American Breeders Magazine 



McCaffrey: The Illawarra Breed of Dairy Cattle 173 

Nor could they be registered in the American Shorthorn herdbook 
if that is based on the same lines as the modern English herdbooks. 

We have a strain of cattle here that have been bred exclusively 
for milk and butter production for seventy years back. To my 
knowledge, there have not been any records made as to the cost of 
producing milk and butter; at any ra^te not in the sense that experi- 
ment stations conduct such tests. Our dairymen are nearly all 
reut payers. Rents are very high in Illawarra, running in some 
instances as high as 2 pounds ($9.72) per acre per year exclusive of 
taxes, rates, etc. We have the landlord system with us. 

The dairymen know the breed and types of cattle that pay the 
rent, and they have held fast to them through all ills and will no 
doubt continue to hold on to them, improving them as they go along. 
Our breeders claim that our cattle are the original types of Shorthorn 
and that generations of feeding have produced the beef types. How- 
ever, we are all living in hope of better results later on when the 
older worlds have solved a few of the many vexed questions in heredity 
— and found clues to the tangled facts of the causes of variation. 

In conclusion I desire to convey my appreciation of the splendid 
efforts of the American Breeders Association and those who have 
contributed in the past to its publications. My wish is that their 
efforts may be crowned with success. 

Herd Book) Association." Very wisely the founders of this body refrained from starting a separate 
Herd Book, which would have served no good object, but might have had the effect of splitting the 
Shorthorn Interest into two distinct sections. Their object was not to Introduce a cleavage in the Short- 
horn ranks, but to restore the reputation of the breed as general purpose cattle, and incidentally to 
meet the growing national demand for milk." 

The above article by Mr. Frank McCaffrey sets forth an Ideal condition under which to carry 
forward to very great success some form of cooperative circuit breeding, such as Is being devel- 
oped In this country. These Illawarra breeders have an Ideal basis in the hybrid product, after 
several generations of intercrossing the Shorthorn, Ayrshire, and other stocks 01 British cattle. 
This product naturally varies greatly with families and with individuals within the family. 
Having been bred by men who are under the necessity of making their money largely out of 
dairy products, combined with beef, doubtless very much of the unfruitful recombinations of 
the hybrid stocks have been discarded. Doubtless among the splendid families now In the hands 
of these breeders, there are occasional individuals and even families with very great power to 
project high "dual purpose" excell< nee into their progeny. The governments 01 Australia and 
of New South Wales could do no wiser thing In the interests of agriculture, than to thus cooper- 
ate in providing the expert assistance needed in establishing In the counties of Camden and St. 
Vincent, a breeding circuit similar to those being developed by the United States Department 
of Agriculture in cooperation with the State Experiment Stations. — Tot Editor. 



A HISTORY OF THE ARABIAN HORSE AND ITS 
INFLUENCE ON MODERN BREEDS 

F. Knorr 
Mitchell, Nebraska 

The origin and early history of the Arabian horse is shrouded in a 
maze of myths and legends — some as charming as fairy tales. Many 
who have written about this breed of horses have given one or the 
other of these wonderful stories currency as fact, and have thereby 
perhaps led the attention away from the real individuality of the 
horse itself. The Arabian horse does not need the assistance of 
legendary lore to prove its superiority. The facts of history, and 
the real worth of the breed as we know it today, are sufficient to secure 
for it the recognition it deserves. 

There is a tradition in Arabia, that all of the pure-blooded Arabs 
trace their ancestry to five mares. These five mares were owned by 
Sheik Salaman, who was the fourth descendant from Ishmael, and 
lived about 3000 years ago. These five mares fell to him as a dowry 
upon his father's death; he complained about his inheritance, but 
after being told that he received the greatest wealth that the land 
possessed he was satisfied. In time these mares foaled, and thence- 
forth the drove increased rapidly, and developed into the most won- 
derful breed of horses man ever saw. 

Another legend has it that a certain prophet selected the best 
mares that could be secured in the land; these were enclosed in a 
corral within sight of feed and water, but both of these were with- 
held for several days. When the gates were opened the mares made 
a wild rush for water and feed; just at that moment the war bugle 
was sounded: five of the mares, half starved and famished for water, 
halted, turned to their master, and were ready to carry him to battle. 
These mares are supposed to be the ancestors of the present Arabian 
horse. 

A third story relates that the Arabians trace the ancestry of their 
horses to those with which Mohammed made his escape to Mecca. 
But recent investigations by Count De Canteleus show that instead 
of escaping on horses, Mohammed at that time had only several 
camels. 

One legend refers to only one mare as the foundation animal. 
A certain Sheik was pursued by the enemy. While taking a rest 
by the wayside his mare gave birth to a colt. Being hard pressed 

174 



Knobr: A History of the Arabian Horse 175 

he left the colt to its fate and continued his flight. The Sheik reached 
camp in safety and after several hours the colt came running into 
camp and this mare and colt were the foundation animals of the 
breed. 

Historical research has brought to light some facts which entirely 
discredit all the legends. They do not show the use of the horse 
so early as usually stated. Many writers on the Arabian horse 



Ibu M*hhusb. A. N. G. B. No.Ji. 

give its existence as early as 1635 B.C. We cannot find any refer- 
ence to the horse outside of Egypt until Solomon's reign in 1015- 
975 B.C., and even at that time all of the horses were recruited in 
Egypt. We well know that in early Biblical times the ass was used 
as beast of burden almost exclusively, and even at a later day the 
wild ass is accredited with a greater speed than the horse. A 
nomadic tribe of Aryan origin pushed out from the mother tribes 
during one of their periodic migration waves, came drifting from the 
north, to the plateau southeast of the Caspian Sea, where they 



176 Americas Breeders Magazine 

settled and founded Media. Juat when they came to that land is 
not definitely known but it was previous to 625 B.C. These Medians 
soon became known for their beautiful horses, that were "'as swift 
as the wind." Horse racing was one of their pastimes and it at- 
tracted many people form other lands. Previous to this time the 
Olympian games at Athens had not included chariot racing but about 



650 B.C. the chariot race for the first time played part in those games, 
but with horses brought "from other lands." Where the Medes 
secured their horses is not known. They may have brought them 
from their original northern home, but there are strong reasons for 
the supposition that these horses were the native wild horse of Media 
and Mesopotamia and that they were there captured and domesti- 
cated. When Naboplassar revolted in 625 B.C. and made alliance 
with the Median King Cyaxares, the fusion of the armies brought 



r 



L 



Knorr: A History of the Arajbian Horse 177 



the Median horse to the south. Later when Nebuchadnezzar (604- 
561 B.C.) extended his territory and built Babylon, subdued Jerusa- 
lem, and began the siege of Tyre, he brought the Median horse with 
his army into Syria. At this time horses were almost unknown in 
f* Phoenicia. The Phoenicians were the greatest merchants of that 

time; their ships and caravans were known everywhere, yet all their 
land traffic was with camels. We find these merchants trading with 
the Arabians, securing from them gold, spices and oils, but in no 
instance do we find records where they traded their goods for horses. 

When the Medes were finally conquered by the Persians in 558 
B.C., and were later again taken from the Persians by the Greeks 
under Alexander in 334 B.C., the rapid spread of the horse began, 
and we have every reason to believe that Alexander introduced the 
Arabian horse into the lands he conquered. Herodotus, the first 
accurate historian whom the world had, states: That so late as 450 
B.C. Arabia could not contribute any horses for Xerxes' armies, 
but gave many camels. If the Arabians had had horses at that 
time, Xerxes would certainly have procured them and the historian 
would have noted the fact. 

Some writers attribute the hardiness of the Arabian horses to 
the adverse conditions under which they have been reared for these 
several thousand years. We well know, however, that it is only 
the best environment that brings out the best qualities in man and 
beast. High excellence in animals cannot be produced under un- 
favorable conditions — in fact, they deteriorate rather than improve. 
How then can we accredit the desert, the sun-parched plains of Arabia 
to be the home of the beautiful Arabian horse? All indications 
point toward the grassy slopes and the foothills of the Caucasus 
Mountains, where physical conditions are so similar to those we have 
along the foothills of the Rockies where a dry climate and moderate 
rainfall make good pasture but without the tendency to make a 
soft, spongy hoof. Captain Upton in Frazier's Magazine (1876) 
says : " The best breeding is not on the peninsula of Arabia, where the 
water is only to be had from wells, but rather in Mesopotamia, and 
the great pastoral districts bordering the Euphrates." All this 
evidence leads up to the idea that the term "Arabian" horse is a 
misnomer, for the breed was fully established before it was introduced 
upon the plains of that land. That there is a gradual deterioration 
taking place in that breed of horses upon its new and foreign breeding 
ground, is proven by the improvement which the Arab is undergoing, 
in this country in the hands of our best horsemen. 



ITS Amehican Breeders Magazine 

The Arabian horse has played no small part in the development 
of all of our breeds of horses; the blood lines of all of our beat stock 
trace back to some Arab or Barb. The race horse, trotter, saddler, 
coach, and draft horse all have some Arab blood in their veins. It 
is often said that this Arab blood, used so long ago, can leave no 



trace at the present time, and that for speed the American horse is 
a far superior animal. It matters not how long since the Arabian 
blood was infused. It was the foundation stock in the development 
of the horse and it gave us the animals that we now have. An 
authority has this to say on that subject:* 

« The Ham oj America, by Rank Foirat. vol. i. 1557. 



Knorr: A History of the Arabian Horse 179 

And though it can scarce be doubted that, in the very commencement of 
turf -breeding there must have been some mixture of the best old English blood, 
probably in great part of Spanish by descent, with the true Arab or Barb 
race, the impure admixture is so exceedingly remote, not within fourteen or 
fifteen generations that the present race-horse of England and North America 
cannot possess one sixteen thousandth part of any other blood than that of the 
Desert. 

It is a long time since the horses Messenger, Diomed, Mambrino, 
Justin Morgan, Bashew, Spark, Selina, Blaze, Fearnaught, Traveller 
and Ethan Allen lived, yet our best stock traces back to them. With- 
out Justin Morgan there would be no Morgan horse; Justin Morgan 
was rich in Arab blood. Messenger and Diomed, the progenitors 
of the American running horse were of like parentage. The beautiful 
coach horses known as the Hackney trace their lineage to the Arabian 
breed. At Fort Collins, Colorado, where the Department of Agricul- 
ture is now trying to perfect a new type of carriage horse, there is 
at the head of that stud, Carmon, who carries in his veins the blood 
of the Arab. The powerful and massive Percheron, whose weight 
at times exceeds a ton, is, in spite of its ponderous size, not without 
grace and has certain lines of beauty, both of which it owes to the 
Arab lineage which has removed that coarseness which prevails with 
many breeds of draft horses. 

Many horsemen make a distinction between the Arab and the 
Barb, when in fact the difference is but slight. The Barb is more 
often spoken of as inferior, yet in spite of this it is generally admitted 
that the Barb has the better knee action of the two. The horses 
of Spain are Barbs with a strong admixture of the best Arab blood. 
Captain Upton wrote that not a single specimen of the Seglawi 
Jedram breed, for which Mesopotamia was once so famous, can now 
be found there. The Mohammedans when they moved westward 
secured much of the equipment for their army in that country, and 
no doubt appropriated most of its stock. They brought these with 
thousands of other Arabian horses to the Spanish Peninsula. When 
they were driven out of Spain many of the horses remained and these 
together with the Barbs, contributed to the f oundation of the Spanish 
breed of horses now known as Jennets. 

The late Mr. Keene Richards spent much money in importing 
and training the Arabian horses for racing purposes, and it was 
unfortunate that just when results might have been expected the 
Civil War dispersed his stud. However, his stock had its influence 
on the horses of Kentucky, and their blood can be found in many of 



180 American Breeders Magazine 

the best pedigrees of the horses of today in that state. While some 
pure-bred Arabs have been great race horses it is not for short dis- 
tance racing that they should be tested. Put him, however, to the 
severest long distance tests and to continuous daily hardships on 
short rations of food or water, call on him for that emergency reserve 
which may be the salvation of life, and his equal will not be found. 
Grant him first place for weight-carrying and as a general purpose 
horse and then mere speed assumes a place of minor importance. 
As motor machines do more and more of the drudgery that hereto- 
fore has been performed by horses, this noble animal comes to occupy 
his original position in the world, that of the joy and companion of 
man in times of peace, and a most valuable and dependable servant 
in times of war. His superior intelligence gives him first rank for 
service and use. His beauty is an asset of much greater value than 
mere speed and it is his intelligent personality that goes to the heart 
of every one who is fortunate enough to become the owner of an 
Arab horse. 

When horses will be bred for these highest uses and not for gambling 
purposes then the Arab horse will become more and more the favorite 
of horse lovers, and the public at large will be educated to appreciate 
and value this breed. And in the same manner as the English 
Thoroughbred and the American Trotter are superior to their Arab 
ancestors for the special purposes for which they have been bred, 
so the pure Arab, as he is now being bred in this country, for the 
qualitie > which especially characterize this breed, will make the Arab- 

ian horse of America the best in the world. 

i 

'r 

' r 
1 1 



CONCERNING THE FAT-TAIL AND THE 

BROAD-TAIL SHEEP 

C. C. Young 
Belen, Texas 

This comprehensive treatise eonoernlng the fat-tall breeds of sheep of Asia is most suggestive. 
This Is a most emphatic illustration of the fact that there Is needed a comprehensive campaign 
In animal Introduction Into this new continent, similar to the campaign now being carried on In 
the Introduction of seeds and plants. The campaign must be accompanied by the utmost prep- 
aration and care to avoid admitting such animal diseases as we do not now have but which would 
jeopardise our entire live stock Industry. Dr. Young's enterprising work should be encouraged In 
all legitimate ways. It were better that both public and private agencies work In this new field 
of developing fur and mutton breeds of hardy sheep. No one Is more sensible than the editor of 
the fact that the worst which could happen to Dr. Young and his Infant Industry would be that 
this kind of sheep breeding should become a fad — even a shadow of the Belgian Hare fad. As 
to whether there Is profit In these sheep In a commercial way only time can tell. Estimates of 
high priced rare skins are not quotations on commercial lots. This, as every other Industry, 
needs to grow slowly and conservatively, until commercial quantities have proved out the profit- 
ableness and the stability of the Industry. — The Editor. 

In an article which appeared in the American Breeders 7 Magazine, 
vol. ii, no. 1, 1911, the writer called the attention of the breeders to 
the fur bearing broad-tail Karakul breeds. It is intended in this 
article to correct certain statements which were then made in refer- 
ence to the big Karakul class. Whilst the description of the exte- 
rior of the big Arabi, so far as its habitat is concerned, was correct 
we were mistaken somewhat as regards the weight, which does not 
exceed that of the Lincoln sheep. The heaviest of all sheep in Asia 
belong to the Ovis steatopyga class which has an average weight of 
250 pounds and belongs to the Kamolaja Koordiutsnaja kind. 

The literature that deals with this sheep is not extensive and 
Russian authorities do not have much to say about it except that it 
is a very hardy desert animal possessing most excellent mutton and 
fat, but produces only fair fur. At present a commission authorized 
by the Russian Department of Agriculture is collecting data regard- 
ing this remarkable sheep, as well as other broad-tail and fat-tail 
varieties, and before very long we expect to have something more to 
say on this subject. This sheep crossed with our Lincolns ought to 
give us the kind of a broad-tail that we alluded to in our former 
article, and as but little Karakul pigment is required in order to 
produce an excellent fur, thanks to the wonderful luster of our Lin- 
colns, Cotswolds, Wensleydales, and especially the Leicesters and 
Dartmores, we should have little trouble in producing the heaviest 
fur bearing broad-taiJ in the world, even if it became necessary to 
inject more Karakul pigment than an off-spring would possess result- 
ing from a cross between a Kamoloja and a Lincoln, for instance. 

181 



182 American Breeders Magazine 

There are about thirty different varieties of broad-tail and fat- 
tail sheep and yet practically nothing has been written on this subject 
by English writers, with exception of Prof. Robert Wallace of whom 
we will speak later in connection with the broad-tail sheep of Cape 
Colony. Some of the literature on these sheep has been translated 
from the Tartar, a few German writers have also contributed valuable 
information in a general way, but the classification seems to have 
been made almost entirely by such Russian naturalists as Sinitzin, 
Perepelkin, Kooleshov, Poniatovsky, Ivanaev, and others. We can 
especially recommend the well illustrated books of the first and third 
of these writers. No attempt has so far been made by any one to 
translate these works into the English language, a task which the 
writer has taken upon himself to perform. Another trip through 
Central and Asia Minor will be necessary before we are satisfied 
with certain classifications and can unhesitatingly state that we are of 
the opinion that the small Karakul, which should properly be called 
Arabi, is the original Ovis platyura from which all other sheep of the 
same class, as well as the Ovis steotopyga, are descended. 

Whilst all Russian writers practically agree with Sinitzin, who 
today is considered an authority, that the Shirazi, Doozboy, Malitch, 
Tartarska j a-Tooshinskaj a, Groozinskaj a, Osetinskaj a, Sokolska j a, 
Resheteliovskaja, Bessarabskaja-Tshooshka are grade Arabis, this 
cannot be said to be the case when it comes to the Ovis steotopyga. 
The stand which we took that this sheep is also a grade Karakul 
which owes its great hardiness and wonderful fat accumulating prop- 
erties and black pigment to the Arabi, will be contested by certain 
authorities, who apparently believe that the fat-tail sheep is of dif- 
ferent origin, chiefly so, on account of its very short tail consisting 
of only three to five vertebrae, and the peculiar position of the fat 
pillows covering the buttocks. We have observed a great variation 
in the size of the tails of the grade Karakuls, dependent entirely 
upon whether the non-Karakuls possess a short or long tail, and 
we think we are right in our assumption as expressed in the following 
pages of this article, but admit that there are several anatomical 
puzzles that we are unable at this time to answer, and we desire to 
state that for the present Natusius and Bom may be justified in 
their classification. Some broad-tails unquestionably have become 
mixed with the fat-tails and the proofs offered by Bom in the case 
of the Zigai is quite sufficient. 

A number of preliminary experiments have been conducted by 
the Department of Agriculture at Washington, D. C, as well as by 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 183 

various breeders, indicating that we can not only compete with 
Asia when it comes to the production of such grade Arabi pelts as 
are known on the market under the trade name of Persian Lamb, 
Astrachan, Krimmer, Afghan (called Caracul in this country), but 
that we can excel that country greatly and with much less Karakul 
blood. Quarter-blood Karakul-Lincoln skins have been produced 
in Texas equal in luster and tight curl development to the best of 
the so-called Persian Lamb skins, and as for the half-blood Karakul- 
Lincoln pelts, there is nothing Asia can produce that can compare 
with them. That proved to be the case, however, only where neces- 
sary precaution was exercised in the selection of our American long- 
wool ewes with the most luster. Some skins in this case were valued 
by wholesale furriers at $10 each, and when one considers that in 
the southwest at least two such skins can be produced annually from 
a ewe, one can get some idea of the importance of this industry to 
our breeders. 

There is but little difference between the half-blood and quarter- 
blood Karakul-Lincoln skins, the value as breeder depending upon 
the luster and tightness of the curl at the time of birth. It has been 
demonstrated that we cannot produce a marketable fur in the first 
cross unless we confine ourselves to the lustrous long-wool sheep, 
although good results have been obtained where half- and three- 
quarter bred Lincoln-Shropshire ewes have been bred to half-blood 
Karakul-Lincoln rams, the skins having been priced as high as $6. 
The writer has one skin produced by Allbright from a half-blood 
Karakul-Shropshire buck and a three-quarter bred Lincoln-Shrop- 
shire ewe which is very pretty indeed, and while not yet priced, it 
should be easily worth $5. Where Karakul bucks are employed that 
are free from Afghan blood (tight-wool) we do not have to use full 
blood long-wool ewes in order to produce $10 skins and the same 
thing is true of the half-blood Karakul bucks, providing, however, 
that such rams have no tight-wool admixture. 

Very satisfactory results indeed were obtained on the ranch of 
the Middle Water Cattle Company, and this is remarkable indeed, 
as the ewes possessed considerable of tight-wool blood, which to a 
certain degree was overcome by the presence of Karakul blood in 
them. These ewes are known in this country by the fancy name of 
Persian broad-tails, which at the best are half-blood Karakul-Tight- 
wools, as we will explain later when we go into the question of Persian 
Broad-tails and Persirianos. Some of these skins were priced by an 
expert at $9, and the lambs from which these pelts were obtained 



184 American Breeders Magazine 

came from Persian broad-tail ewes sired by the two best bucks of 
the original herd of fifteen which we brought to this country. We 
were indeed surprised to find that some of these skins were in every 
way equal to half-blood Lincoln pelts, which only serves to prove 
that a certain amount of tight-wool blood can be overcome, providing 
as already stated, the full blood Karakul rams are free from the tight- 
wool taint. On our own ranch we learned that high grade Lincolns 
gave us the same results as the full-bloods, providing the Karakul 
bucks were free from tight-wool blood. Unfortunately in our first 
herd, our expert whom we trusted, selected some Karakuls for us 
that clearly show by their short and soft underwool that they contain 
a tight-wool strain, which can only be overcome by breeding them 
to the best types of lustrous long-wools. From a mutton standpoint, 
nobody has made more valuable tests than Messrs. Rhome and 
Goodnight, proving that Karakul-Shropshires with the Karakul 
strain predominating, show a wonderful increase in weight and lambs 
at 4 and 5 months have been found to weigh from 80 to 100 pounds. 
The Armour Packing Company of Fort Worth, Texas, vouched for 
these facts and also stated that the Karakul strain seems to have 
the faculty of absolutely removing the disgareeable woolly and musk- 
like flavor peculiar to the mutton of our tight-wools. 

In our former article we spoke of the great hardiness of the Kara- 
kul. For three months we were pasturing on the Mesa at Belen, 
Texas, 200 high grade Lincolns, purchased from F. R. Gooding, and 
some 30 Karakuls. Old settlers were of the opinion that Merinos 
would have starved on this Mesa in one and a half months, as there 
was practically no grass on it, and the sheep had to live off the little 
brush and the few weeds found there. At the end of two months 
we began losing Lincolns on account of starvation, and yet the 
Karakuls were still in good shape. There is no doubt that the 
Karakul sheep should be more generally introduced in the south- 
west where sheep have to go a long distance for water and where 
they cannot possibly exist unless they possess the rustling and 
browsing qualities of the Mexican goat. From a strictly fur stand- 
point, the Karakul will probably be better off in the north where 
feed is more plentiful, as it has been found that unless the ewes 
are in good shape the last two months of pregnancy, the lambs are 
born with insufficient luster. Of course, in the irrigated districts 
where alfalfa is raised this objection can easily be overcome. Breeders 
of mutton, strictly should know that 25 per cent of Karakul blood 
will make a great difference in their flock in hardiness, weight and 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 185 

quality of mutton. In thia case the Karakul bucks do not have to 
possess luster and tight curls at birth. 

Professor Nabours of the Kansas Agricultural College stated in a 
lecture recently in Topeka, that in East India, Bokhara broad-tails 
crossed with native coarse wool sheep produced lambs weighing 
90 pounds when 4 months old ! This would tend to show that Rhome 
did not exaggerate in his report; again Rhome's figures are admitted 
to be correct by the Armour Packing Company. The writer is 
of the opinion that half-blood Karakul-Lincoln lambs will show the 
same weight, and before long we will know exactly, but it is doubtful 



not sufficient proof that Pallace's ululficatlon 
Ovls plstyura. ByiourWeyof Prlnoe Yermo- 
Ioff. 

whether it is safe to cross such half-blood rams on the small Merino 
of the southwest and Mexico, as at birth the lambs will hardly be 
able to pass the pelvic opening. 

OVIS STEOTOPYGA OB THE FAT-TAIL SHEEP 

This breed, according to Prof. P. N. Kooleshov, bears the name of 
fat-tail sheep on account of the lobular accumulation of fat that is 
located on the buttocks and on each side of the very short tail con- 



186 American Breeders Magazine 

sisting of only 3 to 5 vertebrae. There are generally two symmetrical 
pillows on each side of the tail and these together with the short 
tail constitute the so-called "Koordiuk" which in the fat sheep 
weighs 30 pounds, but ordinarily weighs but 10 to 12 pounds. The 
two symmetrical fat pillows on each side of the tail are covered on 
top with long and stiff hair; underneath the surface is smooth and 
free from hair. The peculiarity of storing fat in such big quantities 
under the skin of the buttocks and tail is also characteristic of the 
broad-tail sheep known as Ovis Platyura. From the tail of both of 
these varieties one can ascertain the physical condition of these 
animals for the better they are fed, the larger in proportion is the 
"Koordiuk." 

The fat-tail breeds are found in Asia, Africa and Russia. Accord- 
ing to Robert Hartman, the fat-tail sheep originated in Arabia. 
Pallas asserts that the fat-tail originated directly from the Argali. 
Fitzinger, Wagner and Bom do not agree with Pallas. Fitzinger 
divides the fat-tail into the following classes: Tartar, Mongol, Daur, 
Burat, Khirgiz, Kalmik and Cape. A few fat-tails are found also 
in Egypt, Noobia and Sennar, but it is an established fact that the 
broad-tail sheep was in Africa several centuries before we had any 
record of the presence there of the fat-tail sheep. In many places the 
fat-tail sheep were crossed with the broad-tails in which case an 
animal was obtained with a much shorter tail than either, and a 
great many of these crosses are found in the Caucasus, and in the 
dry steppes of the Precaspian Province of Central Asia. According 
to Bom, the Madagascar, Mekka and Persian short-tail broad-tail 
varieties (Shirazi, Zigai, Doozboy, etc.) belong also to this class. We 
cannot agree with Bom, especially in regard to the Shirazi and 
Doozboy, the former being Karakul long-wools and the latter Karakul 
tight-wools. In many instances where the Karakul blood is in prepon- 
derance the tail does not differ from that of a Karakul, although 
in the Zigai the much shorter tail and other anatomical features 
would indicate an admixture of the fat-tail strain. 

When in this country a Karakul is crossed with an American 
lustrous long-wool, we produce a magnificent fur, but our short- 
wools or tight-wools give us fully as inferior and matty fur as is the 
case with the Karakul tight-wools that Bom is attempting to connect 
with the fat-tail sheep. In any event neither Sinitzin nor Ponia- 
tovsky claim any such relationship. Of course, it would be very 
interesting to find out just what went into the formation of the 
Shirazi, Zigai, Doozboy, and other grade Karakuls. Roughly speaking, 



Young; The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 187 



188 . American Breeders Magazine 

we only know that it is either tight-wool or long-wool blood. The 
fat-tail sheep are very numerous in Bessarabia, Charkov, Taurien, 
Crimea, Ekaterinoslav, Astrachan and the Caucasus. In the Volga 
district the fat-tails are known as "Ordi," also "Kirgizki-Tshoon- 
tooki; ,, on the other side of the river Don, as "Kalmitskaja" and in 
Crimea they are called Greek sheep. In the Caucasus there are 
three classes, the so-called Mazechi, Bozachi and Karabachi. 

Of late years these various sub-classes of fat-tail sheep have been 
crossed with other varieties of Russian sheep, but in the Caucasus 
and among the Nomadic tribes of Asiatic Russia the Ovis steotopyga 
is still kept in a pure state. That this sheep can cover a large area 
when necessary, is proven by its long and strong feet. The neck 
is also very long, and its ability to digest the scantiest of feed on the 
Steppes and even at that accumulate in no time immense quantities 
of fat, marks this as a typical desert sheep. And why should it not? 
Is its hardiness and rustling qualities not due to the Karakul blood 
which it contains and to which it owes its great fat storing qualities? 
Is the fact that those which resemble the Karakul most, actually 
produce furs, not another proof? From what source did it derive 
its black pigment if not from the Karakul? The weight is about 150 
pounds; some types are much heavier. The nose line is greatly 
bent and the tendons are of the strongest kind. Among both sexes 
are those that are horned and others that are not. Some rams have 
as many as 4 to 6 horns; the head is small and the ears are pendulous. 
The fat-tail sheep is raised principally on account of its excellent 
mutton and fat. The fat is used in place of butter, and is very 
appetizing, and devoid of the strong wooly taste characteristic of 
the European sheep. 

The wool is of two kinds, the long hard coarse outer wool (Karakul) 
and the soft fine under wool. The first is lustrous at birth, the latter 
dull. This is precisely what happens in crossing a Karakul to any 
tight-wool. It makes no difference how one might try to breed 
the tight-wool strain out, it simply can't be done, unless a lustrous 
long-wool is bred to the grade Karakul at least once. After several 
more crosses with the pure Karakul the short soft under wool seems 
gradually to disappear. The color of the wool is varied. Some is 
auburn, whilst other is gray, black and even white. In some the 
under wool is very lustrous and white with occasionally a black or 
auburn hair (Karakul long-wool). Excellent skins are obtained from 
the lambs of such ewes. The fur is either black or auburn with 
very pronounced curls. Where could such ewes have gotten their 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 189 

pigment from if not from the Karakul which is the most lustrous 
and highly pigmented animal known? The wool of the adult is used 
in the production of the best of rugs and felt. 

According to Glasco the wool of the Mazech is red, brown and 
white, whereas the Bozach possess gray wool and the Arick is entirely 
white. According to Sinitzin, fat-tail sheep have been raised in 
Crimea for four hundred and fifty years, but today the Malitch is 
replacing them rapidly because they produce a far superior fur. 

The best of the so-called Malitches can hardly be differentiated 
from the full-blood Bokhara Karakuls, and are known by every- 
body to be Karakul long-wools, just such as we will have in America 
before very long as the result of crossing Karakul rams to our Lin- 
colns, Cotswolds and Leicester ewes. . If any enthusiast of the Ovis 
sieotopyga prefers to believe that the Karakul has descended from it, 
or that there is no relationship between the two, we have no objec- 
tions. As for ourselves, after reading everything that we could find 
during three years on this subject and seeing a number of the animals, 
we have come to the conclusion that the fat-tail sheep is nothing 
more than a grade Karakul, a fur producer where tight-wool blood 
is absent, and a very hardy sheep with excellent mutton producing 
qualities where tight-wool blood is present. What about the great 
difference in the number of vertebrae composing the tail of the fat- 
tails and broad-tails? In time we may offer a satisfactory explanation. 

THE OVIS PLATYURA OR THE BROAD-TAIL SHEEP 

The principal characteristic of this class is in their long fat tail 
which consists of fifteen to twenty-four vertebrae. The tail is covered 
on the outside with the same wool as the body and often comes clear 
to the ground. In some classes great masses of fat surround the 
tail from its setting to the tip, while in others the lower portion of 
the tail is free from fat and therefore movable. The broad-tail 
sheep is found in Africa, many parts of Asia and South Russia and 
there are a few even in Southern Italy, and France. Prof. Robert 
Wallace of the Edinburgh University, informs us that the native 
of Cape Colony raise a broad-tail with very long feet and middle 
weight, the tail weighing from 6£ to 16J pounds. 

The broad-tails are less liable to scabies, than Merinos and other 
tight-wools and their wool is coarse and long. Some of them have 
horns, others have not (Natusius and Bom). Among the Russian 
broadtails there are the common Russian broad-tail, the Karakul, 



i! 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 191 

the Pirnaja and Voloshskaja. Most of these varieties are horned. 
As for the ears, some have drooping ears, others only partly so and 
some have ears standing straight up. Another characteristic of these 
sheep is that when their lambs are killed shortly after birth, an excel- 
lent fur is produced as is especially the case with the Karakuls and 
Malitches. These sheep are raised almost entirely on account of 
the great value of their lamb skins. 

In the common Russian broad-tail the tail comes down clear to 
the ground and is immense in size. This class is found in Bessarabia, 
Donskaja, Olblast, Taurien Province and Ekaterinoslav. Average 
weight about 140 pounds. The horns generally have two spiral 
coils and finally greatly diverge laterally. The ears are semi-pendu- 
lous and very long. The head and feet are covered with short white 
hair with occasionally a black spot on these parts. This sheep has 
a long hard outer wool and a short but a rather coarse yellow under 
wool. The meat is the best known. That this class of sheep came 
into Russia from Central Asia, the home of the Karakul which it 
resembles greatly, is commonly conceded. 

The Pirnaja Ovtsa. — This sheep resembles the so-called Tschoon- 
tooki very much and in its makeup is a fat-tail rather than a broad- 
tail sheep, but the horns are very much longer and in spiral fashion 
protrude greatly. The ears stand up straight and the tail is even 
shorter than in the Tshoontooki but with great fat accumulations on 
the sides of the tail. The wool is white and it is not a fur producer. 

The Department of Agriculture of Russia is of the opinion that 
this is merely one of the several sub-classes of the Voloshskaja sheep 
and bears no relationship to the Tshoontooki. The wool is some- 
times black (no doubt due to a larger per cent of the black Karakul 
pigment) and there are in Hungary the so-called black and gray, 
"Zackelschafe" or "Voloschskaja," that must have still more Kara- 
kul blood in them and like the Malitsch, give excellent fur and closely 
resemble the Karakul. We understand that recently a small herd 
of them were presented by the Emperor of Austria to the Argentine 
Republic. 

The Voloshakaja or Zackelschaf. — This broad-tail class is found 
in Russia, Roumania, Austro-Hungary, and on the island of Crete. 
At a distance some look like Angora goats with immense horns. 
Most horns do not coil as is the case in the preceding class, but diverge 
laterally and in some cases upward. The ears stand straight up, 
although some are semi-drooping. Few have no horns. The tail 
which is triangular, resembling a sugar beet, is larger than in the 



192 American Breeders Magazine 

common Russian broad-tail and manipular coupling is therefore neces- 
sitated. The outer wool is white, seldom gray and black, very long 
and coarse. The under wool is very fine, lustrous and in great demand 
all over Europe by manufacturers of fine wool rugs. This breed of 
broad-tail resembles the Voloshskaja sheep very much, and is 
renowned for its most excellent meat. The Malitches are raised 
exclusively in the Province of Taurien, and in Crimea. At the setting 
of the large tail, consisting of twenty vertebrae, there are found great 
quantities of fat. The hair is black, gray or white. The skins of 
very young lambs give excellent fur and resemble our half-blood 
American-Lincolns very much. In Crimea these sheep have been bred 
for four hundred and fifty years and closely resemble the Karakul 
or Arabi of Bokhara; especially in the formation of the rather tri- 
angular tail. The ears are half drooping. The bones of the fore- 
head are very protruding and the nose line is curving. The horns 
are not unlike those of the common Russian broad-tail. The wool 
is very long and coarse and either black or gray. In fact, they change 
their color precisely as the Karakuls do, that is to say, when born the 
lambs are jet black, and velvety in appearance; after three to four 
months the hair becomes brownish and when one year old becomes 
decidedly gray. Some lambs are gray when born, and produce 
beautiful fur resembling black silver fox, but not many of this class 
are raised. 

From April 1 to September 1, the ewes are milked and give about 
70 quarts of exceedingly rich milk, and from which the "Brinza" 
cheese is made. In weight they compare favorably with our Shrop- 
shires. The meat of the very young lambs brings from 30 to 50 cents 
per pound and is regarded as a great delicacy. In that country 
it is broiled barbecue fashion (Shashlik) and seasoned with parsley 
and green onions, salt, pepper, the slightest trace of garlic and a 
powder made from a plant native in Afghanistan and resembling 
powdered grape leaves. It makes a most appetizing dish. 

To the broad-tail class belong a number of breeds in the Caucasus, 
but what little literature there is found on these breeds is in Asiatic 
languages. The most important breeds are the "Tartarskaja-Too- 
shinskaja," "Groozinskaja" and "Osetinskaja." They vary greatly 
in weight and in the size of tail. The Caucasus breeds have very 
long and lustrous wool and most beautiful pelts. According to 
DeBitam, some have smooth, others very curly wool. K. D. Duna- 
vsky states that the Tartarskaja-Tooshinskaja sheep resembles greatly 
the Groozinskaja. The Tooshinskaja has white wool, except on 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 193 

the head, ears and feet which are covered with yellowish spots. 
The head is small, hook-nosed; the horns long and spirally bent. 
The females have no horns. The body is short, but broad. The 
tail consists of sixteen vertebrae. The average weight is 140 pounds. 
The wool is fine, long and very lustrous. The meat is very white 
and excellent and the fat of the tail is used in place of butter and in 
Tiflis brings practically the same price. The best of them are raised 
in Cachetinia. When crossed with Oxfordshires a very good meat 
is obtained. 

Of great importance to the breeders of lamb skins are the so-called 
Sokolskaja, Resheteliovskaja and Bessarabskaja-Tshooshka. These 
varieties are unquestionably grade Karakuls and as there is no tight- 
wool blood present, they give us excellent skins. They are classified 
as belonging to the Long-tails or Ovis dolichura. We know that in 
all quarter breds there is practically no change in the tail and as the 
non-Karakul strain in these varieties possess a long tail, these fur 
producing varieties cannot be classified with any other type except 
the Long-tail Thin-tail. There are four varieties of fur produced 
from these sheep, all of which have good luster and are black, but 
they vary greatly in the formation of the curls, those with larger 
curls resembling our half-blood Karakul-Lincoln pelts greatly, but 
are much inferior in quality. 

The Persian Broad-tail. — There are a great many varieties of 
broad-tails in Persia, most important being the Arabi, Shirazi, Doozboy 
and Zigai. A party in California brought some Shirazis to this 
country and crossed them with Shropshires and called them Persian 
broad-tails. The Shropshire blood made them Karakul or Arabi 
tight-wools. They are therefore not fur producers, but are excellent 
mutton sheep, possessing great hardiness, good weight and their 
mutton is free to a large degree from the woolly flavor of our tight- 
wools. All this is due of course to the Karakul blood, which gives 
them a partial broad-tail effect. A half-blood Karakul-Lincoln is 
more desirable as it will have still more weight, just as much hardi- 
ness, better mutton and the best of fur, if crossed with lustrous 
long-wools. Breeders should not be misled, as Persian broad-tails 
do not produce the so-called Persian lamb pelts, which are beautiful 
half- and three-quarter-blood Karakul long-wool lamb skins tanned 
and dyed. Some breeders confound the Persian broad-tails of the 
United States with Persirianos which is an injustice to the Persian 
broad-tails, as the Persirianos, produced by crossing Persian broad- 
tails with Merinos, contain only half as much Karakul blood and 



194 American Breeders Magazine 

should not be used for breeding purposes if Persian broad-tails can 
be secured, as the Karakul blood is too dilute to do that name justice. 
The Karakul Breeds. — The Karakul breeds are found in Arabia, 
Palestine, Syria Mesopotamia, Asia Minor, Persia, Afghanistan, 
Chiva and especially Bokhara, which is the home of the Arabi from 
which all other Karakul breeds descend. Today the Khanate of 
Bokhara with its immense oasis is the one place where the pure Arabi 
has been preserved, although a few are said to be found also in north- 



'- ' u._Jill II III ■! !■! 

This specimen apparently has less light wool In him than Is generally the caso, and la therefore a 
fur producer. By courtesy of Prince Yermoloff. 

eastern Persia and Chiva. According to Poniatovsky of Bokhara 
and Sinitzin of Crimea, the name Karakul is applied not only to the 
Arabi, but to all grade Arabi most important of which are the Shiraz, 
Doozboy and Zigai. 

The Shirazi is an Arabi Long-wool and like the Malitch an excel- 
lent fur producer, whilst the Doozboy is an Arabi tight-wool which 
has been crossed with certain varieties of the Ovis steotopyga (fat-tail) 
giving us the Zigai. Unfortunately what little literature there is on 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 195 

the last three classes, is in Afghan, Persian and Tartar, and until the 
Russian Commission gets out its book on fat-tail and broad-tail sheep, 
we can say nothing more. 

According to certain authors the small Arabi came to Bokhara 
from Arabia and hence the name Arabi or Arap. This is doubtful, 



b.IJYeah 
if Afghan blood; nevertheless, In 
. Exhibited Id Oiui 

■lnlier 14. IS, IT, 19 



This eve contains «ftra<r of A 
luster. By courtesy of Joseph Slmt 



but it must be added that Smitzin thinks it possible, being of the 
opinion that the Arabi originated in a hot country which explains 
its tight curls. He also believes that curls will only form in hot 
countries, in men as well as animals, and cites as an example the 



196 American Breeders Magazine 

negro. The Uzbecks on the other hand claim that the Arabi which 
they compare with the waves of a black lake (Kara-Kul, pronounced 
Kool) came into the desert of Bokhara from the Pamyrs and that it 
is a mountain sheep and that is the reason why it can endure the 
cold as easily as it does. We agree with the Uzbecks for the ease with 
which an Arabi climbs mountains is remarkable. Any sheep accus- 
tomed to a warm climate when containing but 25 per cent of Arabi 



M> courtesy of Prince Yermoloff. 



blood, becomes at once a cold country sheep; nowhere is that fact 
more appreciated than in Northern Asia. Burch found that a 
quarter-bred Arabi-Merino could stand the coldest of weather and 
blizzards in Michigan, and whilst Simonson reports a great loss of 
Shropshires near Dalhart, Texas, last winter on account of the awful 
snow storms, not one single Arabi succumbed. On the other hand, 
we can say that six months during the hottest part of the summer 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 197 

in Coahuila, Mexico, did not seem to in the least affect our herd. 
An experience of three years has shown us that the sheep can stand 
extremely hot weather and very cold weather aa well. If the Arabi 
came originally from Arabia, should we not find something in that 
country that would serve as a proof? Yet, we need not expect any 
information from that source; it is not to be had. 

The natives point in the direction of Lhassa and Thibet, and the 
Llama-Deli could probably enlighten us. Recently we had the pleas- 



of Prince Ye mioLofl . 



ure of talking to Lord Rochester who was one of the members of the 
English military expedition that fought its way into the Forbidden 
City. To my surprise he gave me the exact description of Sinitzin's 
small Arabi and spoke of the wonderful beauty of the Iamb skins. 
Efforts were made to get a few head out, but they all died from 
improper care and lack of food whilst crossing the high mountains. 
The small Arabi which is extremely hard to find, and when found 
hard to purchase from the natives of Bokhara, has a narrow head, 



198 American Breeders Magazine 

elongated face, and slightly curving nose line, short ears, thin feet, 
tail triangular and not as large as that of the large Arabi; weight 
130 pounds. On the head, tail and feet, which are covered with jet 
black, stiff, very lustrous hair, are found white spots, which may also 
be noted on the sides. The wool is long, coarse and gray in the 
adult, but jet black and in very tight beautiful curls the first few 



FlO. 8— HALFfll.OOD K*H4KOLE-PEHaUN BROADTAIL 




ry way equal to a halfblood Karakulc-Llncoln priced by New York wholesa 


e lurrle 


19.00. IF sold to retail lumen* or tallore It is easily worth 115.0(1 and wot 




e valuable had the Persian Broadtail ewe not contained a strain of Shropshlr 


blood. 



days after birth. According to Sinitzin this is the type from which 
all others originate, and they are found only in Bokhara, between the 
river of Amu-Daria and the city of Bokhara. There is no fur on 
earth that can compare with that of the small Arabi, when obtained 
shortly after birth, and there is none on the market. Any one lucky 
enough to own them, would not be apt to kill them for fur. 



Young: The Fat-Tail and The Broad-Tail Sheep 199 

The Large Arabi. — -This class, Sinitzin states, resulted from a cross 
between the small Arabi and some fat-tail variety. If that is true 
then such a fat-tail must have been cinnamon brown, as occasionally 
a lamb comes of that color, instead of black. But even so, why 
should the large Arabi have such an immense lyre-formed tail, with 
an S-shaped appendage on the end? In our opinion this sheep was 



produced by crossing the Shirazi with the small Arabi. We have 
observed that where the so-called brown Persian broad-tail (Shirazi) 
was crossed with one of our bucks (answering closely Sinitzin's 
description of the small Arabi) an offspring was obtained in every 
way closely resembling the large Arabi. In all cases magnificent 
skins were obtained and this is something that should interest those 



200 American Breeders Magazine 

owners of Persian broad-tails, that have Shirazis that are compara- 
tively free from tight-wool blood. The fact that they are brown 
in color makes no difference, the offspring will nevertheless be black. 

The large Arabi has a very massive head, short face, nose line 
greatly curving, forming a convexity, the ears are drooping and 
larger than in the small Arabi, sometimes the ears are absent; feet 
are very strong, especially hind legs. The wool is coarse, hard and 
long, and black at birth; in three or four months it turns brown and 
in half a year gray, dark gray, seldom white and occasionally remains 
dark brown. We do not think this sheep excels the Lincoln in weight, 
but it is infinitely hardier, possessing the browsing qualities of the 
Mexican Goat. There are quite a few of these, and one other type 
is to be found resulting from crossing the small with the large Arabi; 
they are also quite plentiful, some containing a slight Afghan strain 
(on the tight-wool order). 

The Small Arabi. — It is very difficult to find the small Arabi 
and it takes a great deal of study to learn how to differentiate them 
from the intermediate class. One can spend thousands of dollars 
and cross the entire desert and return without having secured a 
single small Arabi. Among our herd originally containing fifteen 
head we find all three classes of Arabi represented, and we called 
them the Karakul herd although properly the name Arabi should be 
used. 

During 1911 and up to very recently His Excellency Prince A. 
Yermoloff, for twelve years Russian Minister of Agriculture, now 
life Senator and Member of His Majesty's Council, has been kind 
enough to gather certain data for the writer and it is due to his 
efforts that we own today a very exhaustive report on Russian and 
Asiatic sheep, issued by the Russian Department of Agriculture 
at St. Petersburg. His Excellency, the Prince, also sent us Sinitzin's, 
Perepelkin's and Kooleshov's books, also a number of photographs 
for all of which courtesies we hereby express our gratitude. 



TRANSMISSION OF COLOR AND COLOR MARK- 
INGS IN HEREFORD-SHORTHORN 

CROSSES* 

P. E. FOGLB 

Beaver Creek, North Carolina 

The breeder, whether of plants or of animals, needs all the infor- 
mation obtainable to assist in the creation of new stra : ns and the 
improvement of the known strains, and especially is it needful for 
the animal breeder to have all possible knowledge as his work is 
slow at best. 

The color factor is not a vital one at this time and perhaps never 
will be, though even now certain colors are preferred and others 
disliked by the buyer, and at some future time this preference and 
dislike may become more pronounced. 

I have done nothing new in collecting these records, but have 
simply tabulated the results as they have appeared. Very little 
seems to be known regarding the transmission of the color and color 
markings in animals. I have not attempted a comprehensive classi- 
fication of colors of hair, but have grouped the colors with which 
I was immediately dealing in these experiments, under five general 
groups as follows: Red, roan, spotted, white, red body with white 
face. The animals coming under the first four groups are pure or 
grade Shorthorns, the fifth the progeny of Herefoid bull with Short- 
horn cows. 

From 26 solid red or nearly solid red cows there came 35 calves 
of which all had red bodies and white faces: 

16 had red circles around eyes and spot on nose; 

7 had red circles around eyes but no spot on nose; 

2 had imperfect eye circles; 
10 had no red on face. 

From 7 roan cows there were 9 calves: 

5 had roan bodies and white faces; 

1 had red body and white face with no eye circles but spot on nose; 

3 had red bodies, white faces with circles around eyes and spot on nose. 

From 8 spotted cows there came 12 calves: 

1 had red body and white face with eye circles around one eye only; 
1 had red body and white face with imperfect eye circles; 

* Progress report from Committee on Animal Hybrids. Prof. W. J. Spillman, Chairman. 

201 



202 American Breeders Magazine 

7 had red bodies and white faces with circles around eyes and spot on nose; 
2 had red bodies and white faces with no red on face, and 
1 had roan body and white face. 

From 2 white cows there were 6 calves: 

All had roan bodies and white faces; 

1 had imperfect eye circles and spot on the nose. 

From 1 cow with red body and white face with circles around 
eyes and spot on nose there came: 

2 calves with red body and white face with no red on face. 

From 3 cows with red bodies and white faces with red circles 
around eyes there came: 

3 calves with red bodies and white faces with no red on face. 

From 3 cows with red bodies and white faces having no red on 
the face there came: 

3 calves with red bodies and white faces with no red on face. 

From 3 cows with roan bodies and white faces there came 4 calves. 

1 with red body and white face. 
3 with roan bodies and white faces; 

Placing the offspring of each of the different cows in separate 
groups for comparison there is one spotted cow that had 4 calves 
with red bodies and white faces, 2 of these calves had eye circles 
and spot on nose; 1 had imperfect eye circles and 1 calf had no red 
on face. Another spotted cow had two calves: 1 with red body, 
white face and circles around one eye. One with roan body and 
white face with no red on face. One cow white in color had 2 calves 
both of which had roan bodies and white faces, but 1 had imperfect 
eye circles and spot on nose. One red cow had 4 calves, all of which 
had red bodies, white faces and circles around eyes. Another red 
cow had 3 calves all of which had red bodies, white faces, eye circles 
and large spot on nose. 

One roan cow had 2 calves both of which had roan bodies and 
white faces. Another roan cow had 2 calves, 1 of which had roan 
body and white face. ... 

Without detailing each case, where a cow had more than 1 calf 
it may be stated, that in every instance where a red cow had more 
than I -calf, those calves were all marked alike, with two exceptions; 
namely: A Jersey cow that had 2 calves, 1 with red body, white 
face and eye circles, the other with red body, white face and no red 



Fogle: Transmission of Color and Color Markings 203 

markings on face. A brown cow that had 3 calves, 1 with red body, 
white face, eye circles and no spot on nose, 1 with red body, white 
face, eye circles and no spot on nose, 1 with red body, white face 
with no red markings on face. 

Classifying the 50 calves which entered into those observations 
according to color and markings we have: 

33 or two-thirds had circles around eyes; 

27 or practically one-half had spot on nose, of these only 1 had spot on 

nose without eye circle; 
7 had eye circles without spot on nose; 

1 had circle around one eye only; 

2 had imperfect eye circles; 
12 had no red on face. 

The proportions of two-thirds and one-half in relation to eye circle 
and spot on nose, as given above, seems-to be fixed since it has held 
true in all my tabulations, even when there were only a few calves 
to record. 

Summing up color markings of the roan calves we have out of 
a total of 16 calves with roan bodies; 16 calves with white faces; 
1 with imperfect eye circles and 15 without eye circles or red markings 
on faces. 

A few facts in transmission of color and markings have evidently 
stood the test of time and until revised by future knowledge will 
be cf assistance to the breeder. Thus the circle around eyes would 
seem to go with the solid red color, as the greater number of red 
calves carry the characteristic eye circle. The fact that out of 16 
roan calves 15 have no red markings on face (having only imperfect 
eye circles) strongly points to the dissociation of eye circles with 
roan color. The cross of red and white result in roan, and the roan 
cow, having received red from one parent and white from the other, 
transmits the red to about half her offspring and roan to the other 
half, so that about half the calves from a roan cow bred to a Hereford 
bull will be red and the other half roan. 

All cattle breeders who have handled grade Herefords will under- 
stand what is meant by the eye circle and spot on nose. To those 
not familiar with such cattle, I would explain, that when a red cow 
is bred to a white face (Hereford) bull many of the offspring have a 
red circle around each eye and a red spot on the nose, this spot vary- 
ing in size from 2 inches in diameter to nearly covering the face. 

It is of interest to note that this eye circle and spot disappear in 
the offspring when a cow thus marked is bred back to a Hereford 



204 American Breeders Magazine 

bull. In other words, a three-fourths grade Hereford does not as 
a rule show this characteristic mark. I am not prepared to say 
this spot will be always removed in the first generation; it takes 
several more crosses to permanently remove it, but from 10 cows 
bred having white faces (4 with eye circles and 1 with spot on nose) 
not a calf shows a sign of these marks. The keeping of records of 
the transmission of color and color markings will be continued and 
further reports, comprising larger numbers of cattle and extending 
over several generations, will be made to the Association. It is as 
yet too early to attempt to draw definite conclusions, but from the 
results given above, the writer feels encouraged to continue, as the 
road to definite knowledge is now cleared. 

THE TURKEY AS AN EGG PRODUCER* 

W. N. Iewin 
Washington, D. C. 

From the settlement of our country until the present time the 
turkey is the only native b that has been brought under domestica- 
tion. In our economic system the turkey has been used almost exclu- 
sively as a bird for our table on Thanksgiving Day and other holiday 
occasions. It has for this purpose earned a justly popular place in 
the minds of our people. 

According to the U. S. Census Report we had on June 1, 1900, 
6,599,367 turkeys in the United States. These were undoubtedly 
breeding stock, since there is no record of their being kept anywhere 
for the sole purpose of producing eggs for the table, as is the case with 
chickens and ducks. 

In forty years' experience on farms in Ohio and Kansas, where we 
were never without a small flock, the writer never knew or even heard 
of turkeys laying more than one or two settings, and that always in 
the early spring. I was ignorant of the fact that in some parts of our 
great country there were some turkeys that continued to lay more or 
less throughout the season from the latter part of March to January. 

After living in Washington a few years I began the study of fruit 
varieties grown in the vicinity by walking through the market lines 
Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, where the farmers within a radius 

* Mr. Irwin prepared this paper shortly before his death, which occurred June 24, 1911. 

D Both ducka and geese, have at different times and In limited numbers been domesticated, but 
are now so mixed up with Asiatic and European species that It is very doubtful if there is a single 
variety of purely American origin. 



Irwin: The Turkey as an Egg Producer 205 

of twenty-five miles bring every conceivable product of the farm and 
woods. Early in July, about 1900, I saw some turkey eggs, but 
scarcely glanced at them, thinking some one had found an abandoned 
spring nest and that they would not be in condition for the table. 
On another trip through the market I saw turkey eggs on two or 
three different stands. Having tasted of turkey eggs in my boyhood 
days, and remembering their delicious quality, I purchased some, 
and after enjoying eating them, began a systematic search for all 
I could find. From March to June, inclusive, the eggs are worth 
$1.50 to $2.50 per dozen for hatching purposes. From July to Janu- 
ary, inclusive, they are sold at about 5 cents per dozen above the price 
for chicken eggs. For about ten years my family, as well as many of 
our friends whom I have supplied, have been enjoying this truly native 
American luxury. In no single year since I began have I purchased 
less than twenty-five dozen eggs, while one year, 1903, from June 27 
to December 31, I was able to secure 130-2/3 dozen, for which I 
paid $42.57. In 1902, between July 15 and December 18, 53-2/3 
dozen were purchased for $18.34. These eggs were bought from 
farmers whom I found to be honest and truthful, one-half dozen to 
a dozen per week, running along through the season. These farmers 
are holding today many of the same customers they had when I 
began with them. One farmer, Mr. Benj. Groves, informed me of a 
hen that began laying the latter part of March and continued almost 
continuously until the latter part of November. He was sure she 
had laid 200 eggs. Having bought his eggs every week, 1 had no 
cause for doubting his estimate. Other men have told me of birds 
having laid as many as 150 eggs during the season. 

This trait of the turkey here has been going on for so long a time 
that people think it quite commonplace to see the eggs in the market 
here. Many of my friends are buying and using them in preference 
to chicken eggs. 

Turkey eggs, which usually sell at 5 cents per dozen above the 
price of chicken eggs, are more economical than any other, since they 
average about 2\ pounds per dozen against 1$ pounds for chicken 
eggs and seven-eighths of a pound for guinea eggs, which sell about 
5 cents less per dozen than chicken eggs. 

'Comparative Weights of Eggs Pbb Dozsn. 

ounoes 

Plymouth Rock 26 

White Wyandotte 27 

Guinea 13 

Turkey , 42 

PeklnDuek 36 

Chinese Goose 64 



American Breeders Magazine 



Irwin: The Turkey as an Egg Producer 207 

On account of the thicker shell and membranes surrounding the 
contents they retain their good quality very much longer than chicken 
eggs, which have thin shells and membranes. 



holographed by E. L. CnrdaU. 



. Photographed by E. L. Ctandall. 



We have kept eggs purchased in September and October until 
March when, on opening, the yolks would drop out round and plump, 
and the white or albumen be perfectly normal. 



208 American Breeders Magazine 

In Allegan County, Michigan, and in one locality in Massachu- 
setts turkeys are reported to me by thoroughly reliable parties as laying 
quite regularly throughout the season, in the latter case continuing 
into January. 

If we can in a few decades breed up the turkeys to 100 eggs per 
bird, which I believe is possible by proper selection from known good 
layers, our six million turkeys would produce approximately 450,000,- 

000 more eggs than we now are getting from them. At 3 cents per 
egg this would add $13,500,000 to our annual wealth, besides mate- 
rially strengthening our national supply of better foods. 

The effort will not, or need not, cost much, so that in case of failure 
we are no worse off than when we began. 

Turkey chicks, 2 to 3 pounds in weight and certain to be from late 
laying birds, are on the market here throughout the winter at eating 
prices; $1 to $2 each ought to buy the best of these baby birds, 
crated for shipment, where 3 or 4 are found at one time. 

There are only a few female turkeys in this locality that lay eggs 
out of the usual season; but from the fact that one of my friends 
reports a similar case in Michigan and another in Massachusetts, it 
would seem that there is a possibility or even a probability that there 
are a few of these good layers scattered possibly all over the country. 

That this proposition will be ridiculed by wise men, laughed at 
by fools, discussed by intelligent people, and finally adopted and a 
new and profitable enterprise added to our poultry industry, I have 
not the slightest doubt. Every proposition for the betterment of 
man's condition on the earth, from the time Christopher Columbus 
started out to discover the New World to the present time, has 
received like treatment. When Marcus Whitman in the winter of 
1842-3 rode on horseback from Oregon to St. Louis and thence by 
boat and stage proceeded to Washington to protest against Great 
Britain securing control of our Pacific Coast country, that great and 
wise statesman, Daniel Webster, to whom as Secretary of State Mr. 
Whitman appealed, took from his pocket a copper cent and flipping 
it on his fingers said: "Whitman, I would not give that for all beyond 
the Rocky Mountains; we could never defend it, nor get across the 
mountains to it. " If Mr. Webster could return and view the millions 
of happy and prosperous people enjoying a contented life in that 
salubrious climate, and could know how helpful that country was to 
the east in shipping its 50,000 to 75,000 cars of fruit a year, he would, 

1 think, admit that his conception of the value of that country had 
been very poor indeed. 



THE EVOLUTION OF A TYPE OF HORSE 

W. S. Anderson 
Winchester , Kentucky 

The early settlors of America imported from Europe their general 
purpose horse. Later, when a horse was needed by the sportsman, 
the thoroughbred was brought over the Atlantic. Later still, the 
demand arose for a heavy draft horse and he, too, had to come across 
the water. But there has since been developed, mostly from thor- 
oughbred blood, a horse peculiar to this country, known as the Ameri- 
can Trotter. The families of this standard bred horse are so diverse 
that it cannot yet be called a distinct breed. 

Near the beginning of the nineteenth century there had sprung 
up, as by chance, in the state of Vermont, a breed of horses called 
the Morgan Horse. This breed all trace to a horse of unknown 
ancestry whose name was Justin Morgan. He was taken from 
Massachusetts to Randolph, Vermont, when a two-year-old colt. 
Farm mares were taken to his service, and by inbreeding his get, a 
very compactly built, serviceable and beautiful type of horse was 
produced. It is a very great misfortune, to the horsebreeding indus- 
try of our country, that this very superior type of horse should have 
been, by out crossing, almost lost as a pure breed. 

Something over fifty years ago, there were developed the first 
saddle and show horses. These were produced by mingling the 
blood of the thoroughbred and that of the common farm horse. 
Owing to the great varieties of blood lines there has been no stability 
in the families of these saddle horses. By fortuitous combinations 
an occasional animal of real greatness was bred. As the production 
of such a horse had been largely accidental, so matings were made 
with him in a like haphazard way. The industry of producing saddle 
horses is even now in much the same chaotic condition. The owner 
of Harrison Chief used to say that one show horse was all a man could 
reasonably hope to produce in a life time. 

It is easy now for the student, acquainted with the Mendelian 
laws of hybrid behavior, to see why these early breeders so often 
failed. They had too many undesirable traits in the germ plasm of 
their best horses. It is difficult enough to get a pure bred horse 
when only two traits are involved in the hybrid ancestry; but when 
a half dozen, or more, are wrapped up in the germ plasm it is a task 
almost impossible to obtain a strain that will breed true. To place 
the fine horse industry on any thing like a scientific basis, it is neces- 
sary to eliminate the hybrid. 

209 



210 American Breeders Magazine 

So far as is known to this writer, but one earnest and intelligent 
attempt has been made to evolve a pure bred type of saddle horse. 
It is to tell of this work and its success that I write this paper. Thirty 
years ago a young man, J. Gano Johnson, in Montgomery County, 
Kentucky, undertook to evolve a saddle horse that would breed 
true to type. He was aware of the distinct breeds of beef and dairy 
cattle, of draft horses, of hogs and of sheep, so he reasoned that the 
fine horse is of more value than a sheep. Why not a type of the 
saddle horse? Even at the time he began thus to reason he was a 
practical horse breeder, and knew something of the magnitude of 
the task he was about to undertake; but he did not fully realize, 
until later years, the extreme difficulty of realizing his ideal. It 
must be noted that the horse to be evolved had to be the result of 
hybridization. As a matter of fact, when an analysis is made of 
the blood lines of the breed produced, it is found to come from four 
sources. First, the farm horse, second the thoroughbred, third the 
trotter, and last the Morgan Horse. 

The following three sires, each great in his respective line, John- 
son chose as the ones to furnish the foundation material for his new 
horse: Indian Chief, descended from Justin Morgan through Sher- 
man Morgan, Vermonts Black Hawk and Bloods Black Hawk who 
dominated the show rings of Kentucky for the twenty years pre- 
ceding his death in 1879. At St. Louis in 1868 he won three firsts; 
namely for best harness stallion, for best roadster, for sweepstakes 
for all ages and sexes. In this last contest there were sixty-three 
competitors. Harrison Chief foaled in 1872, goes back to Imported 
Messenger through Clark Chief, Mambrino Chief, Mambrino Pay- 
master, and Mambrino, and was during his day one of the distin- 
guished horses of Kentucky. The third great sire chosen was 
Wilkes, by Hambletonian 10, the most prepotent of trotting sires. 
All three sires were of the light harness type rather than the saddle 
conformation. In the great speed of Wilkes, the soundness, strength 
and action of Harrison, and the intelligence and refinement of Indian, 
he believed that he had the essential elements to make a great breed 
of fine horses. He believed that up to his death Indian Chief was 
the greatest individual horse that had been bred in America. This 
opinion is verified by the unique distinction which Indian has of 
having to his credit a number, through his own quality and that of 
his sons and daughters, among the great sires of the American 
Trotting Register, the American Saddle Horse Register, and the 
Morgan Register. So the descendants of these three were used, 
drawing on just as little material, from other- sources, a& possible. .. . 



Anderson: The Evolution of a Type of Horse 211 

The saddle horse is also a carriage horse. That is to say, the horse 
which has the saddle gaits, walk, canter, rack and fox-trot, is also 
trained to trot in harness. It is hot enough that the show horse 
shall be fast at the gaits, but he must also be beautiful of conforma- 
tion, carriage and style. As a matter of fact, as the fine horse exists 
at present, he is a most intelligent and a most beautiful as well as 
a most useful animal. 

After studying the available material, Johnson thought he saw 
points of perfection in the various individuals of his foundation 
animals, which if properly combined in a horse would make him a 
perfect one. In the descendents of the three foundation sires there 
were these qualities: the refined, bony head, the large, mild eye, 
the neatly pointed ear, the long, gracefully arched neck, high withers, 
the straight barrel ribbing out to the hips, the short back, the full 
round quarter well let down, the short sturdy legs, the wide strong 
bone, the flat foot, beauty, animation, brilliant action, extreme speed, 
docility and intelligence. The task was one of selection and of 
combination. 

. He did not have MendePs work as a guide. At the time that this 
work on the new type began, the monumental paper of Mendel had 
not been discovered, and was not for nearly twenty years afterward. 
He possessed but little theoretical knowledge of biology, but he 
knew the points of the horse, and had a clear idea of the type he 
set out to breed. Dominant and recessive unit characters were 
unknown — at any rate by such names — yet he had learned by study- 
ing the behavior of various traits that some always made themselves 
manifest in the soma and others did not, but might be passed on by 
the animal whose body was free from them. His breeding has been 
done with what he calls "manifested characteristics" and "latent" 
ones. These, of course, prove to be nothing more nor less than the 
dominant and recessive unit characters. Without their independent 
discovery his work would have been a failure. For example, he 
must have in his horse the flat, strong foot, as contrasted to the 
narrow "mule" foot. He needed a heavy tail and a water-spout 
tail carriage. He required the flat, strong bone, rather than the 
round, weak one. Some otherwise good horses had thick, heavy ears, 
and in their stead there must be the thin, slender, pointed ear. The 
lung capacity and the walls of the heart must insure strength and 
endurance. In short, no point of weakness or of coarseness must be 
allowed. To make progress the breeder had to learn how these 
various characteristics behave as they pass from parents to offspring. 



212 American Breeders Magazine 

Had he depended on the result of the matings which he alone could 
make the knowledge would have come but slowly. The farm on 
which all this work was done, is in the very center of the fine horse 
industry. Every other breeder's results could be and were studied. 
The same blood lines were being used near by. 

The very first conclusion was that the method of continued cross 
breeding usually practised, would not lead to the goal. The hybrid 
was essential to mix the ingredients, but when it did that, its useful- 
ness ended. So the first endeavor was to get the same desirable 
points in both sire and dam, or in other words, to make the qualities 
pure bred. With the great scarcity of animals of like desirable 
traits it was however impossible to reach the pure bred condition for 
any qualities except by inbreeding. There was, and is yet, a deep 
seated prejudice against the inbreeding of horses. There are even 
those who consider it morally wrong. These views are exceedingly 
narrow, yet to go counter to traditional belief is no pleasant experi- 
ence. His task was all the more difficult because he himself could 
not foretell just what the results of inbreeding would be on the fami- 
lies in use. Trial furnished the evidence that it was safe to inbreed. 
By this method groups of qualities were soon secured pure-bred. 
Just here, I must not fail to say that Johnson could afford to own but 
few of the great horses whose blood he was mingling. Such horses 
are very expensive. It was necessary for him to make a living as 
well as move toward his ideal. This necessitated the sale of many 
excellent individuals which should never have left the stud. Out 
crossing in other studs soon dissipated their excellence. 

Harrison Chief had two renowned sons, Bourbon Chief and Wilson's 
King. Johnson bought and brought to Montgomery County the 
former, Bourbon Chief, using freely these two distinguished sons 
of Harrison Chief. 

The second conclusion to be reached as a result of this work was 
that the shortest route to the goal lay in the female ancestry and 
not the male. Stallions are more expensive than mares, and of 
little value unless mares of like qualities can be had to mate with 
them. Then, too, it is easy to get the services of a great stallion 
without owning him. So he determined to develop a line of brood 
mares, by inbreeding, which should have the points of excellence 
which he needed in his ideal horse. One of these, Queen, traces 
through Whirlwind to Indian Chief; and through Gov. Wilkes to 
both Indian Chief and Geo. Wilkes. While her sire, Red Cloud, 
was by Indian Chief and out of the dam of Wilson's King. In addi- 



Anderson: The Evolution op a Type of Horse 213 



214 American Breeders Magazine 

tion to this there were in her ancestry two notable show mares: 
Daisy Burns, and Bird. This beautiful inbred mare, Queen, was 
mated with Wilson's King. 

From thisfmating was expected the best horse he had yet pro- 
duced. He liad such an accurate knowledge of every feature, and 
the source pi every quality of both Queen and King that he knew 
what the result must be. The colt, Golden King, verified every 
expectation. This animal is not for sale; years of work have been 
spent to produce him that there might be a stallion who could be 
successfully bred to a line of mares from that other great son of 
Harrison, Bourbon Chief. 

The half brother of Golden King, Cloud King, by Wilson's King 
out of May Chief by Harrison Chief, is scarcely less famous than 
Golden himself. Both are show horses, both are successful as sires. 
To have evolved these stallions alone would have been of but little 
value to the fine horse industry, unless at the same time a line of 
mares worthy to mate with them had also been developed. This 
was done, not only by Johnson but also by others who owned horses 
of the same blood lines and who believed in the same methods of 
inbreeding and line breeding. By the time these stallions were 
ready for service there were many mares pure bred for their qualities, 
and many more, nearly so. From the pure bred ones and these 
stallions have come foals of the type. The oldest of these are now 
producing and their produce are likewise of the type. 

The horse of the imagination has been made a reality. There 
are in this stud a number of sons of Golden King, matured or just 
maturing, of whom he is the prototype. There are owned by pro- 
gressive horsemen in Montgomery and surrounding counties many 
more horses which show considerable resemblance to that type. 
Thus as a breeder he has rendered a service of great value to his 
state and nation, by evolving a new type of saddle horse. I call 
this type the Johnson Horse. 

The distinctive features of the type are: intelligence and docility; 
beauty with most graceful lines; soundness, stamina and strength; 
height 15.3; short, strong legs set on the four corners of the body; 
a short back, broad and deep over the loins; long, graceful neck rising 
out of neatly turned withers.; delicate head and sensitive ears; three 
natural gaits — walk, trot and gallop, the other gaits easily acquired; 
in action, "The hocks set well up under the body, the knee breaks 
over hi a fold, every joint flexing from the shoulder down in just the 
right angle to give the utmost roundness of leg fall, every foot falls 



Anderson: The Evolution of a Type of Horse 215. 

in the right place in the right way, all with purity of motion;" in 
speed unsurpassed; color bay or chestnut. I think I am justified 
in saying that the Johnson Horse is an improved Morgan, revised 
and brought up to date: a Morgan, improved in conformation, size, 
beauty, action, speed, with all the strength, soundness, and endur- 
ance of the old Vermont breed. 

With permission of Lieut. R. M. Danford U. S. A. the measure- 
ments recently made of Golden King are given herewith: "He stands 



15.3, and weighs 1200 pounds. From girth line (just back of the 
withers) over withers, neck, and forehead to line between the eyes, 
53J inches; across hips, 21 inches; hips to point of buttocks, 25 inches; 
length of back (from girth line to line joining points of hips), 13 
inches; around hocks, 17 inches; around leg below hocks, 9 inches; 
below knee, 8 inches; girth, 72J inches; around loin and belly, 73^ 
inches." The mature sons of Golden King, as Kentucky Golden, 
Pure Gold, Peter Rabbit, and Young Bill, are so near like him that 
a stranger finds it difficult to distinguish the sons from one another 
or from their sire. . .:'.. 



216 American Breeders Magazine 

The unit characters of the horse may, in a tentative way, be 
stated to be as follows: that the finer qualities are recessive to the 
coarse ones; as the thin, pointed ear is recessive to the heavy thick 
one; the clean, small head recessive to its opposite; the short neck 
recessive to the long one; the flat foot recessive to the "mule" foot; 
the calf knee dominant to the straight, perfect knee; strength domi- 
nant to weakness; true action and superior action recessive to untrue 
and inferior action. In color, chestnut is recessive to grey bay 
and black. 

This mast be understood as a working hypothesis only. It must 
be remembered that qualities go in groups. Often a blend of antago- 
nistic traits is a blend only in appearance, and will segregate in a later 
generation. I have notes made on matings during the last breeding 
season which, when the foals come, will no doubt throw some light 
on the dominant and recessive characters of the horse. It may be 
possible to work out the unit characters of the horse, and to this 
task the writer expects to devote much of his time. 



ORIGIN AND DESCENT OF THE NORWEGIAN 

BREEDS OF CATTLE* 

Dr. J. Frost 
Kristiana, Denmark 

In some recent contributions to the publications of the German 
Agricultural Society, Dr. Dettweiler discusses the origin and descent 
of certain races of cattle whence the various European breeds of 
cattle are supposed to have sprung, and reverses what, heretofore, 
has been the almost universally accepted theory, namely; that the 
black, black and white, and black spotted cattle were originally 
the cattle of the primitive Germans, and the red and red spotted 
cattle belonged to some pre or post Germanic race. The black cattle 
were usually denominated offhand, Germanic cattle, and the red and 
vari-colored cattle, the Celtic cattle. Dettweiler, as noted, reverses 
the positions of these two races of cattle and his statements have so 
far not been contradicted, according to the best of my knowledge. 

In the following I will discuss his theory, with special reference 
to cattle in Norway, and will show that the theory is applicable 
also to breeds in that country. 

The theory which he advances is briefly as follows: 

a tobOi & en Clonic Brachycephal. 



Frost: Norwegian Breeds of Cattle 217 

The red breed of cattle are the Germanic cattle and were tamed 
and bred by the ancient Germans. Long before the Celtic occupancy 
of western Europe the race of black cattle was tamed by the Celts, 
somewhere in the interior of Russia, whence these cattle were brought 
along on their migrations through north Germany, Denmark, and 
other countries, in which the Celts had settled on dispersing over 
western Europe. Dettweiler places this immigration of the Celts 
into Europe at about 2000 years before Christ, or even earlier. 

The black spotted Celtic cattle had come into Norway from Jut- 
land. Dettweiler says: 

The appearance of the black color in cattle on the coast of Norway by the 
proximity of Jutland, is not at all remarkable. Ethnologically speaking, the 
existence there of a race of people which was a derivation from the pure north- 
Germanic type has been established; but I do not know whether the area of 
the expansion of these people covers that of the black and white breed of cattle. 

To arrive at a solution of the problem of the derivation of the 
breeds of cattle in Norway it is necessary to ascertain whence came 
the first settlers of that country, for the assumption closest at hand 
is that different races or breeds of cattle were brought thither by 
various peoples coming there, especially as we know that Norway 
was settled by different bands of migrants. The first remains found 
of man in Norway date with certainty to the earlier stone age. 
Those earliest occupants, as a matter of course, led a very primitive 
existence. They were mostly fisherman and hunters, and their only 
domestic animal was the dog. 

The Norwegian coasts of those days were rather inhospitable and 
offered much less favorable conditions for a dense population than 
today. Therefore, this first population cannot have been numerous, 
but it spread over almost the whole of the peninsula, that is from 
south to north and from west to east. The largest settlements were 
on the southwest coast by reason of people coming there first. 

They were members of a race of people which, during the stone 
period, inhabited the coasts bordering on the North Sea, and with- 
out doubt had come there from the south or east of Europe. 

This North Sea race of the stone age was characterized by blond 
hair and round skulls and was apparently closely akin to the Finns 
of today; it occupied the whole of western Europe from Jutland to 
northwest Germany, included Holland, and extended clear to Scot- 
land. From Jutland these "blond, round heads" flocked in large 
numbers to the nearest landing places on the south and southwest 
coast of Norway, and from there pressed forward north and east. 



218 American Breeders Magazine 

At the close of the early stone period the inhabitants of southern 
Norway gradually took to agriculture and cattle husbandry and 
all the more fertile valleys became populous and well settled by a 
permanent population. 

Whence came the first horses and cattle to Norway is still a matter 
of conjecture. However, there is much in favor of the supposition 
that the immigration of the before-mentioned people of the early 
stone age was not a sudden movement, but took place in successive 
periods and that these immigrants brought their domesticated animals 
from Jutland or Friesland. Among these was also the horse, which 
at that time was common to all the territory adjacent to the North 
Sea, and was related to the horses of the primitive Finns, and not, 
as is. generally asserted, the Celts. From this horse has descended 
the Fjord horse of today. It is a small horse which is closely re- 
lated to the horses which are being bred in Ireland, the Hebrides, 
the Shetland Islands, the Faroe Islands, and Iceland. The Fjord 
horses, as indicated by the name, originated in Norway on the 
Fjords of the western coasts which, during the stone age as before 
explained, were inhabited by a people belonging to the North 
Sea race. 

In the eastern portion of Norway, that which was inhabited by 
an ancient Germanic population, was bred an entirely different 
breed of horses, which might be designated as the northernmost 
branch of the Occidental horse. It is the same horse which has in 
Denmark developed into the present day Sudlander, in the adjacent 
portions of northwest Germany into the Marsh horse, and in Holland 
into the Friesian horse. In Norway the best and most typical repre- 
sentatives of this breed of horses, are the "Gudbrandsdaler." 

Just as the Norwegian horses may be divided into two large groups, 
namely, those of Germanic and those of non-Germanic origin, we 
may similarly group the breeds of their cattle. The first cattle 
in Norway, as the first horses, were owned by that North sea race 
of the stone age, which sometime probably brought them along 
from the interior of what is today Russia. In color those cattle 
were black or black spotted, and are presumably the ancestors of the 
black and white cattle which may at the present time be found in 
the countries of northwest Europe. 

Jutland is assumed by Dettweiler to be the source whence the 
black-and-white cattle came to Germany and Holland within com- 
paratively recent times and even to different sections of Norway in 
earlier (prehistoric) times. There is much to be said in favor of 



Frost: Norwegian Breeds of Cattle 219 

this assumption as it is fairly definitely established that the inhab- 
itants of southwest Norway had come from Jutland. 

The year 1750 B. C, approximately, marked the beginning of the 
bronze age in Scandinavia. There is no evidence that a new race 
of people had come into Norway at the beginning of the bronze age, 
instead, the civilization of the people of the stone age advanced 
slowly into that of the bronze age. Agriculture played an important 
part, and about the same domestic animals were kept then as are 
kept today . b 

Toward the end of the bronze age and at the beginning of the iron 
age there seems to have taken place an immigration of Celts into 
Norway. In ancient remains, forms of skulls characteristic of the 
Celts have been found, and similar skull formation may be found 
there among the living, at the present time. Arbo, the eminent 
Norwegian specialist in skull measurements calls them the " black 
round-heads" in contradistinction to the considerably older "blonde 
round-heads/ ' The former are rarer than the blonds but they occur 
less localized. 

Little is known of the earlier periods of the iron age, whose begin- 
ning is generally estimated at about 500 years B.C. The oldest 
finds, dating from the iron age, point to the Celts as having occupied 
middle Europe during those last few centuries before Christ. There- 
fore, it was not Celts who had bred cattle or introduced cattle hus- 
bandry to any appreciable extent into Norway as raising and breed- 
ing of cattle are of much older standing than the immigration thither 
of Celtic elements. For Holland as well as Belgium I have been 
able to fix the time of the Celtic immigration at as late as the last 
centuries before Christ. A safe assumption is therefore to credit 
the first Norwegian breeds of cattle and horses as well as the first 
breeding operations to the so-called North Sea race of the stone age. 

It is true, further, that the cattle coming from Jutland to the 
west coast of Norway were black-and-white spotted and black, as 
the majority of their decendants have remained till today. 

Wherever, in Norway one finds descendants of the blond haired 
and round skulled race, which in the stone age had settled south and 
west Norway, one may come across the black, gray, and black or 
gray spotted cattle, all the way from the province Jaderen south 
of Stavanger, clear up to the Lofoten with the exception of a few 
scattered red cattle, in portions which demonstrably were settled 

b Schetellg, Veattandetz dldste Kulturhistorie. 

Frost, Agrarversammulung and Landwirtschaft in den Underlanden, in Belgium. 



^■■^- - v- 



220 American Breeders Magazine 

by the Germans before mentioned. Such is, for instance the case 
with the country around Drontheim. 

The majority of and the most typical of Norway's population 
today, is blond, tall and blue eyed, having the long skulls of the true 
north Germanic race. These ancient Germans originally came to 
Norway from the east or the south-east but the time when this 
occurred is unknown. It is supposed that this so-called north Ger- 
manic race occupied nearly all of Sweden in the early stone age, 
while according to Arbo, their appearance in Norway, in the iron 
age, occurrred 2000 years later. It is probable that their advance 
into Norway during these 2000 years took place by degrees. They 
came there as families and kinship groups carrying on farming and 
cattle breeding. They chose the best and most fertile valleys, con- 
quering and driving before them the resident population and convert- 
ing the best and most productive portions of the country into more 
or less purely Germanic colonies. They brought with them their 
horses and their red cattle, which without doubt they had bred in 
their Swedish home for thousands of years before. 

If it be true that a north Germanic people lived in Sweden as 
early as the earliest stone period, it is most plausible to accept with 
Dettweiler and Holdefleiss that the red Germanic cattle descended 
from a species of bovines which was first tamed, domesticated and 
bred in Scandinavia, and that the Scandinavian breed called the 
Fjell cattle is one of the purest and oldest of breeds. d 

The descendants of the red Germanic cattle are now in evidence 
wherever, in Norway, the preponderance of the population is de- 
scended from that ancient Germanic people, as for example, in all 
the valleys of eastern Norway; in Osterdal, Gudbrandsdal, Numeda 1 , 
Glommental, Satersdal, as well as the whole of the province of Tele- 
marken, in Drontheim and in the colony of Osterdale peasants in the 
extreme north in Bardu and Maalselovdal. 

In course of time a great number of other and different breeds of 
cattle came to Norway either in herds which the immigrants brought 
with them, or as individuals which the Vikings brought back as 
booty from their raids. Crossing and greatly differing environment 
brought forth several different types or breeds of cattle which we 
find in Norway today. 

For purposes of improvement of the native cattle much breeding 
stock has been imported during the past century; notably, Ayrshires. 

d Holdefleiss, Uber die Herkunft und Systematlk unaeres Hausrindes. I Hits. Landw. Zeituno 
28: 10, 1911. 



Frost: Norwegian Breeds of Cattle 221 

Notwithstanding that a certain amount of blurring of the original 
race characters took place in the course of the thousands of years 
past, the distinctive features of the various breeds (or races) have 
maintained themselves in Norway more completely perhaps than 
in other countries. High mountains, broad streams and deeply 
cut fjords interposed the most difficult obstacles conceivable to com- 
munication between even adjacent districts and thereby prevented 
any extensive and general mixture of the original breed characteristics. 

Norway is a particularly profitable field of study for the ethnolo- 
gist, because the different racial elements which originally took part 
in settling that country, have maintained themselves in a comparative 
state of purity and distinctiveness to this day and the same is true 
in even a greater measure of breeds of cattle. 

Dettweiler's theories cannot be demonstrated as absolutely true; 
they are hypotheses just as are the foregoing statements concerning 
the original settlement of Norway in prehistoric times. But as 
all the facts regarding the first men, the first horses, and the first 
cattle in Norway cover each other to a remarkable degree, we feel 
justified in accepting the correctness of Dettweiler's theory of a red 
Germanic breed of cattle and of a black post-Germanic breed of 
cattle. 6 

6 Mitteilungen der Deutzchen Landurirtacha-GeselUchaft. No. 53, 1911. Translation by Mrs. O. S. 
Knorr, Washington, D. C. 



EDITORIALS 

THE PEDAGOGICS OF EUGENICS 

One of the marvels of the new century is the rapid popularizatioD 
of the subject of eugenics. In 1906 when the secretary of the Ameri- 
can Breeders Association announced the intention of organizing a 
committee on eugenics a large part of the daily press treated the 
matter with levity and ridicule. But the public viewpoint has 
undergone a radical change, in no small part due to the work of the 
Association. Now, in all the substantial popular magazines and 
even in daily papers, appear articles which in subject matter are 
quite as progressive as those admitted to the Association's own 
publications. The facts presented by such Association workers as 
Dr. Davenport, Dr. Goddard, Dr. Rodgers, Dr. Southard, and others 
in this country and in Europe by Galton, Mudge, Reid, Ploetz, 
Pearson and a host of others have been so convincing that the 
new subject has already won its field; and the movement to know 
man's heredity and to utilize this knowledge in producing races of 
higher efficacy and capabilities, has suddenly become world-wide. 
The Association, having assumed responsibilities in helping to guide 
the eugenics movement in safe channels, is itself just beginning to 
comprehend the magnitude, the importance, the complexity and 
difficulties of the task. Suggestions are arising from every stand- 
point. The public, having accepted as a fact that there is need of 
reforms, is ready for instruction and guidance. The policy of the 
Association has been to investigate vigorously rather than to preach; 
to learn the truth and allow the truth to be its own power. As a 
group the members of the Association have chosen the r61e of re- 
searchers rather than that of propagandists. We have amply proven 
that our point of view is that of true science. The country has taken 
us at our word. We have gained a respectful hearing from the 
intelligent people of the continent. 

In the meantime eugenics has come to be the subject of popular 
discussion, of collegiate instruction, of legislative enactment. It 
seems, that the era of instruction, of advice, of defining public and 
private policies, of the practice of scientific eugenics had made an 
earlier advent than the most optimistic propagandists thought possi- 
ble. Those who have had the foresight to see this new field of service, 
and had the courage to break its virgin sod, had hardly time to look 
back in the furrows, when they were confronted with the need of 

222 



Editorials 223 

being teachers and leaders of the popular side of the movement, as 
well as of its research problems. The Association officers and workers, 
in meeting the double task are in part ready to rise to the tasks which 
are rapidly multiplying. But the field grows so rapidly day by day 
and month by month, that the number of workers must be multiplied. 

The avenues for giving expression to the results of the research 
of the growing number of investigators banded together under the 
eugenics section of the Association must be enlarged. And workers 
must be trained to teach. The pedagogics of eugenics must be 
wrought out in the departments of our universities and colleges, 
and from there carried to our secondary schools and through college 
extension departments to all the people. And it requires no special 
vision to see that genetics, that is, heredity and the breeding of plants, 
animals, and men, is to become one of the most vital of the truly 
cultural subjects of our educational system. Our eugenic investi- 
gators need to be broadly and intimately in touch with those who 
are to develop the pedagogy of this subject, and the teachers must 
constantly sit at the feet of those engaged in research. There is 
a rapidly growing need for the enlargement of the publications and 
other popular activities of the Association, such as exhibits at state 
fairs and national and international expositions. Persons fully 
trained in the known facts and in giving them through public address 
aided by charts and stereoptican illustrations will be needed long 
before the universities will have had the foresight, enterprise and 
the time to produce them. 

Without assuming the role of alarmist, it must be admitted that 
this subject is sure to drift more or less for a lack of adequate leader- 
ship. The breeders of plants and animals will serve largely as con- 
servators of sensible, conservative and practical theories, but if 
fads do not arise it would be because this subject is unlike any other 
unripe subject. And the appeal cannot be made too strongly to the 
governing boards and those in executive authority in our universities 
to grapple with this subject at once that leaders may be produced 
in adequate numbers. The old theory that the function of our 
educational institutions was simply to give men general training has 
drifted upon the rocks. Modern division of labor has created the 
demand that men and women be trained for the specific kind of 
leadership required to care for the problems now demanding solution. 
If any university president doubts the oncoming of eugenics as a 
field for vital university service, not merely to the university man, 
but through university trained experts to the community, let him 



224 American Breeders Magazine 

scan the literature of the subject in 1905 and then in 1912. The 
Association's publications need a radical change in policy, that they 
may deal with the instructional and the popular phases of the subject 
as well as become repositories of the research work of Association 
investigators. While the first need of the results of research is to 
make them available for other investigators, yet the ultimate and 
broad purpose is that this information may be available as a basis 
for practical plans of race development. 

The Association was conceived in part to bring together the re- 
search worker, the practical improver of species, and the educator. 
The sudden growth of eugenics into an educational and even a popu- 
lar subject has greatly enlarged and intensified the need of this 
function of coordinating the results of all workers and of giving them 
all the composite breadth of the view of the whole genetics move- 
ment. In the critical work of popularizing eugenics the cooperation 
of those persons trained in creating new values in plant and animal 
heredity are needed. And on the other hand the rapidly developing 
philosophy of eugenics will help in the more detailed work of the 
producers of new varieties of plants and of improved families and 
breeds of animals. But the great need is leaders, and the call is to 
our great universities to train a scientific, safe, and sane leadership 
which through eugenics, education, and religion, can develop a stronger 
human race. 

THE AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION AND THE PRACTICAL 

BREEDER 

The American Breeders Association has a most vital relation to 
the work of the thousands of national, state and local associations, 
which are composed of persons engaged in the breeding of pedigreed 
animals and plants. These live stock breeders associations, also 
organizations of horticulturists, nurserymen, seedsmen and plant 
breeders, for the most part stress the commercial rather than the 
scientific aspects of their business. They lay stress mainly on the 
work of multiplying plant and animal stocks for general use. 

The American Breeders Association on the other hand has set 
itself to the task of giving emphasis to research work in heredity. 
We need more exact knowledge, as a tool to work with. The Ameri- 
can Breeders Association also emphasizes the more definitely creative 
phases of producing new values, the origination of new types with 
added values, and the improvement of existing breeds of live stock 



Editorials 225 

and varieties of fruits, vegetables and flowers. A third general 
function of the Association is to popularize the results of scientific 
research through its publications and to take such knowledge forth 
to the largest number of breeders possible. It will be seen, that 
the scope and work of these state breeders associations and that of 
the American Breeders Association are mutually inclusive, the inter- 
ests of each include those of the other. The two are not in competi- 
tion, but are supplementary to each other, and should be intimately 
and widely in cooperation. The American Breeders Association, 
through its annual meetings, its bound annual reports, and its quar- 
terly journal, the American Breeders Magazine, endeavors to center 
thought upon the broader features of genetics and practical breeding. 
These publications follow with close attention the results of genetic 
research in America and abroad. They emphasize the large eco- 
nomic values which arise from the improvement of the heredity of 
our great wealth producing crops and breeds of live stock. They 
discuss in the light of modern science of heredity, the methods by- 
which great leaders in breeding have secured their substantial results. 
They place, besides all these discussions, the larger phases of eugenics 
in their economic and social relation. 

MANY GENERAL BREEDERS ASSSOCIATION 

The numerous associations of practical breeders are coming to 
deal more with the theory of breeding. The trotting register associ- 
ations, the advanced registries of dairy breeds, the cow testing asso- 
ciations, and the circuit breeders associations, are examples of a 
tendency to follow out science in a statistical way in building up 
families of exceptional breeding value within the respective breeds. 
Field crop breeders associations, horticultural societies, florists soci- 
eties, and associations of seedsmen and nurserymen are gradually 
paying more attention to scientific discussions in^heir meetogs and 
conversations. But in the end the great work of all these organiza- 
tions is to take the products of the creative breeder and to multiply 
and bring into wide use the new family of this breed or that, and the 
new variety of plants. Thus, thousands of Shorthorn breeders have 
multiplied the "Scotch" cattle brought them through the genius of 
Cruikshank. N. H. Gentry built up and also widely multiplied his 
Berkshires, but in the latter work he had thousands of expert swine 
breeders as helpers. Burbank finds and creates new forms, but the 
seedsmen and nurserymen are the multipliers and purveyors of his 



226 American Breeders Magazine 

new things. Experiment stations put out new varieties; and seed 
growers, seed dealers and nurserymen become agencies to multiply 
them so that eventually they come within reach of all growers. 

Until recent years the science of breeding was in a very undeveloped 
form, and it is even now very incomplete. But it is a lusty youth 
and the time for a new order of things has arrived. The practical 
breeder can now ill afford not to know the widening knowledge which 
relates to his business. He needs the knowledge and skill of the 
scientist. We are rapidly getting rid of our old breeding super- 
stitions, of knowledge of things that are not so and breeding is being 
placed on a firm basis. It will pay the practical breeder to study 
the present status of the knowledge of heredity, and to keep abreast 
of advancement along this line. It will pay him for economic reasons, 
that he may the better use the best materials available in his own 
breeding work. But beyond that it will pay him for the substantial 
pleasure and personal development he will receive from this study, 
as it is being cleared up through research and practical experience. 

THE FIELD OF THE AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 

The American Breeders Association first sought out and secured 
in its membership the genetic scientists and the creative breeders 
of this country and many from other countries. It now desires to 
enlist under its banner the practical breeders also. The genetic 
scientists and the creative breeders number only hundreds or at 
most a few thousand. The practical breeders of live stock, including 
the no less important ones of poultry and bees, are numbered by 
the hundreds of thousands. The American Breeders Association 
will come into its larger purpose, work and influence only when its 
membership numbers by the tens of thousands these practical tech- 
nicians who breed and multiply pedigreed animals and plants. 

Its thought and influence will reach all countries of the earth for 
that which is interesting, new and vital in connection with genetics. 
It will make plain to the laymen the theory of heredity. It will 
interest legislators in putting forward scientific supervision for crea- 
tive breeding in cooperation with the practical breeders. It will 
lead the public press in the discussion of the genetic improvement 
of the human race. In fact if our enterprising breeders of pure 
blooded stock and our plant breeders, seedsmen and nurserymen 
knew how much the association is already doing they would all want 
to share in the inspiration and results by being members of the 
Association and thus become subscribers to its publications. 



Editorials 227 

The fact of having brought the students, scientists of heredity 
and the practical breeders together in a large national organization 
is an achievement worth all it has cost on the part of the members 
and officers in money, patience and loyal effort. The placing of the 
leadership of eugenics in this country in the hands of scientific com- 
mittees, and the development of scientists in genetics is an outcome 
of this general plan which is worth all the Association will cost in a 
generation. 

BREEDERS ARE MULTIPLIERS AND BENEFACTORS 

The so-called breeder of live stock, even though he does not improve 
upon the purebred stock he breeds, but only maintains its good 
qualities, is a public benefactor. He multiplies this stock in its 
purity and supplies it to stockmen and farmers who thus use pedi- 
greed or upgraded stock where otherwise only mongrel and indifferent 
live stock would be used. The breeder of purebred animals, needs 
to know the fundamentals of heredity, or, as we now call it, genetics, 
that he may secure, multiply and distribute that which is really 
superior; not merely in looks but in net profits per herd. It does 
not make one a breeder to pay unduly large prices in the excitement 
of the sales ring, nor does a long list of entries of his stock in a national 
herd book. A breeder to be worthy of the name needs to know how to 
select a foundation of cattle which, when he multiplies them for his 
farmer patrons, will give the farmer larger net profits per farm herd. 
Mere show of a few highly fed animals. is too often accepted as the 
badge of scientific success as a breeder. While shows have a large 
place, winnings of phenomenal animals do not give such a basis 
for genetic values as do data of individuals tabulated into family 
averages. The time has come when such science as is coming for- 
ward from the researchers and practical members of the American 
Breeders Association will help the practical breeder to disregard 
mere show and to build up herds of the best available practical 
stock whether for meat, work, milk, wool, or for a combination of 
two or more of these purposes. 

The science of breeding is beginning to take rank with the sciences 
of chemistry, physics and botany. Men have learned how to investi- 
gate heredity and breeding. This magazine appeals to breeders to 
become members of the American Breeders Association. It needs 
them and they need it. Good can be both received and given. 



NEWS AND NOTES 

ANOTHER INSTANCE OF BAY FOALS FROM CHESTNUT PARENTS 

Another instance of bay foals produced by the mating of chestnut 
parents is to be found in the catalog of the Algeria Stud Farm, which 
was located at Erie, Pennsylvania, until its dispersal occurred. The 
catalog of 1889 of this great stud of thoroughbreds gives the produce 
of the chestnut mare Monopoly as follows: 

Produce 

1881 — Missed to Voligeur. 
* 1884— b f, by Versailles. 
1885— b f, by Versailles. 
1886— b c, Jake Miller, by Rayon d'Or. 
1887— Missed to Rayon d'Or. 
1888 — b f, Exclusion, by Rayon d'Or. 
1889— ch c, by Rayon d'Or. 

Rayon d'Or was a chestnut stallion, and it will be noted that two 
of the three foals Monopoly produced by that horse were bay. This 
would indicate that the theory advanced by a scientific writer in a 
contemporary recently that the chestnut color in horses was a reces- 
sive color, and that it would always be the result of mating of sire 
and dam of that color, is entrely lacking in foundation — The Horse 
World, May 21, 1912. 

A PERTINENT EUGENICS QUESTION 

The Darwinian theory is based on what Herbert Spencer has aptly 
styled "the survival of the fittest." This theory is so well known 
that it is not necessary to enlarge upon it. In investigating insanity 
and degeneracy in Massachusetts, Dr. Southard found twelve towns 
which he characterized as a "eugenic group' ' and which he found to 
be decreasing in population, and twelve other towns which he brought 
under the heading of "cacogenic group," and which he found were 
increasing in population. Does this mean that the "cacogenic" 
population represents an advantageous variation and the "eugenic" 
population a disadvantageous variation? There is food for thought 
here. Is the American Breeders Association endeavoring to bring 
the entire population of the east into the dying-out group, or is it 

228 



News and Notes 229 

aiming only at the white man? Or, more restricted still, is it seeking 
only to set up in America a modern example of the fading-away 
process which characterized Babylon, Egypt, Greece and Rome? 

It is quite true that many members of the Association have earn- 
estly advocated a more numerous progeny by eugenic individuals, 
but are these members themselves raising families of six or eight 
children or are they only advising others to do so? It is fairly well 
established that, counting accidents and celibates, an average of 
three children to each marriage barely maintains the population 
stationary. Let those members of the Association who have families 
of four or more children raise their hands. 

If there are any members of the Association who are not raising 
as many as four children, or who are not in a fair way to do so, do 
they recognize any disadvantageous variations in their cases? If 
so, what are these disadvantageous variations? It is more important 
to know the reason why people who may be fairly classed as part of 
a eugenic population, do not increase in numbers by propagation, 
than it is to study the causes of insanity. We will never get any- 
where by random shots in the air. We must ask those who fail to 
reproduce their kind why it is that they fail. They should answer 
fully and frankly. It is their duty to their fellow men to do so. 
Doubtless many of those who fail to produce a reasonably numerous 
offspring would not like to make public the real reasons for their 
failure. Well, Dr. C. B. Davenport is collecting statistics on human 
beings, and what he collects appears only as statistics. This is an 
appeal to members of the Association to send real reasons to Dr. 
Davenport to the end that he may tabulate them and tell us what 
is the matter with the eugenic part of our population. — C. L. Red- 
field. 

ORGANIZATION OF A EUGENICS CLUB AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY 

Last March, some students at Cornell University, who were inter- 
ested in the eugenics movement, decided to form a club for the study 
of eugenics. During the same week, but unknown to them, the 
Cornell Philosophical Club had passed resolutions hoping to bring 
before the" various organizations within the university likely to be 
interested in eugenics/ ' their desire to establish "a society whose aim 
it shall be to promote the study of the laws of inheritance and of 
eugenic agencies, to disseminate information about such laws and 
agencies, and to arouse interest in them wherever possible within 



230 American Breeders Magazine 

the university community." The result was that a general meeting 
was called to effect an organization. On short notice a large audience 
gathered on March 26th to hear Prof. H. J. Webber, of the Depart- 
ment of Experimental Plant-Breeding, give a lecture on eugenics. 
On that same evening the society was organized, and the following 
officers were elected: President, E. G. Boring; vice-president, H. B. 
Switzer; secretary, E. E. Barker; treasurer, L. R. Koten. 

The membership of the society was drawn from various parts of 
the university community, and in view of this diversity of interests 
represented in the membership, as well as because of its large numbers, 
the society was divided into several subordinate study-groups. Each 
group is designed to consider eugenics in a different aspect, the bio- 
logical, psychological, sociological and economical, and so on. Each 
group meets independently, elects its own leader, and outlines its 
own course of work. These meetings are held once a week. The 
chairmen of the various groups, together with the president, vice- 
president, secretary, and treasurer of the Society, form an executive 
and program committee, whose function it is to direct the general 
affairs of the society, and to arrange a program for each of the common 
meetings of the society as a whole, which occur monthly. 

At a second public meeting of the Society, held on August 16, 
Prof. S. H. Gage, research professor in the college of medicine, made 
an address, and President J. G. Schurman added remarks endorsing 
the movement in behalf of the university. The audience filled one 
of the largest lecture rooms on the campus. Interest in the move- 
ment is quite general, and membership is open to all persons. A 
considerable number of the members are women. The officers, how- 
ever, are restricted to members of the university who are registered 
students. 

The eugenics society at Cornell is ready to ally itself with other 
local organizations for the promotion of the eugenics movement. — 
Arthur W. Gilbert. 

PROGRESS REPORT FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 

I have just received from someone a clipping telling of the organi- 
zation of the Cornell Eugenics Club. The Eugenics Club of the 
University of Wisconsin rejoices in the founding of this sister society. 

We began with about 50 members and an attendence of 75. At 
the session last Saturday night we had an attendence of 300 and our 
membership has now risen to nearly 150. We meet every two weeks, 



News and Notes 231 

generally alternating reports on some line of research by the members, 
with addresses by members of the faculty on eugenic subjects. The 
literature committee has almost finished a classified list of eugenic 
literature, together with a statement of the purposes of the move- 
ment, which is to be published as a bulletin by the Extension Depart- 
ment of the University for distribution through the state. The 
research committee is engaged at present in an investigation of the 
size of families of college professors, a rural township, a labor union, 
a group of business men, the tuberculosis patients of the city, and 
the applicants for relief from the Associated Charities, the indi- 
viduals in each case also reporting upon the families of their fathers 
and mothers, brothers and sisters in other occupations, and similar 
data for the wife. We are trying to make it adequate from both a 
biological and sociological viewpoint. We had a report some time 
since on eugenic legislation in the United States, and another on 
insanity in Wisconsin, the first especially surprising us in the extent 
of legislation already enacted on the subject. It has just occurred 
to me that a summary might be of interest to readers of the Breeders 
Magazine. — 0. E. Baker, Madison, Wisconsin. 

THE VALUE OF SEEDLING CHARACTERS IN PLANT BREEDING 

A distinction is made, for the purposes of plant-breeding, between 
desirable dominant and recessive characters. Once we have a plant 
with a desirable recessive character or characters, it gives us pure 
seed for the next season's planting. While if we have a plant with a 
desirable dominant character, we do not know whether it is pure or 
not (except in those cases where the homozygote can be distinguished 
from the heterozygote), and have to sow the seed and wait a year to 
find out. But if we have studied the seedling characters, and any 
of them are found to be connate (that is, born together) with the 
mature character in question, then we can pick the pure dominants 
from the second or any subsequent generation from a cross with as 
little loss of growing time as the recessives. 

A selected strain of Stizolobiums was found, in the third generation 
from the cross, to contain a recessive factor which caused the young 
shoots and pods to be covered with a close black tomentum instead 
of the usual whitish pubescence. These black plants were all late- 
flowering. The pure dominant plants were selected without any loss 
of growing time, and at a minimal expense, by sowing separately in a 
cold frame, early in the season,, fifty seeds from each of the plants 



232 American Breeders Magazine 

with the dominant character. In two weeks it was obvious, from 
the colors of the plumules, which of the lots of fifty were free from 
the recessive black. In the same strain there were reasons for think- 
ing that the albino condition (in which purple color is absent from 
the whole -of the plant) was less vigorous than the dominant purple- 
flowered. " (Erwin Baur also found the albino Antirrhinums to die 
in greater numbers than the colored plants. Compare his admirable 
genetic monograph in Zeitschrift fuer inductive Abstammungs und 
Vererbungslehre, iii: 70. 1910.) The purple-flowered plants have 
purple-stemmed seedlings. Thus by sowing fifty seeds each from 
a number of plants of this strain, we can readily find the plant or 
plants all of whbse seedlings have both purple epicotyls and whitish 
pubescence on the plumules. These will breed true to both dominant 
characters, and will have been obtained without loss of time. Such 
a test can readily be carried out in the winter season, by sowing the 
seeds in flats. 

The larger the mature plants are, the more important is the study 
of the seedlings, because of the expense of growing to maturity many 
lines whichwill have to be rejected. This is especially the case in 
breeding shrubs and trees. (For instance, one may notice seedling 
characters in the mango and guava which are possibly connate with 
definite qualities of the fruit.) I am convinced that in the future 
it will pay the scientific plant-breeder in some cases to make a micro- 
scopical and chemical study of the seedlings, to learn what seedling 
characters are connate, in the strains with which he is working, with 
desirable dominant characters of the mature herb, shrub, or tree. — 
John Belling, Gainesville, Florida. 

THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON HYGIENE 

AND DEMOGRAPHY 

This Congress will be held in Washington, D. C, September 23 to 
28, 1912. The preliminary announcement which, by-the-way, is 
printed in three languages, English, French, and German, contains 
part of the program which is elaborate and extensive. The work 
program takes up its two divisions : Hygiene and Demography, these 
divisions consisting of eight and one sections respectively, and each 
section having its own program. This convention is of considerable 
interest to eugenists by reason of the close relation of its subject 
matter to eugenics. Dr. C. B. Davenport and Dr. Raymond Pearl 
will read papers before the sub-section of sex hygiene. 



News and Notes 233 

PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED 

Athletic Superiority op our New Stocks. Lieutenant-Colonel Chas. E. 
Woodruff. Reprinted from the Medical Record, April 27, 1912. Pp. 10. 

Modern Vitalism. Chas. E. Woodruff, M.D. Reprinted from the New York 
Medical Journal, August 26, 1911. Pp. 41. 

The Production of New and Improved Varieties of Timothy. Herbert 
J. Webber in collaboration with Thomas P. Hunt, John W. Wilmore, 
Charles F. Clark, Samuel Fraser. Bulletin 313, April, 1912. Pp. 338 to 
392, illustrated with 10 plates. 

The Canadian Seed Growers Association and its Work. Address deliv- 
ered by Mr. L. H. Newman, Secretary of that Association, before the 
Select Standing Committee on Agriculture and Colonization, February 
6, 1911-12. 

Co5perative Tests of Corn Varieties. Evvard R. Minns. Bulletin 314, 
April, 1912, Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station. Pp. 
394 to 412. Illustrated. 

The Heredity of Size, Shape and Number of Tomato Fruits. B. H. A. 
Groth, Ph.D. Bulletin 242, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, 
Brunswick, N. J. Pp. 401, pis. iii, 7 text charts. 

The Vitality of Reproductive Cells. Lowery L. Lewis. Bulletin 96, 
December, 1911, Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College. Pp. 
47, 7 text figures. 

Another Sex-Limited Character. Ed. N. Wentworth in Science. June 
28, 1912. Pp. 986. 

The Women of Tomorrow. William Hard. The Baker and Taylor Com- 
pany, New York, 1911. Review will appear in a later number of the Maga- 
zine. Pp. 211, illustrated. 

NEW BOOKS 

Einfuhrung in die Experimentelle Vererbungslehre. Prof. Dr. Erwin 
Baur. Gebr. Borntraeger, publishers, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 293, 7 x 11 
inches, 80 text figures, 9 colored plates. 

The volume of Mendelian literature is continuing to grow at an 
amazing rate. One of the more notable recent contributions to this 
literature is by Prof. Dr. Baur, professor at the University of Berlin, 
Germany, a book in German under the title of Introduction into the 
Study of Experimental Heredity. This book grew out of a course of 
lectures delivered at the University of Berlin. Although the lecture 
form has been retained the subject matter has not suffered in arrange- 
ment. 

The results of a most extensive series of original experiments by 
the author in breeding and hybridizing enter into these lectures. 
Most of these experiments have been with Antirrhinum or Snap- 
dragon and have not previously been published. 



234 American Breeders Magazine 

From, these cross breeding experiments is also drawn a large part 
of the material for the numerous drawings and colored plates. The 
illustrative material is drawn from the plant and animal world accord- 
ing to the author's needs but in the main examples from plant breed- 
ing preponderate. 

The author does not allow himself to chase theories, nor does 
he place over-much value on untested theories of others. Baur 
does not attempt to explain disputed cytological processes and 
does not admit adherence to any school or theory of the mechan- 
ism of heredity. His work is exactly what the title says it is; an 
introduction into those phases of heredity which are capable of 
experimental demonstration. Doubtful processes and hazy theories 
are in every case simply and sensibly referred to the future for more 
complete research and study. Thus the transmission of modifica- 
tions is disposed of as follows : " Summa Summarum up to the present 
not a single case is known, which might be interpreted as one of 
inheritance of modifications." Hence also, the mutations observed 
by De Vries in Oenothera are regarded with decided suspicion 
"The unstability of this species is something singular.'' "The cause 
of this, undoubtedly remarkable mutability of 0. Lamarkiana, we 
do not know." He punctures the theory of the genesis of new varie- 
ties and even of species by direct mutation by citing the "circum- 
stance, that all cases of mutations generally accepted as such, if not 
in fact all mutations, are such by reason of loss of a single factor, and 
the new variety on being crossed with the original variety, behaves 
so that we can without hesitancy assign the difference to the ab- 
sence of some one factor." 

The trend has for some time been away from strict mathematical 
interpretation of factoral processes and this is evidently supported 
by Baur. Those who have been figuring over interminable formulas 
of correlation tables may question themselves if their mathematical 
endeavors have yielded results commensurate with the expenditure 
of effort. Baur holds that so called correlation of two or more charac- 
ters is frequently merely the manifestation of the same unit character 
in two or more different directions. "Correlation is a concept which 
under the light of modern research is in process of dissolution." 

The economic importance and practical bearing of genetics on the 
breeding of plants and animals is summed up more tersely perhaps 
than in any recent similar literature. "Already, practical breeding 
has become a distinct science, which bears about the same relation 
to the science of heredity as technology bears to chemistry." It is 



News and Notes 235 

only a question of time that all useful and important plants and 
Animals will be analyzed as to their unit characters but this work 
will necessarily have to be done by technicians in well equipped and 
well manned state institutions. Actual breeding will probably always 
be the work of the plant and animal breeders who will utilize these 
facts and will make it their business to originate and place on the 
market new forms and new values. 

"A matter of far reaching importance, is the investigation of the 
intimate processes of mutation, — the solution of the question, whether 
we can give rise to new material, whether under controlled conditions 
we can initiate new unit characters, which will give us new material 
for selection in creative breeding. What we know about these things 
to day is not worth mentioning." The final chapter brings this 
observation: "The theory of natural selection stands and falls with 
this: whether or not it will be shown that mutations really occur with 
sufficient frequency to make possible an effective process of selection." 

The conservatism and caution with which this book is written 
lend it solidity and strength. It is a well rounded publication, 
calculated to give the student a splendid grounding in the principles 
of Mendelism. Graduate students, researchers, and advanced stu- 
dents of heredity and breeding who wish to obtain a thorough work- 
ing knowledge of Mendelism will find this book exceedingly useful. 

Heredity in Relation to Eugenics. Dr. C. B. Davenport, Secretary of 
the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders Association. Henry Holt 
and Company, New York City. Pp. 320. 

This book is a general analysis or broad review of a subject which 
should be represented on the shelves of every public library, and 
should be read by every humanitarian, publicist, physician, teacher, 
parent, and student. This book bears evidence to the fact that 
eugenics is rapidly accumulating a body of usable knowledge and 
that its initial period of research may be followed by a permanent 
period of research, education and application. Eugenics or the 
breeding of men is clearly placed beside and parallel to eusthenics 
or the development of man through home, school, and church, as 
the second great agency for upbuilding the civilization of nations 
and races. 

It is only six years since the secretary of the American Breeders 
Association organized a committee on eugenics; four years later it 
was enlarged into a eugenics section, coordinate with its plant section 
and animal section. At that time no constructive eugenics work 



236 American Breeders Magazine 

had been done in this country, and the purpose to place the leader- 
ship of this subject in the hands of careful scientists has been more 
than realized. The charlatan and the half-baked scientist is no 

■ 

more to control the public teaching of eugenics than that of engi- 
neering, agriculture, or home economics. 

Dr. Davenport clearly forecasts the introduction of genetics as 
a study into our educational system. This is also foreshadowed by 
the organization of genetic associations at a number of our univer- 
sities and colleges, and the promise of organization of many more 
such organizations in connection with the American Breeders Asso- 
ciation. In our agricultural colleges the newer genetic principles 
are being taught in reference to plant breeding and animal breeding; 
and in a few institutions lecture courses are given in eugenics. Thus 
these institutions of higher learning are coming into cooperation with 
this central association in this genetics movement which is gaining 
a mighty momentum. May we not hope that at no distant date 
the elements of eugenic fact may become a part of the curriculum 
of our secondary schools, thus to reach those who compose the body 
of the millions who work on the land, in the shop, and in the home? 

The subject matter treated by Dr. Davenport is so closely related 
to much that is common knowledge and is so well presented, often 
with the aid of graphic illustrations, that the laymen will find it 
both interesting and instructive, and easy to grasp. The preliminary 
chapters define and state the aim and importance of eugenics, and 
give some of the more recently discovered facts, and the newer 
methods in the study of human heredity. 

Nearly 200 hundred pages are given to the subjects of the inheri- 
tance of family traits and to the eugenic significance of the migra- 
tion of defective and valuable traits into new territory. Of special 
interest- are the chapters on the influence on the race of certain indi- 
viduals which have been especially potent in projecting faults or 
excellencies into a large number of their progeny, as in case of the 
strong Kentucky families, and in the debased Jukes family. 

Dr. Davenport's outlines for state eugenic surveys point out one 
of the directions in which practical work is being undertaken. In 
New Jersey and other states these surveys are already under way, 
with the codperation of institutions which deal with the defective 
and criminal classes. The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring 
Harbor, New York, in connection with the American Breeders Asso- 
ciation, has reached a point of great importance. That genealogical 
and other data there collected is already of great value is illustrated 
by the use Dr. Davenport has made of such information in this 



News and Notes 237 

volume. The superintendent, Mr. H. H. Laughlin, who is ably 
accumulating in a fire-proof vault the available records of lineage 
and genetic genealogies, invites the cooperation of all interested in 
either the science or the practice of eugenics. This volume illus- 
trates again the fact that the genetic movement is making substantial 
progress all along the line. — W. M. Hays. 

REFERENCES IN CURRENT LITERATURE 

Marriage of the Deaf. Fred DeLand. Volta Review, no. 3, June, 1912. 
Page 186. 

Heredity and Intermarriage, Factors in Deafmtttjsm. Linnaeus Rob- 
erts. Volta Review, no. 3, June, 1912. Page 184. 

Unfit for Parenthood. John Harris. Westminster Review, May, 1912. 
Pages 579-582. 

The Canadian Seed Growers Association and Its Work. Edited by the 
Secretary, Mr. L. H. Newman. Ottawa, Canada. Pp. 64, 13 text figures. 

This large and useful public service organization, the Canadian 
Seed Growers Association, has as its object the advancement of the 
interests of seed growers and farmers in Canada, by exerting such 
influence and devising such means as will tend to improve the bulk 
of the forty million of bushels of farm seed which are used annually 
in Canada, to the end that the per-acre production of those crops 
may be permanently increased. This pamphlet gives a statement of 
the organization of the Canadian Seed Growers Association, the 
general system of seed growing officially adopted by the Association, 
registration of seed, handling of commercial seed. It further touches 
on choice varieties, production of "Elite Stocks" of seed, maintaining 
purity, grading of seed, seed inspection, etc. 

We recognize the names of many American Breeders Association 
members among the administrative officers as well as in the council 
and directors. The following are the officers for this year : President, 
James W. Robertson, C. M. G.; vice-presidents, Prof. C. A. Zavitz, 
G. A. Gigault, John Mooney, and secretary-treasurer, L. H. Newman 

ERRATA 

The Editors wish to call attention to the following errors in the 
article, "Methods of Corn Breeding," by Professor Herbert K. Hayes, 
in No. 2 of Volume III: On page 99 in place of "these types have 
been called types," read "these types have been called biotypes," 
and on page 104 in line 5 read "biotypes" instead of "genotypes." 



ASSOCIATION MATTERS 

THE EUGENICS RECORD OFFICE 

The purpose, the work and the importance of the Eugenics Record 
Office is coming more and more to public notice. As a research 
institution it is singular of its kind. The facts brought to light and 
turned into usable knowledge by its research and field workers have 
furnished the themes and the inspiration of countless lectures, ad- 
dresses and articles on eugenics the country over. 

The social engineer of the perhaps not so distant future, will 
increasingly draw from this source facts from which to argue, and 
upon which to base plans for social uplift, regeneration and organi- 
zation. 

The legislator in state and national councils will also come here to 
get certain basic facts and statistics so essential to understanding 
the nature of a population, the interrelations of whose component 
parts are daily becoming more intricate and complex, and where 
every problem, whether it be one of industry, of education, of health, 
of immigration, of sociology, ultimately traces back to one of heredity. 

MEMBERS AND ENDOWMENT 

The American Breeders Association has 1690 annual and 197 life 
members, and thousands of new members are needed. Every member 
is urged to invite three friends to join and to request the secretary to 
send them an invitation and a copy of the Magazine. The Associa- 
tion has earned a place by the side of other great movements. Has 
it not earned an endowment? How shall that be secured? The 
best endowment for this publication would be a large membership: 
best, because the membership is a living endowment. 

This Association is the vanguard of research and creative work in 
genetics. It has in hand much work which an endowment of money 
would enable it to carry out. It needs money to bring into the 
field of public effort a number of things which public institutions 
are not ready to undertake. It needs means to be devoted to the 
coordination of the forces working along genetic lines. 

The proposition of bringing together the plant and animal breeders 
was once met with much doubt and even with opposition, but it has 
proven of very great value. Making possible the placing of eugenics 
in America in the hands of real scientists was a service of inestimable 

238 



Association Matters 



HEADQtUBTEBS OT Field Wobeebs or the Eugenics Record Office, Cold SpaiNd Harbob 

L. I„ New Yobi. 
Here under the direction of Dr. C. B. Davenport a force of twelve field workers Is encaged, li 
•sole research. The workers spend their time lnstudying the family distribution of specific me nta 
d physical traits. 



Eugenics Recobd Oftice: : 
1 at the Eugenics Record Office Is 
a system devised by Dr. Daven 



240 American Breeders Magazine 

value. The association of those concerned with eugenics with those 
working in plant and animal improvement, is proving not only its 
wisdom, but is of very large scientific value. Who will suggest the 
sum which should be raised for an endowment? And who will 
suggest a plan of securing it? And while formulating plans for a 
money endowment for research in genetics let one and all ask our 
friends, by becoming members, to become a living membership 
endowment to the Magazine, the annual reports and other publica- 
tions. Let us set the sum for an endowment at $500,000 or more 
and work till we get it. 

THE MAGAZINE TO OPEN ITS PAGES TO ADVERTISEMENTS 

• 

Preparations are being made to change the status of the American 
Breeders Magazine as to second class privileges, in order to enable 
it to accept advertising matter for publication. 

This change of policy will not cause any material change in the 
Magazine except perhaps in appearance. There will be the same 
number of pages of reading matter as advertising will be placed on 
additional pages. Complete details will be published in the next 
number of the Magazine when, it is thought, the necessary arrange- 
ments with the Post Office Department and the publishers will 
have been made. 



I am glad to contribute to such a good work as you are doing. May you 
live long and prosper. — C. L. Watrous, Des Moines, Iowa. 

I conceive that there can scarcely be anything of more importance than 
the fostering of a wholesome public sentiment concerning the facts of eugenics. 
— W. A. Barnes, Marston, Missouri. 

I consider the publications of this Association the most instructive and 
useful literature published today and I am convinced that no young man 
interested in any phase of genetics can afford not to read this literature. — 
Chas. McIntire, C handler sville, Ohio. 

I regard the American Breeders Association as the most important and 
influential agricultural association in America and probably second only to 
the American Association for Advancement of Science in promoting general 
progress and welfare of the nation — T. V. Munson, Denison t Texas. 

I am tired of your duns for annual membership in the American Breeders 
Association, so please drop them and make me a life member. Check enclosed. 
— S. M. Tracy, Biloxi, Mississippi. 



Public Libraries Private Libraries 
Libraries of Educational Institutions 

As well as new members of the Association should secure copies of the 
Annual Reports of the Proceedings of the American Breeders Association 
while the supply lasts. No library, whether general or special is complete 
without the publications of the American Breeders Association. 

These publications are valuable and are becoming more so from year to 
year. We have on hand a limited number of 

Vol. IV Proceedings A. B. A. Cloth bound, illustrated, 373 pages, $2.00 

Vol. VI Proceedings A. B. A. Cloth bound, illustrated, 466 pages, $2.00 

Supply of copies of Vols. I, n, III and V is exhausted. 

Persons taking life membership receive these publications free. 

Address: SECRETARY AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 

Washington, D. C# 

NINTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN 

BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 

Columbia, South Carolina, Jan. 24, 25, 26, 1913 

AS GUEST OP THE FIFTH NATIONAL CORN EXPOSITION 

Columbia is all that can be desired as to climate, location and hospi- 
tality. Reduced rates have been promised on all railroads. Not only Co- 
lumbia but the State of South Carolina is interested in making these great 
educational meetings a success. Section and general meetings of the Asso- 
ciation will be held in the buildings of the University of South Carolina. 

The Eugenics Section will hold the largest, most important and best 
attended meeting in years. 

Plant breeders and improvers will have an unusual representation and 
will have numerous exhibits at the Corn Exposition. 

The Animal Section meetings will be well represented also. 

Let the secretary know of your plans for attending* Send in early to 
the respective section secretary titles of papers and requests for places 
on the program. 



BULLETINS OF THE EUGENICS RECORD OFFICE 

No. 1. Heredity of Feeble-mindedness (Goddard) $0.10 

No. 2. Study of Human Heredity (Davenport and Others) 10 

No. 3. Study of Insanity (Cannon and Rosanoff) .10 

No. 4. Inheritance in Epilepsy (Davenport and Weeks) 15 

No. 5. Insanity in light of the Mendelian Theory (Rosanoff and Orr). .15 

No. 6. The Trait Book (Davenport) 10 

These publications are sold at prices named only by the Eugenics Recor4 
Office, H. H. Laughlin, Supt., Cold Spring Harbor, L. I., New York. Persons 
taking A. B. A. life membership are entitled to these publications at one-half 
the price given. 



The American Breeders Association 



OFFICERS OF THE ASSOCIATION 

President 

HON. JAMES WILSON, Washington, D. C 

Vice President 

DR* H. J. WATERS, Manhattan, Kansas 

Secretory And Treasurer. 

HON- WILLET M. HAYS, Washington, D. C 

Chairman Want Section 

DR* GEORGE H. SHULL, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y. 

Vice Chairman PI Ant Section 

PROF. W. T. M ACOUN, Ottawa, Canada 

SecreUry PUnt Section 

DR. H. J. WEBBER, Ithaca, N. Y. 

Chairman Animal Section 

DR. RAYMOND PEARL, Orono, Maine 

Vict Chairman Animal Section 

PRO^F. E. N. WENTWORTH, Ames, Iowa 

Secretary Animal Section 

PROF. H. W. MUMFORD, Urbana, Ml. 

Chairman Eugenics Section 

DR, E. E. SOUTHARD, Boston, Mass. 

Vice Chairman Eugenics Section 

DR. H. H. GODDARD, Vineland, N. J. 

SecreUry Eugenics Section 

DR. C B. DAVENPORT, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y. 



EDITORS 

WILLET M. HAYS, Secretary of the 
H. J. WEBBER, Secretary of the Plant Section 
H. W. MUMFORD, Secretary of the Animal Section 
C B. DAVENPORT, Secretary of the Eugenics Section 
GEO* W. KNORR, Editorial Secretary 



Membership: Annual, $2.00; Life, $20.00; Delegate, $25.00 

No entrance fee 

Address AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 

Washington, D. C. 

An Endowment Fund of $500,000 is needed 



THE WAVERLY PRESS 
BALTIMORE. U. 8. A. 



tfk 



2= 



Vol. m, No. 4. Whole Number 12. 

CONTENTS 

A Study in Eugenic Genealogy. 

A. Gartley, Honolulu, Hawaii , 241 

First Report of Committee on Immigration. 

Prescott F. Hall, Chairman, Boston, Massachusetts .'. 249 

The Eugenical Aspect of Venereal Disease. 

Dr . H. E . Jordan, University, Virginia - 256 

The Fertility of Hybrids in a Mammalian Species Cross. 

John Detlefson, Urbana, Illinois * 261 

First Annual Conference of the Eugenics Field Workers. 

Superintendent H. H. Laughlin, Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island, New York 265 

Some Biological Principles in Animal Breeding. 

Prof. W.E. Castle, Cambridge, Massachusetts..... '270 

Horses and Horse Breeding. 

H. K. Bush-Brown, Washington, D. C 282 

Comparison of Yields between Hybrids and Selections in Oats 

Dr. H. H. Love, Ithaca, New York 289 

The Size of the Seed Planted and the Fertility of the Plant Produced. 

J. Arthur Harris, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y 293 

Ten Yean of Corn Breeding. 

Eugene Funk, Shirley, Illinois : 295 

Pedagogics of Genetics. 302 

EDITORIALS: 

Genetics— A Field for the Scientific Philanthropist 303 

Eugenics at the Hygiene and Demography Congress 306 

Breeding.) Genetics, Eugenics 308 

News and Notes: 

Genetics at the University of Illinois 310 

The Gideon Memorial Tablet 310 

Selection in Pure Lines 311 

Korean Cattle .-*.*.. ^ .-.. . . 312 

Publications Received 313 

New Books 313 

Reference in Current Literature 3 16 

Association Matters: 

A" Appeal v 319 

Election of Life Member During the Past Quarter 319 

Reduced Rates to the Meeting of the American Breeders Association 319 



4 



< 



THE AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE is published quarterly by the 
American Breeders Association for the use of its members and for others who are 
students of Eugenics and Genetics and for breeders of plants and animals. 

Price of single copies 35 cents* 



The American Breeders Association 

Is a cooperative association designed to develop the science of heredity and 
the art of breeding, and to bring that knowledge to persons interested in these 
subjects. 

The membership is composed of progressive breeders of live stock, horticul- 
turists, seedsmen, scientists, teachers, publicists, physicians, and others interested 
in the various phases of heredity of plants, animals and men. All freely cooper- 
ate through the Association and contribute the time required to make investigations, 
to prepare papers, to attend the annual meetings and to help build up the literature 
of the science and practice of breeding. 

All persons in any way interested are cordially invited to become members* 
Holders of memberships are entitled to the American Breeders Magazine, to the 
annual report of the Proceedings of the Association, and to full participation in the 
activities of the Association. 

An endowment fund of $500,000 is being solicited. Who can help raise it? 

Membership: Annual, $2*00; Life, $20.00; Delegate, $25.00. 
No entrance fee* 

Address all communications to: 
AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION 

Washington, D. C. 



i 



K 



(Copyright, 1912, by the American Breeders Anodttioa.) 



■*. 



- 



THE AMEEICAN 
JBBEEDEBS MAGAZINE 

" When in any nation the standard of intellect and the number of intellectual men have increased, 
we may expect from the law of the deviation from an average that prodigies of genius will appeal 
somewhat more frequently than before." — Charles Darwin. 

Vol. Ill Fourth Quarter, 1912 No. 4 



A STUDY IN EUGENIC GENEALOGY 

A. Gartlby* 
Honolulu, Hawaii 

Eugenics is probably the most important and urgently necessary 
scientific work being pursued today as measured by its value both 
to the individual and to the state. This science was named by Sir 
Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton's lucid writings 
on the subject are fundamental and may almost be accepted as the 
eugenic creed. His definitions, "Eugenics is the study of the agen- 
cies under social control that may improve or impair the racial qual- 
ities of future generations either physically or mentally, ,, and the 
more comprehensive one, "Eugenics is the science which deals with 
all influences that improve the inborn qualities of a race; also those 
that develop them to the utmost advantage," broadly set forth the 
scope of the work of the men and women who have undertaken to 
organize the science in its scientific and practical phases. 

The science is new, and the subject has been misunderstood and 
misapprehended by some persons. The thought of a biological con- 
sideration of man — as a human animal — has been so abhorrent to 
the average mind that sociologists and biologists have lacked the 
courage or inclination to urge their theories or publish their truths, 
knowing that prejudices precluded rational and sensible considera- 
tion. Discussions of the relative importance of environment or 
heredity usually result whenever the subject is mentioned. But 
nurture and nature are very closely related and the eugenist proposes 
to unite the forces of the sociologists and biologists and increase the 
physical and mental soundness of man, and to raise to higher level 
the culture and the intelligence of the great citizen body. The his- 

* Paper read before the Social Science Club of Honolulu, Hawaii, May, 1912. Mr. Gartley is Life 
Member A. B. A. 

241 



242 American Breeders Magazine 

torian, the political economist, the sociologist and the philosopher 
have so far deduced no natural law nor suggested any practical 
rules of ethics by which this object might be obtained. The eugenist 
will endeavor to deduce such a law and prescribe methods of its appli- 
cation. Certainly this endeavor cannot be considered unworthy. 

The law of Mendel has given us the key and it is hoped that great 
advance will be made through the study of precise data as to the 
unit characters in the germ plasm of man and the method of their 
transmission from generation to generation. 

For centuries philosophers and thinkers, from Plato down, have 
recognized the inheritance of qualities from the individual but have 
usually only considered negative or recessive qualities and have 
warned against the inheritance of degeneration and defects. Galton 
in his book, Hereditary Genius, published in 1869, pointed out that 
mental qualities are inherited as are physical qualities and that it 
is both possible and desirable to improve the human race. Years 
of study and patient investigation have advanced the subject from 
an academic to a working basis. The publication of Galton's address 
"Eugenics, Its Definition, Scope and Aims" met with an enthu- 
siastic response, and the work as outlined is now being actively 
advanced in Great Britain under the direction of Prof. Karl PearsoD 
at the Eugenics Laboratory of the University College, London, which 
was established in 1905 by Sir Francis Galton, and was made his 
residuary legatee at his death in 1911. In the United States a begin- 
ning in the organization of eugenics study and propaganda have also 
been made and the Eugenics Record Office was established at Cold 
Spring Harbor, Long Island, N. Y., October, 1910, in connection 
with the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders Association 
and the collection and study of records and data is now well under 
way. 

Pearson has stated three fundamental biological ideas. First, 
"That the relative weight of nature and nurture must not a priori 
be assumed but must be scientifically measured; and thus far our 
experience is that nature dominates nurture and that inheritance 
is more vital than environment." Second, "That there exists no 
demonstrable inheritance of acquired characters. Environment modi- 
fies the characters of the existing generation, but does not (often) 
modify the germ plasms from which the next generation springs. 
At most, environment can permit a selection as to which germ plasms, 
among the many provided, shall be potential and which shall remain 
latent." Third, "That all human qualities are inherited in a marked 



i> 



/ 

* 



Gartley: A Study in Eugenic Genealogy 243 

and probably equal degree." If these ideas are substantially true 
the theoretical side is much simplified and "selection of parentage 
is the sole effective process known to science by which a race can 
continuously progress.' ' 

Studies in heredity indicate that every man is an aggregation of 
large numbers of certain physical and mental characters, and that 
these characters are not reducible to simpler forms. They are 
therefore called unit characters; and they are transmitted through 
the germ plasm as separate units. Furthermore, the inheritance of 
these unit characters seems to follow Mendel's law and the presence 
or absence of desirable or undesirable characteristics marks the 
differences in the character of the men and women about us. It 
has been convincingly demonstrated that a unit character, absent 
in both parents, will also be absent in all their offspring, or, in Men- 
delian terms, when a recessive mates with a recessive, only recessives 
result. This has been most strikingly shown in the results of the 

CouStnS 
| I I I I | 1/ \| I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 

'ddddnnmnnnnn 



I i ' • > ' i v \r 

^>yj|| N M N N N H_^ 



H N N N N D 



D ■ • II N N N IV 



N N N N 

Fiq. 1. — Transmission op Deaf-Mutism 



In this as well as the following heredity charts the squares represent male members of families, 
the disks female members. Squares or disks shaded black represent Individuals possessing the char- 
acter under consideration, white symbols, normal ones. Where sex Is unknown the letter N stands 
for normal, D, deaf-mute. " Note the fraternity of deaf-mutes derived from the central mating of 
cousins. Most of those who outmarried, even though their consorts were deaf, had hearing children." 
(After Davenport, Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, p. 127.) 

selective mating of the feeble-minded, and never has a normal child 
been known to result from the union of two feeble-minded parents. 

As another example, vigor and virtue seem to be dominant, and 
weakness and vice to be recessive. When a dominant character 
mates with a recessive the children will all have the dominant char- 
acter but possibly in a dilute condition; the recessive character, 
however, remains latent, and will reappear one-fourth as often as 
the dominant. 

In order to show more clearly the principles outlined above, three 
heredity charts are shown and these, selected out of several thousands 
already plotted, are quite convincing and should furnish material 
for thought and study. 



244 



American Breeders Magazine 



The first chart shows the inheritance of deaf-mutism to be com- 
plete by the marriage of cousins, in families or strains possessing 
this deLt, when the defect is produced no doubt from the same 
cause. It will be noted that the out-mating of this defective strain 
with deaf-mutes or other strains produces normal children. This 
chart emphasizes the necessity of care in consanguineous matings 
when defects are known to exist in the strain. There is also danger 
in such matings, of the reappearance of latent defects, after having 
been absent from one or more generations. This chart shows the 
inheritance of only one physical defect, but many other physical 
and mental defects show a similar method of inheritance and follow 
the Mendelian law. 

What are perhaps the most remarkable and most convincing results 
have been obtained from the study and the charting of heredity 



D-H» 



D 



^<|)<§)Ii}-HS 



<3>^difcil6be6EH-6ii6b 



1 1 1 [^ |^ [£] ,2fr [£] |^ [ji|| i |£| (£) 



Fig. 2— Heredity Chabt Showing Transmission of Feeble-Mindednes* Through Threi 
Generations. 

(Courtesy of Dr. H. H. Goddard, Vineland, N. J.) 

of feeble-mindedness and are especially shown by the work of Dr. 
Henry H. Goddard of Vineland, N. J., in charge of the Institution 
for Feeble-Minded. One chart, showing the transmission of feeble- 
mindedness, is worthy of special study. Concerning the history of 
the case Dr. Goddard says: b 

This chart is particularly interesting as showing the mental defect running 
through four generations, and through the mother's family in three of these, 
although there is defect on the father's side also in the third generation. 



b American Breeders Magazine, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 176. 



Gartlby: A Study in Eugenic Genealogy 



245 



The chart, figure 3, brings out the unfailing transmissible of feeble- 
mindedness with peculiar force. The central figure is a woman who 
had three husbands, and the social experiment, charted above, was 
as follows: 

This woman was a handsome girl, apparently having inherited some refine- 
ment from her mother, although her father was a feeble-minded alcoholic 
brute. Somewhere about the age of seventeen or eighteen she went out to 
do housework in a family in one of the towns of this state (New Jersey). She 
soon became the mother of an illegitimate child. It was born in an almhouse 
to which she fled after she had been discharged from the house where she had 
been at work. After this, charitably disposed people tried to do what they 
could for her, giving her a home for herself and her child in return for the work 
which she could do. However, she soon appeared in the same condition. 




D 



O 



O Or-iOB 
I Eh-® 



wire 




oieo 



** HUSftANP 




I I I 

4 4 4 

iNr. mw. i*r. 



n 



Olidti6*>"6>ti #!• 66 



k 



» s 

MOS.MOS 



Fia. 3— Heredity Chart Showing Transmission of Feeblb-Mindedness Through Four 
Generations 

(Courtesy of Dr. H. H. Goddard, Vineland, N. J.) 



An effort was then made to discover the father of this second child, and when 
he was found to be a drunken, feeble-minded epileptic living in the neighbor- 
hood, in order to save the legitimacy of the child, her friends saw to it that 
a marriage ceremony took place. Later another feeble-minded child was 
born to them. Then the whole family secured a home with an unmarried 
farmer in the neighborhood. They lived there together until another child 
was forthcoming which the husband refused to own. When finally the farmer 
acknowledged this child to be his, the same good friends interfered, went into 
the courts and procured a divorce from the husband, and had the woman mar- 
ried to the father of the expected fourth child. This proved to be feeble- 
minded, and they have had four other feeble-minded children, making eight 



246 



American Breeders Magazine 



in all, born of this woman. There have also been one child still-born and 
one miscarriage. 

As will be seen from the chart, this woman had four feeble-minded brothers 
and sisters. These are all married and have children. The older of the two 
sisters had a child by her own father, when she was thirteen years old. The 
child died at about six years of age. This woman has since married. The two 
brothers have each at least one child whose mental condition is known. 
The other sister married a feeble-minded man and had three children. Two 
of these are feeble-minded and the other died in infancy. There were six 
other brothers and sisters that died in infancy. 

No record can show more black symbols, or in other words, 
transmission of defectiveness, than that of the last two generations, 
where all known members of the strain are feeble-minded. 



fcrmfy 



UiOOi 



J)aru>/n 
fcrmiiy 



Get/To* 
filtni/y 



%0 O M [ O »rO 




Fia. 4 — Genetic Chart of Three Families Possessing Marked Ability 

Black symbol signifies that the person which It represents In the kinship, possessed scientific 
ability. The letter R on side of symbol denotes that In addition the person Is a Fellow of the Royal 
Society. Numbers within symbols Indicate other children In chlldshlp not charted. 



It will be noted that the two feeble-minded brothers of the second 
generation (shown on the right of the chart) had one normal brother 
whose normal son, mated to a normal woman, produced two normal 
children. 

But there is a bright side as well and Galton's efforts were largely 
positive; that is he endeavored to demonstrate the inheritance of 
mental capacity and the possibility of improving the human race. 
An abbreviated record of his own family including the Wedgwood 



Gartley: A Study in Eugenic Genealogy 247 

and Darwin families is pregnant with data in support of the conclu- 
sion that these strains cany the potential germ plasm of hereditary 
genius, great mental capacity, powerful physique, and longevity. 
There can be no question that "Inhibitions responsible for honesty 
and dishonesty, morality and licentiousness, temperance and drunk- 
enness, as well as strength and defectiveness of mind, talents for 
music, for poetry, for oratory, for mechanical invention and the 



absence of these talents" are wholly or in part "subject to the Men- 
delian laws of segregation, dominance, and recombination." What 
we want is a nation of individuals possessing physical and mental 
capacity, soundness, aggressiveness, concentration, and sympathy 
and a germ plasm transmitting these qualities. Unfortunately these 
qualities are only occasionally combined in one individual, but usually 



248 American Breeders Magazine 

appear separately. The production of a race of men and women, a 
great majority of whom shall possess these qualities, will be the 
next step in human achievement. 

The value of the individual possessing a potentially strong plasm 
is excellently illustrated by Davenport" who cites one of our best 
known genetic records, namely, that of Elizabeth Tuttle. 



Tihotbt D Wight, S.T.D.. L.L.D. 

From two English parents, sire at least remotely descended from royalty, 
was born in Massachusetts, Elizabeth Tuttle. She developed into a woman 
of great beauty, of tall and commanding appearance, striking carriage, of 
strong will, extreme intellectual vigor, of mental grasp akin to rapacity, 
attracting by not a few magnetic traits, but repelling when she evinced an 
extraordinary deficiency of moral sense. 

• Heredity in Relation to Eugenia, Davenport, p. 22S. 



Report of the Immigration Committee 249 

On November 19, 1667, she married Richard Edwards of Hartford, Connec- 
ticut, a lawyer of high repute and great erudition. Like his wife he was very 
tall and as they both walked the Hartford streets their appearance invited 
the eyes and the admiration of all. In 1691 Mr. Edwards was divorced from 
his wife on the grounds of her adultery and other immoralities. The evil 
trait was in the blood, for one of her sisters murdered her own son and a brother 
murdered his own sister. After his divorce Mr. Edwards re-married and had 
five sons and a daughter by Mary Talcott, a mediocre woman, average in talent 
and character and ordinary in appearance. None of Mary Talcott' s progeny 
arose above mediocrity and their descendents gained no abiding reputation. 

Of Elizabeth Tuttle and Richard Edwards, the only son was Timothy Ed- 
wards who graduated from Harvard College in 1691, gaining simultaneously 
the two degrees of Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts, a very exceptional 
feat. He was pastor of the church in East Windsor, Connecticut, for fifty- 
nine years. Of eleven children the only son was Jonathan Edwards, one of 
the world's great intellects, preeminent as a divine and theologian, President 
of Princeton College. Of the descendants of Jonathan Edwards much has 
been written; a brief catalogue must suffice: Jonathan Edwards Junior, Pres- 
ident of Union College; Timothy Dwight, President of Yale; Sereno Edwards 
Dwight; President of Hamilton College; Theodore Dwight Woolsey, for twenty- 
five years President of Yale College; Sarah, wife of Tapping Reeve, founder 
of Litchfield law school, herself no mean lawyer; Daniel Tyler, a general of 
the Civil War, and founder of the iron industries of North Alabama; Timothy 
Dwight the second, President of Yale University from 1886 to 1898; Theodore 
William Dwight, founder and for thirty-three years warden of Columbia Law 
School; Henrietta Frances, wife of Eli Whitney, inventor of the cotton-gin, 
who, burning the midnight oil by the side of her ingenious husband, helped 
him to his enduring fame; Merrill Edwards Gates, President of Amherst Col- 
lege; Catherine Maria Sedgwick, of graceful pen; Charles Sedgwick Minot, 
authority on biology and embryology in the Harvard Medical school; and 
Winston Churchill, the author of Coniston. These constitute a glorious galaxy 
of America's great educators, students, and moral leaders of the republic. 

(To Be Continued) 



FIRST REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON IMMI- 
GRATION OF THE EUGENICS SECTION 

Alexander E. Cance; James A. Field; Robert De C. Ward; 

Prescott F. Hall, Secretary 

At a meeting of the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders 
Association, held at Washington, December 30, 1911, the following 
resolution was adopted: 

Resolved: That the Eugenics Section organize a permanent committee 
on immigration, with authority to cooperate with similar committees of other 



250 American Breeders Magazine 

organizations in securing laws which will be more effective in securing immi- 
grants which bring good health and normal and superior heredity to this 
country. 

In accordance with this vote a committee on immigration was 
organized as follows, the chairmanship of it being left in abeyance 
for the present: 

Prof. Franz Boas, Columbia University, New York City; Dr. Alex- 
ander E. Cance, Amherst, Mass.; Prof. James A. Field, University 
of Chicago; Prescott F. Hall, Boston, Mass., Secretary; Prof. Robert 
DeC. Ward, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 

The first meeting of the committee was held March 26, 1912, in 
Boston, Messrs. Field, Hall and Ward being present. There was 
a discussion of the situation, and the committee felt that the first 
year of its work should be devoted to a general survey of the needs 
and possibilities of eugenic work in immigration matters, rather than 
to starting any original investigations. 

The starting point for eugenic work in immigration seems to be 
to ascertain in what particulars the present law governing the admis- 
sion of aliens are defective or inadequate, and whether the adminis- 
tration of those laws is or can be effective to shut out those elements 
of immigration which are dangerous to the well being of the nation 
for eugenic reasons. The need for information on these points is 
the greater as our citizens generally know very little of what goes on 
at the ports of entry. Furthermore what is printed in our news- 
papers regarding administration methods is often false or misleading. 
Your committee, therefore, consulted numerous immigration officials, 
especially in New York and Boston; visited Ellis Island; talked with 
Commissioner Williams and with New York State officials, and 
went over a large number of official reports regarding immigration 
and the methods of inspecting and deporting aliens. 

As a result of this work, your committee finds that not only are 
the immigration laws inadequate to effect the exclusion of the unfit, 
but that the inspection is not as thorough as it ought to be, owing to 
inadequate facilities, an insufficient number of inspectors, and the 
frequent arrival of very large numbers of aliens at one time. It 
further finds that in some cases the law is actually violated, both in 
the spirit and in the letter. 

A specific instance of the kind of thing that is now going on is the 
case of Pace Chosen, a Hebrew boy arriving from Russia, February 
15, 1912. The boy was certified as an imbecile by the examining 
surgeon. This certificate was confirmed subsequently by three dif- 



Report of the Immigration Committee 251 

ferent medical boards summoned to pass on the case, and his condi- 
tion was admitted by his family. Sect. 2, of the immigration act 
and the case of Zatarian V. Billings, 204 U. S. 170, make it clear that 
the boy was an alien and that his exclusion was mandatory. Inter- 
cession was made, however, in his behalf by a Jewish organization 
in Washington, and finally Secretary Nagel ordered him landed on 
bond. In the similar case of Mosche Rabinowitz, landed November 
13, 1909, the alien immediately became a public charge as an inmate 
of an insane asylum in Missouri; and could not be deported, because 
having been landed, he acquired citizenship through the citizenship 
of his father. 

These two instances show that even where the inspection is thor- 
ough, unfit aliens are occasionally admitted, owing to alleged motives 
of humanity or personal influence with the Department. That, 
whatever the cause may be, large numbers of unfit persons are landed 
every year is made clear by the experience of New York State. Ac- 
cording to Goodwin Brown, Special Counsel to the New York 
State Commission in Lunacy, the state has suffered an expense of 
at least $25,000,000, to say nothing of the damage to the public 
health, through the admission of defective aliens. By the last avail- 
able census, New York State's foreign born population is less than 
30 per cent, while the foreign born population of the insane hospitals 
is over 50 per cent, reaching 65 per cent in New York City. In 
Bellevue Hospital in 1908, 84 per cent were of foreign parentage! 

Perhaps of even greater menace to the public health than the alien 
insane, are the alien feeble-minded. The former are, at least to 
some extent, segregated, and prevented from breeding; the latter, 
except in one or two states are not segregated sufficiently to remove 
the menace of their presence. Feeble-mindedness is peculiarly a 
defect where family histories become important. In his report for 
1911, Hon. William Williams, Commissioner of Immigration at New 
York, has this to say about this class (Report of the Commissioner- 
General, p. 147) : 

I desire to add a few words on the subject of "feeble-minded" immigrants. 
Our attention is from time to time called to the number of feeble-minded alien 
children in the public schools of New York, many of whom have passed through 
Ellis Island. One reason why they are not excluded is, as pointed out in my 
last annual report, lack of time and facilities for thorough examination as to 
mental condition. Another is that while idiocy and imbecility can usually 
be recognized even in infancy, yet feeble-mindedness can rarely be discovered 
so early, and is usually recognized only as the child approaches the school 
age. As to children under 5 (and a great many such alien children come here). 



252 American Breeders Magazine 

it is probably correct to say that nothing short of an inquiry into their hered- 
ity will enable the government to determine whether or not they are feeble- 
minded, and since no such inquiry is now made, the law as to the exclusion 
of young feeble-minded children is virtually a dead letter, and the Ellis Island 
authorities have not the means at their command to vitalize it. Not only 
is a feeble-minded person likely to become a charge upon the community, but 
such an individual may leave feeble-minded descendants, and so start a vicious 
strain that will lead to misery and loss in future generations and influence 
unfavorably the characters and lives of hundreds of persons. A great majority 
of feeble-minded children are born of parents who have suffered from feeble- 
mindedness, insanity or epilepsy. A large proportion of the inmates of Elmira 
reformatory are feeble-minded. The feeble-minded contribute largely to the 
criminal class and are often the cause of incendiary fires. At a time when the 
subject of feeble-mindedness is becoming more and more important in civ- 
ilized countries and the nature and bearings of this taint are being carefully 
studied by scientists the government would seem called upon to make far 
greater efforts than it does to prevent the landing of feeble-minded immigrants. 

From a eugenic standpoint, however, the danger from classi- 
fiable defectives, great as this is, is probably less than the danger 
from the much larger class of aliens who are below the mental and 
physical average of their own countries and cannot fail to lower the 
average here. To quote again from the report of Commissioner 
Williams (Report of the Commissioner-General for 1909, p. 133): 

I have already adverted to the easy-going character of our exclusion laws 
and stated that even their strict enforcement keeps out only the very bad 
elements of foreign countries. Between these elements and those that are 
a real benefit to the country (as so many of our immigrants are) there lies a 
class who may be quite able to earn a living here, but who in doing so tend to 

pull down our standards of living I wish merely to emphasize 

what must be known to every thinking person, that [this class] is coming here 
in considerable numbers and that we are making no effort to exclude it. 

In 1907, a clause was added to the immigration law debarring 
those certified by a surgeon as being mentally or physically defective, 
Such defect being likely to affect their ability to earn a living. The 
object of those supporting this amendment was to have defectives 
absolutely barred upon the surgeon's certificate; but it has been 
construed so as to make the certificate merely one piece of evidence 
to be considered by the board of special inquiry sitting on the case, 
and so virtually reduces the eugenic question to the economic one 
whether the alien is liable to become a public charge. 

This construction is the more serious on account of a ruling of 
the Secretary of Commerce and Labor, made February 8, 1912, 
commonly known as "Decision No. 120." The law says (Sect. 20) 



Report op the Immigration Committee 



253 



that an alien who becomes a public charge '/from causes existing 
prior to landing" may be deported within three years from the date 
of his entry. In this case a girl who entered in 1909 became an inmate 
of a New York insane hospital in 1911. The New York State Board 
of Alienists certified that the causes of insanity were constitutional 
psychopathic tendencies and mental instability, and that these causes 
existed prior to landing. A surgeon of the Marine Hospital Service 
gave a similar certificate. The patient claimed a felonious assault 
in 1911 as the cause of her condition. The Secretary ruled that 
it had not been shown that the causes named by the surgeons were 
the sole causes of the insanity; and that the department officials, 
though possessing no medical knowledge, could revise the opinion 
of medical experts. The New York State Board of Alienists vigor- 
ously protested, quoting numerous medical authonties to show that 
an external cause, like the alleged assault, could not be the cause of 
the patient's condition; but deportation was refused, and the decision 
still stands. 

This decision as to deportation shows that it is even more important 
than before to make examination at the time of entry thorough. It 
also shows that if medical experts are of any value at all, the law 
should be altered so as to make the decision of the medical officer, 
or of a medical board on appeal, final. As a concrete illustration of 
the present condition of things, it appears that in 1910 at one of our 
largest ports, of 1483 aliens certified by the surgeons for serious mental 
or physical defects, 1370 were landed. That such persons do not 
delay in becoming public charges is shown by the experience of Mass- 
achusetts in 1910.* 



Class. 


Total number. 


Less than one year In United 
States. 


Insanity 


99 
31 
22 


49 


Tuberculosis 


31 


Typhoid 


21 






Total 


152 


101 







Attention should be called in this connection to another most 
dangerous decision made by the Secretary of Commerce and Labor 
July 12, 1912, in the case of Biwke Polayes. This decision holds, 
m effect, that minor foreign born children of naturalized citizens are 
free from the operation of the immigration laws. In other words, 
an alien may come here, take out naturalization papers, and bring 

• Report of Surgeon of Public Health Service at Boston, for 1910. 



254 American Breeders Magazine 

in his children, even though they are idiotic, insane, tuberculous, 
leprous, or otherwise dangerously diseased. Of course, in many cases 
such children must at once be placed in institutions in order to protect 
the public health, and, in many other cases, will soon become public 
charges; while the danger of epidemics and general infection will be 
greatly increased. This decision reverses the practice of the Immi- 
gration Bureau since 1882, and is, we believe, in direct conflict with 
the decision of the Supreme Court above referred to. 

The commissioners at the various ports are undoubtedly doing 
the best they can; but when 5000 aliens arrive in one day at Ellis 
Island, as not infrequently happens, it is obvious that either they must 
be detained for a longer time or more surgeons must be furnished 
in order to have an adequate medical examination. In mental cases 
especially, it may be necessary to have doubtful cases under exam- 
ination for a longer time; but the saving of expense to the state and 
municipal authorities as well as the protection of the public health 
demand this. 

Not only should Decision No. 120 be reversed, but the present 
period of deportation should be extended to at least five years. There 
is no time limit on the deportation of immoral persons. Why should 
there be on other defectives and delinquents? Further, it seems to 
your committee that instead of the burden of proof being placed as 
now upon the government to show that the alien became a public 
charge from causes arising prior to landing, the burden should be 
upon the alien to show that the cause of his becoming a public charge 
arose subsequent to his landing. The extension of the period to 
five years has been recommended as to major criminals by the Immi- 
gration Commission. 

Under the present law transportation companies are liable to a 
fine of $100 for bringing any idiot, imbecile, epileptic, or a person 
having tuberculosis or a loathsome or dangerous contagious disease, 
if the alien's condition could have been detected on embarkation 
(Sec. 9). Although this provision has been in force several years, 
the fines collected in 1911 amounted to $24,600, showing that the 
companies are willing to take considerable risks. It has been found 
that they sometimes protect themselves by requiring a deposit of 
the amount of the fine. The Immigration Commission recommends 
increasing the fine to a maximum of $500, leaving the minimum as 
at present. Your committee endorses this recommendation. 

Your committee has had access to the results of a questionnaire 
sent in 1911 to all living graduates of the Harvard Medical School. 



Report of the Immigration Committee 255 

Of the replies received all but five favored a more rigid inspection 
of immigrants and the application of more thorough physical and 
mental tests. Many doctors having experience in immigrant local- 
ities wrote strongly to the effect that the present inspection is not 
sufficient. 

Your committee recommends the adoption of the following reso- 
lutions by the Eugenics Section for transmission to and adoption 
by the American Breeders Association; and further recommends that 
the Secretary of the Association send copies of these resolutions to 
the President of the United States, and the members of the Immi- 
gration Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives: 

Whereas it appears that in spite of existing immigration legislation, and 
the. faithful enforcement of such legislation by the Commissioners of Immi- 
gration at New York and other ports, many mentally and physically defective 
aliens obtain entrance to this country, to the detriment of the public health, 
and of the eugenic future of the race, and to the burdening of the public 
treasury, 

Resolved : That in the opinion of this Association the decision known as 
"Decision No. 120' ' and the decision that minor children of naturalized aliens 
are exempt from the operation of the immigration laws should be at once 
reversed. 

Resolved : That the period of deportation (except in the case of immoral 
persons, as to whom there is and should be no limit of time) should be extended 
to five years, and that the burden of proof should be changed so that the alien 
must show that the cause of his becoming a public charge arose subsequent 
to landing. 

Resolved : That the fines imposed on transportation companies for bring- 
ing inadmissible aliens be made to cover also the bringing of insane persons, 
and that the amount be changed to not less than $100 nor more than $500 in 
each case. 

Resolved: That enlarged facilities should be given the Commissioners of 
Immigration at the various ports, especially at Ellis Island, in order that a 
more thorough examination of aliens may be possible; and that a sufficient 
number of expert alienists should be appointed to examine mental cases. 

Professor Boas dissents from the conclusions and recommendations 
of the Committee. 



THE EUGENICAL ASPECT OF VENEREAL 

DISEASE 

H. E. Jordan* 
University, Virginia 

The most insistent reason for the eradication of the venereal dis- 
eases, namely, the eugenic, does not seem to have received adequate 
popular emphasis. Public sentiment is gradually being evolved, 
and legislation framed, to protect the race against the reproductive 
libertinism of the pauper, the criminal, and the idiot. Also, society 
is now quite generally fully protected against such serious contagious 
diseases as diphtheria, scarlet-fever, and small-pox. But nothing 
short of criminal negligence still prevails almost universally in the 
matter of protecting both the present generation and the future 
race against the dangers of syphilis and gonorrhoea. There exists 
not a single valid argument against the legal registration, isolation, 
detention, and prohibition of marriage of certain classes of patients. 
It is the purpose of this note to present what appear irrefutable 
arguments for the statutory limitation of venereals, to attempt to 
discover the speciousness of the arguments sometimes urged against 
legal restrictive measures, and to evoke discussion of this matter so 
supremely significant from the standpoint of the future race. 

A serious consideration of the widespread prevalency and racial 
harm of the "social diseases/' leaves no shadow of doubt that they 
are fundamental and extremely pernicious anti-eugenic factors. At- 
tention to other eugenic endeavors will be of little avail unless we 
include in our program a crusade to the death upon venereal disease. 
No interest can be paramount to that of the race. There can be no 
loftier motive than to aid in the production and universal establish- 
ment of the highest type of physical, moral, and intellectual man, 
within the limits of human protoplasm. This being granted, all 
questions of practicality and constitutionality must give way to right. 
Nothing can be more practical than the elimination of economic 
and racial inefficiency. When we agree that it is right to eradicate 
venereal diseases — and no one will seriously argue the point — then 
it would seem that those measures which will most speedily effect 
this condition are the most justifiable. The personal liberty and 
individual comfort of the unfortunates need, and should, be regarded 

a Chairman of the Eugenics Section of the American Association for the Study and Prevention 
of Infant Mortality. In slightly altered and amplified form this paper was presented at the Cleve- 
land meeting, October 3, 1912. 

m 



Jordan: Eugenical Aspect of Venereal Disease 257 

only to an extent not incompatible with full protection to society 
and the race. Society surely has a right, even an obligation, to 
guard its well-being against destructive and deleterious agencies. 

Under the heading Prudery, in an article on "The Sterilization 
of Criminals and Defectives," Dr. John N. Hurty, State Health 
Commissioner of Indiana, writes thus: 

What are we doing for posterity in the protection of human blood and human 
health? We are permitting thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thou- 
sands of human beings to marry and reproduce their own kind, when at the 
time of their marriage they are deviates or they are afflicted with unmention- 
able diseases which if they will not directly cause death, will visit themselves 
to the third and fourth generation in the forms of blindness, bone disease, 
insanity, imbecility and all varieties of tuberculosis and cause nervous wrecks, 
moral degenerates, and perverts. We are doing this because we will not stop 
it, not because we cannot. 'Tis puling, pursy prudery which prevents. We 
are filling our almshouses, hospitals, jails, penitentiaries and homes for the 
morally and physically unfortunate, by our refusal to meet the social question, 
the sex problem, the prevention of the procreation of degenerates, in an honest, 
sensible, pure-minded manner. The medical fraternity knows the horrible 
price modern society is paying for this prudery. Their hospital records and 
the records of their private practice, were they made public, would be the 
blow that would stagger humanity. 

The need for some radical immediate action is surely obvious. 
But what can be done? And how? The problem is more difficult 
than that of preventing the reproduction of ordinary defectives. 
Here sterilization (vasectomy) can be resorted to. But such measure 
will not help in the case of syphilis and gonorrhoea, for the infection 
would still remain. Registration, in order that the public may be 
in a better position to protect itself against this type of infection; 
detention under custodial care, until pronounced permanently cured 
by expert authority, in order that the source of infection may be 
properly controlled; and legal prohibition to marriage, in order that 
innocent and noble women may not be betrayed into a life of misery 
and sterility and that children may not be born with blighted heritage. 
One or the other of these safeguards alone will not be effective in 
meeting the demands of the situation; all together, coupled with an 
educational propaganda, must be observed coincidentally. 

What are the difficulties regarding registration? First, expense. 
But in a country as potentially rich as America, and one that spends 
more than $100,000,000 annnually in caring for its defectives and 
unfortunates, this additional expense is a mere bagatelle. The crea- 
tion and maintenance of the necessary machinery for registration 



258 American Breeders Magazine 

are relatively simple matters. How will regulation effect the solic- 
itation of professional help on the part of those infected? Will not 
some continue untreated, become more virulent foci of infection 
and of protracted standing, suffer needless incapacity, and die a need- 
less death in consequence? Possibly. But this condition is an inev- 
itable transition phase from the old to the new order of things. More- 
over, it being common knowledge that infected individuals will be 
registered in the department of health, any candidates for debauch 
may be restrained from taking the risks. Once the public is properly 
informed concerning the true and serious nature of these diseases, 
public sentiment will not simply tolerate, but indeed demand, reg- 
istration. 

What are the difficulties in the way of custodial care? Again, 
great expense. But wars have been fought and are being paid for; 
enormous quantities of tobacco, liquor and narcotics are still being 
consumed — without good, indeed with positive harm to the race — 
and the whole expense is patiently and cheerfully borne. Perhaps 
if it were made clear to our generation that, in consequence of our 
supine indifference and our shortsighted satisfaction with simply 
palliative measures, our children and grandchildren will inherit heavy 
burdens in the shape of enormous demands for the support of ever- 
increasing misery and incompetence, and that the welfare of the 
race is being jeopardized, we might become willing to sacrifice the 
enjoyment of superfluous comforts for this altruistic and of racial 
salvage. Surely no other course seems to hold such promise of per- 
manent solution. 

What are the difficulties in the way of procuring and enforcing 
restrictive legislation against the marriage of gonorrhoeal and syph- 
ilitic patients? In this case, only relatively small expense. But we 
we will have to combat here legislative lack of information, public 
prejudice, moral inertia, legal conservatism, clerical and institutional 
opposition, medical professional ethics, and the universal traditional 
fetish of "personal liberty" and "equal rights." Perhaps all that 
is needed, however, to overcome the opposition is a common sense 
educational propaganda. Progress may be slow, but a successful 
issue is inevitable. 

Dr. Charles Elliots 7 remarks (The Crusade for Sex Hygiene) seem 
pertinent: 

It is absolutely inconsistent with all other public health measures that vene- 
real patients, patients with syphilis or gonorrhoea, should be allowed to keep 
these diseases secret, should be walking about the streets, working in the shops 



Jordan: Eugenical Aspect of Venereal Disease 259 

and factories, sitting in the street cars, and frequenting the hotels. We do 
not allow such conduct nowadays with regard to any other contagious diseases. 

It is high time, gentlemen, that this practice within the medical 
profession should be brought to an end, and that all venereal diseases should 
be registered and made- subject to control as scarlet fever, diphtheria, and 
small-pox are. Indeed, the reasons for publicity with regard to venereal 
diseases are stronger than they are with regard to any other of the contagious 
diseases. In the second place, cities and states should make large public 
provision in dispensaries and hospitals for the treatment of the venereal dis- 
eases. They should be treated with a view to prevent their further distribu- 
tion through the community. 

In the third place, the practice of the medical profession needs to be com- 
pletely changed in regard to their sense of responsibility towards innocent 
people who may be infected by persons whom the physicians know to have 
venereal disease. That is a very important point, and it is going to be a very 
difficult point in the prosecution of this crusade. It is the practice of many 
physicians to conceal the fact that the young man who is under treatment 
for venereal disease is so affected, even when the physician knows that the 
young man is about to marry an innocent girl. Many physicians justify that 
concealment, and say it is the only mode of action consistent with the general 
ethics of the profession, namely, a sacred confidence between the physician 
and his patient. That sort of ethics ought no longer to be endured. 

But the most important phase of the evil, the primary cause of 
its considerable prevalency even among the better classes, remains 
to be considered, namely, prostitution. The publication of the 
Report (1911) of the Vice Commission appointed by the Mayor of 
Chicago — a commission composed of some of the best men and women 
of that city — gives cause for hope that measures for the extermination 
of prostitution will soon receive more general intelligent considera- 
tion. Above all, the report makes very clear that prostitution is 
not a negligible evil, but one of prime and fundamental import. 
When we are told that in Chicago alone $16,000,000 are the profits 
annually accruing from this vice, served professionally by 6000 (the 
most conservative estimate) potentially -useful young women, and 
patronized by thousands of the best young manhood of our country, 
the evil appears as the most momentous that society has to contend 
against. For the ruin of this fair manhood, the consequent frequent 
suffering and sterility of their later marriage-mates, and the blasting 
of little children's lives presents a picture truly appalling. Multiply 
Chicago proportionately by the number of cities in this country and 
the world, and then contemplate the enormity of the results in terms 
of misery, degradation, poverty, blasted homes, ruined lives, and 
racial injury! Truly, this is not an evil that we can longer afford 
to harbor and neglect. Miss Jane Addams, of Hull House, Chicago, 



260 American Breeders Magazine 

in her recent series of four splendid articles in McClure's Magazine 
(1911-12) on "A New Conscience and an Ancient Evil," sympathet- 
ically portrays the evil in faithful colors and proper perspective. She 
would pay the price of another Civil War to rid the country per- 
manently of this curse, and deem it infinite gain. It is most grati- 
fying that social workers of her type and caliber sternly refuse to 
compromise with medical inspection, segregation, or "regulation"— 
in short, with anything less than absolute eradication. To say that 
to abolish an evil as old as the race is impractical or impossible is 
to belie one's native aspirations for a better world, and one's peren- 
nial faith in the final triumph of right. If prostitution ought to be 
abolished if it be possible, then it can be abolished, for what is right is 
possible. Indeed, for the life of the nation and the race it must be 
abolished. 

One wishes to solicit here especially the help of the medical pro- 
fession who too frequently simply connive at prostitution and its 
sequelae of disease; and of the clergy who largely ignore the latter in 
their relation to marriage. It is wrong also that physicians to 
venereal patients should count fidelity to the Hippocratic oath as of 
more consequence than the saving of an innocent girl from a neces- 
sarily unhappy marriage, and her possible offspring from probable 
defect. If the Hippocratic oath works such ill it ought no longer 
to be administered. Nor will properly trained high-minded physi- 
cians any longer respect it in those instances where it means harm 
to an unsuspecting individual or the unborn race. 

Men have long held the legislative reins. Concerning those mat- 
ters which relate most closely to woman's welfare and that of the race 
they have sometimes been indifferent and at other times they 
have largely bungled. They need expert advice from those most con- 
cerned, the women, to whom the future race is most closely related. 
Only woman can fully know the price paid for human life. She will 
no longer tolerate to have so valuable a thing so recklessly produced 
and so ruthlessly squandered. 

Women will soon be universally admitted to equal suffrage with 
men, because it is right that they should be if they desire. The 
suffragist movement contains great possibilities for powerfully abet- 
ting the eugenic propaganda. Woman will legislate to properly pro- 
tect herself as the "mother" of the race against wanton infection. 
She instinctively feels more keenly the importance of conserving 
the greatest national asset, human life, and will bring about proper 
action for the preservation of the best elements of the race. Of 



1 



Detlefsen: Fertility of Hybrids 261 

course we shall probably have to pass through a period marked by 
radicalism and extremes. This is perhaps inevitable. But even- 
tually men and women will together work out some ethical code of 
life in accordance with the best eugenic ideals. 

THE FERTILITY OF HYBRIDS IN A MAMMA- 
LIAN SPECIES-CROSS 

John Detlefsen 
Laboratory of Genetics, Bussey Institution, Harvard University 

Sterility is a common phenomenon in the hybrids obtained by 
mating members of distantly related groups or types, both in animals 
and in plants. In fact, there is a tacit understanding among the 
taxonomists that members of the same species produce fertile off- 
spring when mated inter se; but a successful cross between members 
of different species or genera may result in sterility of one or both 
sexes among the hybrids. In case both sexes are sterile, a further 
genetic study becomes impossible. When one sex alone among the 
hybrids is sterile, that sex is usually the male; and since the females 
are fertile, it becomes possible to study the inheritance of characters 
and fertility of offspring by crossing these female hybrids back to 
the males of either parent species. 

Among mammals, at least, work on inheritance and fertility in 
species crosses is in its inception. Various compilers, such as Rorig 
and Przibram, have given lists of mammalian species crosses, with 
brief mention of the partial or complete dominance of one parent, 
and the fertility of the hybrids, when known. Grateful as we are 
for the facts that are thus accumulated, we must, nevertheless, admit 
their general inadequacy; for most mammalian species crosses were 
made by those who were merely interested in sheer possibility of the 
cross. Those breeders who are interested in the economic mammals 
have been the most fortunate, because most attention has been 
directed to their study. The consensus of opinion is that the time- 
honored cross between horse and ass results in sterile male mules 
but that the female mule is occasionally fertile with either the horse 
or ass (Waldow von Wahl, 1907). The zebroid (zebra X horse) is 
supposedly sterile in both sexes (Ewart, 1899; Iwanoff, 1911). The 
same is true of the zebrule (zebra X ass). When the cow and bison 
are crossed, they produce fertile female catteloes, but sterile males 
(Boyd, 1908; Iwanoff, 1911). 



262 American Breeders Magazine I 

I 

The offspring of the fertile female mule have merely been men- 
tioned, but further reports regarding their fertility and other char- 
acters are lacking. The female hybrids between the cow and bison 
have been crossed back to males of both parent stocks, thus produc- 
ing one-quarter bison, or three-quarters bison. The one-quarter 
bison females are fertile, as may be expected. The three-quarters 
bison female have not been fully tested, but are possibly also fertile. 
The one-quarter bison males are not always fertile, for Boyd reports 
the appearance of but one out of four tested males. Iwanoff reports 
a fertile three-quarters bison male; and supposes, on purely theoret- 
ical grounds, that a mating of such a fertile male with a quarter- 
bison female would result in fertile one-half bison of both sexes, *£] 

Material. — It has been the good fortune of the writer to work with 
the progeny of a mammalian species cross which in many respects 
is comparable to the horse-ass cross and bison-cow cross. It is my 
purpose to report briefly on the fertility of these offspring. The 
parent species were the wild Brazilian cavy (Cavia rufescens) and 
the domesticated guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus). The two forms differ 
consistently and clearly in color, texture of hair, size, shape of skulls 
and skull sutures, tooth formation, and the like. There is no doubt 
but that the two parent stocks are separate species; for, even if the 
evidence of the systematist were really arbitrary, such evidence must 
obtain more weight when one considers that the male hybrids are 
completely sterile. 

The original crosses between these two species were the result of 
mating the wild males to the tame females. The reciprocal cross 
was not attempted, for, it was feared that the smaller wild female 
would succumb in pregnancy when mated to the much larger sized 
tame male. The wild males were wholly fertile, with tame females, 
although matings were secured only with much difficulty. The 
tame females bore their hybrid young in due time and with the usual 
guinea-pig average per litter. Now since the average number per 
litter in the tame guinea-pig is much larger than in the wild, and 
since a tame female gives this larger average, even when impregnated 
by a wild male, we have every reason to believe that such wild males 
are wholly fertile with tame females and the abundant number of 
spermatozoa insures complete fertilization. Having obtained these 
one-half wild hybrids, the females were mated back to the wild males 
and the tame guinea-pig males, producing three-quarters wild, and 
one-quarter wild respectively. The matings to the wild males were 
not very successful and only one three-quarters wild male was reared 



Detlefsen: Fertility op Hybrids 263 

to maturity. He was sterile. The matings to the tame males were 
wholly successful, and produced 83 one-quarter wild. Pursuing the 
same method of mating the hybrid females of one generation back 
to the tame guinea-pig males, there were produced a regular series 
of more dilute wild-blooded generations ranging from J wild to the 
3tt wild. In all, over 1700 hybrids of various blood dilutions have 
thus been produced. The fertility of about 400 male hybrids has 
been tested. All female hybrids are fertile. 

Problems. — The wild males were wholly fertile in captivity, hence 
captivity itself may. be eliminated as a factor causing the sterility 
of their less wild hybrid sons. The problem immediately suggested 
itself: how great must be the blood dilution, or for how many gen- 
erations must the hybrid females be crossed back to the guinea-pig 
in order to eventually produce fertile male hybrids? When fertile 
male hybrids were produced, would all their offspring be fertile in 
both sexes, if such males were mated to their hybrid sisters or guinea- 
pig females? 

Method. — To judge an animal's fertility, the breeding test is hardly 
sufficient. It is well known that a male may be potentially fertile, 
and yet fail to show it because of some physiological state, such as 
the emaciation of sickness or the sluggishness of obesity. Further- 
more the number of males to be tested increased so rapidly that 
facilities were lacking to breed all of them. Hence, another test 
was devised. By making a small incision in the scrotum and punc- 
turing the epididymis at one or several points, and placing the liquid 
contents in a normal salt solution at bodily temperature, with the 
aid of a microscope a complete index of the male's fertility was 
obtained. 

Results. — Now, whereas any male always gave the same microscopic 
test during his adult life, there was a great difference between indi- 
vidual hybrids. Some males might not possess any sperm at all; 
but in their place were found a few or many incompletely matured 
spermatogonia. Other males might possess a few non-motile or motile 
spermatozoa in addition. Still others might have an abundance of 
motile spermatozoa, just as any normal male. All grades and com- 
binations were found; but the last class alone could be successfully 
mated to females. Fully 200 offspring from such males have been 
born. 

The results of the experiments on the male hybrids up through 
the sixth generation are given in the table presented. The one-half 
wild hybrid males had no spermatozoa. The succeeding generations 



264 



American Breeders Magazine 



of less intense wild males present a consistent series, in which a con- 
tinually increasing percentage of males show spermatozoa. Of the 
21 males tested in the sixth generation, or the -g-V wild, all had sper- 
matozoa. But the mere presence of sperm does not produce fertile 
males. In order that fertilization of the egg shall take place, the 
sperm must be motile to reach and penetrate the egg. Many males 
with immotile sperm were mated to. females, but invariably gave the 
same result: no progeny. 

When we consider those males which had any motile spermatozoa 
whatsoever, we find the same sort of a series. The ^ wild hybrid 
males had no sperm and naturally would have none which were 
motile. The J wild males likewise had no motile sperm, although we 
saw in the previous column that 25 per cent showed sperm. The 
| wild males were the first which showed motile sperm, and were 
likewise the first to be successfully mated with females. The per- 





Tabl 


e of fertility 

Total number 
tested. 


of hybrid males. 






Class of hybrids. 


per cent with 
any sperm. 


per cent with 
any motile 
sperm. 


per cent readily 
fertile. 




* wild 


6 













i wild 


22 


25.0 










i wild 


71 


47.8 


17.3 


9.8 




A wild 


04 


71.1 


46.6 


35.5 




A wild 


80 


88.7 


62.9 


60.7 




A wild 


21 


100.0 


66.7 


66.7 



centage of males with motile sperm increased rapidly in each succeed- 
ing generation until finally the V* wild showed 66.7 per cent with 
motile sperm. So far as I have been able to test, it would seem that 
any male with motile spermatozoa is fertile; but in those cases in 
which immatured spermatogonia or non-motile spermatozoa greatly 
outnumber the motile spermatozoa, the chances that such will reach 
and penetrate an egg are small. An intimate study of the motility 
of sperm and the possibilities of obtaining offspring from male hybrids, 
has led me to believe that any male with an abundance of motile sperm 
is readily fertile. Abundance of motile sperm means at least one- 
half motile. The last column gives the percentages of male hybrids 
in each generation, which are readily fertile and which can successfully 
impregnate females. This last category shows the same sort of 
increase that the others show. It is therefore clear that fertile male 
hybrids may be produced in constantly increasing numbers in the 
offspring of a cross which originally gave only sterile males and fertile 



1 



i 



Laughlin: Eugenics Field Workers Conference 265 

females. In the original cross, elements are introduced or formed 
which prevent the full maturation of the male reproductive cells, but 
the female reproductive cells seem unaffected. These disturbing 
elements may be eliminated by continually crossing the female hybrids 
back to normal tame males, thus producing fertile male hybrids. 

Offspring of fertile male hybrids. — It is not out of place to mention 
the fertility of the sons of the fertile male hybrids. The male hybrids 
with an abundance of motile spermatozoa could be successfully 
mated to female hybrids, and to tame female guinea-pigs. 

When a fertile male hybrid was mated to a female hybrid their 
male offspring were not necessarily fertile. We hardly expected 
they would be, for the female might transmit the disturbing elements 
in this cross just as much as when mated to a tame guinea-pig. About 
forty male hybrids from this sort of a cross have been tested, and 
they give all grades between absolute sterility and fertility. 

When, on the other hand, a fertile male hybrid was mated to the 
guinea-pig female, all the male offspring have been fertile. This is 
the expected outcome, for the fertile male hybrid may be regarded 
as a sort of recessive, in which the disturbing elements introduced 
in the original cross have been eliminated; and when he is mated 
to the female guinea-pig, no such elements are again introduced. 
About thirty male hybrids from this class of crosses have been tested 
and all found to be wholly fertile. 

Practical application. — If the cattaloes, mules, and other mamma- 
lian hybrids are at all comparable to the hybrids in these experiments, 
then fertile races of such hybrids may be produced in the same man- 
ner. As a simple illustration, I may say that all the color, coat, size, 
and anatomical characters known in guinea-pigs, have been trans- 
ferred to these hybrids. Any combination of these characters may 
be united with fertility. It is conceivable that desired characters 
in hybrids between other mammalian species may be combined with 
fertility of both sexes, in the same manner. 

FIRST ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE 
EUGENICS FIELD WORKERS 

Supt. H. H. Laughlin 
Cold Spring Harbor, New York 

The recent interest in the study of human heredity has led to the 
development of a new sort of specialist — the eugenics field worker — 



266 American Breeders Magazine 

whose business it is to go into the home neighborhoods of certain per- 
sons for the purpose of studying and charting their family connections 
and describing each individual of the network with care and accuracy 
with special reference to traits characteristic of the family. Modern 
eugenic research which seeks among other things, to determine the 
maimer of the inheritance of traits demands that authentic and 
extended pedigrees be provided for study. Experience has taught 
that such data can be secured only by sending trained field workers 
into the home territories as above mentioned. Up to the time 
of this conference, which was called by Dr. Davenport at the 
Eugenics Record Office, Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island, New York, 
on June 20 and 21, 1912, thirty-two persons had, at some time during 
the preceding three years, been engaged in this new sort of work. 
Twenty of these workers were present at the conference. 

Prior to this meeting several meetings of the research committees of 
the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders Association had been 
held, but there the research committees held sway and the field worker 
played a secondary r61e. The June meeting, however, was primarily 
a field workers' meeting. They met for the purpose of exchanging 
experiences, for receiving fresh inspiration and new ideals, for stand- 
ardizing the methods of charting authentic pedigrees, and for stand- 
ardizing the use of descriptive terms. The methods for recording 
descriptions of individuals and for charting family pedigrees suited 
to eugenic study were standardized in 1910 by the Eugenics Record 
Office, the Skillman School for Epileptics, Skillman, N. J., and the 
Training School at Vineland, N. J., and published in Bulletin No. 2 
of the Eugenics Record Office. This Bulletin will shortly be sup- 
plemented by Bulletin No. 7 — the Family History Book by Dr. C. B. 
Davenport. This latter bullentin is in reality a field workers' manual. 

In view of the rapidly growing demand for trained field workers 
in eugenics it is doubtless of interest to recall that this method of 
securing at first hand the data for the careful study of the inheritance 
of human traits was foreshadowed by Robert L. Dugdale in his work 
on" the "Jukes" in the isolated valleys of New York; by Dr. Oscar 
McCullough of Indianapolis who, a generation ago, instituted field 
study of the degenerate "Ishmaelites" of Indiana; and by Dr. Alex- 
ander Graham Bell, who made a careful family trait survey of Martha's 
Vineyard, R. I. Such field work in human heredity has for its purpose 
the working out of pedigrees of sufficient accuracy and detail to 
justify prediction as to the hereditary potentialities of selected strains 
and individuals. 



4 



Laughlin: Eugenics Field Workers Conference 267 

The work in the study of human heredity in America followed 
closely upon the genetics revival of recent years. Prof. C. W. Far- 
abe6, of Harvard University, who made observations on the inher- 
itance of brachydactylism, and Dr. and Mrs. Davenport of the Car- 
negie Station for Experimental Evolution, who made studies in the 
inheritance of the characteristics of human eye color, and skin color 
and hair color and form, were the earliest American investigators 
by the new methods, of human traits. The growth of eugenics 
research has been so rapid within the last three years that now insti- 
tutions in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, 
Michigan, and Minnesota are employing trained field workers. Since 
this conference was held (the date of this writing is August 15, 1912) 
this office has made agreements with one institution in Minne- 
sota, one in Illinois, one in New York, one in Pennsylvania, and two 
more in Massachusetts whereby trained field workers are to begin 
eugenic studies on October 1, 1912. Two more workers are also to 
be added to the office staff of the Eugenics Record Office. 

This growth is permanent because it is built upon truth. A body 
of facts, sufficient to enable eugenists to determine the laws govern- 
ing the behavior in heredity of specific traits, is being built up by 
the professional work of these trained field workers. Slowly but 
surely eugenics is wresting from nature the truth concerning the 
manner of the inheritance of human traits, and it is becoming appar- 
ent to state administrative and institution officials, to social workers, 
and to men of science generally that the problems of the social mis- 
fits among humanity are at root biological problems that ultimately 
must be solved by applying biological remedies, in essence if not in 
external or social aspect identical, with those applied by the breeders 
of plants and animals in the rise of domestication. New York State, 
through its State Board of Charities, has recently established a Bureau 
of Analysis and Investigation. This is essentially a bureau of eugen- 
ics, and will devote its attention to the eugenic aspects of the work 
of the State Board of Charities. Dr. Gertrude E. Hall is chief of 
this new bureau, and has recently held its first civil service exami- 
nation for the selection of field workers. Ultimately every state 
must look toward the cutting off of its supply of defectives rather 
than of maintaining more institutions as the final solution of the 
problem of social misfits, and from the history of the field workers 
movement in the last three years, it is evident that the states are 
appreciating the ultimate possibilities of applied eugenics. 



American Breeders Magazine 



LOMO ISIAND, NgW VOBK, JoXE 20 AMD- 21, 1912 

Standing (Itjt to right).— Mary M. Slurges, employed by the Eugenics Record Office In studying 
consanguineous marriages on the Islands aft the Maine Coast. Former Eugenics work, study of 
family distribution of cancer for the Crocker Cancer Research Fund. 

E. P. Moore, employed jointly by the Eugenics Record Office and the New Jersey State Hospital, 
Trenton, N. J., In studying the Inheritance of Insanity Id the New Jersey State Hospital. Former 
eugenics assignment, study of family dlstrll 

Helen T. Reeves, employed by New J. 
N. J., In studying the inheritance of feebh 
Formerly employed jointly by that Inst I tul 

Elisabeth 8. Klt«, employed by the Vlneland {N. J.) Trait 
and Girls lu studying the Inheritance uffeeble-inlndodness I 

Marlon Collins, employed by the Honson Stabs Hospl 
itaoco of epilepsy In the families represented In that Instl 

Dr. Elisabeth B. Muncey, employed by the Eugenics 
of Huntington's chorea In New York. Connecticut, New 

Jane H. Ross, employed jointly by the Eugenics Ret 
for the Insane, Washington, D. C., In studying the Inherits,! 



e Hornet 



Eugenics Record Office. 



■d Office In studying 
, and Pennsylvania 



Altai, Hatl 



Ruth W. Law ton, e 
Dorchester, Mass., In 

Veda Elvin, employed by the New York St 
In studying the Inheritance of halts of dellnquer. 

Ethel C. Mscomber. employed jointly by tb 
State Hospital, Concord, N. H., in studying t 
Institution. 



nen, Bedford Hills, N. Y-, 
e and the New Hampshire 



Laughlin: Eugenics Field Workeks Conference 269 

Florence H. Danlelson, employed by the Eugenics Record Office In making a eugenics survey of 
Woodbury Town, Connecticut. Former assignments, jointly employed by the Eugenics Record 
Office and the Monson State Hospital, Palmer, Mass., in studying the inheritance of epilepsy in fam- 
ilies represented in the latter institution. Employed by the Eugenics Record Office in studying 
the inheritance of skin color in mulatto families in Bermuda and Jamaica, B. W. I. 

Sitting (left to right). — Dr. Arthur H. Estabrook, employed by the Eugenics Record Office In 
extending the studies of Robert L. Dugdale on the "Jukes." Former assignments, study of the 
inheritance of albinism in Eastern Massachusetts, and the study of Inheritance in the criminal insane 
at the Matteawan State Hospital Flshkill-on-Hudson, New York, and the study of the heredity 
of the " Nam" family of degenerates in " Nam Hollow." 

Amey B. Eaton, employed jointly by the Eugenics Record Office and the Utah Agricultural Col- 
lege, Logan, Utah, in studying the inheritance of mental and physical traits in the Mormon families 
in Salt Lake Valley, Utah. Formerly employed by the Eugenics Record Office in seeking data upon 
the inheritance of biological traits recorded in American genealogies, and in studying the inheritance 
of mental and physical traits in the Amish sect in Pennsylvania. 

Mrs. D. L. F. Woodward, employed by the Skillman (N. J.) State Village for Epileptics, in study- 
ing the inheritance of epilepsy in families represented in that institution. 

Florence Orr, employed jointly by the Eugenics Record Office and the New Jersey State Hospital, 
Trenton, N. J., in studying the inheritance of insanity in the families represented in the latter insti- 
tution. Former eugenics work; in Kings Park State Hospital, Kings Park, N. Y., studying the inher- 
itance of insanity in families represented in that institution. 

H. H. Laughlin, Superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office. 

C. B. Davenport, trustee and director of the Eugenics Record Office; Director of the Station 
for Experimental Evolution, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island, 
New York. 

William F. Blades, editorial secretary, Eugenics Record Office. Also especially studying the 
Inheritance of hare-lip and cleft palate. 

Besides those who attended the meeting, the following have also been 
engaged in field work in eugenics: Miss Jane Griffith, who was for 
some time employed in field work by the Vineland (N. J.) Training 
School; Miss Saidee C. Devitt, now a field worker of the Faribault, 
Minnesota, School for Feeble-Minded, was formerly employed by 
the Skillman School for Epileptics in the same work; Mary O. Dranga 
was formerly employed by the Eugenics Record Office in studying 
the inheritance of factors in juvenile delinquency in the Chicago 
Psychopathic Institute and later engaged in extending the work of 
Dr. Oscar McCullough on the "Ishmaelites" of Indiana; Adele 
McKinnie is employed jointly by the Eugenics Record Office and 
the Michigan School for Feeble-Minded, Lapeer, Mich.; Maud W. 
Moore, formerly employed by the Vineland Training School in eugenics 
field work; Gertrude C. Cannon, formerly employed by the Kings 
Park State Hospital, Kings Park, N. Y.; Miss Florence R. Davis, 
archivist, Eugenics Record Office; Susan K. Gillian, employed by 
the Eugenics Record Office in studying the inheritance of skin color 
in mulatto families in Louisiana; Dr. Jaime de Angulo, employed 
by the Eugenics Record Office in describing the effects of vasectomy 
upon the inmates of the Indiana Reformatory, Jeff ersonville, Indiana, 
and later in charting out pedigrees of these men with reference to 
criminalistic traits; and H. H. Le Seur, who has succeeded Dr. de 
Angulo in the same work. 



SOME BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL 

BREEDING 

W. E. Castle 
Bussey Institution, Forest Hills, Massachusetts 

Animal breeding is the most ancient of all arts. Its beginnings 
antedate civilization, going back to a time when man lived as the 
beasts of prey live, subsisting upon such animals as he could catch 
or kill. As man increased the game began to decrease, and the more • 
provident would keep alive for a time the young of their favorite 
animal, when taken, until these young had grown larger and would 
yield more food. Often no doubt, a feeling of attachment grew up 
between captor and captive and the day of slaughter was postponed 
until the captive had reached breeding age. If young were born in 
captivity, the thought must at once have occurred to the observer, 
"Here is an easier and more sure way of getting food than by hunt- 
ing; why not raise cattle and sheep rather than hunt them." But 
not all men reasoned thus or, if they did, abandoned the chase, 
for this continued with increased vigor. The game grew scarcer 
and wilder and was pursued into less accessible places. Horses 
and wild dogs were employed to aid in the chase. Wild cattle were 
hunted to death and wholly exterminated, and wild sheep were almost 
exterminated. The disappearance of the wild form gave impetus 
to the propagation of the tame one. Thus the pastoral stage of 
man's existence was reached. He moved from place to place in 
search of forage for his flocks and herds, the dog and the horse being 
his assistants. The most important of our domesticated animals 
trace back their existence to this stage of culture. The flocks and 
herds furnished flesh, milk, clothing and shelter; the horse trans- 
portation; the dog defense, aid in the care of the flock, and, not least, 
companionship. Under the open sky, watching the stars by night 
and the changing seasons by day, man laid the foundation of the 
first science, astronomy. In the fertile river valleys, he found he 
could raise food for himself and his animals when the supply on the 
plains grew short. Thus agriculture began. It necessitated fixed 
abode in one spot, regulations as to land-tenure, irrigation, and the 
like. New uses were now found for the animals; the ox was yoked 
to the plow, and the horse was harnessed. Thus civilization began, 
largely through the instrumentality of domesticated animals. 

Though animal breeding is the oldest and most fundamental of 
the arts, its practise down to the present time has been almost wholly 

270 



Castle: Biological Pbinciples of Animal Breeding 271 

empirical. A science of animal breeding scarely yet exists, not 
because thoughtful men have failed to give attention to the subject 
but rather because of its inherent difficulty. We breed animals as 
our fathers and grandfathers did because their time-honored methods 
succeed and we know of no reason for changing those methods. In- 
deed we can not expect to improve them in a rational way until we 
learn why certain methods succeed and why others fail. Such knowl- 
edge of the underlying reasops for successful practise will when secured 
constitute a science of animal breeding. 

The technique of successful animal breeding is difficult and special 
in the case of each kind of domesticated animal and can best be 
learned from an apprenticeship on a farm or study in a farm school. 
The general principles empirically deduced from centuries of practise 
may be concisely stated thus: 

(1) Like begets like, hence the breeder must select for propagation 
the type of animal he desires to perpetuate. 

(2) Pedigree counts. The desired type is more certain to occur 
among the offspring, if it has occurred repeatedly among the ancestors. 

(3) Inbreeding brings uniformity of type but causes loss of vigor. 

(4) Crossbreeding increases vigor but destroys uniformity of type.. 
No one of these generalizations is universally true. To state the 

recognized limitations and exceptions would be to recapitulate the 
literature of breeding with the omission only of its technique. The 
new science of genetics is concerned with the discovery of the reasons 
for these four empirical generalizations and their various exceptions. 
To the very first of the four generalizations there are frequent 
exceptions as every experienced breeder knows. Like does not 
always beget like. Thus roan short-horned cattle do not always 
breed true. They produce their like, roans, in about 1 case out of 
2, but in the remaining case an all-red or an all white or a spotted 
red-and-white animal is likely to be produced. Blue Andalusian fowls 
are another well known exception to the rule that like produces like. 
Besides producing blue offspring, Andalusian fowls produce also 
black ones and white ones. Yellow mice are another unfixable vari- 
ety of animal. They breed true in about 2 cases out of 3. In the third 
case a black or brown pigmented animal is produced. Illustrations 
need not be multiplied; the literature of breeding is full of cases in 
which like has failed to produce like. Until quite recent years no 
satisfactory explanation of such cases has been forthcoming. Why 
a roan variety of cattle or a blue variety of fowl should be fixable to 
the extent of 60 per cent, whereas yellow mice should be fixable to 



272 American Breeders Magazine 

the extent of 66 per cent was quite incomprehensible until a general 
law of color inheritance had been worked out. 

The first serious attempt to formulate a general law of heredity 
was made in 1889 by Francis Galton, a pioneer in the study of genetics. 
He went about the matter in a systematic way, first collecting facts 
and then generalizing from them. In studying family records of 
the height of human beings he observed both that like begets like 
and that pedigree counts. For tall children are in general born only 
to tall parents, and the children are more certain to be tall if the 
grandparents also have been tall. He concluded that the resemblance 
of children to their grandparents was on the average only half as 
close as to their parents. Or to express it mathematically, if we call 
the parental influence one-half, that of the grandparents is one- 
fourth; that of the great-grandparents one-eighth; and so on, each 
earlier generation of ancestors exerting only half as much influence 
as the next later one. This generalization, at first adopted tentatively 
only, Galton called the law of ancestral heredity. It states the facts 
of relative average size of ancestors and offspring about as well as 
we can state them at the present time, but offers no biological expla- 
nation of this relation. Nor does it inform us as to the probable 
limits of size variation among the children. This so-called law of 
Galton in reality rests on a false biological assumption, viz., that the 
character of the germ-cell regularly corresponds with that of the 
parent producing it. Galton himself recognized and pointed out 
this defect, but could devise no way of obviating it. 

In order to test his empirical law more widely Galton in 1897 applied 
it to a case where it is now clearly not applicable, viz., to color inher- 
itance in mammals. The particular case selected by him for study 
was unfortunately a peculiarly difficult one, viz., the inheritance of 
black spots in Bassett hounds. The result was that he reached 
erroneous conclusions. 

The race of dogs studied was the Bassett hounds of Sir Everett 
Millais, a carefully bred race having the short crooked legs of a ^ 

Dachshund combined with the spotted coat of a beagle. Careful 
records had been kept of the breeding of these dogs for many gener- 
ations. In most respects they had been bred to a uniform type, but 
in color two different conditions occurred. The dogs were all (or 
nearly all) spotted yellow-and-white. Part of them bore in addition 
spots of black, being thus tricolor yellow-black-and-white. Those 
without black spots were called by Galton non-tricolor. 

Galton found on examination of the records that parents of one 



Castle : Biological Principles of Animal Breeding 273 

sort may produce young of the other sort as well as its own, though 
in smaller numbers. Neither kind, then, breeds entirely true, though 
each tends to produce its like. It was found further that parents 
produce a larger proportion of offspring like themselves if the grand- 
parents also have been of that same sort. Hence there exists an 
apparent ancestral influence which Galton believed to be roughly 
approximated by his mathematical law. That this influence is 
apparent only, not real, I hLve shown elsewhere." 

Galton had verified in this case as in that of human stature, the 
two, century-old generalizations, "Like begets like" and "Pedigree 
counts." He had attempted to measure the force of pedigree in 
his law of ancestral heredity, but not to account for it. 

A more successful attempt to formulate a general law of heredity 
had been made some years earlier by Gregor Mendel, but this was 



unknown to Galton as to other biologists of that time. We call it 
Mendel's law. In accordance- with this law, the facts of color inher- 
itance observed by Galton can be more fully explained. 

It is a fundamental feature of this law that the characteristics of 
animals and plants are inherited as units. For example, in figure 
1 are seen the skins of a family of rats; of the parents at the left, of 
their offspring at the right. The parents obviously differ in color- 
ation, and the young are divided in a corresponding way into two 
groups approximately equal. Five of thcyoung resemble one parent, 



a The Laws of E 


sredlty of Galton and Mendel, and Some Laws Governing Race Improve™ 


by Selection. Prot 


Am. Acad. Arts and Sol., vol. 39, pp. 223-242, 1603; On The Inheritance 


Tricolor Coat In Gu 


nea-Pige, and ins Relation to Gallon's Law of Ancestral Heredity. Amrri 



274 



American Breeders Magazine 



four resemble the other. The grouping of young into two classes 
has no relation to sex; each group includes both sexes. In both 
groups the animals are particolored, black and white, but in one 
group the black areas are more extensive than in the other. In one 
group the black head and back-stripe alone are black; these are called 
"hooded" rats. In the other group the entire dorsal surface is black; 
these are "Irish" rats. In neither group is the extent of the pigmen- 
tation absolutely uniform; it varies within narrow limits, yet the 
limits of the two groups are widely separated. No one would hesi- 
tate for a moment as to the grouping of any individual. If each 
group had been reared to maturity and had been allowed to breed 
separately, it would have been found that the hooded rats bred true, 
but that the Irish group produced again two sorts, Irish and hooded. 
If these grandchildren had in turn been sorted out into groups and 
bred separately, it would have been found that hooded rats would 
again produce only hooded young, whereas the Irish grandchildren 
would some of them again produce two sorts of young, Irish and 
hooded, while others would produce only Irish young. See the 
following diagram. 



Parents 

Hooded 



Children 

Hooded. 



Grand-children 

. .Hooded... 



Great-grand-children 

Hooded 



> •• S 



Hooded Hooded 



Irish 



Irish < Irish 



f Hooded 
\ Irish 



Irish. 



Irish 



To make a long story short, this is a good example of alternative 
or Mendelian inheritance. Irish is the dominant pattern, hooded 
recessive. Recessives always breed true, but dominants are of two 
sorts, those which breed true (called homozygous), and those which 
do not breed true (called heterozygous) but also produce recessives. 

The original Irish parent in this family was heterozygous. In 
half its gametes the hooded condition was transmitted, in half the 
Irish condition. The Irish children were of the same sort, as would 
be found also part of the Irish grandchildren, but others of the Irish 
grandchildren would be found to be homozygous, transmitting noth- 
ing but the Irish character, and these would breed true. The note- 
worthy thing in this experiment is the demonstration that hooded 
and Irish patterns behave as alternative units, which may be brought 



1 



Castle: Biological Pkinciplbs op Animal Bkbbding 275 

together in the same individual by cross breeding and then separated 
out again in later generations. 

If instead of crossing a hooded rat with an Irish one, as in the family 
already discussed, we cross it with a wild gray one, we obtain a dif- 
ferent result. The children are all gray like the wild parent, but the 
grandchildren are of four sorts, gray-all-over, black-all-over, gray 
hooded, and black hooded, approximately in the proportions, 9:3:3 
: 1. By a cross two new color varieties have been created, the all- 
black and the gray hooded. It is evident that in this case, as in the 
foregoing, color-pattern is sharply alternative in inheritance, but 
the wild parent was homozygous in pattern not heterozygous, so 
all the children showed that same dominant pattern, and the hooded 
pattern reappeared first among the grandchildren, in one-fourth of 
the individuals. But among the hooded grandchildren, as well as 
among the self colored, both gray individuals and black ones occur. 
The same pattern occurs portrayed in different tints, gray or black. 
It is evident therefore that the gray color is alternative to black in 
the same way that self pattern is alternative to hooded. It is evident 
further that color and pattern are wholly independent, just as I may 
write the letter A either in red or in blue crayon. There is no nec- 
essary relation between the letter which I write and the color in 
which I write it. 

Likewise the hooded, Irish, and self patterns of rats may be por- 
trayed either in black or in gray. Color and pattern in rats are 
therefore units independently transmitted in heredity and the vari- 
eties produced by crossing are nothing but new combinations of 
these same units. It is conceivable however that a new variety might 
be produced by actual alteration of one of these units, that the black 
for example might become blacker, or the gray might become lighter 
and that the modified units might still behave as alternatives. But 
the idea has somehow become prevalent among students of heredity 
that such modification is impossible, that Mendelian units cannot 
change. "We have got in the habit of designating unit-characters 
by symbols, A, B, C, etc., and we have come to think of unit-charac- 
ters as no more variable than these symbols. In reality no two 
organisms are ever exactly alike, and it is doubtful whether any 
unit-character is ever exactly the same in any two organisms. Some 
would frankly admit this and yet maintain that what is transmitted 
is in every case the same, that is that the germinal basis of a unit- 
character is unchangeable, whatever may be true of its manifestation 
in the individual. The theoretical consequence of such a view is 



276 



• American Breeders Magazine 



that selection can have no effect in modifying unit-characters. This 
conclusion is frankly avowed by many leading students of genetics. 
To show its unsoundness, it will be sufficient in a specific case to 
modify a unit-character. Many unit-characters have been so mod- 
ified. I will describe a case in which the hooded pattern of rats 
has been changed by selection. This work has been done with the 
assistance of Dr. John C. Phillips, though others of my associates 
have shared in it to a lesser extent. 

Table 1. — Results of Selection for Modification of the Coat-pattern of Hooded Rats. 



Description of selection. 



© 

u 

3 
M 

a 

I 

00 

s 

I 

§ 



Number of 
generation. 



1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 



Average grade 


Average grade 


Number of 


parents. 
2.51 


offspring. 


offspring. 


2.05 


150 


2.52 


1.92 


471 


2.73 


2.51 


341 


3.09 


2.72 


444 


3.33 


2.90 


610 


3.52 


3.11 


861 


3.56 


3.20. 


1,077 


3.75 


3.48 


1.408 


3.78 


3.54 


1,322 


3.86 


3.72 


706 


3.94 


3.76 


158 



Total. 



C4 

M 

a 

a 

* 

o 

00 



CO 
00 

3 

d 

.5 



1 

2 

3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 



1.46 
1.41 
1.56 
1.69 
1.73 
1.86 
2.00 
2.05 
2.11 
2.18 
2.27 



1.00 
1.07 
1.18 
1.28 
1.41 
1.56 
1.70 
1.80 
1.92 
2.01 
2.16 



Total. 



7,548 

55 

132 

195 

329 

701 

1,252 

1,680 

1,655 

1,591 

1,406 

543 

9,539 



Several years ago the experiment was begun of selecting from a 
stock of hooded rats extreme plus and minus variates and breeding 
the two selections separately. The most extreme variations of the 
hooded pattern at the outset are indicated roughly by grades —2 
and + 3 of figure 2. At first the two series overlapped in the region 
of grade 0, but soon they ceased to do so and have drawn wider and 
wider apart ever since. In each generation the most extreme indi- 
viduals were selected as parents. Table 1 shows the average grade 
of parents and offspring in each generation. But tables 2 and 3 
show the average grade of offspring of parents of a particular grade 



Castle: Biological Principles op Animal Breeding 277 

in each generation. Attention is called to the following facte con- 
cerning the plus selection, that is, selection in the direction of black- 
ness and solid color (table 2). 

(1) At the outset the darkest parents we had were of grade 3, 
now we have parents of grade 5J, an all-black rat being grade 6 (the 
self condition). It is evident, therefore, that new grades of parents 
have appeared during the experiment; the table shows that they 
have come in gradually, 3 J grade parents, in the third generation; 
3J grade parents, in the fourth generation; 3f grade and 4 parents, 
in the fifth generation, and 4J grade parents in the seventh genera- 
tion. The modification has progressed through all intermediate 
stages between hooded and self, including Irish. 

(2) An examination of the horizontal rows of the table shows that 
in any generation the higher the grade of the parents, the higher 



that of their offspring. In general therefore the somatic character 
of an animal in this series is an index of its genetic character. This 
makes change through selection possible. 

(3) An examination of the vertical columns of the table shows 
that upon the appearance of a new grade of parents, the regression 
of the offspring is considerable, but with further selection it dimin- 
ishes. I may add, what this table does not show : that with repeated 
selection it disappears altogether and is even reversed. That is, 
the lowest-grade offspring produced by selected high-grade parents 
do not regress downward toward the starting point of the series, 
but upward toward the mode of the parental generation. This indi- 
cates that the effects of the selection are permanent, for a new mode 
has been created toward which regression occurs. 

In the minus selection series (table 3) the initial selection consisted 
of animals between —1 and —2 in pigmentation. Fairs of —2 par- 



278 



American Breeders Magazine 



Table 2. — Relation Between Average Grade of Parents and 





a 

h o 

1 2 

3 s 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 
10 
11 


















Average grade 




1.87 


2.00 


2.12 


2.25 


2.37 


2.50 

2.06 (37) 
1 80(133) 
2.32(54) 
2.55 (11) 


2.62 


2.75 i 2.87 


3.00 


• 


1.82 (7) 


1.76(18) 
1.70(46) 




1.87 (20) 
1.87 (8) 




2.15(5) 
2.11 (44) 
2.63 (64) 


2.12(51) 
1.92 (52) 




2.35 (12) 


3 

•P4 


1.28 (56) 
2.06 (21) 


1.92 (45) 
2.15 (17) 


2.41 (23) 


2.47 (59) 


t* 
& 




2.46 (43) 
2.65 (18) 
3.00 (12) 


2.70(47) 
2.97 (37) 
2.87 (21) 


2.49 (71) 


? 








2.60 (143) 


*3 














2.81 (15) 


a> 
















3.25 (2) 
























M 




■ 


















§ 






















> 
< 




































i 




























Total. 













-I 



Note. — Figures in parentheses show numbers of offspring on which the averages in each case are based. 



ents occur for the first time in generation 4. Table 3 shows for this 
series the relation of average of offspring to grade of parents, and 
the results agree in every respect with those of table 2. Note, that: 

(1) New grades of parents appear as the experiment progresses. 
We how have parents pigmented only on the top and sides of the 
head, and with a large white spot on the forehead. If such rats 
have ever existed elsewhere at any time, I have failed to learn of 
them. 

(2) The higher the grade of the parents in any generation, the 
higher that of their offspring. 

(3) Regression grows less with repeated selection and finally changes 
its direction. 

What is the conclusion of the whole matter? We find that hooded, 
Irish, and self patterns in rats, though Mendelizing as unit charac- 
ters in relation to each other, are quantitative variations no more 
stable in character than intermediate stages; that any desired inter- 
mediate stage may be produced by selection alone, and when pro- 
duced is fully as stable as any one of the three conditions named; 
that in a similar way stages of less pigmentation than any previously 
known in rats other than albinos have been produced and that there 
is every reason to suppose that this reduction can be carried forward 
by selection until all color is eliminated from the coat. 

Selection consequently is not a mere agency for the sorting out 
of unit variations (factors or genes) ; it is a creative agency by means 
of which unit characters can be modified and variation can be given 



Castle: Biological Principles op Animal Breeding 279 



Average Grade of Offspring in Plus Selection Series. 



of parents. 


ber of 
ring. 


3.12 


.3.25 


3.37 


3.50 


3.62 


3.75 


3.87 


4.00 


4.12 


4.25 


4.37 


a & 






















150 


2.50 (5) 






















471 


3.07 (10) 


3.17 (6) 
2.89 (64) 
2.81 (138) 
3.10 (143) 
3.09 (131) 


2.91 (8) 
2.70 (23) 
2.94 (145) 

2.96 (123) 

2.97 (160) 


















341 


2.69 (122) 


3.02 (20) 
2.87 (69) 
3.10 (212) 
3.18 (177) 
3.46 (59) 
3.25 (4) 




2.75 (6) 
3.07 (14) 
3.22 (78) 
3.35 (184) 

3.49 (469) 

3.50 (591) 
3.68 (252) 
3.75 (4) 












444 


2.81 (114) 


3.08 (64) 
3.16 (181) 
3.23 (289) 
3.50 (484) 
3.43 (244) 


3.35 (8) 
3.26 (80) 
3.49 (90) 
3.53 (238) 
3.65 (424) 
3.72 (307) 
3.67 (88) 


3.36 (7) 
3.41 (14) 
3.53 (15) 
3.31 (64) 
3.57 (45) 
3.76 (107) 
3.88 (55) 


3.00 (3) 






610 


2.84 (28) 






861 


2.87 (28) 




3.75 (3) 
3.69 (22) 
3.75 (4) 
3.84 (8) 




1,077 




3.72 (60) 
3.57 (7) 
3.77 (32) 
3.75 (7) 


3.96 (8) 
3.50 (3) 


1,408 

1,322 

706 
























3.94 (4) 


158 













7.548 



r 



a particular direction, the only limits to its action being physiolog- 
ical limits. 

But someone may say, you have considered merely one sort of 
unit character; grant that this is modifiable, what of the numerous 
other ones which have been described? In reply I can only say that 
I confine my attention to one for lack of space. I have not limited 
my study to one, and I have yet to meet with a unit-character which 
is not both variable and modifiable. It is only by closing one's 
eyes to minor variations that one can see gametic purity in heredity. 
Some recognize the occurrence of these minor variations but deny 
that they are of any consequence. This is the position of de Vries 
and Bateson, Johannsen, and Jennings. Bateson for example in 
studying the inheritance of an extra toe in fowls recognized that it 
was not always equally well developed; nevertheless he grouped 
together in one class (having the extra-toe) all animals which devel- 
oped even a trace of it, and placed in another class (as not possessing 
it) all which failed to develop an extra-toe, even though some of the 
latter actually did transmit the extra-toe. Now this is perhaps the 
best one can do in sorting out the material; but it is clearly unwarrant- 
able to conclude that all fowls with an extra-toe possess a unit char- 
acter or gene which is wanting in all birds which do not have the 
toe, or vice versa. Clearly toe-character is inherited in various grades 
precisely as whiteness is in rats. Undoubtedly toe-character also 
is modifiable by selection; indeed I have fully established this fact 
in guinea-pigs (1906). 



280 



American Breeders Magazine 



Table 3. — Relation Between Average Grade of Parents and 





Number of 
generation. 


Average grade 




1.12 


1.25 


1.37 


1.50 


1.62 


1.75 


1.87 


m 


1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
S 
9 
10 
11 




1.34 (8) 
1.17 (17) 
1.05 (20) 
1.56 (4) 


0.85 (31) 
1.45 (5) 
1.03 (28) 
1.16 (29) 
1.50 (51) 


1.37 (6) 
1.11 (37) 
1.31 (28) 
1.31 (59) 
1.25 (53) 
1.34 (24) 






1.05 (10) 


I 

J" 


1.05 (12)* 
0.85 (5) 


0.67 (3) 
1.22 (48) 
1.36 (40) 
1.35 (54) 
1.46 (94) 
1.55 (5) 


1.09 (27) 
1.26 (63) 
1.34 (93) 
1.30 (262) 
1.49 (244) 
1.67 (32) 


1.10 (12) 
1.96 (3) 
1.18 (95) 


*8 




1.64 (143) 


o 






1.59 (502) 










1.65 (330) 










1.84 (19) 


i 

9 






























< 




































Total 







•Figures In parentheses show numbers of offspring on which the averages in each case are based. 



I therefore regard as unsubstantiated the genotype conception 
of heredity in which unit-characters are regarded as indestructible 
and unmodifiable entities. Organisms are not devoid of variability; 
neither are the unit-characters which they manifest devoid of varia- 
bility, nor yet is the germinal basis of such unit-characters devoid of 
variability. Unit-characters may arise gradually as the result of 
repeated selection in a particular direction. 

I have dwelt thus at some length upon this question because of 
its theoretical and practical importance. If unit-characters are im- 
mutable, then straight selection is a waste of time, and the only 
procedure for the breeder well worth while is to hybridize and thus 
seek new combinations of unit-characters. This view has been repeat- 
edly presented in recent years, but has met with scant favor at the 
hands of experienced animal breeders. 

Experienced breeders, to be sure, are not qualified to pass final 
judgment on a theoretical question, but a theory which will not 
work out in practice needs careful scrutiny; there is surely something 
wrong with it. If, however, unit-characters are modifiable, then 
selection is of value not only in the isolation of particular combina- 
tions of units, but also in the improvement of the units themselves. 

Mendel's law, in its broad general features, does stand the test 
of practice. It represents a fundamental general law of heredity. 
Many of the characteristics of animals and plants are transmitted 
substantially as units and are therefore capable of recombination in 
the form of new varieties through the agency of crossing. By apply- 



Castle: Biological Principles op Animal Breeding 281 



Average Grade of Offspring in Minus Selection Series. 



of parents. 


1 « 
If 


2 


2.12 


2.25 


2.37 


2.50 


2.62 


2 75 


2.87 




















55 


















132 


















195 


1.36 (9) 
















329 


1.52 (109) 


1.80 (5) 
1.52 (85) 
1.74 (260) 
1.85 (377) - 
1.93 (403) 
2.00 (469) 
2.14 (149) 












* 


701 


1.58 (283) 






1.82 (11) 
1.88 (15) 
1.85 (17) 
2.07 (53) 
2.13 (67) 
2.24 (45) 








1,252 


1.72 (969) 


1.93 (41) 
1.87 (36) 
1.93 (148) 
2.04 (197) 
2.15 (144) 


1.62 (4) 
1.87 (30) 
1.91 (175) 
2.06 (104) 
2.18 (117) 


2.28 (18) 
1.66 (6) 


1.87 (6) 




1,680 


1.78 (1170) 




1,655 


1.90 (811) 






1,591 


1.95 (473) 
2.08 (48) 


2.16 (49) 
2.09 (19) 


1.97 (27) 
2.33 (16) 


2.19 .(20) 
1.95 (5) 


1,406 
543 




9,539 



ing Mendel's law to specific cases one is able to predict with a con- 
siderable degree of accuracy what combinations will result from a 
particular cross and in what proportions these will be produced. 
Such a practical test is the best possible evidence of the correctness 
of a theory. Mendel's law throws light on each of the generaliza- 
tions of empirical animal breeding previously enumerated: 

It throws light on those recognized exceptions to the generaliza- 
tion that like begets like, and shows under what circumstances those 
exceptions are to be expected. 

It shows why and when pedigree counts, and under what circum- 
stances a knowledge of pedigree is of no consequence whatever. 

It shows why inbreeding brings uniformity of type, and cross- 
breeding destroys it. 

Mendel's law is then a first step toward the establishment of a 
science of animal breeding. But it is only a first step on a long and 
weary road, and we must be careful not to misinterpret or misapply 
it. Otherwise we are liable to be turned aside from the direct road 
of progress. We must not, for example, conclude on insufficient 
evidence that unit-characters possess an immutability which organ- 
isms do not possess. It is the purpose of this paper to insist on this . 
point. Further we are jiot yet warranted in concluding that all 
inheritance is unit-character inheritance. A too sweeping general- 
ization of this sort may also lead us astray. Let us proceed with 
enthusiasm, but with caution, noting well our landmarks. 

The practical utility of Mendel's law is much greater to the plant 



282 American Breeders Magazine 

breeder than to the animal breeder, because the plant-breeder is 
concerned largely with the production of a very few first generation 
or second generation hybrids of merit, which are then multiplied 
indefinitely by asexual means or self fertilization. In the case of 
the domesticated animals such methods of multiplication are impos- 
sible. Every individual produced has two parents, and purity of 
race in the parents is indispensable to uniformity of type in the 
progeny. 

As a theoretical foundation principle Mendel's law is equally val- 
uable to animal breeders and to plant breeders. 

HORSES AND HORSE BREEDING* 

H. K. Bush-Brown 
Washington, D. C. 

In a former article published in the American Breeders Magazine, 
I suggested that the best race horses, both trotters and runners, be 
studied anatomically in their living active form, and from the skeleton 
after death, as a means of mathematically determining what differ- 
ences there are in structure. This would enable us to not only estab- 
lish a method of defining types but also to ascertain which structural 
propositions are the most favorable to speed and endurance, and in 
what way the runner differs from the trotter. Every horseman recog- 
nizes the differences of proportion at a glance and by instinct, but 
so far as I know they have not been reduced to mathematical and 
comparable terms. 

• No one will question that the separate types of horses which we 
breed and keep for specific purposes, are the results of selective breed- 
ing, and that the differences between breeds are largely a matter of 
differences in the proportions of the structure of the skeleton. And 
this suggests the need of an accurate and reliable method of measur- 
ing the bodies of individuals, which will make full allowance for 
variations in size, so that not only large and small individuals of 
the same breed may become comparable, but also individuals belong- 
ing to different breeds, and even the same individual in different 
stages of growth. Such a method must clearly be based upon a 
unit common to all individuals, and upon a comparison of propor- 
tions rather than upon absolute measurements. 

a This Is the second article of the aeries on Horses and Horse-Breeding begun by the author In 
American Breeders Magazine, vol. 11, no. 2, and no. 3. 



Bush-Brown: Horses and Horse Breeding 



283 



I therefore submit to the consideration of animal breeders a system 
which I have devised after much study and experimentation. It 
is as follows: 

The height of the horse at the withers is divided into three equal 
parts denominated "heads"; in order to facilitate closer measure- 




-4 
Si 



II 






GO 



ments the "head" is divided into four further parts, called quarters; 
each quarter is divided into six parts called minims. In the diagrams 
Figures 1 to 5 these denominations are abbreviated H for "head;" 
N for "quarter" and M for "minim." By this scale, no matter what 



284 



American Breeders Magazine 



~^/ nfencnt -> 




.1 
8 1 

* MM 

I .3 
" S 



Bush-Brown: Horses and Horse Breeding 



285 




9 

3 
I 

a 

« IS 



J 



3 S 

. -a" 

|j 
a 

O co 

£ 4 

I 



£ 



286 



American Breeders Magazine 




I 

1 






I- 

O I* 



£S 



a 



Bush-Brown: Horses and Horse Breeding 



287 



WtHC 




I 

d 



d 

J3 



£ 

OQ 
• 2 

2 E 

* 1 

Iv 
E 

>S o 

a 



I 

8 



288 American Breeders Magazine 

size the individual is, his own height determines the unit of his 
measure. By setting down all the actual proportion measurements, 
on this scale, an exact record of the form and structural peculiarities 
of an animal may be obtained which may be available for comparing 
other individuals, whether living or dead. With help of those propor- 
tion measurements a sculptor or painter can reproduce an exact 
form of some one individual horse, in drawing or painting or in 
model in any size. 

A system of absolute measurements is of no value whatever when 
we come to compare individuals of different sizes, even within the 
same breed. Similarly, a comparative measurement based upon the 
circumference of an animal, as unit, is of little value. On the other 
hand, by means of the system of measuring as outlined above, the 
exact outline, as presented to the eye from any given point of view, 
can be reproduced. 

By determining what constitutes the perfect type of Thorough- 
bred, Morgan, Trotter, Percheron or other breed whatsoever, each 
horse in his own type, can be measured and standards of propor- 
tion be established for that type. If the breeders would work this 
out on an agreed system, the judges in a show ring would have an 
exact mathematical test to assist their judgment as formed by visual 
comparison and experience. 

To illustrate the manner of using this method, the proportion- 
measurements of "Woolsey" are given in Figure 1. Woolsey was 
an old time trotting sire, the full brother of Sunol. 

For purposes of comparing breeds, I add the measurements of 
the imported Arab, Leopard, presented to General Grant by the 
Sultan of Turkey, Figure 2; Ethan Allen 3d, a typical Morgan, 
Figure 3; Hons Fleur an imported Norman, Figure 4, and also of 
Red Lion, Figure 5, a cross bred son of the latter from a thorough- 
bred dam. 

The same system of measuring may be applied to cattle, but a 
cow's body does not fill a square as does a horse; so instead of taking 
the height of the cow at the withers it is necessary to take the length 
from the front of the shoulder to the end rump bone or illium, and 
divide this length into three and this into quarters and minims the 
same as for the horse. With this scale the cow will be found to be 
as harmoniously proportioned as the horse, and to be one-half a 
head lower at the withers than the horse. 

I am inclined to believe that the reason why the large number of 
records of measurements of individual cows, massed in the herd 



Love: Comparisons of Yield and Selections in Oats 289 

books of the Holstein Friesian Association have been difficult to digest 
and to utilize for statistical work, was that all these measurements 
were absolute and therefore not comparable except in averages com- 
prising large numbers of cows. This system of notation of propor- 
tions applied to a large, number of cows would furnish us most exact 
data on the question of form and function, and would enable us to 
determine whether, and if so in what particular, of form of physical 
conformation or of type the 14 pound cow differs from the 20, 25 and 
30 pound cow. All measurements, so far made on growing cattle 
from calfhood to maturity, have given no positive results because the 
data concerning even the same individuals were not comparable. 

With this scale standard types of cattle can be established by 
averages or otherwise the same as has been suggested for horses. I 
have measured the stuffed specimen of a giraffe and find that the 
length of his head bears the same relation. to the length of his body 
as is found in the horse. It would be interesting to know to how 
many mammals this system of measuring can be made to apply. 



COMPARISONS OF YIELD BETWEEN HYBRIDS 

AND SELECTIONS IN OATS a 

Dr. H. H. Love 

Ithaca, New York 

The purpose of this paper is to set forth the results of some attempts 
to improve the oat crop by selection and hybridization. This work 
has been under way at the Cornell Experiment Station for the past 
five years. The hybrids and selections were made by Mr. J. B. 
Norton, of the United States Department of Agriculture. The 
preliminary work was done in Illinois but on accepting a position in 
the Plant-Breeding Department of the Cornell Agricultural College, 
Mr. Norton brought a set of the hybrids and selections to New York. 
After a year at Cornell Mr. Norton returned to the Bureau of Plant 
Industry and the testing of the hybrids and selections has been left 
for others to do. The writer has had charge of the work for the past 
four years. 

The work originally consisted in planting rows, a rod in length, 
of the different strains and repeating the series on a different type of 
soil. Later, however, the different strains were planted in rod-rows 

a Paper No. 31, Department of Plant-Breeding, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 



290 



American Breeders Magazine 



and the rows repeated a number of times. The rod-row system is 
used by this department for all small grain work. Some of our 
results were furnished Dr. T. L. Lyon, of this Station, to compare 
with some plat tests and it was found that the rod-row repeated a 
number of times is apt to be more nearly correct than a large plat 
repeated only once. 

The following varieties and combinations were represented in the 
hybrids and selections tested: 



Series. 


Hybrids. 


Series. 


Selections. 


27 


I Garten's Tartar King X Clydesdale 


62 


Sixty Day 


31 


, Burt (Early White) X Texas Red Rust- 


63 


Burt (Extra Early) 




proof 


; 120 


Silver Mine (Great Dakota) 


32 


Burt (Early White) X Early Champion 


1 123 


Welcome 


34 


Burt (Early White) X 8lxty Day 


1 132 


i Sixty Day 


42 


Asia Minor Rustproof (3676) X Clydes- 


1 137 


j Early Champion 




dale 


138 


| Early Champion (Prosperity) 


49 


Sixty Day X Clydesdale 


5938 


| Sixty Day 


50 


Sixty Day X Probsteler 


, 


l 



The strains showing the highest yield in 1907 and 1908 were. sown 
in a larger number of rows in 1909, in order to give them a fairer test. 
These strains were also repeated in 1910 and 1911. In the following 
table the ten best selections and hybrids are shown with their average 
yields for the three years. This table includes only strains which 
have been tested 5 to 8 times in 1909, 8 to 13 times in 1910 and from 
15 to 21 times in 1911. 

Three year average, 1909 to 1911. 



Hybrids. 


! 
i 

Average yield ' 
bushel per acre. 

51.7 
51.8 
52.1 
52.4 
53.1 
53.6 
54.0 
54.3 
56.0 
62.1 


Selections. 




Pedigree No. 


l 

Pedigree No. 


Average yield 
bushel per acre. 


31al-16-l 


132-2 


47.3 


34al-24 


62-11-17-1 


49.4 


49a2-18 


63-1-4 

62-11-6-3 


49.5 


49al-27-l 


51 1 


50al-22 


62-IT-6-2 


51.1 


49a2-13 


62-11-18-1-1 


54-5 


49a2-20 


5938-1 

123-5 

i 120-9 

i 62-11-18-3 


54.6 


49a2-22 


57.3 


50al-10 

34al-ll-2 


57.7 
58.6 




* 

Average ' 






54.0 


53 1 



This shows an average yield of 54 bushels for the hybrids and 53.1 
bushels for the selections. The highest yielding strain for the three 



Love: Comparisons of Yield and Selections in Oats 291 



years is a hybrid, while the three strains ranking next in order are 
selections. 

It seemed desirable to know how these new sorts would compare 
with some of the well known commercial varieties and such a test 
was begun in 1910 and continued in 191 1 . The seed of the commercial 
varieties was obtained from different seed houses. The hybrids and 
selections, together with the commercial varieties were sown in rod- 
rows and these rows repeated usually 21 times. The results for the 
ten best hybrids and ten best selections, together with the results for 
the 8 best commercial varieties, are shown in the following table: 



Two year average, 1910 and 1911. 





Hybrids. 




Pedigree 


> No. 


Average 

yield bushel 

per acre. 


49a2-13 


55.5 


34al-32-l 


56.0 


34al-28-2 


56.9 


49a2-16-10 


57.4 


49a2-18 


57.9 


50al-10 


58.3 


50al-22 


59.6 


27al-31 


60.3 


49a2-20 


61.7 


34al-ll-2 


66.5 




. 


Average . 




59.0 









Selection. 


Pedigree No. 


Average 

yield bushel 

per acre. 


62-II-17-1.. 


53.0 


5938-1 : 


53.5 


63-1-4 


54.2 


62-II-6-3 


54.9 


62-II-6-2 


55.0 


33al-15 


56.0 


120-9 


62.3 


123-5 


62.6 


62-II-18-3 


64.3 


62-II-18-1-1 


65.1 




58.1 



Varieties. 





Average 


Name 


yield bushel 




per acre. 


Black Tartarian... 


40.7 


Golden Giant Side 


42.3 


White Tartar King 


45.5 




47.8 


Swedish Select 


52.0 


Danish Island 


54.0 


Silver Mine 


61.4 


Lincoln 


62.4 


Average 


508 



This table shows an average yield for the hybrids of 59 bushels 
per acre, for the selections 58.1 bushels per acre, and for the eight best 
varieties 50.8 bushels per acre. The analysis of this data also brings 
out the value of certain classes of hybrids and selections and the value 
of certain varieties, as a basis on which to start improvement. 

Among the 10 best hybrids, 4 are from series 49, 3 from series 34, 
and 2 from series 50. Series 49, as is shown in table, is a cross between 
Sixty Day and Clydesdale; series 34 is a cross between Burt (Early 
White) and Sixty Day; and series 50 is a cross between Sixty Day and 
Probsteier. Thus 9 of the best hybrids have Sixty Day as one of the 
parents which shows the value of this variety in these combinations. 
This variety also shows its value in the selections, for 6 of the 10 best 
selections are from this variety. No doubt for other localities and 
other environments there will be found certain other varieties which 
will be just as valuable for selection work or hybridization. Another 
point of interest is whether the hybrids or selections prove themselves 



292 American Breeders Magazine 

the better yielders. Considering the 10 best hybrids and selections 
in each case, the averages for 1909 and 1910 favor the hybrids, while 
for 1911 the conditions are reversed. The three-year averages and 
the two-year averages show for the 10 best an advantage for the 
hybrids of about one bushel in each case. In each year, however, 
the best selection yields better than the best hybrids from 1.3 to 5.9 
bushels per acre, yet the three-year and the two-year averages give 
respectively an advantage of 3.5 and 1.4 bushels to the best hybrid 
over the best selection. The same hybrid is best in the three-year 
and in the two-year averages, while the best selection in the three- 
year average is second best in the two-year average. 

In 1907 the tests of all hybrids gave an average of 49.19 bushels 
per acre, while the average of all straight selections gave a yield of 
52.64 bushels per acre. In 1908 the calculated average yield per 
acre of all hybrids was 56.2 bushels and of all straight selections 48 
bushels. In 1909 the average yield of all hybrids was 33.6 bushels 
per acre, while that of all straight selections was 26.9 bushels per 
acre. For 1910 the average yield of all hybrids was 65.9 bushels 
per acre, while that of all selections was 54.2 bushels per acre. For 
1911 the average yield of all hybrids was 45.8 bushels per acre, of all 
selections 48.7 bushels per acre. The average for the five years was 
for the hybrids 50.14 bushels per acre and for the selections 46.09 
bushels per acre. The average for the five years shows that the 
hybrids gave a higher yield than the selections and seems to indicate 
that as far as yield is concerned the hybrids are better, on the average, 
than the selections. 

The data thus far obtained furnishes considerable evidence on the 
value of different classes of hybrids. It would seem that the most 
promising combinations of those tested are the Burt crossed with 
Texas Rustproof, Burt crossed with Sixty Day, and Sixty Day crossed 
with Extra Early Burt. These conclusions cannot be taken as abso- 
lute, as other combinations than those tested might turn out more 
promising. 

These results show the possibilities of improving the oat crop by 
the selection of good plants from a variety or by the combination 
through hybridization of the desirable qualities of different varieties 
and thus obtaining a strain of superior value, and it is hoped this 
article will create sufficient interest to induce plant breeders and care- 
ful grain growers to follow this line of work. 



THE SIZE OF THE SEED PLANTED AND THE 
FERTILITY OF THE PLANT PRODUCED 

J. Arthur Harris 
Cold Spring Harbor ', Long Island, New York 

In the practical growing of animals and plants both breeding and 
feeding are factors of great significance. In our enthusiasm over the 
possibilities of the newer methods in genetics, we are apt to forget 
that there must be limits to the improvements of the innate racial 
qualities which can be attained by hybridization or selection. These 
limits once reached, we are thrown back upon refinements in culture 
and feeding — upon the physiology of the individual as contrasted with 
the germinal constitution of the race — for further margins of improve- 
ment. 

For these reasons, I have always planned my breeding experiments 
to obtain incidentally as much information as possible on the strictly 
physiological factors influencing yield. Such factors are, for example, 
the influence of the environment of the parent plants furnishing the 
seed planted* upon the characteristics of the offspring, the influence 
of the size of the seed planted, etc. 

The purpose of this note is merely to explain a diagram illustrating 
the importance of one of these physiological factors, namely, the 
weight of the seed planted; in determining yield. 

The data for the diagram are drawn from twenty experimental 
crops of garden beans, involving Navy, White Flageolet and Ne Plus 
Ultra, represented by many thousands of individuals. The scale 
at the bottom shows the range of variation, of the weight of the seed 
planted, in units of 0.025 gram. b The vertical scale on the left hand 
side shows the mean number of pods per plant. The height (on the 
latter scale at the left of the diagram) at which the twenty sloping 
lines cut the ordinates (vertical lines) erected on the weight classes, 
gives the smoothed mean number of pods per plant for that weight 
of seed. 

The actual means are of course very irregular, since the bean plant 
is very sensitive to its environment, for in ordinary field cultures, 
uniform conditions cannot be given. Moreover, exact agreements of 
the empirical and theoretical means are never secured because of the 

* See "A First Study of the Influence of the Starvation of the Ascendants upon the Characteristics 
of the Descendants. I-II." American Naturalist, vol. 46, pp. 313-343, 656-674, 1912. 

b That is, class 3 - 0.050 to 0.075, or a mean of 0.0625; olass 4 - 0.075 to 0.100; class 5 - 0.100 to 
0. 125; class 24 - 0.575 to 0.600. 

293 



294 



American Breeders Magazine 



errors of sampling common to all statistics. Of course, the lines as 
given here are to be looked upon merely as a conventionalized repre- 
sentation of the increase in mean number of pods per plant associated 
with an increase in the weight of the seed planted. But, considering 
the difficulties inherent in the materials, they are very accurate 
conventions. 

The twenty series not only represent three distinct varieties but 
were grown under widely varying conditions and show in consequence 




MayAf offset/ jo fain ted. 

r Diagram Illustrating Influence of Weight of Seed upon the Yield 

i 

great differences in the slope of the lines which express in concrete 
terms the mean number of pods per plant. Yet, in every case there 
is a conspicuous gain by the planting of heavier seeds. 

Considerable attention has already been given by experiment sta- 
tion workers to the question of light and heavy seed, with the general 



Full details are given in a paper in vol. ix, part I of Biometrika: "On the Relationship Between 
the Weight of the Seed Planted and the Characters of the Plant Produced. I." 



Funk: Ten Yeabs of Corn Breeding 295 

result that the heavier seed gives the heavier yield. But generally, 
the lighter seeds have been separated by fanning and in many cases 
included blighted or shrivelled seeds. Here all seeds were perfect, 
as far as could be determined by individual examination. 

The practicability of seed grading depends entirely upon the ratio 
of the cost to the returns from the increase in yield thus secured. 
These are problems which practical men must figure out. The pur- 
pose of this note will have been fulfilled if it suggests to the breeder 
the importance of planning his work so as to take more fully into 
account than is generally done, the purely physiological factors. 

TEN YEARS OF CORN BREEDING 

Eugene D. Funk 
Shirley, Illinois 

That little kernel, corn, capable of springing forth into a beautiful 
living plant and growing to a height of twelve or more feet within the 
short period of ninety days, and what is greater still, to be able to 
reproduce itself over 1,000 fold during one short season, surely we 
ought to talk more about it, to study its characteristics and habits 
until we have learned many things yet unthought of. The farmer 
of the corn belt has scarcely begun to realize the possibilities and neces- 
sities that lie before him in order to meet the future demands for corn. 

No two ears of corn are exactly alike, yet it is found that within 
varieties there exist certain strains or families. Breeding corn is 
simply carrying out nature's own methods, but in addition one must 
keep a record of each individual plant or set of plants resulting from 
certain ears. By selection we are enabled to increase certain desir- 
able qualities and thus we bring about the tendency of each succeed- 
ing generation to become more uniform and fixed in its certainty to 
reproduce these qualities. 

What the ear-Unrow method reveals. — On planting the kernels of 
corn from a given mother-ear in a single row, that row of progeny 
will invariably have a certain degree of individuality throughout the 
season and show a contrast with other rows similarly planted. It may 
be that this particular row will germinate almost perfectly, out- 
grow the neighboring rows completely and at gathering time having 
ears of uniform size and few nubbins outyield all others in the field. 
Yet the selection of the original ears for planting may have been made 
with the greatest care to have them all as nearly uniform as possible. 



Fin. 1— Ruphibkntitivk Simflbi or Seed Conn Selected fob Planting in thb Yubs 

1901 TO 100* 

Learning mm representing the seed selected for plan ting on about 160 acres. Each of the ten-ear lota, 
ahown Id the Illustrations, figures 1 to 3, represents the seed selected for planting la their respective 
years and so these are not the tan beet or the ten poorest ears, but as nearly as possible a true repre- 
sentation of the whole. 

In order to obtain the very beat seed that could be found from the crop of 1901. Prof. P. G. Holden 
and Dwlght Funk visited several of ths best corn breeders of that time to obtain seed ears, and the 
■ample marked 1901 shows this corn. The eleven samples show the Improvement which has been 
wrought from year to year by selection. 

It would not be fair to say, concerning the Increase In yield, that the 82-bushel crop of 1903 and the 
Si-bushel crop of 1911 la a correct comparison because the soil used was better and more fertile in 191 1. 



Funk: Ten Yeaks op Cobn Breeding 297 

The treatment through the season for each row may be identically 
the same and the chances for any variation in fertility of the soil 
reduced to the minimum. The very next row to this vigorous and 
high yielding row of com may represent the opposite extreme, poor 
germination, weakly, perhaps of a pale green color through the season 
and giving a very small yield. Notes are taken of these different 
rows of corn during the growing season. Previous to the time of 
pollenization all tassels of weak and undesirable stalks are removed 
to prevent the pollen from the inferior stalks fertilizing the more vigor- 
ous plants. All ears and rows bear individual numbers which are 
recorded in a book especially prepared for this purpose. Each row 
is husked separately and the corn weighed. By this means we secure 
the yield per acre of the progeny of each mother ear. 

From the rows yielding at the highest rate per acre, thus showing 
their mother ear to have the highest producing power, we save the 
best corn for the next year's breeding plot. These ears are selected 
from hills which contain three stalks in order that each ear selected 
may have been grown under the same conditions. From these same 
best rows, seed is also saved for larger fields of from five to ten acres, 
which we call multiplying plots, the yields of which are carefully 
noted. 

Making the performance record. — The yields, first of the mother 
plants, then of the multiplying plot and then the larger fields become 
the performance record of the strain of corn, the same as the individual 
track record of his progeny becomes the record of the trotting horse. 

The results for the first few generations, while we may have large 
yield composed of all sorts and sizes of ears— hybrids from many 
hundreds of other plants — we find comparatively few ears equalling 
or excelling the mother ear. But these are the ears selected for 
future propagation and improvement and after the type is once fixed, 
we may expect a reasonable uniformity in the progeny of succeeding 
generations. Corn breeding is not necessarily the getting of typical 
beauty of ears, or perhaps a few ears and the rest nubbins, but it is to 
produce corn that will increase an average yield of 28 or 29 bushels 
per acre to an amount that will justify the labor and expense and 
that farmers have a right to hope for. 

Yield per acre is the unit, the all essential point in which the farmer 
is most interested. The score card, the corn shows and the competi- 
tive corn judging are all good and have their place in awakening the 
interest to better and more profitable corn raising. The commercial 
corn breeder should not allow himself to become too greatly absorbed 



American Breeders Magazine 



D COBJt StLECtID FOB Plaktino [H TBE YltB 



Funk: Ten Years op Corn Breeding 299 

in ideal ears, unless these can show for themselves by authenticated 
records prepotent powers in reproduction. Dr. H. J. Webber, of 
Cornell University, advises in plant breeding to stick closely to the 
important characteristics and not to give weight to features not of 
practical value. Apparent but slight deformities will eventually 
take care of themselves, or may be improved. Personal experience 
has abundantly proven this to us, for some of our highest yielding 



Pig. 3— Rephebbntatite Samples or Seed Corn fob Planting in the Ye aba 1909 to 19! 1 

strains of com today are anything but ideal ears from the standpoint 
of the score card. 

Theoretically a mother ear should be cylindrical, with well filled 
tip and butt, wedge-shaped kernels close together at both crown and 
next to the cob. The kernels should be of as nearly uniform size as 
possible in order that the planter may drop a given number of grains 



I! 

1 1 



■3 

I 



Funk: Ten Years of Corn Breeding 301 

in each hill, thus securing an even and perfect stand of corn. But 
in front of all this, there must be a performance record. In other 
words, a pedigree of what the ancestors of this strain of corn have 
been capable of doing. Seed coming from ordinary looking ears but 
possessing such strains of inherent power as to produce a medium size 
ear on a maximum number of stalks, is certainly far superior for the 
farmer to plant than the finest show corn that was ever at a corn 
show which has been selected merely from the point of beauty and 
the ideal score card. This is not saying that nothing can be accom- 
plished by physical selection alone, and the planting of seed from good, 
symmetrical ears. A great deal can be accomplished both in the 
improvement of type and to certain extent in yield. 

Now comes the most interesting point. While we have maintained 
this selection for type and uniformity, in our breeding plots for high- 
est yields, an entirely different type of the same variety of corn has 
gradually become prominent. Here the selection is largely governed 
by the predominating type of the seed corn gathered from the highest 
yielding rows and by comparison with the type of the mother ear. 
After a selection of ten ears from some of our highest yielding strains 
of Funk's Gold Standard Learning and Funk's Yellow Dent, it is 
most striking to observe, that both varieties show a tendency toward 
the same type and neither of them conform to the present score card 
or our arbitrary selection of type for a perfect ear. In general the 
increase has been about fifteen bushels to the acre. Several hundred 
farmers, who have planted this seed in practically all of the corn 
growing sections of the world, agree that the increase in yield over the 
ordinary selection by the average farmer is from five to twenty bushels 
and in many cases more per acre. This compares favorably with 
our check plots. A series of experiments showed that six years out 
of seven the smooth type of corn made the highest yield, and in 
another case the same was true five out of seven times. 

I wish it were otherwise and that we could discover some relation 
of idealism tcr high yield. I anticipate the question that if like pro- 
duces like why should we not be able to reproduce a lot of fancy and 
high scoring ears? We may produce them, but we have to use a some- 
what different method, and in so doing we fail to get the largest yield. 
A great many farmers are making a mistake in demanding too large 
an ear for a seed ear. This throws the corn too late in maturing, 
even during an ordinary fall a large proportion of the stalks with 
large ears are caught by the frost; large ears are not really necessary 
for a bumper crop of corn. I have a report of an average of 106.8 



302 Amebican Breedebs Magazine 

bushels per acre of corn grown in Minnesota, with Minnesota No. 13 
seed. And with what we would consider a nubbin in Illinois, Jerry- 
Moore of South Carolina grew 228 bushels on an acre none of the 
ears that he planted measured over 8| to 9 inches in length. Corn 
breeders should strive for a medium sized ear on a maximum number 
of stalks, and then they can grow all the corn that the f ertility in the 
soil will allow. 

PEDAGOGICS OF GENETICS 

The teaching of the science of heredity and breeding, and the 
training of experts in plant and animal breeding and in eugenics, is 
rapidly coming into our system of education. The value of a study 
which peculiarly combines cultural with vocational values appeals to 
the student and will bring this subject rapidly into demand, as will 
also its interest as a phase of biology, which fascinates. Its vital 
relation to the economic production of farm products and therefore 
its relation to the cost of living, will make it attractive to students 
pursuing general and vocational courses not concerned primarily with 
genetics. Classes in genetics in our colleges and universities will be 
especially interesting and vital for those preparing for vocations which 
relate to eusthenic betterments. 

Those universities and colleges which can employ special teachers 
have here a most unique opportunity to take the lead and place this 
subject upon a basis at once scientific, pedagogic proper and prac- 
tical. The American Breeders Association appeals to these insti- 
tutions to take on this important work much more rapidly. This 
Association took the lead in bringing the subject of eugenics under 
the guidance of a group of scientific investigators. Almost before 
we ealized that it could be so the subject had passed into the stage of 
teaching and of propaganda. No small group of investigators can 
alone cope with these phases of the subject. The educators, physi- 
cians, preachers and philanthropists are now needed to do their part. 
Those who would lead must study the available literature. 

Philanthropists who contemplate giving money to colleges and 
universities could do no better than to dedicate generous sums to the 
endowments of chairs of genetics. Legislative bodies should make 
substantial appropriations to their state agricultural colleges and 
state universities to establish and liberally sustain chairs of genetics. 



EDITORIALS 

GENETICS— A FIELD FOR THE SCIENTIFIC PHILANTHROPIST 

When the American Breeders Association was organized nearly 
ten years ago it was in response chiefly to a need that was felt for 
conference among breeders and scientists, and to give stimulus to 
research work in the science of heredity and the art of breeding. 

Subsequent events, as for instance the wonderful and exceedingly 
popular work of a number of plant breeders, and the oncoming Men- 
delian and DeVriesian thought, have made of genetics a remarkably 
practical, productive science. The recent and seemingly permanent 
rise in the cost of living, which is giving economists and legislators 
so much concern, has served to make immensely important and vital 
the increasing of food production through the developing of better 
breeds and varieties. The fact that one-half of the increased food 
production of whatever kind will eventually come through the use 
of better bred varieties of plants, cereals, fruits, and animals makes 
this matter of genetics or breeding the biggest proposition in agri- 
culture, after soil conservation. 

The work of the American Breeders Association has been carried 
on by a few sincere and devoted individuals, with such means as 
were raised by a membership consisting of scientists, practical breeders 
of plants and animals, of physicians, sociologists, social workers, 
ministers, officers of eleemosynary institutions, and men and women 
of affairs, all alert and interested. Through their efforts a new world 
of research has been opened. But what has so far been done, though 
a mere beginning, has afforded a glimpse of amazing possibilities. 
With these developments of a decade, the American Breeders Associa- 
tion has grown to an organization equipped with effective methods 
to attack some of the most vital problems facing the race in its prog- 
ress. The Association has attracted a large number of scientists 
of other countries, and seems in a fair way to become international in 
scope. 

The influence of the Association has made itself felt in numerous 
other ways. The plant breeder, a name and a man theretofore un- 
known, has come into public prominence; colleges and universities 
are establishing chairs of genetics; eugenics and genetic societies are 
being organized at intellectual centers; experiment stations are in- 
creasingly giving attention to the subject of experimental breeding; 
states, as Minnesota and New York, are organizing great establish- 

303 



304 American Breeders Magazine 

ments for the breeding of their field crops; the former State has a 
farm for the specific purpose of breeding and originating fruit varieties. 

All this work has been received by the public with an open-mihded- 
ness bordering on avidity. Its influence has gone forward so rapidly 
that it is in a fair way to overtake and swamp us because of our inade- 
quate means of taking care of the new openings and demands. Hav- 
ing originated the movement, the Association feels the responsibility 
of directing it, that it may proceed along a sound and useful course, 
and to save it from falling into the hands of quacks, impostors, and 
half-baked scientists. 

Several circumstances have favored us in the promotion of this 
educational propaganda in genetics, eugenics, animal breeding, and 
plant breeding. Chief among these is the greater public appreciation 
of out-door life, of nature and nature study. Recent years have 
seen the beginning of the "back, to the land" movement among 
the more virile elements of the race; a keen and active interest in 
matters pertaining to farming and to country life is almost univer- 
sal. Numerous books and magazine articles, the daily press, and 
even the stage, have drawn public interest to the questions of genetic 
race culture, and of the improvement of the heredity of plant and 
animal life in an advanced and permanent agriculture. These 
matters have all become very vital parts of our civilization and are 
becoming more so daily, as increasing population and greater complex- 
ity df civilization make us' more dependent upon an intensive, highly 
specialized, and scientific agriculture. 

So much for the aims and the work of the American Breeders Asso- 
ciation. It has passed through the struggle of becoming an institution. 
It has brought together the genetic scientists and breeders. It has 
brought into the closest cooperative relations the breeders of plants, 
the breeders of animals, and those interested in eugenics. By a quiet 
policy of stating the results of research in eugenics it has overcome 
the opposition of an at first hostile press and of indifferent public 
opinion. It has thus been a powerful factor in compelling a respectful 
hearing for the science of eugenics and of genetics in general. It is 
recognized as already having rendered a large service, and its mem- 
bers believe it has further large and important functions to perform. 
Its scientific and philanthropic status is almost ideal. It is now ready 
for two things which alone can enable it to lead in the large service 
before it: 

It needs endowment for its research work and it needs many more 
members as bearers of its educational work. 



Editorials 305 

The man of research, the scientist, is on trial and is successfully 
demonstrating his usefulness. It is a characteristic of our modern 
science, that it fully recognizes its own importance. We are living 
in a time in which science is more and more applied to the affairs of 
man and to problems of public welfare. Persons with means could 
not find a more admirable group of people with whom to cooperate 
in putting forward enduring constructive work than the men and 
women of this Association. It is now so thoroughly organized and 
seasoned as to its field, its specific problems, and its methods, that 
its work should be recognized by persons who wish to invest money 
in truly vital service. In these days of large fortunes men and women 
seek to give in such manner that some large and permanent purpose is 
served which will do the most for human welfare and uplift. Scientific 
philanthropy has taken the place of scattered, indiscriminate charity. 

Public and private money has been forthcoming from various 
sources for practical extension work in teaching, on a nation-wide 
scale, the facts of soil conservation and conservation of soil fertility. 
But owing to the peculiarity of research work in genetics and eugenics, 
the financial results are not always immediately in view, and in con- 
sequence public money is not usually so generously appropriated. 
Thus, much of the burden is borne by private individuals or the needed 
work is not done. Strange to say, the large live stock and herd book 
associations do not appropriate any money for research work. And in 
regard to that branch of genetics which concerns itself with eugenics, 
practically all research and educational work has been done under 
private agencies and with limited funds. Few as yet view eugenics 
in its broader aspect, namely; as a means of conserving the race 
through the preservation of family stocks of genius and leadership 
and exceptional ability, and the discovery and encouragement of 
capable and prepotent blood lines. 

There is a much closer connection between genetics and the large 
social and public questions than the superficial student is aware of. 
The scientists who are doing research work in eugenics need the sup- 
port of those who are in touch with the problems of charity and correc- 
tion; and these, in equal measure, need to be in touch with those who 
are rapidly building up the science of eugenics. We have no public 
interest in which there is greater need of common sense based on expe- 
rience and research. 

It should appeal to each member of the Association as a personal 
duty to bring the work of this Association to the attention of his 
friends, particularly to the attention of persons who are in position 



306 American Breeders Magazine 

to assist this work with funds. There are hundreds of persons of 
wealth in this country who would be glad of an opportunity to ad- 
vance a cause racially so important if only the facts in the matter 
were brought to their attention. The Association is officially in 
touch with only a comparatively small number of these people. 
Through its members it may reach many thousands. Let then each 
member feel it his personal duty to secure the interest and support of 
persons who are in position to endow the Association with large funds 
for carrying forward its work. 

It is to be earnestly hoped that the next important foundation of 
historical note in scientific philanthropy will be made by some per- 
son or group of persons, to place genetics and eugenics in position to 
work out freely and in the fullest measure their logical tasks. Here 
is a work whose importance overshadows almost all else in human 
affairs, because it is basic of all permanent betterments; it concerns 
the race in its widest meaning and has to do with its very soul and 
life blood. From the endowment of this institution, the American 
Breeders Association, which is at once one of research and education, 
would date a period whose influence would give a permanent and new 
direction to the course of human affairs. 

EUGENICS AT THE HYGIENE AND DEMOGRAPHY CONGRESS 

That eugenics and sex hygiene have suddenly sprung into promi- 
nence was shown during three weeks in September at the International 
Congress on Hygiene and Demography in Washington. In a great 
exhibit, held in connection with the Congress in the Red Cross build- 
ing, these subjects held a leading place. The officers of the National 
Federation of Sex Hygiene and of the Eugenics Section of the Ameri- 
can Breeders Association boldly and very successfully carried on a 
campaign of education and publicity. At least, the tens of thousands 
of visitors at the exhibition and delegates to the Congress on Hygiene 
and Demography, and the people of Washington, have seriously 
accepted at face value the proposition that sex and eugenics matters 
are up for solution by scientific and educational methods. 

The truly astounding fact about the entire eugenics and sex hygiene 
exhibit is that almost no controversy was aroused. The facts of 
sex diseases were driven home by means of graphic charts and read- 
ing charts and even by photographs and models in a most effective 
but unobjectionable way. That the annual cost of immorality and 
social diseases approximates three billion dollars out of a total of 



Editorials 307 

thirty-four billion dollars, of our national production, makes one 
shudder. We are worse than playing with race making, we are riot- 
ing with nascent souls. A million and a quarter of infected women, 
who rightly blame men for their downfall, infect millions of men and 
through them probably millions of unblamable wives. Race morality 
and race hygiene are our greatest immediate national needs. Science, 
education and religion are ready to join in a mighty cooperation, in 
an energetic struggle against these devitalizing influences which tend 
to our undoing as a nation and a race. 

The more pleasant and the ultimately more vital subject is race 
building. The Demography Congress clearly brought out the fact 
that we have 2 per cent of subnormal or abnormal children; or about 
two million people who are feeble-minded, or with a genetic tendency 
to insanity, immorality or criminality; and still others with a tendency 
to consumption or other organic weaknesses. It was also shown that 
some families of the nearly ninety millions of so-called normal people 
average high in efficiency while others rank low in their inherited 
ability to become useful citizens. The practicability for expert 
eugenists to assist young people in avoiding matings, in which a given 
weakness coining from both sides is certain to result in unf ortunate 
children, was clearly stated by Drs. Davenport and Laughlin of the 
Eugenics Record Office, and is based upon their practical efforts at 
making scientific diagnosis on which people can base self-advice. 

The Eugenics Record Office had about fifteen hundred square feet 
of wall space occupied by a display of very neat reading-charts and 
illustrations. This, together with the exhibit of sex hygiene, was 
perhaps the most intently studied exhibit in the entire building. No 
estimate has been made of the number of visitors to this eugenic 
exhibit. It is sufficient to say that the floor was much of the time 
crowded and that a large number of persons came with note-books 
and freely took notes from the charts. 

A popular and interesting feature was the series of half-hour lec- 
tures on eugenics, in the special lecture room. These lectures or 
talks, some illustrated with charts and slides, were along popular 
lines, and were attended by intelligent audiences to the full capacity 
of the room. Dr. Chas. B. Davenport, Dr. H. H. Goddard, Dr. E. E. 
Southard, Dr. H. E. Jordan, Mr. Bleeker van Wagenen, Secretary, 
W. M. Hays, Mr. V. M. Cady, Mr. H. H. Laughlin, all members of 
the Association, had volunteered to fill the various lecture periods, 
so that three daily lectures could be given during the entire week. 
Mr. Cady of the Sex Hygiene Society, estimates the number of 



308 American Breeders Magazine 

attendants at the eugenics lectures at 3,000. The Association is 
greatly indebted to the gentlemen who donated their time and 
services. 

BREEDING, GENETICS, EUGENICS 

The dictionaries and common usage need to be brought closer 
together in the use of the words breeding, genetics and eugenics. 
As used in this Magazine and by the persons associated in the America 
can Breeders Association, these words have each come to have a 
definite meaning somewhat different from that assigned by the dic- 
tionaries. By Breeding is meant: That part of the production of 
plants and animals which relates to making varieties and breeds of a 
special type or of superior value, and extending the use of these values 
so that this blood may be used by other breeders. The word Genetics 
is accepted to mean : That branch of the science of living things which 
deals with their heredity and variation, and the breeding of plants, 
animals, and men. Eugenics, as defined by Galton, and generally 
accepted, means: "The science which deals with all influences that 
improve the inborn qualities of the race." That there is a divergence 
of definition and usage is shown by the fact that the 1910 edition of 
one of our leading dictionaries defines Eugenics as "The science of 
improving stock, whether human or animal, or of improving plants/' 

The international society devoted to the science of breeding has 
adopted the term Genetics as a part of its name — the International 
Society of Genetics—and some of its members, who are also members 
of the American Breeders Association, suggest that the name of this 
Association be changed to the American Genetics Association. This 
change has, in fact, been under consideration for some years among 
the members of this Association. This change would naturally carry 
with it the change of the name of this Magazine to American Genetics 
Magazine, American Journal of Genetics, or an equivalent name. 
When this Association was formed the name "Breeders" was the only 
commonly known name available. That name has been of great 
advantage in conveying to the public the practical purpose of the 
organization. On the other hand, it has been somewhat misleading, 
in that the public has always assigned it a restricted meaning, class- 
ing this organization and its publications with associations and publi- 
cations which almost exclusively relate to the practical art and business 
of animal breeding. 

Under the proposed change of name our association would enjoy 
a designation which would distinguish it entirely from all other breed- 






N 



A 



* 









Editorials 309 

ers associations, and our publications also would be distinguished 
from periodicals devoted mainly to the interests of the practical 
breeder. Some live-stock journals, which have felt that the American 
Breeders Magazine might become a rival, would then recognize its 
distinctive field under a name more clearly expressing the large pur- 
pose it is trying to fill. 

The word "Genetics" would carry the broader meaning and would 
not be out of harmony with the present use of this term. The broader 
relation of the word genetics to the science of heredity, and breeding, 
and to the art of the improvement of the heredity of plants, animals, 
and man would be recognized. The word " Breeding" would be given 
its due prominence in the names of the Plant Section and the Animal 
Section, and the word " Eugenics" would be used in its restrictive 
sense in the name of the Eugenics Section. Workers, investigators 
and students could then be recognized by the following terms: Genet- 
ists: those interested in a broad way in the entire field of the science 
of heredity and the art of breeding. Genetic Scientists: students and 
investigators. of the theoretical aspects of heredity and breeding. 
Eugenists: those interested in the improvement of the heredity of the 
human species. Breeders: raisers and improvers of plants and ani- 
mals. Plant Breeders: improvers and originators of varieties of 
plants. Animal Breeders: raisers and improvers of breeds of domes- 
ticated animals. 

The word Thremmatology has also been somewhat in use, with a 
meaning nearly the same as given above for genetics. It would not 
be as convenient for general use as the latter word. For example, 
the name American Thremmatological Association would not make 
a convenient nor easily understood name. The word genetic, from 
the root word, gen, genea suggests the thought, to be born, as the 
word "eugenic" suggests the thought, to be well born. 

The division of meanings outlined above for the words Genetics, 
Breeding, and Eugenics, has the advantage of simplicity, and of 
being easily understood by the laity, and of conforming closely with 
uses already common in the leading countries. 



NEWS AND NOTES 

GENETICS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 

Professor John Detlefsen formerly connected with the Laboratory 
of Genetics, Bussey Institution, Harvard University, has been elected 
to the assistant professorship of genetics in the College of Agriculture 
of the University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois. Professor Det- 
lefsen will also fill the place of assistant chief in genetics in the Agri- 
cultural Experiment Station. 

THE GIDEON MEMORIAL TABLET 

The readers of the American Breeders' Magazine will be interested 
to know that the Native Sons of Minnesota have erected a tablet to 



the memory of Peter M. Gideon, originator of the Wealthy apple. 
The tablet, which was unveiled by his daughter, was placed near 
where the original Wealthy tree stood, on the old Gideon homestead 
at Excelsior, Minnesota. The exact location of the original tree seems 



J^j 



r 



f 



News and Notes 311 

to be in doubt; this would indicate that this act of recognition, in 
common with many others, was planned somewhat too late. 

Among those assembled to witness the dedicatory exercises were 
many prominent in horticultural work as well as in the affairs of the 
state. There were a number of speeches in testimony of the services 
of Mr. Gideon to horticulture. A group of the older horticulturists 
present, who knew Mr. Gideon, and who saw the first apples exhibited 
from the original tree, seemed to link the present with the past. 

Mr. Gideon really erected his own monument in 1864, when he 
planted the seed from which the Wealthy apple tree came, and the 
dedicatory exercises on June 15, 1912, only expressed in another 
manner the appreciation which many who grow and use the Wealthy 
apple have had, and still have for this man and his services to pos- 
terity. — M. J. Dorset, St. Anthony Park, St Paul, Minnesota. 

SELECTION IN PURE LINES 

One of the most pressing problems of today for the science of biol- 
ogy, as well as for the scientific plant-breeder, is to discover whether 
genetic factors are constant or are variable. This can probably 
be determined by experiment, if executed with the precision of the 
physical laboratory. The practical question is, whether selection 
can have any measurable effect when carried out in two opposite 
directions within a homozygous strain. Leguminous plants that are 
functionally cleistogamic (self-fertilized) seem to offer, in the dimen- 
sions of their dry seeds, suitable material for the experiment. Several 
sources of error, however, must be guarded against. Dry seeds 
measured in the spring, and again a month later, will sometimes be 
found to have shrunk perceptibly in the interim. The actual length 
of the dry seeds is also, in some strains, certainly determined by the 
amount of crowding in the pods. 

The dimensions of a bean are maternal characteristics, and the only 
advantage of measuring more than one seed to each plant is to obtain 
an average which will be freer from the effects of "modifications." 
Now it seems that we should first reduce the modifications to as low 
a degree as possible. We can sometimes do this by taking our beans 
only from ripe pods of the average length and number of seeds, and 
by. omitting the proximal and distal beans in strains of plants where 
these are often much smaller or larger respectively than the median 
beans. We should, I think, select in each generation those plants 
the average size of whose seeds is respectively highest or lowest. 



V 

f p 



312 American Breeders Magazine 

Any seeds from each of these selected plants can then be grown, and 
the selection of plants continued for further generations. Each of 
the variates used in our work will then always be the mean dimensions 
of the typical beans of one individual plant. 

If we mix at first all the beans of the plants of the homozygous 
strain, and then select the largest beans for one line and the smallest 
beans for another line, we shall, in some leguminous plants at least, 
be testing the distal beans of a pod against the proximal beans, and 
we may perhap find no effects from such selection, even after ten 
years. The separate beans of a leguminous plant are certainly 
not individuals with regard to their dimensions, but are only limbs 
or members of the zygote on which they grow. The great modifica- 
tions, in beans from different parts of the pod, and in pods with differ- 
ent numbers of seeds, will, in some leguminous plants at least, quite 
mask, for the purpose of selection, any small genetic differences which 
might or might not arise from variations of the individual genes. 

It has been considered as proved, with Phaseolus vulgaris ^th^t selec- 
tion continued for several years produce no effect in different homozy- 
gous lines. But in these experiments, the separate beans, and not the 
individual plants, were selected.* Hence, I think that further search 
for a possible result of selection in pure lines (much less quantitatively 
than the immediate result of selection among the progeny of hetero- 
zygotes) will be useful. — John Belling, Gainesville, Florida. 

KOREAN CATTLE 

I have seen occasional specimens of Manchurian or Mongolian 
cattle that are good enough to catch the eye but the average specimen 
is a decided "Canner." Manchurian and Mongolian cattle are long 
horned, raw boned beasts that excite no admiration whatsoever. 
The Korean cattle on the other hand are magnificent specimens, 
resembling our Aberdeen Angus cattle very much. The Korean 
cattle are kept by the Koreans mainly for work purposes, being used 
in plowing the rice paddies, and in carrying freight to market on their 
backs or in heavy two-wheeled carts. They are commonly polled, 
black and sleek in color, with a tinge of Guernsey yellow or brown 
along the back. Some types are brownish yellow all over. The bulls 
attain large sizes, 1600 to 2000 pounds. The breed has less blockiness 
of type, less spring of rib and less compactness than our Aberdeen 

*W. Johannsen, Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre, pp. 113-157, Jena, 
1909. 



1 



^ 






? 



'S 



News and Notes 313 

Angus breed. Taken as a whole though the breed is a magnificent 
one and doubtless under careful breeding management would fully 
equal any of our selected, domesticated breeds. — E. C. Parker, 
Johnson, Montana. 

PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED 

Eugenics. W. E. Neiberger, M.D., Bloomington, 111. Pp. 7. Reprint from 
the Clinique, July, 1912, being a paper read before the Illinois Homeopathic 
Medical Association, May, 1912. 

Another Sex-Limited Character. Edward N. Wentworth, Ames, Iowa. 
Reprinted from Science, June 28, 1912, page 936. 

Some Data on the Inheritance of Horns in Sheep. T. R. Arkell. Bui. 160 
of New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Durham, N. H. 
Pp. 35, 43 text-figures. 

Evidence of Alternative Inheritance in the F2 Generations from 
Crosses of Bos Indicus on Bos Taurus. Dr. Robert K. Nabours. 
Reprint from American Naturalist, 1912, pp. 428-436, 9 text-figures. 

Co5perative Cow Testing Associations in Minnesota. Bulletin 1. De- 
partment of Agriculture, Albert Lea, State High School, Theo. Sexauer, 
Director, Albert Lea, Minn. Pp. 55, illustrated. 

Mendelian Inheritance in Cotton Hybrids. C. A. McLendon. Bulletin 
99, Georgia Experiment Station, August, 1912. Pp. 141 to 228, 20 text- 
figures, 8 diagrams. 

National Reservations for the Protection of Wild Life. T. S. Palmer. 
Circular 87, Bureau of Biological Survey, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 
Pp. 32, 5 text-figures (maps). 

The Kallikak Family. H. H. Goddard. Pp. 121, fig. 14, charts 14. The 
Macmillan Company, New York, 1912, publishers. Price $1.50 net. 

In this monograph, the eugenics movement is enriched by a sub- 
stantial piece of literature. It is in line with the publications of 
research work issued by the Eugenics Record Office, being a contri- 
bution to more definite knowledge of a specific phase of human hered- 
ity. Dr. Goddard, who is an active member of the American Breed- 
ers Association is known to our members by his contributions and 
lecture work on the subject of feeblemindedness. 

The author could not possibly have chosen a stronger and more 
convincing manner of presentation of the hereditary character of 
feeblemindedness. Such a story as this must strike home and attract 
public attention and arouse the public conscience. The book is an 
outline of a vast breeding experiment, extending over six generations, 
undertaken by the principals all unconsciously, but an experiment 
nevertheless as the scientist, who always controls . and checks his 
work, could not have planned much better. 



314 American Breeders Magazine 

There are charted and recorded a total of 1146 individuals con- 
nected with this family. In one branch are recorded 41 matings, in 
which the parents were feebleminded persons, the offspring of these 
were 222 feebleminded and 2 normal. Another branch of the family- 
has only normal individuals, and many of them of high physical and 
mental attainments. 

We predict that this book will give the study of eugenics a strong 
impetus. The simplicity of the story, its appealing every-dayness 
and the warm human interest that fills its every page, make the book 
splendid reading for the layman and general reader. Dr. Goddard 
writes cautiously, he makes no attempts to draw generalizations. 
Suggestions in the way of "what is to be done" are made with the 
Doctor's characteristic reserve and carefulness. 

The book is a primer of eugenics — anyone who can read, can under- 
stand it. It is a sermon— it drives home a lesson, the result of one 
thoughtless act. It is a demonstration of the effectiveness of modern 
methods of research as applied to human heredity. It is an unspoken 
appeal to other philanthropists, than the one who made this piece 
of research work possible, to support similar work in this new, mar- 
velously productive and important field in the understanding of the 
human soul and human society. 

The reflective person will receive from this little sketch new light 
on a large number of old problems. From it, the idea that many of 
our economic problems are at bottom biological ones, gains strong 
support. Dr. Goddard very correctly says: 

Such facts as those revealed by the Kallikak family drive us almost irresistibly 
to the conclusion that before we can settle our problems of criminality and 
pauperism and all the rest of the social problems that are taxing our time and 
money, the first and fundamental stop should be to decide upon the mental 
capacity of the persons who make up these groups. . . . • . Thus it is, 
that if all the slum districts of our cities were removed tomorrow and model 
tenements built in their places, we would still have slums in a week's time, 
because we have these mentally defective people who can never be taught to 
live otherwise than as they have been living. 

Is Mankind Advancing? Mrs. John Martin. Pp. 302, numerous diagram 
tables. The Baker and Taylor Company, New York, 1910, publishers. 

Mrs. Martin, who by the way is a life member of the Association, 
essays an answer to this question in a highly interesting and instruc- 
tive book, which shows evidences of resourcefulness and a vast amount 
of library research work. 



^ 



r 



r 



i 



^ 



News and Notes 315 

The broad inference to be drawn from this book, is that the pres- 
ent day race of the white man, as measured by morals, by religion, 
by general intelligence, by genius, by art, stands behind that of the 
ancient Greeks. That our civilization is below the level of the An- 
cients, not merely in many, but in most respects. 

Although not prepared to agree with the author throughout, we 
are willing to admit that she presents an impartial analysis of our 
civilization. She is optimistic with faith in the eventual evolution of 
man. Note that the book is dedicated "to the super-man with the 
hope that his coming may not be too long delayed." 

The question is put to our consciences whether we are more moral 
than the ancient Greeks; whether we can truly say that we are more 
honest, or more temperate, or chaste or just, or tolerant or hardy, or 
public spirited. Have we progressed in Democracy? do we hold life 
more precious? These questions are difficult to answer concisely; 
at best we can deal only in comparisons. 

We are asked to judge man — homo — on his individual basis. We 
are asked to divest our minds of the idea that the accumulation of 
centuries in the way of knowledge, property, appliances, houses and 
other physical evidences as railroads, steamships, wireless, aero- 
planes, skyscrapers, and so forth, represent our very own civilization. 
Man is not to be measured by the quantity of things he makes or 
by his wealth, or by the vastness of his undertakings, but by his own 
intrinsic worth. 

Eugenics is recognized by Mrs. Martin as a possible factor of great 
moment, but she appears to lay greater stress upon environment as 
an evolutionary factor. The race must make a new start by providing 
a suitable "breeding ground for the coming super-man." Thus 
the exodus of woman from home activities in city and on farm into 
the industries, factories and shops is deplored. A strong plea is 
made for the farm as a breeding place for the race. "The state 
must recognize the human right of every child to be brought upon a 
farm," and Mrs. Martin advances numerous excellent euthenic 
reasons for this opinion. 

The book is written in strong and vigorous style, becoming at times 
delicately and bitingly ironical. One feature especially, which com- 
mends it to the reader is the entire absence of dreary compilations of 
statistics, which at first thought one would expect in a book which, 
from its nature, must depend largely upon comparisons to carry its 
point. On the other hand, the glorification of the ancient Greeks in 
superlatives, detracts from, rather than adds, strength to the argu- 
ment. The classicists, who have filled all literature with their exu- 



^» 



316 American Breeders Magazine 

berant appraisement of Greek culture, were largely governed by senti- 
mental and poetical rather than by practical and scientific motives 
and Mrs. Martin has erred in accepting their dicta too literally. 

The diagrams showing graphically the levels of attainments in 
various lines of human endeavor, during several centuries, should be 
more fully explained. This manner of presentation is open to criti- 
cism, as no explanation is given of the technique or method by which 
the various values were assigned. 

The reading of this book is commended to legislators, congressmen 
and senators; teachers and educators and to eugenists in general. 

REFERENCES IN CURRENT LITERATURE 

The Single Testing System of Breeding for Eggs. D. F. Laurie, Depart- 
ment of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia. Pp. 14, text-figures 3. 

Mr. D. F. Laurie, who is the Government expert and lecturer in 
South Australia, scarcely needs an introduction to the members of 
the Association. The interesting publication here named contains 
an outline of a system of breeding, and a method of housing that 
were used by Mr. Laurie in developing several distinct South Austra- 
lian laying strains of poultry. The trap-nest is discarded and the 
single pen, 3 feet by 30 feet, with house 3 feet by 3 feet at end of pen, 
adapted. This breeder believes thoroughly in line breeding, because 
according to Mendel's law the proper course is to breed the various 
generations inter se until segregation is definitely assured. "Never 
breed from unsound or unfit and your work will proceed, but if one 
parent be unsound no amount of fresh blood will give any definite 
improvement." 

A Fruit Breeding Farm in Minnesota. 

An article in The Farmer, St. Paul, Minnesota, Number of October 
5, 1912, describes the fruit breeding farm, which is owned by the 
state of Minnesota and is located in that state. Dr. Chas. Haralson, 
for many years associated in plant breeding work with Prof. Niels 
Hansen of the South Dakota Agricultural College has been the super- 
intendent of this interesting breeding farm ever since it began opera- 
tions in 1907. The purpose of this institution is, of course, to origin- 
ate new varieties of fruit, hardier and better than present varieties, 
and also adapted for a greater variety of special uses. The methods 
employed are those usually followed by plant breeders — selection and 
cross breeding. While this kind of work is naturally a long time propo- 
sition, the results obtained even in the short space of five years have 



News and Notes 317 

justified the wisdom of establishing this institution. At present, 
6,000 cross-bred seedlings of apples, 6,000 of plums, 60,000 of straw- 
berries, 13,000 of grapes, 10,000 of raspberries, and large numbers of 
cherries, apricots and peaches promise to turn in results in the shape 
of new commercial varieties. At any rate, this is a splendid founda- 
tion for a beginning. Hardy and desirable varieties of fruit trees and 
vines from all parts of the world are here brought together and by 
crossing new combinations of blood lines are made to form new varie- 
ties. Every state ought to have such an institution. 

Problems in Eugenics. Containing the papers communicated to the First 
International Eugenics Congress, held at the University of London, July 
24 to 30, 1912. Pp. 490. Published by the Eugenics Education Society, 
London, 1912. Price, 8/6 net. 

This highly interesting publication is introduced by the presiden- 
tial address before the congress, in which Mr. Leonard Darwin sounds 
the "keynote" of the Eugenics movement. The papers read and 
submitted at the congress are arranged under the sections of: I, 
Biology and Eugenics; II, Practical Eugenics; Ha, Education and 
Eugenics; III, Sociology and Eugenics; IV, Medicine and Eugenics. 

The papers are printed in the language of the country in which they 
were originally prepared by their respective authors; many of the 
papers, however, have been translated into English. We note that 
of the papers contributed, 16 were originally in English, 9 in French, 
5 in Italian and 2 in German. An additional volume of papers 
which were submitted too late to get into this volume, is promised. 

The Inheritance op Skin Color. Dr. H. E. Jordan, University of Virginia. 
Reprint from Science. August 2, 1912. 
The writer expresses the opinion that skin color unquestionably 
is a Mendelian character. Segregation in the Mendelian sense takes 
place and there are records in mulatto offspring, cases of reversion, 
as well as cases of undoubted segregation of the white skin color in 
the third generation. This paper touches a large number of relevant 
topics, as for instance, the close histological resemblance of brunette 
and mulatto skins and the fact that protracted exposure to the sun 
will "tan" even very fair skin, causing an increase in the number of 
pigment granules in white skin. "Dark skinned races like the 
Italians and Spanish and finally the brunettes of the Anglo-Saxon 
race, may owe their pigmentation to negroid ancestry. The con- 
necting link may well have been the negro slaves of Roman times, and 
the conquering Teutons." 



318 American Breeders Magazine 

Studies in Human Heredity. Dr. H. E. Jordan. Bulletin of the Philo- 
sophical Society of the University of Virginia. Pp. 293 to 317, illustrated 
by numerous heredity charts. Price, 40 cents. 
Investigations by the author, into the heredity of left-handedness 
have incidentally brought to light other characters which seem to 
show hereditary tendencies. Among those are tuberculosis, cancer, 
hermaphroditism, onyxis, nephritis, melancholia and thumb-prints. 
Dr. Jordan holds, that "if pathologic conditions are determined 
even in part by hereditary constitutional bases, then methods 
looking to permanent racial cure, i.e., complete eradication, must 
reckon more intelligently and widely with the hereditary aspect of 
disease. ,, 

Ethnic Census in Minneapolis. Prof. Albert E. Jenks. American Journal 
of Sociology, May 1912. 
Professor Jenks discusses the " forces of ethnic cohesion and amal- 

• 9 

gamation" on the basis of an ethnic census recently made in Minne- 
apolis and embracing 80,000 heads of families. This article is in 
the nature of a preliminary report; the deductions given are drawn 
from that part of the material which have been digested to date. 
For the first time perhaps, we are enabled through the data fur- 
nished by this census taken in a city with a large and diverse foreign 
population to gain a fair idea not only of the rate of amalgamation 
taking place in a large city, but of the diverse elements which enter 
into it. These preliminary statements suggest that the blood mix- 
ture coming under the observation of this census is complete, ethnic 
(racial) lines being totally obliterated. To quote Prof. Jenks : 

Of the slightly less than 80,000 heads of families whom we have under con- 
sideration, not one pure-blood individual of the fourth generation American 
birth has been found who has married with another pure-blood person of his 
own people, no matter what the generation of this second individual may have 
been. In other words the force of ethnic cohesion has broken down completely 
after the third generation of American birth, and the amalgamation process 
is then given full rein. This is true of the 80,000 heads of families coming 
originally from 37 distinctive people whom our investigation has found in 
Minneapolis, and, strange as it may seem, it is as true of the Jew as of the other. 

The eff eels of crossing on fecundity of families are of decided inter- 
est. Some combinations as pure Irish with pure Irish are more 
fecund than Irish with Scandinavian; the latter tending to pull 
down the degree of fecundity. We incline to the opinion that these 
fecundity data will need to be handled with extreme caution as the 
classification of individuals in the census is based, not on ethnic 
but on geographic (nationality) distinctions. 



» 



,M 



I 



ASSOCIATION MATTERS 

AN APPEAL 

Members who are in arrears for their 1911 or for 1912 membership 
dues are respectfully requested to settle, so that all funds coming from 
this source may be available before the close of the year. The Associ- 
ation has been to rather more than usual expense in the printing of 
the combined annual reports VII and VIII. Increased cost of mate- 
rial and printing, as well as an unusually large amount of compli- 
cated typographical work, has made this volume more expensive 
than any two preceding numbers. The Council of the Association 
hopes that its efforts will be appreciated by the membership at large, 
and that the outstanding annual dues for 1912 will be sent with 
promptness. The total of this amounts to a considerable sum and it 
will go far toward enabling us to meet our obligations. 

The price of Volume VII- VIII has been fixed at $3 and members 
are asked to assist in finding sale for single copies to libraries and 
non-members. 

ELECTION OF LIFE AND DELEGATE MEMBERS DURING THE PAST 

QUARTER 

Mr. E. A. Mcllhenny, Avery Island, Louisiana; Norges Lan- 
deruksheiskole, Foringsforsoksstationen, Norway; Johns Hopkins 
University, Baltimore, Maryland ; State Normal and Industrial College, 
Greensboro, North Carolina; Canadian Medical Association, Mon- 
treal, Canada; Hamilton Public Library, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 
Mrs. Aaron M. Wilcox, Baltimore, Maryland. 

REDUCED RATES TO THE MEETING OF THE AMERICAN BREEDERS 

ASSOCIATION 

The secretary of the National Corn Exposition, Mr. George 
Stephenson, announces that he has secured reduced fares in the terri- 
tory of the South Eastern Passenger Association, for persons intending 
to attend the Corn Exposition and the Annual Meeting of the Ameri- 
can Breeders Association. The selling date of these tickets begins 
January 20. It is possible that several of the other passenger associ- 
ations will grant reduced rates also. In the event that they do not, 
however, visitors from territory outside should purchase tickets to 
some point within the territory of the South Eastern Passenger Associ- 
ation, say Washington, D. C, Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, St. 

319 



r - 



320 American Breeders Magazine 

Louis or New Orleans and from there take advantage of the excur- 
sion fares which amount to just about one-half of the regular fare. 

On the 24th and 25th the meetings of the American Breeders Associ- 
ation will be confined to the regular sessions. On Monday the 27th, 
the members will visit the exposition on its opening day. On Janu- 
ary 26, the visiting members of the Association, together with all 
men at the exposition in connection with the educational exhibits, 
will be taken for a pleasure trip to Charleston, as the guests of the 
Southern Railroad and the Charleston Chamber of Commerce. A 
brief visit will be made to the Drainland Experiment Station; thence 
to Summerville where the visitors will be shown the only tea farm in 
the United States, and last, but most interesting of all, will be the 
visit to the quaint old city of Charleston, where all will be entertained 
by the Chamber of Commerce. Among the features planned for the 
entertainment is a visit to the points of scenic and historical interest 
about the city; a harbor trip taking in the Navy Yard, Fort Sumter 
and Fort Moultrie, and a clam-bake on the Isle of Palms. The secre- 
tary of Charleston Chamber of Commerce writes: "You may rest 
assured that to the members of the American Breeders Association 
the day at Drainland, Summerville and Charleston will be the time 
of their lives." Charleston hospitality will be on tap. The Ameri- 
can Breeders Association will have a booth in the exposition for its 
headquarters, also an exhibit and will have use of a lecture room where 
lectures and talks may be illustrated by lantern slides if desired. 



The Association is especially appreciative of the work, along various 
lines, of Mrs. Aaron M. Wilcox of Washington, D. C. Mrs. Wilcox, 
who is a life member of the Association, has presented delegate mem- 
berships to the Canadian Medical Association, to the Public Library 
at Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The last of these she gave in honor 
of her son the late Horace W. Wilcox who resided at Hamilton, 
Ontario. Mrs. Wilcox has also presented a delegate membership 
to Johns Hopkins University, at Baltimore, Maryland. 



Washington, D. C. 

An Endowment Fund of $5U0,000 Is needed 



THE WAVERLV PRESS 



* 



4 



3 2044 106 307 416 




I